Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

THE "OSWALD IN DOORWAY" THEORY REVISITED (JUST FOR THE LAUGHS IT ALWAYS BRINGS)

0 views
Skip to first unread message

David Von Pein

unread,
Aug 25, 2008, 8:23:55 PM8/25/08
to


www.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_thread/thread/750d770bc96732b6

>>> "Oswald photographed in TSBD doorway after all?" <<<

So Oswald was out on the front stoop during the shooting, and yet
decided to lie to police and tell them he was inside the building??

Per this CT logic, Oswald has a PERFECT alibi that would have cleared
him of the murder charge, and obviously some of the dozens of OTHER
Depository front-door lurkers would have noticed Lee being there too
-- but instead of telling the truth re. his being out front, he
decides to clam up for two days, even when he's given multiple GOLDEN
OPPORTUNITIES TO SCREAM HIS 12:30 WHEREABOUTS TO THE WORLD ON LIVE
TELEVISION, "Live" comments out of Oswald's mouth that the cops
couldn't have done anything about, even if the police and FBI WERE
"in" on a "hush up the truth" cover-up operation.

Which, of course, begs the secondary inquiry of -- WHY IN GOD'S NAME
WOULD THE COPS LET OSWALD SPEAK FREELY TO LIVE T.V. CAMERAS NUMEROUS
TIMES IF THEY (THE DPD) ARE TRYING TO "COVER UP" OSWALD'S REAL
STATEMENTS?

Plus -- Re. the OSWALD-IN-DOORWAY theory -----

CTers who still believe in that theory need to overcome an even BIGGER
"Doorway" stumbling block -- that being:

Why on Earth would Oswald go back INSIDE the Depository immediately
after witnessing the shooting that he had nothing to do with, to get a
soft drink on the 2nd Floor, and then, seconds later, decide to leave
the scene entirely after going back inside the building?

Was he THAT thirsty? He had to have that Coke so badly, he dashes
inside at the exact time the biggest murder of the 20th Century is
taking place practically on his front stoop. And yet he's not the
slightest bit interested in even STAYING OUTSIDE FOR EVEN SO MUCH AS
20 SECONDS FOLLOWING THE TURMOIL!

Amazingly logical, these CTers, huh? Amazing.

David Von Pein
October 14, 2005

Harry

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 12:12:24 PM8/26/08
to
On Aug 25, 6:23 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> www.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_thread/thread/750d7...

Isn't it lunch time at the "home?"

You're a joke. Of course, I'm not the first person to tell you that.
You've probably heard it all your life.

See ya. Wouldn't wanna be ya.

Harry

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 12:59:44 PM8/26/08
to
> See ya. Wouldn't wanna be ya.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

By the way, Cone Head, why haven't you and your moronic, stupid, jerk-
off, lunatic, jackass, bone-head, weirdo, a--hole, butt-sniffing troll
buddies ever posted any evidence that would convict LHO in front of a
REAL jury instead of a Made-for-TV movie?

We've all been waiting for months and all you do, Bugliosi Jr., is
troll the internet like a dick-head.

Get to work, boy!

Message has been deleted

aeffects

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 5:52:24 PM8/26/08
to
On Aug 26, 2:45 pm, Chuck Schuyler <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote:
> > Get to work, boy!- Hide quoted text -

>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> It has been done, Harry.
>
> It is called the Warren Report.

there's that silly guy again..... who ya trying to fool, son? The WCR
is farce..... the mere fact your here 47 years late trying to sell the
damn thing is testament to the fact ya can't close the deal Chuckles
daShoe.... Carry on son...

Gil Jesus

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 6:10:53 PM8/26/08
to
On Aug 25, 8:23�pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:

> Which, of course, begs the secondary inquiry of -- WHY IN GOD'S NAME
> WOULD THE COPS LET OSWALD SPEAK FREELY TO LIVE T.V. CAMERAS NUMEROUS
> TIMES IF THEY (THE DPD) ARE TRYING TO "COVER UP" OSWALD'S REAL
> STATEMENTS?


Did Von Pinhead know that the cops ordered the press not to ask any
questions when Oswald passed by because they "upset" him ?

I've got it on video, folks. The cops say "No questions" and the press
agrees. Oswald is then moved right by the throng of reporters without
a peep.


Funny how the cops were worried about "upsetting" Oswald.

But they weren't worried about taping his interrogation.

They weren't worried about having an outside stenographer record the
sessions.

They weren't worried about questioning him without the benefit of
counsel.

Of course, you wouldn't be worried either if you knew the guy was
never going to make it to trial.

Harry

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 6:28:43 PM8/26/08
to
On Aug 26, 3:45 pm, Chuck Schuyler <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote:
> > Get to work, boy!- Hide quoted text -

>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> It has been done, Harry.
>
> It is called the Warren Report.

It is called the Warren Report.>>>>>>>

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Please! Please stop!

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

My sides are killing me!

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

That wasn't the funniest thing I've seen or heard all day, but it
ranks right up there.

Thanks for the laughs.

LMAO!!

Oh shit! *Wheeeeeeew!*

Harry

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 6:33:31 PM8/26/08
to

It's strange how you never look at evidence, but you're a "expert" on
it.

Well, that was a bad choice of words. It's not strange, it's
deliberate.

Did you graduate high school? If so, why did your teachers fail you by
not teaching you HOW to think?

David Von Pein

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 7:17:38 PM8/26/08
to

>>> "Did [David Von Pein, my LN hero and savior] know that the cops ordered the press not to ask any questions when Oswald passed by because they "upset" him?" <<<


Of course I know that. I have the video too.

What's your point, Mr. Kook?

Since the DPD asked the press to not "shout any questions at this
boy" (Oswald), is it the contention of the Mega-Kook (Gil Jesus) that
this request by the DPD thereby PREVENTED and completely PROHIBITED
Lee Oswald from shouting out conspiracy-leaning information and facts
TO THEM (the press)?

IOW -- Short of taping up his mouth with duct tape, how could the DPD
(an organization that many CTers think was a major part of the
"framing" of Oswald) possibly have controlled LHO's own voice and
prevented him from blowing the "conspiracy" wide open within hours of
the assassination by blurting out any number of potentially plot-
revealing pieces of info as he was marched through the DPD corridors
while live TV cameras and microphones were recording his every
movement?

Please explain how the evil DPD managed to pull that off re. Oswald's
hallway appearances.

Harry

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 10:25:20 PM8/26/08
to

State the name of person(s) who saw LHO on the sixth floor firing a
rifle.

You can't. There are none.

David Von Pein

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 10:31:56 PM8/26/08
to

>>> "State the name of person(s) who saw LHO on the sixth floor firing a rifle. You can't. There are none." <<<


State the name of the person(s) who saw O.J. Simpson thrust a knife
into the bodies of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman on 6/12/94?

You can't. There are none.

And yet Orenthal Simpson is guilty all the same (based on the EVIDENCE
that says so; not the silly jury...the evidence).

And, of course, you told a lie when you said nobody saw LHO firing
from the 6th Floor (but you know this, of course; you just feel like
being a stupid kook tonight...like always).

Harry

unread,
Aug 26, 2008, 10:34:25 PM8/26/08
to

Put a SIMPLE question to a LONE-NUT FREAKAZOID and what do you get?

*sigh*

aeffects

unread,
Aug 27, 2008, 10:32:43 AM8/27/08
to
On Aug 26, 7:31 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>> "State the name of person(s) who saw LHO on the sixth floor firing a rifle. You can't. There are none." <<<
>
> State the name of the person(s) who saw O.J. Simpson thrust a knife
> into the bodies of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman on 6/12/94?

is this a OJ USENET board, Mr. Lone Nut KOOKSTER?

Are you at a loss for words again? Did you forget who JFK was? Is
your monthly stipend from Vinnie late, AGAIN?


> You can't. There are none.

focus son, FOCUS!

0 new messages