TOMNLN - MAN IN RR TOWER (BOWERS) SAW NO ONE RUNNING AFTER SHOTS
Todd W. Vaughan
Knowing how your panties get wet over "evidence/testrimony", I've been
saving this gem for you.
>From the Warren Commission testimony of Eugene Boone:
QUOTE ON
Mr. BOONE - Well, there is a big cement works out there. We went on
west across Houston Street, and then cut across the grass out there
behind the large cement works there. Some of the bystanders over there
seemed to think the shots came from up over the railroad in the
freight yards, from over the triple underpass.
So there was some city officer, I don't know who he was, motorcycle
officer had laid his motorcycle down and was running up the embankment
to get over a little retaining wall that separates the freight yards
there. He went over the wall first, and I was right behind him, going
into the freight yards. We searched out the freight yards. We were
unable to find anything.
Mr. BALL - A good many officers over there searching?
Mr. BOONE - Yes; there were. Most all of the officers--well, all of
the officers in front of the sheriff's office there. There were others
that I don't recall. There were other officers in the area. Also, they
all ran in that general direction, over around the depository and also
down into the freight yards.
Mr. BALL - Any railroad employees around there?
Mr. BOONE - There was one colored boy way on back down in the freight
yards. He had been working on one of the pullmans down there.
Mr. BALL - And didn't you talk to somebody that was also in a tower?
Mr. BOONE - Yes; I did.
Mr. BALL - A man named Bowers?
Mr. BOONE - I don't know what his name was. He was up in the tower and
I hollered up there to see if he had seen anybody running out there in
the freight yards, or heard any shots. And he said he didn't hear any
shots, and he hadn't seen anybody racing around out there in the
yard.
Mr. BALL - That was a railroad tower?
Mr. BOONE - Yes; it is situated between the tracks and the school book
depository. Almost directly west of the building.
QUOTE OFF
So much for your outright lie that Bowers saw 2 (or 3) men run from
the stockade fence after the shots were fired.
Todd
tom...@mail.com
OUCH! That's going to leave a mark!
Ross
tomnln
Details are HERE>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
<tom...@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1175533998.1...@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
3rd feature down from the top.
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1175532922.4...@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
3rd feature down from the top.
ALL in your own words
I see you STILL Rob $/time from your employer.
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1175532922.4...@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
David Von Pein
==================================
The more one looks over Bowers' WC testimony, the less and less "pro-
CT"/"pro-multiple shooters" Bowers becomes (despite the fact that
CTers for years have loved to prop Bowers up as a sterling and rock-
solid "Conspiracy" witness).
Lee Bowers' testimony is quite interesting in the "Where Did The Shots
Come From?" regard. Upon looking at his April 2, 1964, Warren
Commission testimony, we can certainly see how, indeed, the "CT" side
has gently turned Mr. Bowers into a "Conspiracy" witness, when he
actually doesn't really belong in that category at all. ....
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/bowers.htm
Bowers is one of the many, many witnesses who heard exactly three
shots fired on 11/22/63, and he said the shots came from either the
area of the Depository OR the Triple Underpass area. But not from BOTH
of these locations. It was one or the other, but not both.
But conspiracy theorists have turned Mr. Bowers into a conspiracy-
favoring witness who (to hear the CTers tell it) positively saw PROOF
of a second gunman on the Knoll. But when you look more deeply at his
testimony, it can be seen that he's not actually a witness with which
to promote conspiracy or a Knoll shooter.
He didn't see a "gunman" on the Grassy Knoll or behind the picket
fence behind the Knoll. He didn't see any rifle or other weapons. He
merely saw some "milling around". Let's look at Mr. Bowers' exact
words to the Warren Commission:
"I just am unable to describe rather than it was something out of the
ordinary, a sort of milling around, but something occurred in this
particular spot which was out of the ordinary, which attracted my eye
for some reason, which I could not identify." -- Lee E. Bowers, Jr.;
04/02/64
The conspiracy buffs, in true-to-form "Make Mountains Out Of
Molehills" style, have thus turned Mr. Bowers' "out of the ordinary",
"milling around", "I just am unable to describe", and "I could not
identify" remarks into apparent "proof" that a killer had just shot
JFK from behind a fence atop the Grassy Knoll....even though Bowers
saw NO WEAPONS OF ANY KIND in the hands of anyone he observed that
day. And he specifically said he "could not identify" what it was that
caught his eye in the area of the fence.
The testimony of Bowers also provides some idea as to the type of
reverberating sounds that can be produced in Dealey Plaza. And while
earwitness testimony is useful to a degree, it is at the same time, as
my cohort in LN-ism, Vincent Bugliosi, has said repeatedly throughout
his career, "notoriously problematic". ....
"With respect to whether or not any shots were fired from the Grassy
Knoll, I want to make the following observations -- firstly, it is
perfectly understandable that the witnesses were confused as to the
origin of fire. Not only does Dealey Plaza resound with echoes, but
here you have a situation of completely-unexpected shots over just a
matter of a few moments.
"When you compound all of that with the fact that the witnesses were
focusing their attention on the President of the United States driving
by, a mesmerizing event for many of them....and the chaos, the
hysteria, the bedlam that engulfed the assassination scene....it's
remarkable that there was any coherence at all to what they thought
they saw and heard.
"Human observation, notoriously unreliable under even the most optimum
situation, HAS to give way to hard, scientific evidence. And we do
have indisputable, scientific evidence in this case that the bullets
which struck President Kennedy came from his rear, not his front." --
VINCE BUGLIOSI; 1986
Todd W. Vaughan
> You have already been Proven a LIAR toad;
Tomnln,
Officer Boone's testimony is readily available in the 26 volumes.
You've claimed to have the volumes, so if it's not, I should expect
you to soon claim otherwise.
Officer Boone's testimony reads exactly as I've quoted below. Again,
you've claimed to have the volumes, so if it's not, if I've quoted
Boone incorrectly, I should expect you to soon point out where and
how.
You've claimed that Lee Bowers said he saw 2 (or 3) men run from the
fence right after the shots.
Boones' testimony proves you to be a liar.
You've also claimed that you only deal in, and want to discuss,
"evidence/testimony".
Lets' discuss Boone's testimony.
I bet you won't do it.
Which will just serve to prove you to be a liar yet again.
Todd
>
> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
>
> 3rd feature down from the top.
>
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:1175532922.4...@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> > Todd- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Todd W. Vaughan
> You have a;ready been Proven a LIAR toad.
Tomnln,
Officer Boone's testimony is readily available in the 26 volumes.
You've claimed to have the volumes, so if it's not, I should expect
you to soon claim otherwise.
Officer Boone's testimony reads exactly as I've quoted below. Again,
you've claimed to have the volumes, so if it's not, if I've quoted
Boone incorrectly, I should expect you to soon point out where and
how.
You've claimed that Lee Bowers said he saw 2 (or 3) men run from the
fence right after the shots.
Boones' testimony proves you to be a liar.
You've also claimed that you only deal in, and want to discuss,
"evidence/testimony".
Lets' discuss Boone's testimony.
I bet you won't do it.
Which will just serve to prove you to be a liar yet again.
Todd
>
> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
>
> 3rd feature down from the top.
>
> ALL in your own words
>
> I see you STILL Rob $/time from your employer.
>
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:1175532922.4...@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
3rd feature down from the top.
ALL in your own words
I see you STILL Rob $/time from your employer.
PROOF OF YOUR LIES TOAD;
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1175540631.3...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
3rd feature down from the top.
ALL in your own words
I see you STILL Rob $/time from your employer.
CHOKE ON IT CRIMINAL
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1175540601.2...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
Todd W. Vaughan
> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
>
> 3rd feature down from the top.
Tomnln,
That's what I thought.
You don't want to discuss "evidence/testimony", you never have. Your
claims that you do are just another one of your lies.
Todd
>
> ALL in your own words
>
> I see you STILL Rob $/time from your employer.
>
> CHOKE ON IT CRIMINAL
>
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:1175540601.2...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Todd W. Vaughan
> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
>
> 3rd feature down from the top.
Tomnln,
That's what I thought.
You don't want to discuss "evidence/testimony", you never have. Your
claims that you do are just another one of your lies.
Todd
>
> ALL in your own words
>
> I see you STILL Rob $/time from your employer.
>
> PROOF OF YOUR LIES TOAD;
>
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:1175540631.3...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
tomnln
HERE>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
3rd feature from the top.
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1175540631.3...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
You were Proven a LIAR 3 times HERE>>>
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
When are you ghonna address the Lies of officer Baker?
You've been Dodging that one for a Year.
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
Would you care to address the Altered Walker back yard photo?
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1175542542....@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
records that Prove you a LIAR.
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
ps;
you're STILL a Whore.
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1175542515....@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...