On Apr 4, 6:53 am, mainframetech <
mainframet...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 6:32 pm, David Von Pein <
davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Thick-headed Chris is the one who doesn't "get it". Just having ONE
> > picture showing JFK's limo not surrounded by motorcycles and not
> > having SS men on the bumpers would be enough to defeat Palamara's
> > silly notion that SS agents always rode JFK's bumpers as part of their
> > regular course of duty while protecting President Kennedy.
>
> > And even if some SS procedures were violated during the motorcades
> > where spectators were hanging out of windows and the SS agents weren't
> > always on the bumpers--so what? All that means is that those
> > procedures were not religiously adhered to during MANY motorcades,
> > including motorcades when JFK was not being shot and killed by rifle
> > fire.
>
> > Take another thick pill, Chris. You seem to have a lot of those in the
> > medicine chest.
>
> Poor Davey, drooled before squawking again. Dave ol' boy, There
> are bound to be times when the SS agents couldn't maintain their
> positions at the limo, but that's all planned ahead of time. To have
> a superior order a standdown just before the Assassination might be
> considered a bit suspicious, eh? It's clear from the video that the
> agent ordered off his detail is nonplused and doesn't understand why
> the order to get away from the president was issued at the last moment
> before they took off for the 'parade'. Don't forget the video. It's
> clear what's happening in it.
It might be suspiscious if that had never been done before. The
photographic record tells us that numerous times in the past, agents
did not ride on the bumper or the running boards and without incident.
The same decision was made in Dallas. The confusion of the one agent
indicates nothing except that he hadn't gotten the message that the
decision was made not to have agents ride the lead limo. If anything,
it is more indicative that there was nothing sinister about the
decision. If somebody wanted to make sure no agents would be in
position to protect JFK, they would have made the order clear ahead of
time.
>
> And on your earlier comment, Palamara didn't swear the agents were
> always there as far as I know, if you different, show it. Remember,
> Palamara has the word of many agents as to how things went and how tey
> did their job with JFK.
Unfortunately, all we have is Palmara's word for that.
>
> If the agents were right and JFK never ordered the SS agents away
> from the limo, what's the excuse for the superior ordering his agents
> away from their crucial positions that protected JRK from a shot from
> behind?
>
It wouldn't have to be a formal order. He could let his displeasure
with having them hover without ordering them to stay away. That would
be his way of telling them to not be close to him if they didn't think
it was necessary. That would leave it to their judgement.