VIDEO: "Mankind WAS my business"
Gil Jesus
Chamber of Commerce, November 18, 1963
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Gil,
An touching except? Don't you mean a touching excerpt? The speech is
OK but the mawkish, choclate-box music rather ruins the effect, don't
you think? Talk about schlock, LOL!
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
tomnln
THAT oughta take the focus off of Oswald being;
5 ft.3 inches tall
Blond Hair
119 pounds.
Hey Timmy;
Wanna address officer Baker's 5 different stories about his lunchroom
encounter with Oswald?>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ba2d97c-4b65-4561...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
Gil Jesus
> Atta boy Timmy;
>
> THAT oughta take the focus off of Oswald being;
> 5 ft.3 inches tall
> Blond Hair
> 119 pounds.
>
> Hey Timmy;
> Wanna address officer Baker's 5 different stories about his lunchroom
> encounter with Oswald?>>>
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
>
Typical troll tactic, Tom. When they have nothing, go after the
spelling.
Shows how desperate they are for an upper hand.
mozark
> Chamber of Commerce, November 18, 1963
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hr5ydIa_yyY
Just great. Wish we could find the speech without the silly music and
Photoshopping.
Imagine any President today -- or Presidential candidate -- using
words such as mercy and charity.
Bud
Seems he also had a successful business with womenkind on the side.
mozark
>
> Seems he also had a successful business with womenkind on the side.
Something no one will ever accuse you of.
aeffects
Dudster gives new meaning to the term "hand JIVE"
muc...@gmail.com
And what's your "business"? Chasing juicy she-male hookers all across
Clark County?
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, I already gave you an answer about your <snicker> 5' 3" Oswald
identification over on the Jim Douglass thread, not to mention on
earlier occasions.
You're not ducking the issue are you tomnln?
Let's recap for you, tomnln. You claimed Mrs Duran gave a 5' 3" Oswald
impersonator her name and phone number in Mexico City, right?
When I asked you why, if that was the case, Mrs Duran's name and phone
number were found written in the REAL Oswald's notebook you said the
notebook entry was probably faked, like the *Mr Hunt* letter, right?
Now when I pointed out to you that Oswald sent letters to the CPUSA
and the FPCC in New York, attaching finished copies of his *Hands Off
Cuba* handbills, detailing how he'd had the handbills printed, you
claimed those letters were probably faked too, right?
If those letters are fake, tomnln, why then do we have two TV films,
plus stills made from those same films, showing Oswald handing out the
very same *Hands Off Cuba* handbills, tomnln?
And why, tomnln, do we have a recording of a WDSU radio program where
the host, Bill Stuckey, reads out word for word and discusses with
Oswald the content of the handbill on air?
That is all evidence/testimony, tomnln, in the 26 volumes, but you
don't want to deal with it, do you tomnln?
You just want to make up some nonsense about how it all must be faked,
don't you tomnln?
It appears that you now FEAR evidence/testimony, tomnln. That's now
the case, isn't it tomnln? You now FEAR evidence/testimony?
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Jul 26, 11:05 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> Atta boy Timmy;
>
> THAT oughta take the focus off of Oswald being;
> 5 ft.3 inches tall
> Blond Hair
> 119 pounds.
>
> Hey Timmy;
> Wanna address officer Baker's 5 different stories about his lunchroom
> encounter with Oswald?>>>
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
>
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:9ba2d97c-4b65-4561...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> Hi Gil,
>
> An touching except? Don't you mean a touching excerpt? The speech is
> OK but the mawkish, choclate-box music rather ruins the effect, don't
> you think? Talk about schlock, LOL!
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> On Jul 26, 4:11 am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > An touching except from a JFK speech given before the Florida State
> > Chamber of Commerce, November 18, 1963
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hr5ydIa_yyY- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Bud
What was the old meaning?
Todd W. Vaughan
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Tim,
Did Tomnln ever reply to you?
Todd
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Todd,
It appears tomnln doesn't want to reply to what I put on the Jim
Douglass thread, or this one here.
Suddenly tomnln doesn't appear to want to discuss *evidence/testimony*
anymore.
I wonder why that is?
Presumably even he realises now how absurd his arguments look,
LOL! :-)
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hr5ydIa_yyY-Hidequoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Tim,
>
> Did Tomnln ever reply to you?
>
> Todd- Hide quoted text -
Todd W. Vaughan
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Tim,
>
> > Did Tomnln ever reply to you?
>
> > Todd- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
But Tim, I thought Tomnln loved to discuss "evidence/testimony" - it's
his forte', his life. And now we hear nothing from him? I'm worried,
Tim. I wonder if he is ill, and if we should be concerned?
Naw, nevermind.
aeffects
WENDY'S = calories, we know YOU'RE ill... KUTGW!
Todd W. Vaughan
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dave,
Almost every food known to man = calories, Captain Stupidfuck, and I
feel fine, thanks.
Where am I posting from today, Cap'n? What secret internet-tele-
connection-portal have I secretly hacked into to help the nefarious
conspiracy with their big cover-up in the JFK caper?
Don't be a glory-hog, David, get swabby Gill to help your sorry ass
figure it out.
Hey, I just realized, you and Dave Thomas of Wendy's share the same
first name - is this really Dave Thomas? Let me talk to Healy.
Todd
aeffects
> TOP POST
>
> Hi Gil,
>
> An touching except? Don't you mean a touching excerpt? The speech is
> OK but the mawkish, choclate-box music rather ruins the effect, don't
> you think? Talk about schlock, LOL!
talk about schlock....ah.... the tough dude from down-undah, slamm'in
Samantha Brown's brown gofer -- LMFAO..... hey, Aussie "Newsgroups"
Commentator [sic]. We need more good men, we're running out... step
up!
They have a "military draft" down there? Look around, son! No place to
run - no place to hide...
aeffects
ya look horrible, son.... 350 pounds and Wendy's everyday -- that
sickness kiddo every which way you cut it...
> Where am I posting from today, Cap'n? What secret internet-tele-
> connection-portal have I secretly hacked into to help the nefarious
> conspiracy with their big cover-up in the JFK caper?
>
> Don't be a glory-hog, David, get swabby Gill to help your sorry ass
> figure it out.
>
> Hey, I just realized, you and Dave Thomas of Wendy's share the same
> first name - is this really Dave Thomas? Let me talk to Healy.
showing Dave Thomas the same courtesy you show dead presidents, I
see..... you are a sick-fuck aren't ya?
> Todd
Todd W. Vaughan
Actually I'm about 250. At 6 foot or so, I could stand to lose a few.
But it's not from Wendy's, Dave, the only thing I eat at Wendy's is
the salad and the chili.
You, on the other hand, look anemic, skin and bones, your coat just
seems hangs on you in the pics I've seen. What's got you all skinny,
Dave, out there in the decadence of Vegas? What could it be? What,
please tell us.
And with that Frankenstein head, what the heck?
>
> > Where am I posting from today, Cap'n? What secret internet-tele-
> > connection-portal have I secretly hacked into to help the nefarious
> > conspiracy with their big cover-up in the JFK caper?
>
> > Don't be a glory-hog, David, get swabby Gill to help your sorry ass
> > figure it out.
>
> > Hey, I just realized, you and Dave Thomas of Wendy's share the same
> > first name - is this really Dave Thomas? Let me talk to Healy.
>
> showing Dave Thomas the same courtesy you show dead presidents, I
> see..... you are a sick-fuck aren't ya?
So you're saying that comparing Dave Thomas to you is an insult to
Dave Thomas?
LMAO!
You are a stupid one after all.
LMAO!
aeffects
uh-huh -- sure you do... they ALL say that. Kinda like saying, you
bought Playboy magazine for the articles.... yea never looked at the
pictures, eh? LMFAO
> You, on the other hand, look anemic, skin and bones, your coat just
> seems hangs on you in the pics I've seen. What's got you all skinny,
> Dave, out there in the decadence of Vegas? What could it be? What,
> please tell us.
tell you mom you'll be heading for Vegas for a weekend, I guarantee
you'll return a different man, hell, you'll return a man....
> And with that Frankenstein head, what the heck?
Frankenstein head...? you aren't cut out for this Todd, perhaps you
should return to BB guns and stationary targets way up there in the
wilderness of Lansing Mich.... GAWD you too damn easy... I'll take
catsup with my fries thanks.. they have curly fries at Wendys?
>
>
> > > Where am I posting from today, Cap'n? What secret internet-tele-
> > > connection-portal have I secretly hacked into to help the nefarious
> > > conspiracy with their big cover-up in the JFK caper?
>
> > > Don't be a glory-hog, David, get swabby Gill to help your sorry ass
> > > figure it out.
>
> > > Hey, I just realized, you and Dave Thomas of Wendy's share the same
> > > first name - is this really Dave Thomas? Let me talk to Healy.
>
> > showing Dave Thomas the same courtesy you show dead presidents, I
> > see..... you are a sick-fuck aren't ya?
>
> So you're saying that comparing Dave Thomas to you is an insult to
> Dave Thomas?
no cigar son -- you insulted him, whose next Mother Theresa? Keep up
the good work Blutto ROFLMFAO!
aeffects
Dudster threw his hank, wake up son.....
Todd W. Vaughan
I bought Playboy for BOTH the articles AND the photos (you're
"pictures", kindergarten boy).
>
> > You, on the other hand, look anemic, skin and bones, your coat just
> > seems hangs on you in the pics I've seen. What's got you all skinny,
> > Dave, out there in the decadence of Vegas? What could it be? What,
> > please tell us.
>
> tell you mom you'll be heading for Vegas for a weekend, I guarantee
> you'll return a different man, hell, you'll return a man....
Mom's dead, Healy, 17 years past.
I offered for YOU to come HERE Healy, to visit me.
I've never been to Vegas, no desire to see all the filth you call
home.
Where I live is quite, country, you turned it down.
Now I know why.
>
> > And with that Frankenstein head, what the heck?
>
> Frankenstein head...?
Yeah, let me explain - you're head looks like Frankenstein.
>you aren't cut out for this Todd, perhaps you
> should return to BB guns and stationary targets way up there in the
> wilderness of Lansing Mich....
Lansing...wilderness?
LOL.
Maybe on the campus of MSU, Frank, but other than that I'd say you're
due for a geography lesson.
LOL.
Dig out that atlas you use for a coaster,
>GAWD you too damn easy... I'll take
> catsup with my fries thanks.. they have curly fries at Wendys?
Curly fries?
What are you thinking, Frank. With your neck bolts and all you can't
open your mouth that far.
You stick to the kids meal, champ.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > Where am I posting from today, Cap'n? What secret internet-tele-
> > > > connection-portal have I secretly hacked into to help the nefarious
> > > > conspiracy with their big cover-up in the JFK caper?
>
> > > > Don't be a glory-hog, David, get swabby Gill to help your sorry ass
> > > > figure it out.
>
> > > > Hey, I just realized, you and Dave Thomas of Wendy's share the same
> > > > first name - is this really Dave Thomas? Let me talk to Healy.
>
> > > showing Dave Thomas the same courtesy you show dead presidents, I
> > > see..... you are a sick-fuck aren't ya?
>
> > So you're saying that comparing Dave Thomas to you is an insult to
> > Dave Thomas?
>
> no cigar son -- you insulted him, whose next Mother Theresa? Keep up
> the good work Blutto ROFLMFAO!
>
>
>
> > LMAO!
>
> > You are a stupid one after all.
>
> > LMAO!
>
> > > > Todd- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Todd,
He seems to have lost his appetite for discussin' evidence/testimony
lately!
Still, I'm sure we'll hear back in a a few days, once he's managed to
cobble some implausible explanation together. Should be good for a
laugh!
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Jul 27, 10:59 pm, "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com>
> Naw, nevermind.- Hide quoted text -
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0ac6b56d-a037-44e6...@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
Say, I already gave you an answer about your <snicker> 5' 3" Oswald
identification over on the Jim Douglass thread, not to mention on
earlier occasions.
You're not ducking the issue are you tomnln?
Let's recap for you, tomnln. You claimed Mrs Duran gave a 5' 3" Oswald
impersonator her name and phone number in Mexico City, right?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "WCR claimed" that Duran gave the 5'3" Oswald the office number.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When I asked you why, if that was the case, Mrs Duran's name and phone
number were found written in the REAL Oswald's notebook you said the
notebook entry was probably faked, like the *Mr Hunt* letter, right?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The *Mr. Hunt* letter was Never proven FAKE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now when I pointed out to you that Oswald sent letters to the CPUSA
and the FPCC in New York, attaching finished copies of his *Hands Off
Cuba* handbills, detailing how he'd had the handbills printed, you
claimed those letters were probably faked too, right?
If those letters are fake, tomnln, why then do we have two TV films,
plus stills made from those same films, showing Oswald handing out the
very same *Hands Off Cuba* handbills, tomnln?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Douglas Jones of the Jones Printing Company said it was NOT Oswald who
ordered those flyers timmy.
Your side states that Oswald was a Loner.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And why, tomnln, do we have a recording of a WDSU radio program where
the host, Bill Stuckey, reads out word for word and discusses with
Oswald the content of the handbill on air?
That is all evidence/testimony, tomnln, in the 26 volumes, but you
don't want to deal with it, do you tomnln?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like you're referring to the "Altered Transcript" in which Oswald blew
his cover.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You just want to make up some nonsense about how it all must be faked,
don't you tomnln?
It appears that you now FEAR evidence/testimony, tomnln. That's now
the case, isn't it tomnln? You now FEAR evidence/testimony?
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you care to address the authorities "Tampering with evidence
repeatedly?>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c378a1c9-80a5-4ebc...@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
toad vaughan wrote;
Tim,
Did Tomnln ever reply to you?
Todd
I write;
I sure did toad;
I just forgot to show Timmy what a LIAR You are>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
toad vaughan wrote;
But Tim, I thought Tomnln loved to discuss "evidence/testimony" - it's
his forte', his life. And now we hear nothing from him? I'm worried,
Tim. I wonder if he is ill, and if we should be concerned?
Naw, nevermind.
I write;
Your "concern" should be focused on your Destruction of your own
credibility>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:925fcbb1-a416-4768...@v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
You sure did, eh?
What, about three minutes before you put this reply up, after ducking
the issue for around a week?
You seemed to lose enthusiasm for responding on the *From The Jim
Douglass Book* thread, tomnln.
Did you begin to FEAR evidence/testimony, tomnln?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Jul 31, 3:56 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:c378a1c9-80a5-4ebc...@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hr5ydIa_yyY-Hidequoted text -
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, did you take a little hiatus there, while you cobbled together
your totally inadequate response, tomnln?
On Jul 31, 3:53 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:0ac6b56d-a037-44e6...@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> Hi tomnln,
>
> Say, I already gave you an answer about your <snicker> 5' 3" Oswald
> identification over on the Jim Douglass thread, not to mention on
> earlier occasions.
>
> You're not ducking the issue are you tomnln?
>
> Let's recap for you, tomnln. You claimed Mrs Duran gave a 5' 3" Oswald
> impersonator her name and phone number in Mexico City, right?
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The "WCR claimed" that Duran gave the 5'3" Oswald the office number.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No they didn't, tomnln. YOU concocted the ridiculous 5' 3" Oswald
nonsense from Mrs Duran's HSCA testimony, an interview in which she
twice identified Oswald as the man she met from his NOPD mugshot and
an interview which led her HSCA interviewers to conclude that she most
likely HAD met the real Oswald, tomnln.
You're the only believer in the 5' 3" Oswald, tomnln.
>
> When I asked you why, if that was the case, Mrs Duran's name and phone
> number were found written in the REAL Oswald's notebook you said the
> notebook entry was probably faked, like the *Mr Hunt* letter, right?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The *Mr. Hunt* letter was Never proven FAKE
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it was YOUR argument, tomnln. The entry in Oswald's notebook,
showing the address that Mrs Duran gave him was never proven fake
either, tomnln. In fact, it is considered to be authentic, as are the
letters Oswald wrote to the FPCC and the CPUSA, enclosing copies of
his finished handbills that he had printed at Jones Printing Company,
tomnln.
>
> Now when I pointed out to you that Oswald sent letters to the CPUSA
> and the FPCC in New York, attaching finished copies of his *Hands Off
> Cuba* handbills, detailing how he'd had the handbills printed, you
> claimed those letters were probably faked too, right?
>
> If those letters are fake, tomnln, why then do we have two TV films,
> plus stills made from those same films, showing Oswald handing out the
> very same *Hands Off Cuba* handbills, tomnln?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Douglas Jones of the Jones Printing Company said it was NOT Oswald who
> ordered those flyers timmy.
> Your side states that Oswald was a Loner.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You avoided the question about the TV films, tomnln, and Douglas Jones
from Jones Printing did not say it was NOT Oswald, tomnln, as you
claim. In fact, he could not positively say the person ordering the
handbills was not Oswald, isn't that so, tomnln?
And his recollection is outweighed by THREE written statements from
Oswald that he arranged the printing, tomnln, and a welter of other
evidence. In fact, there is far more evidence/testimony that it WAS
Oswald than that it wasn't Oswald, tomnln. Isn't that so, tomnln?
---------
>
> And why, tomnln, do we have a recording of a WDSU radio program where
> the host, Bill Stuckey, reads out word for word and discusses with
> Oswald the content of the handbill on air?
>
> That is all evidence/testimony, tomnln, in the 26 volumes, but you
> don't want to deal with it, do you tomnln?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Looks like you're referring to the "Altered Transcript" in which Oswald blew
> his cover.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No tomnln. I'm referring to Bill Stuckey's *Latin Listening Post* that
was recorded several days before Oswald's cover was blown on
*Conversation Carte Blanche*, where he was revealed to be a Marxist,
tomnln. Different radio program, tomnln. Different recording. It
appears that you are unfamiliar with the evidence/testimony in this
matter, tomnln. Quite unfamiliar with it, tomnln.
No wonder your argument is so poor, tomnln. In fact, your assertion
about the notebook entry and the letters probably being faked really
is quite ABSURD, isn't it tomnln? LOL! What's your next nonsensical
theory, tomnln?
aeffects
>
> What, about three minutes before you put this reply up, after ducking
> the issue for around a week?
>
> You seemed to lose enthusiasm for responding on the *From The Jim
> Douglass Book* thread, tomnln.
>
> Did you begin to FEAR evidence/testimony, tomnln?
*fear* is reeking from every byte you post, son.... so buy yourself a
quart of bourbon, better yet read a bit of Thomas Merton. Ya need
redemption, Timmy from down-undah.... we know.....
> > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hr5ydIa_yyY-Hidequotedtext -
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Toots,
Er, I mean, David *aeffects* Healy. Say, but if I'M the one that's so
fearful, how come YOU and Ben Holmes were the ones that ran from
further discussion of his *Lady In Yellow Pants In Nix Equals Z Film
Alteration* theory?
Not to late too resume discussion, Dave, you being a published expert
on Z film alteration and all.
But perhaps you're too fearful, Toots-E-Roll fella?
Keep on runnin', good buddy!
:-)
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > toad vaughan wrote;
>
> > > Tim,
>
> > > Did Tomnln ever reply to you?
>
> > > Todd
>
> > > I write;
>
> > > I sure did toad;
>
> > > I just forgot to show Timmy what a LIAR You are>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
aeffects
>
> Er, I mean, David *aeffects* Healy. Say, but if I'M the one that's so
> fearful, how come YOU and Ben Holmes were the ones that ran from
> further discussion of his *Lady In Yellow Pants In Nix Equals Z Film
> Alteration* theory?
>
> Not to late too resume discussion, Dave, you being a published expert
> on Z film alteration and all.
stay on point son...
Tim, ya gotta face the facts sonny, you know little concerning the
Zapruder film and what little you do [know] is what your handlers
spoon feed ya.... so hang around, buy the WCR, get up to speed get
yourself a copy of the Great Zaprduer Film Hoax... on film alteration
and theories and when you feel competent, comment on film compositing
stuff. You are literate, yes?
Who knows, maybe I'll autograph your copy -- you'll have to provide a
purchase receipt though....
Bud
> On Aug 2, 9:30 pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > TOP POST
>
> > Hi Toots,
>
> > Er, I mean, David *aeffects* Healy. Say, but if I'M the one that's so
> > fearful, how come YOU and Ben Holmes were the ones that ran from
> > further discussion of his *Lady In Yellow Pants In Nix Equals Z Film
> > Alteration* theory?
>
> > Not to late too resume discussion, Dave, you being a published expert
> > on Z film alteration and all.
>
> stay on point son...
Exactly what he is doing, staying focused on the issue your hero
brought up.
> Tim, ya gotta face the facts sonny, you know little concerning the
> Zapruder film and what little you do [know] is what your handlers
> spoon feed ya.... so hang around, buy the WCR, get up to speed get
> yourself a copy of the Great Zaprduer Film Hoax... on film alteration
> and theories and when you feel competent, comment on film compositing
> stuff. You are literate, yes?
What is with all this "smoke and mirror" misdirection? Back on
point, soldier, the "lady in the yellow pants" is the subject.
tomnln
http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:40f71b9b-ca69-4c55...@b2g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
Blond Haired
119 pound Oswald came from the tewstimony of Sylvia Duran.
HSCA Volume III
And, YOU'RE Stuck with it.
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e7e7f393-9166-462a...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
aeffects
> On Aug 3, 12:51 am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 2, 9:30 pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > TOP POST
>
> > > Hi Toots,
>
> > > Er, I mean, David *aeffects* Healy. Say, but if I'M the one that's so
> > > fearful, how come YOU and Ben Holmes were the ones that ran from
> > > further discussion of his *Lady In Yellow Pants In Nix Equals Z Film
> > > Alteration* theory?
>
> > > Not to late too resume discussion, Dave, you being a published expert
> > > on Z film alteration and all.
>
> > stay on point son...
>
> Exactly what he is doing, staying focused on the issue your hero
> brought up.
sitdown dudster, you're irrelevant when it comes to this issue
muc...@gmail.com
> On Aug 3, 5:23 am, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 3, 12:51 am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 2, 9:30 pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > TOP POST
>
> > > > Hi Toots,
>
> > > > Er, I mean, David *aeffects* Healy. Say, but if I'M the one that's so
> > > > fearful, how come YOU and Ben Holmes were the ones that ran from
> > > > further discussion of his *Lady In Yellow Pants In Nix Equals Z Film
> > > > Alteration* theory?
>
> > > > Not to late too resume discussion, Dave, you being a published expert
> > > > on Z film alteration and all.
>
> > > stay on point son...
>
> > Exactly what he is doing, staying focused on the issue your hero
> > brought up.
>
> sitdown dudster, you're irrelevant when it comes to this issue
Ben's *Lady in Yellow Pants* theory was DOA (even his pathetic lap dog
understands this). The real question is why Ben is so afraid to admit
his mistake.
aeffects
> On 3 Aug, 20:01, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 3, 5:23 am, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 3, 12:51 am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 2, 9:30 pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > > TOP POST
>
> > > > > Hi Toots,
>
> > > > > Er, I mean, David *aeffects* Healy. Say, but if I'M the one that's so
> > > > > fearful, how come YOU and Ben Holmes were the ones that ran from
> > > > > further discussion of his *Lady In Yellow Pants In Nix Equals Z Film
> > > > > Alteration* theory?
>
> > > > > Not to late too resume discussion, Dave, you being a published expert
> > > > > on Z film alteration and all.
>
> > > > stay on point son...
>
> > > Exactly what he is doing, staying focused on the issue your hero
> > > brought up.
>
> > sitdown dudster, you're irrelevant when it comes to this issue
>
> Ben's *Lady in Yellow Pants* theory was DOA (even his pathetic lap dog
> understands this). The real question is why Ben is so afraid to admit
> his mistake.
sitdown marky-mark, you're irrelevant -- as been proven over and over
again...... you may rise from you knees now, begone, tort!
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, but you ALREADY posted, in this same thread, that:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "WCR claimed" that Duran gave the 5'3" Oswald the office number.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How does this gell with your claim that:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 5 ft. 3 inch
Blond Haired
119 pound Oswald came from the tewstimony of Sylvia Duran.
HSCA Volume III
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you actually know the evidence/tewstimony (sic) in this case,
tomnln?
You've introduced two mutually exclusive scenarios, tomnln. The WCR
was in the sixties, long before the HSCA which was in the seventies.
What are you actually trying to say?
BTW, can't help but notice you are running from the other stuff I
posted tomnln, LOL!
It seems you now FEAR evidence/tewstimony (sic), tomnln.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Aug 4, 3:09 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> The 5 ft. 3 inch
> Blond Haired
> 119 pound Oswald came from the tewstimony of Sylvia Duran.
>
> HSCA Volume III
>
> And, YOU'RE Stuck with it.
>
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*- Hide quoted text -
tomnln
Duran described the Oswald in Medxico City as;
5 ft. 3 inches tall
Blond Hair
119 pounds.
Timmy believes that is the Oswald accused of killoing JFK.
http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
HOHOHOHOHOHOHO
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e764c7e6-1223-4247...@r35g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, doesn't that statement you linked to say that the guy from Jones
Printing, Douglas Jones, *could not positively say the person ordering
the handbills was not Oswald*?
I think that that is correct, isn't it tomnln?
It hardly supports your argument, tomnln. Especially as finished
copies of Oswald's FPCC handbill were found in the files of Jones
Printing by the FBI in November, 1963, were they not, tomnln?
I think I'm correct in saying that too, aren't I tomnln?
Of course I am! :-)
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Aug 4, 2:27 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> http://whokilledjfk.net/you_asked_for_it.htm
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
> >> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hr5ydIa_yyY-Hidequotedtext -
>
> >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> toad vaughan wrote;
>
> >> Tim,
>
> >> Did Tomnln ever reply to you?
>
> >> Todd
>
> >> I write;
>
> >> I sure did toad;
>
> >> I just forgot to show Timmy what a LIAR You
> >> are>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
tomnln
Right on top from the 26 volumes.
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a70d3149-ceef-4387...@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...