Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

JFK Assassination Forum Archives -- Misc. Topics Of Interest (Part 109)

10 views
Skip to first unread message

David Von Pein

unread,
Aug 24, 2009, 4:01:23 AM8/24/09
to
ARCHIVED JFK ASSASSINATION FORUM POSTS OF INTEREST (PART 109):

======================================================


COMMISSION EXHIBIT 903 AND COMMON SENSE 101:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/165967aeaee7185a

A SOLE ASSASSIN SANS THE SINGLE-BULLET THEORY? NO WAY!:
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1039.msg14112.html#msg14112
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1039.msg14202.html#msg14202


KING KOOK GARRISON:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/861618f7ed67f119

HOW MANY BULLETS HIT GOVERNOR CONNALLY?:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/c663651da0a3c6ee
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/9dfe157de5075bc7

JAMES TAGUE, THE WARREN COMMISSION, AND PAGE 117 OF THE WCR:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/9a65eae909a84feb
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/a499211823b9df75

SHIRTS, PANTS, AND JACKETS:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/87362abad980a00e
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/27bbb70337aa16cd

BUGLIOSI, BUSH, JFK, AND RFK:
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1062.msg14296.html#msg14296

BUGLIOSI AND CE399:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/94774572e45dcac9


MORE MISC. BLADDER-BUSTING HILARITY FROM THE CONSPIRACY KOOKS:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/ecc5fa9d2adfcb2d
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/a902780328298856
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/be8ddb495957508c
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/e4c924034196a474
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/a5fd939964430e53
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1059.msg14213.html#msg14213
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1059.msg14215.html#msg14215
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1059.msg14217.html#msg14217

======================================================

David Von Pein

unread,
Aug 24, 2009, 7:48:50 PM8/24/09
to

www.JFKAssassinationForum.com/index.php/topic,912.msg14449.html#msg14449

>>> "...because the dummies had rigid necks..." <<<

So what?

The rigid necks have absolutely nothing to do with the most major
finding/conclusion elicited by the two Grassy Knoll tests in ITTC --
with that major finding/conclusion being --- ANY frontal gunshot would
have either totally destroyed JFK's head (the Winchester rifle test)
or, at a bare minimum, produced damage and a probable exit hole in the
left side of JFK's head (the Carcano test).

Now, "Pam", just how does the rigidness of the test dummies' necks
affect the above two findings with respect to the simulated "From The
Grassy Knoll" test shots performed by Michael Yardley in "Inside The
Target Car"?

Are you implying that if the necks had not been "rigid", Yardley's
bullets would have behaved totally differently? And if the neck had
not been rigid for the Carcano "Knoll" shot, then the test dummy's
head would NOT have had ANY damage to its LEFT side at all?

Is that the nonsense you want to believe, "Pamela"?

(Just make up some crazy, silly-sounding excuse to answer my last
inquiry, "Pam". I'm accustomed to that from CTers anyway.)

0 new messages