QUESTION FOR WALT RE LHO CLOTHING
Todd W. Vaughan
Walt,
In another thread yesterday you claimed that…
QUOTE ON
Oswald said his clothes were dirty...just as Mrs. Bledsoe described
them.
QUOTE OFF
I'm having trouble finding where Mrs. Bledsoe is supposed to have
"described" LHO's clothes as being "dirty".
Does she say the shirt was dirty or that the pants were dirty, or
both?-
Todd
Walt
Mr. Ball.
And the bus was going in what direction?
Mrs. Bledsoe.
West.
Mr. Ball.
All right, now, tell me what happened?
Mrs. BLEDSOE. And, after we got past Akard, at Murphy---I figured it
out. Let's see. I don't know for sure. Oswald got on. He looks like a
maniac. His sleeve was out here [indicating]. His shirt was undone.
Mr. Ball.
You are indicating a sleeve of a shirt?
Mrs. Bledsoe.
Yes.
Mr. Ball.
It was unraveled?
Mrs. BLEDSOE. Was a hole in it, hole, and he was dirty, and I didn't
look at him. I didn't want to know 1 even seen him, and I just looked
off, and then about that time the motorman said the President had been
shot, and I sit--when I go to town I sit this way on the bus. The
motorman is right there [indicating], and I sit right there so that I
can get off.
Mr. BALL. You mean--where do you sit with reference to the motorman,
one seat or two seats behind him?
"AND HE WAS DIRTY"
>
> Todd
Todd W. Vaughan
Well Walt, that doesn't say his pants or his shirt were dirty. It says
"he" was dirty.
Did she mean his clothes? She doesn't say.
Did she mean his body, his hands, or face,or hair? She doesn't say.
How then can you say his shirt AND his pants, were dirty?
>
>
>
>
>
> > Todd- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Walt
She was talking about his shirt..... You really are desperate aren't
you??
Didn't she say just just prior to her remark about him being all
dirty, that his shirt wasn't buttoned and it had a hole in it. Taod
I don't think yer really this stupid.... I think yer just desperately
trying to slither away from the truth.
Todd W. Vaughan
I'm desperate?
LMFAO!
Let's look at what Bledsoe actually said, shall we?
"Was a hole in it, hole, and he was dirty, and I didn't look at him."
She didn't say " Was a hole in it...and it was dirty.."
She said "HE was dirty".
Now, I'M not saying the shirt and/or pants were or were not dirty.
But for YOU to say that the shirt and/or pants were dirty based on
what Bledsoe said above is simply ridiculous. She never says any such
thing.
> Didn't she say just just prior to her remark about him being all
> dirty, that his shirt wasn't buttoned and it had a hole in it.
She's actually talking only about the sleeve of the shirt at that
point, not the entire shirt.
Mr. Ball. You are indicating a sleeve of a shirt?
Mrs. Bledsoe.Yes.
Mr. Ball. It was unraveled?
Mrs. BLEDSOE. Was a hole in it, hole, and he was dirty, and I didn't
look at him."
Then she moves from talking about the shirt sleeve to talking about
him.
Mrs. Beldsoe. Was a hole in it (the shirt, TWV) and he was dirty...
If she meant at that point to say the shirt was dirty, wouln'd you
expect her to say, "and IT was dirty", instead of "and HE was dirty"?
Use your common sense for a change, Walt.
>Taod
> I don't think yer really this stupid.... I think yer just desperately
> trying to slither away from the truth.
>
The TRUTH is that she NEVER, EVER, stated that she thought the shirt
and/or pants were dirty.
Nor do I believed did, Baker, Whaley, or Roberts, all of whom saw him
after the shooting.
You took liberties with what Bledsoe said, and got caught.
Walt
Hey Asshole...... I took no liberties I just used good old fashioned
common sense.... (Something that you obviously lack)
Bledsoe said that Oswald was "all dirty".... In your world that must
mean his face and hands were dirty but his clothes were clean. Do you
realize how stupid that will appear to 99% of the people?? Don't you
care if you appear to be completely devoid of logic and common
sense??
David Von Pein
>>> "Bledsoe said that Oswald was "all dirty"." <<<
Now I see that Walt is going to place quotes around a word ("all")
that was never once uttered in front of the word "dirty" by Mary E.
Bledsoe during her entire WC session.
Bledsoe did NOT say "all dirty", you lying kook. She said:
"...And he was dirty, and I didn't look at him. I didn't want to know
I even seen him..." -- M. Bledsoe
Walt is putting a word in Bledsoe's mouth that never came out of it.
I think we can genuinely label Walt a bona fide "liar" in this "all
dirty" instance--especially considering the fact that Todd just a few
posts earlier printed out Bledsoe's exact WC testimony in this regard
(the exact same words I just re-posted above)....with those words, of
course, not including the word "all" in front of "dirty".
As I said yesterday (and it's even truer 24 hours later):
"I wouldn't trust Walt C. to tell me what day of the week it
was....let alone trust him with providing any of the "facts"
surrounding the assassination of America's thirty-fifth Chief
Executive." -- DVP; 05/05/2008
www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/e5f748020ee142d3
Walt
> >>> "Bledsoe said that Oswald was "all dirty"." <<<
>
> Now I see that Walt is going to place quotes around a word ("all")
> that was never once uttered in front of the word "dirty" by Mary E.
> Bledsoe during her entire WC session.
>
> Bledsoe did NOT say "all dirty", you lying kook. She said:
>
> "...And he was dirty, and I didn't look at him. I didn't want to know
> I even seen him..." -- M. Bledsoe
>
> Walt is putting a word in Bledsoe's mouth that never came out of it.
>
> I think we can genuinely label Walt a bona fide "liar" in this "all
> dirty" instance--especially considering the fact that Todd just a few
> posts earlier printed out Bledsoe's exact WC testimony in this regard
> (the exact same words I just re-posted above)....with those words, of
> course, not including the word "all" in front of "dirty".
Hey Pea Brain you dumb SOB....I posted Bledsoes testimony...Not Toad.
Yer right she didn't say "All" dirty..... She said he was dirty....It
changes NOTHING you stupid asshole. Do you also think as the Toad
does that she was referring to is faces and hands and not referring to
his clothes, when she said he was dirty?
The primary point is: Oswald said he went to his room and changed
his clothes because they were dirty. Mrs Bledsoe verified Oswald's
statement whe she said that he was dirty. I know you'll attempt to
lie and put a different spin on the reason that Oswald changed his
shirt and trousers and I hope you do.....Because I love to see you
make an ass out of yourself.....
curtjester1
Hey, Walt, if he didn't have dirty clothes, why did he go to the
roominghouse and change them? If HE was really dirty, he would have
taken a shower there, wouldn't he??
CJ
Walt
>
> Now I see that Walt is going to place quotes around a word ("all")
> that was never once uttered in front of the word "dirty" by Mary E.
> Bledsoe during her entire WC session.
>
> Bledsoe did NOT say "all dirty", you lying kook. She said:
>
> "...And he was dirty,
Ok, So her exact words weren't during her testimony weren't "all
dirty"
If I wanted to make an issue out of her exact words I might find her
words of "aal dirty" in her affidavit. I don't know It seems like
she might have used those words but I really don't give a damn,
because the exact words are not whats important..... She said Oswald
was dirty, and that verifies what Oswald told the interrogators. He
said he went to his room and changed his shirt and trousers because
THEY WERE DIRTY.
She said he was dirty.... she was referring to his clothes, because
that's the subject of her testimony. And you're a Kook if you think
she thought his face and hands were dirty but his clothes were clean.
robcap...@netscape.com
How can you support the statements he looked like a "maniac" and that
he had a "hole in shirt at the elbow?" Here is her affadavit, where
does she mention either of these things?
AFFIDAVIT IN ANY FACT
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DALLAS
BEFORE ME, Patsy Collins, a Notary Public in and for said County,
State of Texas, on this day personally appeared Mrs. Mary E. Bledsoe,
w/f 67, 621 N. Marsalis, Dallas, Texas, Telephone WH2-1985 who, after
being by me duly sworn, on oath deposes and says:
Last Friday, November 22, 1963, I went downtown to see the President.
I stood on Main Street just across the street from Titche's until the
parade passed by. The I walked over to Elm Street and caught a bus to
go home. The bus traveled West on Elm Street to about Murphy Street
and made a stop and that is when I saw Lee Oswald get on the bus. The
traffic was heavy and it took quite sometime [sic] to travel two or
three blocks. During that time someone made the statement that the
President had been shot and while the bus was stopped due to the heavy
traffic, Oswald got off the bus and I didn't see him again. I know
this man was Lee Oswald because he lived in my home from October 7,
1963 to October 14, 1963.
/s/ Mrs. Mary E. Bledsoe
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME THIS 23rd DAY OF November A.D. 1963
/s/ Patsy Collins
Notary Public, Dallas County, Texas
robcap...@netscape.com
Why did the shirt he was arrested in NOT have a hole in the sleeve at
the elbow if he did NOT change?
David Von Pein
>>> "I [Walt The Mega-Kook] posted Bledsoes [sic] testimony...Not [Todd]." <<<
Yes, you're correct. And I am wrong here. You did first post it above.
I stand corrected on this particular point. Sorry.
But the fact that YOU, yourself, posted the verbatim testimony
initially makes you look even more foolish (if that's possible) when
you then turned around in a later message and incorrectly quoted
Bledsoe as saying "all dirty".
>>> "If I wanted to make an issue out of her exact words[,] I might find her [Bledsoe's] words of "all dirty" in her affidavit." <<<
No, you won't. I already checked that, in fact, before writing my
previous post. The word "dirty" doesn't appear anywhere in Bledsoe's
affidavit either, which you evidently are too lazy to look up for
yourself (as is your half-assed custom most of the time). .....
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/bledsoe1.htm
Face it, Walt, you tried to get away with putting a notion in the
minds of people here (including the one unregistered "lurker" who
visits per month) when you added the word "all" into the Bledsoe
mix...hoping (apparently) nobody would catch you in this deception.
Consider yourself caught.
David Von Pein
Oswald's arrest shirt did have a hole in it (in the right sleeve at
the "elbow" area too):
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?absPageId=138183
Walt
> Oswald's arrest shirt did have a hole in it (in the right sleeve at
> the "elbow" area too):
>
CE 150 is NOT the shirt that Oswald was wearing at the time of his
arrest. CE 150 is the shirt with the large ragged hole in the right
elbow that Mrs Bledsoe saw him wearing on the bus just a few minutes
after the shooting.
CE 150 is the shirt that Oswald removed and put in the dresser drawer
where it was found later that afternoon.
A news photographer named Winfrey took a photograph at the police
station shortly after Oswald's arrest which shows Oswald with his
manacled hands raised and the right sleeve is stretched tight against
his elbow, and there is NO HOLE in that shirt sleeve. Anybody who
has ever worn-out the elbow area out of a shirt sleeve knows that when
you bend your elbow as Oswald's is in the picture your elbow pops
through the hole.
The shirt that Oswald was wearing at the time of his arrest was the
clean shirt that he had put on in his room at 1:00pm.
Walt
These asshole LNer's are just showing their lack of
intelligence......They are attempting to say that Oswald's body was
dirty but his clothes were clean, and Mrs Bledsoe was describing only
his body when she said
"HE WAS DIRTY" .... What a pathetic bunch of liars......
Here's the pertinent part of her testimony......
Mrs. BLEDSOE. And, after we got past Akard, at Murphy---I figured it
out. Let's see. I don't know for sure. Oswald got on. He looks like a
maniac. His sleeve was out here [indicating]. His shirt was undone.
Mr. Ball.
You are indicating a sleeve of a shirt?
Mrs. Bledsoe.
Yes.
Mr. Ball.
It was unraveled?
Mrs. BLEDSOE. Was a hole in it, hole, and he was dirty,
Any person with an ounce of commonsense would understand that Mrs
Bledsoe was talking about Oswald's general appearance and grooming.
She was specifically talking about his shirt when she said he boarded
the bus and she noticed his shirt was undone ( unbuttoned) and it had
a hole in the sleeve at the elbow, and he was dirty. I believe most
folks with an ounce of commonsense would understand that his clothes
were dirty.
>
> CJ- Hide quoted text -
Neil Coburn
water but you can't make it drink.
Neil
Walt
I think that also applies to horses asses....... cuz they refuse
what's good for em also.
curtjester1
LMAO. I don' think Marina ever claimed about the smell in close
quarters.
CJ
Todd W. Vaughan
LMFAO!!!
You're taking liberties even in this post (see my next response
below).
>
> Bledsoe said that Oswald was "all dirty"....
Goddammit, Walt, even when I post her testimony in the very post you
respond to you can't get it right.
What the fuck is wrong with you? Are you brain dead or just plain
obtuse?
Bledsoe did not say LHO was "all dirty".
She said "he was dirty".
Words have meaning, Walt.
So, why do you see fit to constantly change and twist them?
>In your world that must
> mean his face and hands were dirty but his clothes were clean. >
Don't you get it. We (I, you, anyone) don't know WHAT was dirty,
becasue Bledsoe didn't specify.
But that doesn't give you the right to claim to know it was his shirt
and pants.
>Do you
> realize how stupid that will appear to 99% of the people?? Don't you
> care if you appear to be completely devoid of logic and common
> sense??
It's very clear who's stupid here, Walt.
If you think it's unclear as to who's stupid, Walt, allow me to phrase
it the way Mrs. Bledsoe might - you're stupid.
Now, I suppose you'll comeback and say I called your shirt and pants
stupid.
Like I said, you're stupid.
Todd W. Vaughan
> On 6 May, 14:56, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > >>> "Bledsoe said that Oswald was "all dirty"." <<<
>
> > Now I see that Walt is going to place quotes around a word ("all")
> > that was never once uttered in front of the word "dirty" by Mary E.
> > Bledsoe during her entire WC session.
>
> > Bledsoe did NOT say "all dirty", you lying kook. She said:
>
> > "...And he was dirty,
>
> Ok, So her exact words weren't during her testimony weren't "all
> dirty"
> If I wanted to make an issue out of her exact words I might find her
> words of "aal dirty" in her affidavit. I don't know It seems like
> she might have used those words
LMFAO!
Well why the fuck don't you check the affadavit then, instead of
talking out of your ass?
And FYI she says no such thing in her affadvait.
>but I really don't give a damn,
> because the exact words are not whats important<
You've got to be kidding me.
I need top see that again.
"...the exact words are not whats important..."
Yep, that's what I thought your said.
You've got to be kidding me.
Well, then, Walt, thanks for explainning your entire way of looking at
this case.
Everybody listen up!!!
Walt says "...the exact words are not whats important..."
What an idiot.
>.... She said Oswald
> was dirty, and that verifies what Oswald told the interrogators. He
> said he went to his room and changed his shirt and trousers because
> THEY WERE DIRTY.
But that's not what you said she said Walt.
Word's have meaning.
>
> She said he was dirty.... she was referring to his clothes, because
> that's the subject of her testimony.
She changed the subject of what she was talking about that time from
the hole in his shirt to him with the use of the word "he".
Words have meaning.
Unless of course you are Walt Cakebread, who says that "...the exact
words are not whats important..."
What a KING KOOK.
And you're a Kook if you think
> she thought his face and hands were dirty but his clothes were clean.
>
> and I didn't look at him. I didn't want to know
>
>
>
> > I even seen him..." -- M. Bledsoe
>
> > Walt is putting a word in Bledsoe's mouth that never came out of it.
>
> > I think we can genuinely label Walt a bona fide "liar" in this "all
> > dirty" instance--especially considering the fact that Todd just a few
> > posts earlier printed out Bledsoe's exact WC testimony in this regard
> > (the exact same words I just re-posted above)....with those words, of
> > course, not including the word "all" in front of "dirty".
>
> > As I said yesterday (and it's even truer 24 hours later):
>
> > "I wouldn't trust Walt C. to tell me what day of the week it
> > was....let alone trust him with providing any of the "facts"
> > surrounding the assassination of America's thirty-fifth Chief
> > Executive." -- DVP; 05/05/2008
>
> >www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/e5f748020ee142d3- Hide quoted text -
Todd W. Vaughan
wrote:
>
Well, what makes you think it did not?
Todd W. Vaughan
> On 6 May, 21:54, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Oswald's arrest shirt did have a hole in it (in the right sleeve at
> > the "elbow" area too):
>
> >http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?absPageId...
>
> CE 150 is NOT the shirt that Oswald was wearing at the time of his
> arrest. CE 150 is the shirt with the large ragged hole in the right
> elbow that Mrs Bledsoe saw him wearing on the bus just a few minutes
> after the shooting.
> CE 150 is the shirt that Oswald removed and put in the dresser drawer
> where it was found later that afternoon.
Of course it is.
Scores of photos and films show LHO in DPD HQ after his arrest. He is
clearly wearing the CE 150 shirt. There was even a study done proving
this.
>
> A news photographer named Winfrey took a photograph at the police
> station shortly after Oswald's arrest which shows Oswald with his
> manacled hands raised and the right sleeve is stretched tight against
> his elbow, and there is NO HOLE in that shirt sleeve. Anybody who
> has ever worn-out the elbow area out of a shirt sleeve knows that when
> you bend your elbow as Oswald's is in the picture your elbow pops
> through the hole.
You're simpleton, Walt.
No one ever said that the hole was exactly where it would need to be
for LHO's elbow to "pop throught the hole".
Hell, the hole could have been (but was not) on the inside elbow of
the shirt and still could have been described as being on the elbow of
the shirt. But LHO's elbow would not have popped out, right?
You assume that the exact center of the hole lines up wiith the exact
center of LHO's elbow when bent.
Prove it!
Besides, Winfrey's photos are not taken at the right angle to show the
Todd W. Vaughan
Try writing a sentence that makes sense.
curtjester1
Haha Todd, as I see you are resortin' to the mindset of the playground
of your youth.
Don't give up ol' boy, you can always check out McWatters', and
Whaley's nose tests if you want to build a case for support, huh?
CJ
Todd W. Vaughan
Haha CJ, you wrote...
QUOTE ON
LMAO. I don' think Marina ever claimed about the smell in close
quarters.
QUOTE OFF
That sentence makes absolutely no sense.
>
> Don't give up ol' boy, you can always check out McWatters', and
> Whaley's nose tests if you want to build a case for support, huh?
Please tell me where I can find the "nose tests" of these witnesses
that you refer to, or is this yet another one of your sentences that
don't make sense?
Walt
Dear Dumbass..... Do you know why shirt sleeves get holes in them??
It's because when the arm is bent at the elbow it pulls the fabric
tight across the elbow and strains the fibers....and the sleeve fabric
is subject to friction at the elbow from placing the elbows on the
arms of chairs and tables etc. Some sport jackets are made with a
leather patch at the elbow because it is a area that gets a lot of
wear.
Where the hell do you think the hole in the sleeve would have been??
If you don't think it was at the elbow, you're either a liar or
stupid, or maybe you're a stupid liar?? And if the shirt that Oswald
was wearing at the time of his arrest had a hole in the sleeve at the
elbow his elbow would have been protruding from that hole. There was
no hole in the shirt in Bill Winfrey's photo, but there was a hole in
the shirt Oswald was wearing on the bus, so commonsense dictates that
he changed his dirty shirt in his room at 1:00pm.
>
> Prove it!
>
> Besides, Winfrey's photos are not taken at the right angle to show the
> hole.
>
>
>
>
>
> > The shirt that Oswald was wearing at the time of his arrest was the
> > clean shirt that he had put on in his room at 1:00pm.- Hide quoted text -
Walt
Toad's never advanced beyond that juvenile mindset.
>
> Don't give up ol' boy, you can always check out McWatters', and
> Whaley's nose tests if you want to build a case for support, huh?
>
Todd W. Vaughan
Oh, it's clear who has the mindset of a child, Walt, especially when
it comes to intepretation of evidnence and testimony.
Enjoy the spanking I just gave you on CE-150 as the arrest shirt.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Don't give up ol' boy, you can always check out McWatters', and
> > Whaley's nose tests if you want to build a case for support, huh?
>
> > CJ- Hide quoted text -
>
robcap...@netscape.com
Well, the fact that LHO did change is documented. I don't know what
you LNers are trying to prove when there is evidence he did change.
Never heard of DP Dectective Fay Turner, huh? Well, along with
Detective Moore he searched LHO's N. Beckley residence and Moore would
do an inventory of the items found. They bury the clothing descripton
to page 2 (the last two items) but this is whay they list:
1 brown shirt with button-down collar
1 pair grey trousers with other miscellaneous men's clothing
Here is the link:
http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/01/0110-002.gif
On the first day (11/22) he did tell Fritz he only changed his pants,
but the next day he said he changed both his shirt and pants, and this
is what they found. Try to find these items mentioned in either
Moore's or Turner's testimony, they never covered the clothing. Why?
LHO would say these clothes were "dirty" that is why he changed them.
curtjester1
during sex would have noticed if he was an unkempt person in any way.
She had tons of testimony, and all you would have to do is come up
with his lack of hygene or his possible pattern of unkempt dressing.
Why are you acting this way?
>
>
> > Don't give up ol' boy, you can always check out McWatters', and
> > Whaley's nose tests if you want to build a case for support, huh?
>
> Please tell me where I can find the "nose tests" of these witnesses
> that you refer to, or is this yet another one of your sentences that
> don't make sense?
>
Everyone else seems to understand this. Why can't you? Can't you
grasp that McWatters and Whaley, especially Whaley who commented so
closely to even his bracelet might have noticed something unordinary
about his manner of dress. Why can't you comprehend that you simply
could look up their WC testimonies and look for any supporting
corroboration for your wacked-out theory?
CJ
Todd W. Vaughan
#1. The sentence as your wrote it made no sense. It was incorrectly
structured and grammatically incorrect. Do you understand that? Here
is what you wrote again:
LMAO. I don' think Marina ever claimed about the smell in close
quarters.
Tell us all, didn't you really mean to write...
LMAO. I don' think Marina ever COMPLAINED about the smell in close
quarters.
Isn't that what you meant to write?
Do you see now why the sentence makes no sense.
Or are you really truly this fucking stupid?
#2. There is in fact something in the literature about Marina talking
about Oswald's smell and his hygeine habits, but you'll never find it.
>
>
>
> > > Don't give up ol' boy, you can always check out McWatters', and
> > > Whaley's nose tests if you want to build a case for support, huh?
>
> > Please tell me where I can find the "nose tests" of these witnesses
> > that you refer to, or is this yet another one of your sentences that
> > don't make sense?
>
> Everyone else seems to understand this. Why can't you? Can't you
> grasp that McWatters and Whaley, especially Whaley who commented so
> closely to even his bracelet might have noticed something unordinary
> about his manner of dress. Why can't you comprehend that you simply
> could look up their WC testimonies and look for any supporting
> corroboration for your wacked-out theory?
What does a "nose test" have to do with LHO's "manner of dress".
And if you really beleive this, why didn't Whaley say LHO's clothes
were dirty.
You're actually tearing down Walt's theory, not anything I said.
LMFAO!
curtjester1
when you know exactly what the issue is and have to resort to that to
circumvent that you have no case. Anything would have done in the
sentence. Claimed anything, claimed foul, complained.....It's just
something that dicks do. It's all in the 25 ways of disinformation
posted by Healy. Nothing new, just mean spirited, evil punks just
going about their way. You and your commie punks are a disgrace to
the human race.
CJ
Todd W. Vaughan
Never had one, jerk off.
At ten years old I was researching this case.
> Who cares,
> when you know exactly what the issue is and have to resort to that to
> circumvent that you have no case. Anything would have done in the
> sentence. Claimed anything, claimed foul, complained.....It's just
> something that dicks do.
>It's all in the 25 ways of disinformation
> posted by Healy. Nothing new, just mean spirited, evil punks just
> going about their way. You and your commie punks are a disgrace to
> the human race.
The bottom line is that your sentence made no sense as it was written
and when read in context did not convey what you wanted to convey.
And now you're all pissy becasue someone pointed out your mistake.
Try shaking the sand out of your panties for a change.
curtjester1
wrote:>
> > Haven't you grown out of your ten-year old punk stage yet.
>
> Never had one, jerk off.
>
> At ten years old I was researching this case.
>
old.
> > Who cares,
> > when you know exactly what the issue is and have to resort to that to
> > circumvent that you have no case. Anything would have done in the
> > sentence. Claimed anything, claimed foul, complained.....It's just
> > something that dicks do.
> >It's all in the 25 ways of disinformation
> > posted by Healy. Nothing new, just mean spirited, evil punks just
> > going about their way. You and your commie punks are a disgrace to
> > the human race.
>
> The bottom line is that your sentence made no sense as it was written
> and when read in context did not convey what you wanted to convey.
>
> And now you're all pissy becasue someone pointed out your mistake.
>
> Try shaking the sand out of your panties for a change.
No, what's real is that anyone knew what the sentence meant, even
you. Your parents don't like you. You family couldn't. Nobody here
does. That's no mistake.
CJ
>
Todd W. Vaughan
> On May 8, 1:38 pm, "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:>> > Haven't you grown out of your ten-year old punk stage yet.
>
> > Never had one, jerk off.
>
> > At ten years old I was researching this case.
>
> Well, you've just proved you have been in denial well before 10 yrs.
> old.
>
No, I've just stated that've I've been researching this case since I
was 10 years old.
Anything you take from that is your own supposition, and not based on
anything factual.
>
>
>
>
> > > Who cares,
> > > when you know exactly what the issue is and have to resort to that to
> > > circumvent that you have no case. Anything would have done in the
> > > sentence. Claimed anything, claimed foul, complained.....It's just
> > > something that dicks do.
> > >It's all in the 25 ways of disinformation
> > > posted by Healy. Nothing new, just mean spirited, evil punks just
> > > going about their way. You and your commie punks are a disgrace to
> > > the human race.
>
> > The bottom line is that your sentence made no sense as it was written
> > and when read in context did not convey what you wanted to convey.
>
> > And now you're all pissy becasue someone pointed out your mistake.
>
> > Try shaking the sand out of your panties for a change.
>
> No, what's real is that anyone knew what the sentence meant, even
> you. Your parents don't like you. You family couldn't.
I checked with my parents. They do like me. When they asked who would
be so riduculous to have said otherwise, I showed them your sentence.
They didn't understand it either.
>Nobody here
> does. That's no mistake.
Really, "nobody" at all.
Let me ask you something, Mr. "Jester".
If I were to find just one person here who said they liked me, just
one, would you then be man enough to admit that you were wrong when
you said that nobody here likes me?
>
> CJ