Why was Ruby so Certain Oswald was the Assassin?
RICLAND
When he shot Oswald, Ruby couldn't possibly have known if Oswald was the
real assassin.
No one knew this except Oswald... and the real assassins/conspirators.
ricland
luthie...@yahoo.com
Bud
RICLAND wrote:
> When he shot Oswald, Ruby couldn't possibly have known if Oswald was the
> real assassin.
You may be on to something. He said "You shot my President, you
rat" and may have been tackled before he could finish the thought with
"or at least I think there is an off chance you may have".
cdddraftsman
If LHO was innocent and was really being used as a patsy ,
he would of known nothing of importance to give to the police ,
so there would of been no reason to silence him . AAMOF it
would of been very important to these so called Hidden Hands ,
to keep LHO alive , so he could stand trial , do time , or be
executed . This would close the books on the case and these
so called co-conspirators would of gotton away scott free .
That Ruby Murdered LHO would be the last thing anyone who
was behind the scenes would want . It forces the conspiracy
question and only makes people think more about a subject
*They* would want forgotten . Ricland's *They* being those
that haven't been identified and don't exist anywhere except
in the overactive imagination of wet panty detectives like luthier
, who foam at the mouth and fawn and fondle themselves into
believing their a real dick tracy . Take away the tracy and what's
left ? A leftist dick leaning luthier , what else ? .............tl
PS : Ricland really stepped on the shoe mine that time ! Let History
record it is much more likely Ruby heard what everone else heard ,
that there was overwhelming evidence that LHO killed JFK while
hanging out at the DPD on the 22nd and 23rd and that he shot
LHO out of righteous anger that he had assassinated JFK . That
you can count on , not a billion nilly vanilly constructs by asshole
conspiracy writers bent on making a quick buck off of fools like
luither , Gil and Ricland , who are so gullible that it's more funny
then JFK trying to ' Cough Up a Bullet ' !
Hehehehehhahahahahhohohhohoh ! Maroons ! ............:-)
RICLAND
The above is such an incoherent pile, if you packaged it and put
"Manure" on it, you'd win a blue ribbon at your local county fair.
" If LHO was innocent and was really being used as a patsy ,
> he would of known nothing of importance to give to the police ,
> so there would of been no reason to silence him ."
>cddraftsman
No, cddraftsman.
He'd have been able to prove his innocence which would have been proof
of a conspiracy.
Duh...
ricland
Rule Rattray
"cdddraftsman" <cdddra...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1174952660.2...@r56g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> Which in itself is a disclaimer against conspiracy .
> If LHO was innocent and was really being used as a patsy ,
> he would of known nothing of importance to give to the police ,
> so there would of been no reason to silence him .
Come on, man. You can't really be this dumb. The assassins needed a patsy,
and Oswald was it. If he had lived, he might have been able to lead
authorities to the real killers. The only good patsy is a dead patsy, and
the only reason a patsy was needed at all was to close the books on the case
with no one going to trial, where cross examination is allowed and evidence
is actually weighed.
Where they really screwed up was in letting him get out of the book
depository alive in the first place.
AAMOF it
> would of been very important to these so called Hidden Hands ,
> to keep LHO alive , so he could stand trial , do time , or be
> executed .
Suppose he had gone to trial and had been acquitted? What then? Never mind,
Oddball. I've had my fill of non-logic for the year in this one stupid post
of yours.
This would close the books on the case and these
> so called co-conspirators would of gotton away scott free .
> That Ruby Murdered LHO would be the last thing anyone who
> was behind the scenes would want . It forces the conspiracy
> question and only makes people think more about a subject
> *They* would want forgotten . Ricland's *They* being those
> that haven't been identified and don't exist anywhere except
> in the overactive imagination of wet panty detectives like luthier
> , who foam at the mouth and fawn and fondle themselves into
> believing their a real dick tracy . Take away the tracy and what's
> left ? A leftist dick leaning luthier , what else ? .............tl
I take it back. You really are that dumb.
Rule
Name calling bullshit snipped.
David Von Pein
Yeah....there was that little snafu...plus that business about firing
away at JFK from XX number of directions within the context of a ONE-
PATSY assassination plot (per the Oliver Stone-like beliefs of so many
CTers worldwide). That was just a BRILLIANT scheme by those plotters,
wasn't it?
Mr. Rattray,
Serious question: Do you truly think it was a WISE move by the
proverbial and forever-unnamed "they" to pre-approve and green-light a
MULTI-SHOOTER/ONE-PATSY Presidential assassination plot in Dealey
Plaza on Nov. 22, 1963?
If you answer: "Yes, that's just the way I'd kill the President and
frame my lone patsy, too" -- please explain the logic of that
seemingly-ultra-crazy decision.
cdddraftsman
supplied the means to defeat your own arguement . LHO wasn't
going to lead the authorites anywhere , they had his rifle with his
prints on it , his shirt fibers on it and shell casings next to the
SN location . If you see LHO leading authorities on a crusade
to capture and convict ' Hidden Handed ' imaginary co-conspirators
after shooting a cop , your head is so far up your asshole you'll
believe anything and anyone ! FOOL ! ........tl
> ricland- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
cdddraftsman
are sooooo cleaver to frame this innocent man , they get his rifle
with his prints on it and plant the gun and the shell casings and
a billion other things that prove LHO wa guilty , THEN !!!!!!! For
the sake of a really GOOD BIG WHOPPER OF A STORY ,
They fall down on the job and let LHO escape the TSBD alive
instead of just arrainging to have him killed there , NOOOOO ! they
have to have him shot by a mafia connected bar owner on national
TV ! HAhahahahahhohohohhohoheheheheheh ! That wouldn't
bring no suspicion to anybody behind the scenes now would it ?
Hhahahahahahahahhohohhhohohohheheheheheheheehhehehe!
Collapse of your bullshit construct ! Pull your head otta your butt
you idiot ! ...................tl
On Mar 27, 12:17 am, "Rule Rattray" <ruleratt...@comcast.net> wrote:
> "cdddraftsman" <cdddrafts...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Rule Rattray
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1174981936.0...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
The object, sir, was to kill the President, and they knew the fix was
already in.
(And who said they were brilliant? Not me, that's for sure.)
Rule
>
Bud
Rule Rattray wrote:
> "cdddraftsman" <cdddra...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1174952660.2...@r56g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> > Which in itself is a disclaimer against conspiracy .
> > If LHO was innocent and was really being used as a patsy ,
> > he would of known nothing of importance to give to the police ,
> > so there would of been no reason to silence him .
>
> Come on, man. You can't really be this dumb. The assassins needed a patsy,
> and Oswald was it. If he had lived, he might have been able to lead
> authorities to the real killers.
The kooks always have dead folks vouching for a conspiracy.
> The only good patsy is a dead patsy,
Likewise kooks.
> and
> the only reason a patsy was needed at all was to close the books on the case
> with no one going to trial,
Ruby went to trial.
> where cross examination is allowed and evidence
> is actually weighed.
>
> Where they really screwed up was in letting him get out of the book
> depository alive in the first place.
Yah, Baker`s mistake, had he nabbed Oz in the TSBD, Tippit may have
been allowed to grow old.
> AAMOF it
> > would of been very important to these so called Hidden Hands ,
> > to keep LHO alive , so he could stand trial , do time , or be
> > executed .
>
> Suppose he had gone to trial and had been acquitted?
Or, significantly more likely, broken out of jail by flying monkies.
> What then? Never mind,
> Oddball. I've had my fill of non-logic for the year in this one stupid post
> of yours.
All this thinking stuff just wears a kook down.
aeffects
> Rule Rattray wrote:
> > "cdddraftsman" <cdddrafts...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
you need a *pale* larger, stump!
Bud
Of course it is ludicrous. You frame the patsy behind the victim by
shooting the victim in the front. If you are going to frame Oz with a
rifle, why not use Oz`s rifle to do it, they had control of it,
according to the kooks.? Any "they" did this complex planning, with
preparation being done way in advance, and then "they" allow Oz to
wander the TSBD, where he supposedly goes to the two most likely rooms
to contain alibi witnesses at lunchtime, the two lunchrooms. It always
comes down to the same thing, the kooks approach is "what had to be
true for Oz to be innocent", and thats what they believe.
Bud
It never occurs to you to stop and think "Man, I`m so stoned they
probably won`t understand what I write anyway"?
David Von Pein
Me neither.
But when compared to the batch of after-the-fact CT-Kooks that reside
in this insane asylum, those "MULTI-GUNMEN, ONE-PATSY" plotters are
all in Einstein's class.
Rule Rattray
"Bud" <sirs...@fast.net> wrote in message
news:1175040692....@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Rule Rattray wrote:
>> "cdddraftsman" <cdddra...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1174952660.2...@r56g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>> > Which in itself is a disclaimer against conspiracy .
>> > If LHO was innocent and was really being used as a patsy ,
>> > he would of known nothing of importance to give to the police ,
>> > so there would of been no reason to silence him .
>>
>> Come on, man. You can't really be this dumb. The assassins needed a
>> patsy,
>> and Oswald was it. If he had lived, he might have been able to lead
>> authorities to the real killers.
>
> The kooks always have dead folks vouching for a conspiracy.
>
>> The only good patsy is a dead patsy,
>
> Likewise kooks.
>
>> and
>> the only reason a patsy was needed at all was to close the books on the
>> case
>> with no one going to trial,
>
> Ruby went to trial.
It's pointless to suggest it, but why don't you look into that trial in
detail and see what happened there?
Forget it.
Rule
Bud
Consider it forgotten.
Rule Rattray
>
> David Von Pein wrote:
>> >>> "Where they really screwed up was in letting him get out of the book
>> >>> depository alive in the first place." <<<
>>
>> Yeah....there was that little snafu...plus that business about firing
>> away at JFK from XX number of directions within the context of a ONE-
>> PATSY assassination plot (per the Oliver Stone-like beliefs of so many
>> CTers worldwide). That was just a BRILLIANT scheme by those plotters,
>> wasn't it?
>>
>> Mr. Rattray,
>>
>> Serious question: Do you truly think it was a WISE move by the
>> proverbial and forever-unnamed "they" to pre-approve and green-light a
>> MULTI-SHOOTER/ONE-PATSY Presidential assassination plot in Dealey
>> Plaza on Nov. 22, 1963?
>>
>> If you answer: "Yes, that's just the way I'd kill the President and
>> frame my lone patsy, too" -- please explain the logic of that
>> seemingly-ultra-crazy decision.
>
> Of course it is ludicrous. You frame the patsy behind the victim by
> shooting the victim in the front. If you are going to frame Oz with a
> rifle, why not use Oz`s rifle to do it, they had control of it,
> according to the kooks.?
They did.