Gil Jesus: Oswald didn't do it.....because we don't know where he got the ammo!!!
YoHarvey
he's not been married.
Gil Jesus
> Is this not the same reasoning: �Jesus loves little boys.......because
> he's not been married.
Still can't get past the question, huh Ed ?
Still can't prove HOW Oswald got the ammo, huh ?
Let me ask you another question, since you insist that Oswald came
into possession of the ammo and yet can't prove HOW he got it....
Were Oswald's fingerprints found on the ammo clip or the cartridges
when the FBI examined them on November 23, 1963 ?
Yes or No ?
YoHarvey
Jesus? You consider yourself a 30 year plus researcher. You've said
so. Now, in 30 years has ANYBODDY determined where the ammo came
from? No, nobody has. AND YOU KNOW THIS. So, when asking your
question what are you attempting to do? So easy to figure out. You
AGAIN are trying to impress ANYBODY who will listen by asking a
question you know has no answer. This is what YOUR type does. You
have NO evidence, no proof, NOTHING proving conspiracy. You know it;
we know it. Do us all a favor. Stop successfully attempting to make
yourself look like a larger asshole than we already know you to be.
And since you still don't understand a very simple concept....one more
time for you Chico: Ed. stands for Editor, not Edward roflmao. Ya
know something Chico, even Ellen Rossley wouldn't marry you. And
lord, look what she chose roflmao.
YoHarvey
Since his finger prints WERE found on the trigger housing; case closed.
Gil Jesus
Ed:
If he possessed the ammo as you've SPECULATED....How did he load the
ammo into the rifle WITHOUT leaving his fingerprints on either the
ammo clip or the cartridges ?
Mr. LATONA. I was not successful in developing any prints at all on
the weapon. I also had one of the firearms examiners dismantle the
weapon and I processed the complete weapon, all parts, everything
else. And no latent prints of value were developed.
Mr. EISENBERG. Does that include the clip?
Mr. LATONA. That included the clip, that included the bolt, it
included the underside of the barrel which is covered by the stock.
Mr. EISENBERG. Were cartridge cases furnished to you at that time?
Mr. LATONA. They were, which I processed, and from which I got no
prints.
( 4 H 23 )
So far, you haven't shown HOW Oswald came to possess the ammo. Now
you're faced with explaining how he loaded the ammo that you cant
prove he ever possessed into the rfile without leaving any
fingerprints.
You're digging a hole, Ed.
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -
WRONG ONCE AGAIN Chico!!!!!
Gil Jesus
> WRONG ONCE AGAIN Chico!!!!!-
Here it is again, Ed.
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh4/html/WC_Vol4_0016a.htm
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jesus? Your ignorance is ONLY supassed by your gayness:
From: JFK: First Day Evidence. Excerpted:
Although the trigger-housing fingerprints were "extremely faint and
barely distinguishable" and "partially distorted," a positive
identification of Lee Harvey Oswald was made by Scalice. This is
perhaps the most important finding made since the time of the
assassination. It may now be stated as fact that the fingerprints of
Lee Harvey Oswald were left behind on the trigger housing of the rifle
found on the sixth floor of the Book Depository.(11)
"Initially, only Oswald's partial palm print was identified under the
barrel of the rifle (10 points of identification are usually required
for a positive ID). In 1992, I met with Rusty Livingston, a former
Dallas policeman assigned to the crime lab at the time of the
assassination. Livingston had saved high contrast photo prints of the
rifle, taken before it was shipped to FBI headquarters in Washington.
The photos contained evidence that had gone unnoticed, and when
Frontline had them analyzed, Oswald's guilt seemed even more certain.
Vincent Scalice, a renowned fingerprint expert and HSCA consultant,
was engaged by Frontline and expressed astonishment at what he saw --
three fingers from Oswald's right hand had left their mark just inches
from the trigger.
"Scalice, in fact, had located a whopping 18 points of identification.
After the production aired, he continued his work and increased the
total to 24 points. "If I had seen these four photographs in 1978,"
says Scalice, "I would have been able to make an identification at
that point in time. After this reexamination, I definitely conclude
these are Oswald's prints. There is no doubt about it." Other experts
pointed out that the prints were "fresh" because they would not last
long on a smooth, oily metal surface such as the trigger guard
housing." (Gus Russo, Live by the Sword [Baltimore, Maryland: Bancroft
Press, 1998] p. 462.)
Gil Jesus
Now, Please answer the questions, Ed.
How did Oswald come into possession of the WCC ammunition and clip ?
How did he load the ammo into the rifle without leaving fingerprints
on either the clip or the cartridges ?
YoHarvey
Yawn!! Notice how our pathological liar now skips over my previous
posting. This is typical of pathologics. When nailed, they attempt
to MOVE away quickly....onto something new.
As for how he loaded the ammo, I am not an expert in the field of
weapons. However, since we know Oswalds fingerprints were on the
trigger housing, we can safely state that he loaded the weapon.
Nobody was with Oswald at the time. As usual with Jesus's rhetorical
questions, it remains rhetorical.
Gil Jesus
> On Dec 4, 3:52�pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Now, Please answer the questions, Ed.
>
> > How did Oswald come into possession of the WCC ammunition and clip ?
>
> > How did he load the ammo into the rifle without leaving fingerprints
> > on either the clip or the cartridges ?
>
>Notice how our pathological liar now skips over my previous
> posting. �This is typical of pathologics. �When nailed, they attempt
> to MOVE away quickly....onto something new.
No, Ed. I asked you the same two questions I asked you before.
> As for how he loaded the ammo, I am not an expert in the field of
> weapons.
One doesn't need to be a weapons expert to know that ( absent the
wearing of gloves or wiping them off ) the clip and cartridges could
not have been loaded without leaving fingerprints on them.
>However, since we know Oswalds fingerprints were on the
> trigger housing, we can safely state that he loaded the weapon.
Don't change the subject Ed, lest people might think you're a
"pathologic".
The subject here is the ammo, not the trigger guard.
Only prints on the clip or cartridges would be considered proof that
he loaded the weapon.
So far, you haven't been able to prove to us
1. HOW Oswald came to possess the ammo.
2. HOW Oswald loaded the weapon without leaving fingerprints.
KEEP RUNNING EDDIE
YoHarvey
1. He bought it; he found it; his mother gave it to him. Pick one.
2. Wore gloves. Next.
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -
This is the logic of Chico Jesus. Hypothetical:
My 12 year old son, riding his brand new bicycle on his birthday
accidentally runs over the neighbors dog....and kills it. Nobody sees
him do this.
My neighbor calls the police. They investigate. They see the tire
treads over the back of the dog. Door to door they go, looking for
bicycles. At my home, they determine the bicycle used to kill the dog
belongs to my son.
Question: Is it relevant where my son got the bicycle?
Gil Jesus
NOT SO FAST, ED:
"There is no evidence that Oswald wore gloves or that he wiped prints
off the rifle." ( WCR 647 )
You have been unble to connect the ammunition or clip to Oswald
through purchase
You have been unable to connect the ammunition or clip to Oswald
through possession
You have been unable to connect the ammunition or clip to Oswald
through fingerprints
KEEP RUNNING
YoHarvey
Chico? I do believe all in this NG now know and understand why you
were thrown off the police deparrment.
Gil Jesus
>
> This is the logic of Chico Jesus. �Hypothetical:
>
> My 12 year old son, riding his brand new bicycle on his birthday
> accidentally runs over the neighbors dog....and kills it. �Nobody sees
> him do this.
>
> My neighbor calls the police. �They investigate. �They see the tire
> treads over the back of the dog. �Door to door they go, looking for
> bicycles. �At my home, they determine the bicycle used to kill the dog
> belongs to my son.
>
Ed:
Logic is never a substitute in a criminal case for EVIDENCE
The ammunition/clip must have impeccable credentials and absolute
authenticity, for without it, neither Oswald nor the world's greatest
rifleman could have fired that Carcano three times in 5.6 seconds. It
is an essential piece of the evidence that cannot be connected to
Oswald in any way, other than through the speculations of WC
apologists.
Circular reasoning doesn't work either.
YoHarvey
When taken in totality, the clip means NOTHING. Jesus chooses to
ignore ALL OF THE EVIDENCE AGAINST OSWALD because he cannot reconcile
the clip issue. Read that again. Anybody wonder why he was thrown
off the police department??? roflmao, roflmao. Apparently, in the
world of doublewides, the police are nice and tidy. They reconcile
EVERYTHING roflmao, roflmao.
tomnln
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ee71ac87-631f-4f27...@r10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Speaking of Husbands Spiffy ! ! ! !
Aren't you also married to lowery?
You seem to dining at his house so often enjoying those "Tube Steaks".
ps;
The board of Health has put a Quarantine sign on your wife's snatch.
tomnln
> Is this not the same reasoning: Jesus loves little boys.......because
> he's not been married.
There arte 40,000 guys who don't need marriage due to your wife running
around with a mattress on her back Spiffy.