Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Tom HANKS and Company.....

4 views
Skip to first unread message

aeffects

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 1:21:47 PM3/4/10
to

On his upcoming project re: the JFK assassination:
"We're going to do the American public a service," Hanks says. "A lot
of conspiracy types are going to be upset. If we do it right it'll
perhaps be one of the most controversial things that has ever been on
TV."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/04/tom-hanks-on-his-jfk-assa_n_485418.html

(btw Mr. Hanks Tom, we're waiting.... and please, get some else to do
Internet PR for Vince Bugliosi)

Sam McClung

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 2:42:39 PM3/4/10
to
maybe hanks can play the babushka lady
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/bosom_buddies1.jpg
of course, that would be insulting to the babushka lady


"aeffects" <aeffe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:393261eb-423a-4fb9...@u19g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

lazu...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 2:45:35 PM3/4/10
to
For Hanks to make that statement...think about it...he is slapping the
conspirators who killed JFK on the back,it's pathetic, he did great work
with Saving Private Ryan, but he's gonna go the route of Bugliosi...laz

Sam McClung

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 3:00:42 PM3/4/10
to
and george w., in one of his drunken frenzies, can play the epileptic, which
should be easier for him to play than playing president of the usa for daddy
and his other coffin buddies, he won't even have to try stammering a
sentence or two, just play drunk, like when he supposedly choked on a
pretzel? yeah, that's right, johns hopkins lab technicians found significant
amounts of alcohol in george w.'s evil satanic body, so being on the
bandwagon was all a ruse

his alleged daddy, george h. w. can play the north knoll sniper

dick cheney as badgeman, only he wants a shotgun, not a rifle

ronald dumsfeld as brennan the wall sitter


"Sam McClung" <mcc...@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:hmp2f...@news4.newsguy.com...

Sam McClung

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 3:09:14 PM3/4/10
to
hanks is in it for the money and media exposure just like bug is, aging
yuppies who can't afford their monthly rent anymore and will say anything
for $

hanks on the d-day beaches in the movie is a joke,
coming from a man whose dad was on a b-17 mission over the beaches on d-day

the only thing private hanks might save is public recognition of the secret
activities of secret organizations like the satanic skull and bones

makes one wonder how often hanks goes to the bohemian grove

<lazu...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:2036-4B90...@storefull-3252.bay.webtv.net...

aeffects

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 4:23:30 PM3/4/10
to

when they start dressing up in the US flag, watch out...

Bud

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 6:16:57 PM3/4/10
to
On Mar 4, 2:45 pm, lazuli...@webtv.net wrote:
> For Hanks to make that statement...think about it...he is slapping the
> conspirators who killed JFK on the back

No, he is slapping the conspiracy retards in the face.

rwalker

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 6:51:45 PM3/4/10
to
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:16:57 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:

>On Mar 4, 2:45 pm, lazuli...@webtv.net wrote:
>> For Hanks to make that statement...think about it...he is slapping the
>> conspirators who killed JFK on the back
>
> No, he is slapping the conspiracy retards in the face.
>

You appear to be the only sane person posting to this thread.

lazu...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 6:54:01 PM3/4/10
to
Yes David-just gimme an hour of Uncle Fetzer's Boys in response-Doug
Weldon, David Lifton, Doug Horne, Jack White, David Healy, Robert
Groden, Vince Palamara...Laz

lazu...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 6:56:46 PM3/4/10
to
If HBO runs this, they along with Hanks and Bugliosi are traitors to
truth, and reason...Laz

Sam McClung

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 10:44:03 PM3/4/10
to
hbo is a subsidiary of time warner, a bushy skull and bones corporation

notice who their mouthpieces are...hanks; bug; geraldo; et al.

I know the latter two don't know elvis is alive, they can't be too swift


<lazu...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:2041-4B90...@storefull-3252.bay.webtv.net...

Sam Brown

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 10:54:16 PM3/4/10
to

"rwalker" <rwa...@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:rrh0p5tp00vuutf5v...@4ax.com...

An astute observation.

Sam Brown

unread,
Mar 4, 2010, 10:53:40 PM3/4/10
to

"Bud" <sirs...@fast.net> wrote in message
news:bc98ad9a-8dca-4486...@33g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...

Saving Private Ryan was a piece of shit, Band of Brothers however was
brilliant. Hanks as an actor is a snoozefest, but as a producer he's pretty
good. Can't wait for "The Pacific" to air over here.
>

Sean Smiley

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 2:13:10 AM3/5/10
to
On Mar 4, 3:16 pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2:45 pm, lazuli...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> > For Hanks to make that statement...think about it...he is slapping the
> > conspirators who killed JFK on the back
>
>   No, he is slapping the conspiracy retards in the face.
>
Bud, winner of the memorial Rahm Emanuel Prize!

Sean Smiley

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 2:17:19 AM3/5/10
to
On Mar 4, 7:53 pm, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> "Bud" <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote in message

>
> news:bc98ad9a-8dca-4486...@33g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Mar 4, 2:45 pm, lazuli...@webtv.net wrote:
> >> For Hanks to make that statement...think about it...he is slapping the
> >> conspirators who killed JFK on the back
>
> >  No, he is slapping the conspiracy retards in the face.
>
> >>,it's pathetic, he did great work
> >> with Saving Private Ryan, but he's gonna go the route of Bugliosi...laz
>
> Saving Private Ryan was a piece of shit, Band of Brothers however was
> brilliant.

Agree & agree. I'd say "overrated", though, rather than a pos,
but.... (The Oscars were funny that year. Or the reactions. HOrrors!
"Shakespeare in Love" won, instead of the fave, "Ryan". Neither rated
a win, or even a nomination....)

Sam Brown

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 2:35:24 AM3/5/10
to

"Sean Smiley" <seansmil...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:62784e1a-e50f-4031...@k36g2000prb.googlegroups.com...

On Mar 4, 7:53 pm, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> "Bud" <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote in message
>
> news:bc98ad9a-8dca-4486...@33g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Mar 4, 2:45 pm, lazuli...@webtv.net wrote:
> >> For Hanks to make that statement...think about it...he is slapping the
> >> conspirators who killed JFK on the back
>
> > No, he is slapping the conspiracy retards in the face.
>
> >>,it's pathetic, he did great work
> >> with Saving Private Ryan, but he's gonna go the route of Bugliosi...laz
>
> Saving Private Ryan was a piece of shit, Band of Brothers however was
> brilliant.

Agree & agree. I'd say "overrated", though, rather than a pos,
but.... (The Oscars were funny that year. Or the reactions. HOrrors!
"Shakespeare in Love" won, instead of the fave, "Ryan". Neither rated
a win, or even a nomination....)

Giving Gwyneth Paltrow a Best Actress Oscar is like awarding Gil Jesus "Best
Christian"!

aeffects

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 3:28:54 AM3/5/10
to
On Mar 4, 3:51 pm, rwalker <rwal...@despammed.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:16:57 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirsl...@fast.net>

> wrote:
>
> >On Mar 4, 2:45 pm, lazuli...@webtv.net wrote:
> >> For Hanks to make that statement...think about it...he is slapping the
> >> conspirators who killed JFK on the back
>
> >  No, he is slapping the conspiracy retards in the face.
>
> You appear to be the only sane person posting to this thread.  

who asked you, shithead? btw, Bud the Dudster ain't who he thinks he
is, but WE know!

aeffects

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 3:33:34 AM3/5/10
to
On Mar 4, 11:13 pm, Sean Smiley <seansmileyran...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 3:16 pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:> On Mar 4, 2:45 pm, lazuli...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> > > For Hanks to make that statement...think about it...he is slapping the
> > > conspirators who killed JFK on the back
>
> >   No, he is slapping the conspiracy retards in the face.
>
> Bud, winner of the memorial Rahm Emanuel Prize!

lmfao..... say shithead, ya found another alias, eh? You lone nut
trolls need better paying jobs!

David Von Pein

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 3:49:03 AM3/5/10
to

>>> "If HBO runs this [JFK project], they along with Hanks and Bugliosi are traitors to truth, and reason." <<<


The poor Anybody-But-Oswald conspiracy kooks seem upset. What a shame.
Their imagined conspiracy plot isn't going to be put on the screen by
Tom Hanks, Bill Paxton, Gary Goetzman, and HBO.

Here in the world of reality (and sanity), HBO's "Reclaiming History"
mini-series will be putting on the TV screen the ACTUAL EVIDENCE and
FACTS concerning November 22, 1963, and the man who killed JFK, Lee
Harvey Oswald.

Kudos to Mr. Hanks, et al. It's not very often that we get to see that
kind of truth and accuracy in MOVIE form when it comes to the topic of
the JFK assassination, although Director Mel Stuart twice has done it,
with his 1964 masterpiece of a documentary "Four Days In November",
and then with his 1978 made-for-TV movie "Ruby And Oswald", which is a
very accurate depiction of the events in Dallas too:

http://DVP-Potpourri.blogspot.com/2010/01/four-days-in-november.html

http://DVP-Potpourri.blogspot.com/2010/02/ruby-and-oswald-1978-tv-movie.html

http://DVP-Potpourri.blogspot.com/2009/12/bill-paxton-interview.html

Gil Jesus

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 6:32:31 AM3/5/10
to

In this post,

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.books.tolkien/msg/e14b84337d7a1a65?hl=en&dmode=source

"RWalker" is posting from Paetec, the same company whose server "Bud"
posts from

Hostname: 64.80.105.241
ISP: PaeTec Communications
Organization: New York Chiropractic College

and he's posting from......you got it......upstate new yawk:


Geo-Location Information

Country: United States
State/Region: New York
City: Syracuse
Latitude: 43.0514
Longitude: -76.1495
Area Code: 315

Now a look at the info on "Bud"

http://www.spokeo.com/email/search?e=sirslick%40fast.net

Any questions ?

Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 6:42:24 AM3/5/10
to

>>> "Any questions?" <<<

Just one:

Does Nurse Ratched realize you've busted out?

Gil Jesus

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 6:52:56 AM3/5/10
to
On Mar 4, 3:09�pm, "Sam McClung" <mccl...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> hanks is in it for the money and media exposure just like bug is, aging
> yuppies who can't afford their monthly rent anymore and will say anything
> for $

I agree that money is the driving force behind these nutters. Gary
Mack was a CTer before he got the job at the Sixth Floor Arcade. Now
he tows the official line. Bob Groden claimed on BlackOp radio that he
was offered a position at the SFM, but he turned it down because there
was a condition that he had to "switch sides".

There's an old saying that "everybody has a price".

I agree with you Sam. It appears that money can change a person's mind
very quickly in some cases and is a powerful motivator in others.

robcap...@netscape.com

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 9:49:00 AM3/5/10
to

There is also a third option of they were NEVER on the CT side in the
first place! Can anyone say disinfo agent?

Ben Holmes

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 9:58:57 AM3/5/10
to
In article <30d79802-6206-410f...@k17g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
robcap...@netscape.com says...

>
>On Mar 5, 6:52=A0am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 4, 3:09 pm, "Sam McClung" <mccl...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>>
>> > hanks is in it for the money and media exposure just like bug is, aging
>> > yuppies who can't afford their monthly rent anymore and will say anythi=

>ng
>> > for $
>>
>> I agree that money is the driving force behind these nutters. Gary
>> Mack was a CTer before he got the job at the Sixth Floor Arcade. Now
>> he tows the official line. Bob Groden claimed on BlackOp radio that he
>> was offered a position at the SFM, but he turned it down because there
>> was a condition that he had to "switch sides".
>>
>> There's an old saying that "everybody has a price".
>>
>> I agree with you Sam. It appears that money can change a person's mind
>> very quickly in some cases and is a powerful motivator in others.
>
>There is also a third option of they were NEVER on the CT side in the
>first place! Can anyone say disinfo agent?

Can you say "Death Certificate" without any dishonesty?


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com

robcap...@netscape.com

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 10:30:32 AM3/5/10
to
On Mar 5, 9:58 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In article <30d79802-6206-410f-8259-16cf97023...@k17g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,

> robcap...@netscape.com says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Mar 5, 6:52=A0am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> On Mar 4, 3:09 pm, "Sam McClung" <mccl...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
> >> > hanks is in it for the money and media exposure just like bug is, aging
> >> > yuppies who can't afford their monthly rent anymore and will say anythi=
> >ng
> >> > for $
>
> >> I agree that money is the driving force behind these nutters. Gary
> >> Mack was a CTer before he got the job at the Sixth Floor Arcade. Now
> >> he tows the official line. Bob Groden claimed on BlackOp radio that he
> >> was offered a position at the SFM, but he turned it down because there
> >> was a condition that he had to "switch sides".
>
> >> There's an old saying that "everybody has a price".
>
> >> I agree with you Sam. It appears that money can change a person's mind
> >> very quickly in some cases and is a powerful motivator in others.
>
> >There is also a third option of they were NEVER on the CT side in the
> >first place! Can anyone say disinfo agent?
>
> Can you say "Death Certificate" without any dishonesty?

LOL!! This from a man who thinks LHO owned the alleged murder weapon,
that said rifle was high velocity, that said rifle had a CLIP INSIDE
IT when it was discovered, that LHO went to Mexico City for sure due
to overwhelming evidence, oh what the heck, here is the LIST OF THIS
LIARS CLAIMS!

Ben never proved his claim that “much of the evidence that frames LHO
PREDATES Tampa” (11/18/63)!
Ben never proved his claim that CE-399 came from “LHO’s rifle” when it
was NEVER proven that CE-139 (Mannlicher-Carcano) was ever his in the
first place!
Ben never proved his claim that the FBI had IMMEDIATE JURISDICTION
over the JFK assassination because they get this with ALL FELONIES in
the U.S.
Ben never proved his claim that there is evidence showing LHO ALTERED
HIS OWN CHIN in the one and only genuine BY photo (according to him)—
CE-133A!
Ben never proved his claim that LHO had his watch fixed between 10/62
and 3/31/63.
Ben never proved his claim that a low velocity musket ball was the
Cause of Death (COD).
Ben never proved his claim that NO doctors are ballistic experts.
Ben never proved his claim that the 40” Carcano is a HIGH VELOCITY
rifle.
Ben never proved his claim that NO death certificate mentions a high
powered rifle.
Ben never proved Marina did in fact take CE-133A (backyard photo), and
it is AUTHENTIC.
Ben never proved his claim that LHO most definitely did receive the
40” Carcano he allegedly ordered.
Ben never proved his claim that LHO went to Mexico City in Sept./Oct.
1963.
Ben never proved his claim that the weight listed on the “Bill of
lading” was TARE weight.
Ben never proved his claim that LHO knew Silvia Duran.
Ben never proved his claim that LHO went to Mexico City because Silvia
Duran’s name is allegedly in his notebook.
Ben never proved his claim that there was OVERWHELMING evidence
showing LHO went to Mexico City when the CIA and WC claimed he did!
Ben never proved his claim that many CT authors AGREE WITH HIS CLAIM
ABOUT THERE BEING OVERWHELMING evidence showing LHO went to Mexico
City when the CIA and WC claimed he did.
Ben never proved his claim that the wound in JFK’s back could be at
the T-1 level, NOT the T-3 level (as the PH doctors, the Burkley death
certificate and the clothes said/showed) because NO one who said this
was a ballistic expert.
Ben never proved his claim that an “extremely low velocity” bullet
could do the SAME damage as was seen in JFK’s head.
Ben never proved his claim a FMJ bullet could do the damage that was
seen in JFK’s head.
Ben never proved his claim that a bullet fragment could cause the
major dent in the limo’s chrome windshield frame (experts I have read
said it had to be a full bullet).
Ben never proved his claim that CE573 was the bullet actually fired at
Gen. Walker on 4/10/63.
Ben never proved his claim that the odds “favored” the two limo
fragments came from ONE bullet based on an inconclusive result.
Ben never proved his claim an “inconclusive” was as good as a match in
a court of law.
Ben never proved his claim that NO doctor at PH was qualified to
determine a high velocity bullet killed JFK.
Ben never proved his claim that doctors use muzzle capability speed
OVER IMPACT SPEED when determining what type of bullet did the damage.
Ben never proved his claim that Lt. Day’s claim was EQUAL to and more
PERSUASIVE than Latona’s tests.
Ben never proved his claim that LHO ordered a 40” Carcano.
Ben never proved his claim that a FMJ bullet usually breaks into three
pieces on contact.
Ben never proved his claim that there is evidence showing LHO ordered
a 40” Carcano.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 11:46:31 AM3/5/10
to
In article <2005fc17-6cfd-4446...@v20g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>,
robcap...@netscape.com says...
>
>On Mar 5, 9:58=A0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <30d79802-6206-410f-8259-16cf97023...@k17g2000yqb.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> robcap...@netscape.com says...

>>
>> >On Mar 5, 6:52=3DA0am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>> >> On Mar 4, 3:09 pm, "Sam McClung" <mccl...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > hanks is in it for the money and media exposure just like bug is, ag=
>ing
>> >> > yuppies who can't afford their monthly rent anymore and will say any=
>thi=3D

>> >ng
>> >> > for $
>>
>> >> I agree that money is the driving force behind these nutters. Gary
>> >> Mack was a CTer before he got the job at the Sixth Floor Arcade. Now
>> >> he tows the official line. Bob Groden claimed on BlackOp radio that he
>> >> was offered a position at the SFM, but he turned it down because there
>> >> was a condition that he had to "switch sides".
>>
>> >> There's an old saying that "everybody has a price".
>>
>> >> I agree with you Sam. It appears that money can change a person's mind
>> >> very quickly in some cases and is a powerful motivator in others.
>>
>> >There is also a third option of they were NEVER on the CT side in the
>> >first place! Can anyone say disinfo agent?
>>
>> Can you say "Death Certificate" without any dishonesty?

<moderated>

I guess not...

Sam McClung

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 1:26:00 PM3/5/10
to
"robcap...@netscape.com" <robc...@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:30d79802-6206-410f...@k17g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

seems the only employment history of "mack" (i.e. dunkel) is being paid as a
radio then tv mouthpiece

groden has been through enough, his home being burglarized and all...hey,
where was "mack" that night?

aeffects

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 1:28:14 PM3/5/10
to

lone nut alias charade is up hon... time for your traveling circus to
head back to acj (.john's)....

no advertising on your way out the door...

aeffects

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 2:24:38 PM3/5/10
to
On Mar 5, 12:49 am, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:

doesn't wash troll..... and NO advertising

timstter

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 10:21:36 PM3/5/10
to
On Mar 5, 10:32 pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 3:28 am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 4, 3:51 pm, rwalker <rwal...@despammed.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:16:57 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirsl...@fast.net>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > You appear to be the only sane person posting to this thread.
>
> > who asked you, shithead? btw, Bud the Dudster ain't who he thinks he
> > is, but WE know!
>
> In this post,
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.books.tolkien/msg/e14b84337d7...

>
> "RWalker" is posting from Paetec, the same company whose server "Bud"
> posts from
>
> Hostname: 64.80.105.241
> ISP: PaeTec Communications
> Organization: New York Chiropractic College
>
> and he's posting from......you got it......upstate new yawk:
>
> Geo-Location Information
>
> Country: United States
> State/Region: New York
> City: Syracuse
> Latitude: 43.0514
> Longitude: -76.1495
> Area Code: 315
>
> Now a look at the info on "Bud"
>
> http://www.spokeo.com/email/search?e=sirslick%40fast.net
>
> Any questions ?

LOL! This is pitiful! R Walker has identified himself with his full
title on previous threads on this board. He is not Bud.

BTW, Gil, I thought that I was Bud, according to you. What happened to
THAT theory? I believe it was founded on the fact that we both have
used the term <snicker> in posts to you. This was something I simply
copied from Bud, but a paranoid clown like you took it as some sort of
SUPER DOOPER evidence of identity, LOL!

Your deductive powers are as pathetic as the garbage you present as
*evidence* in your purloined YouTube videos, Gil.

You really should seek some kind of qualified medical intervention for
your paranoid state of mind.

Perhaps Dr Walker might suggest some names that can assist you.

Concerned Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

lazu...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 2:55:01 AM3/6/10
to
Come on Bud-the first half hour of saving Pvt. ryan was incredibly
moving...to call it a piece of shit? Well....no wonder you can worship
the warren report...Laz

Sam Brown

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 4:53:14 AM3/6/10
to

<lazu...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:23611-4B9...@storefull-3253.bay.webtv.net...

> Come on Bud-the first half hour of saving Pvt. ryan was incredibly
> moving...to call it a piece of shit? Well....no wonder you can worship
> the warren report...Laz
>
It wasn't Bud that made this comment. It was me. You may have a minor point,
the landing on Omaha Beach was very good but the rest was pure tripe.

Bud

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 7:10:30 AM3/6/10
to
On Mar 6, 2:55 am, lazuli...@webtv.net wrote:
> Come on Bud-the first half hour of saving Pvt. ryan was incredibly
> moving...

It was good.

>to call it a piece of shit?

That was Sam Brown. But I think Hank`s best work was on "Bosom
Buddies".

>Well....no wonder you can worship
> the warren report...Laz

I always hold the unvarnished truth in high regard.

robcap...@netscape.com

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 9:46:26 AM3/6/10
to
On Mar 6, 2:55 am, lazuli...@webtv.net wrote:

Everyone knows it is movie, save Bud of course because he is easily
fooled, and it was the tribute those that really did strom the beaches
on 6/6/44 that matters. Most of us got that part, but folks like Bud
ONLY know what they are told by their bosses.

aeffects

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 2:40:22 PM3/6/10
to
On Mar 6, 1:53 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> <lazuli...@webtv.net> wrote in message

son, when you have your face buried in someone's lap, how can YOU see
anything on a screen?

Get your coat on shithead, gonna get a bit chilly around here for YOU
and your foolish aliases.....

Sam Brown

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 3:49:22 PM3/6/10
to
news:2864cc1d-a873-4553...@d2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

Once again, since you kooks seem to be incapable of following a thread. It
was ME that called SVP a POS.

It is entirely disrespectful to those who stormed those beaches to imply
that this silly movie was an accurate representation of events that took
place during that particular campaign. A close relative of mine took part in
that mission and refers to the movie as despicable nonsense. Frankly Rob, I
would take his opinion over yours every time.

Sam Brown

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 3:53:19 PM3/6/10
to

"Sam Brown" <samjb...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4b92bfe3$0$12922$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au...

>
> "robcap...@netscape.com" <robc...@netscape.com> wrote in message
> news:2864cc1d-a873-4553...@d2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 6, 2:55 am, lazuli...@webtv.net wrote:
>> Come on Bud-the first half hour of saving Pvt. ryan was incredibly
>> moving...to call it a piece of shit? Well....no wonder you can worship
>> the warren report...Laz
>
> Everyone knows it is movie, save Bud of course because he is easily
> fooled, and it was the tribute those that really did strom the beaches
> on 6/6/44 that matters. Most of us got that part, but folks like Bud
> ONLY know what they are told by their bosses.
>
> Once again, since you kooks seem to be incapable of following a thread. It
> was ME that called SVP a POS.

Apologies. That should had read SPR not SVP.

0 new messages