IN CASE MCADAMS DOESN'T POST THIS ONE
Gil Jesus
YoHarvey
> http://www.prouty.org/mcadams
Chico? Who has more names, you or McAdams?
YoHarvey
Let's see.....Mcadams is a renowned scholar. Jesus droppout of high
school. McAdams has had a distinguished career. Jesus sells used car
parts from home. McAdams is articulate. Jesus is incoherent.
McAdams is straight. Jesus likes to butt fuck 12 year old boys.
Gee, ya think jealousy may be involved here??? lol
robcap...@netscape.com
Or this Gil:
Debra Hartman, who posted the following observations about John
McAdams on 10 October 2000:
"In many ways, John McAdams is a product of the times -- a symptom,
not the disease. The disease is the corruption of the American
educational system. It has become more and more difficult in recent
times to tell the truth in America; nowhere is that more true than in
America's schools, colleges and universities. There are many theories
on when this began and why it happened. Whatever the cause, the point
is it has happened, and the progess of a McAdams through the American
educational system (both public and private) to a teaching position at
a university is a cautionary tale of the new dark age we have entered
in America.
McAdams has neither the educational preparation nor the ability for
such a position -- his language skills are abysmal; his analytical
skills non-existent. Not only has he done no research whatsoever on
the historical question he pretends to study, he has no knowledge of
even the basics of a research methodology. Thus, McAdams himself
argues against long established historical facts; on the other hand,
he is incapable of doing the research necessary to either confirm or
dispute such facts.
In the academy, once a work is published in a fact-checked or peer-
reviewed venue in any discipline, long established practice is this:
Those who would challenge such published information must do a
complete and thorough review -- whether the case involves historical
research, scientific study, or a mathematical proof.
On this newsgroup [alt.conspiracy.jfk] and on the website of Marquette
University, McAdams commits daily academic fraud. He pretends that
evidence for a corpus of facts drawn from HSCA records, most of which
has been available in print for at least six years, has never been
provided. Instead, he argues with knowing deceit that there are no
documents to support a major story appearing in the heavily fact-
checked Washington Post (and later, in the seminal book on the JFK
assassination, Oswald Talked). An interesting charge, if true; but of
course it's not. The professor at the distinguished university is an
academic crackpot, and sadly, a fraud on the public -- a base
propagandist in scholar's robes."
YoHarvey
wrote:
Ok, so we have one lesbians opinion :-)
tomnln
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:47d57142-1c01-4fd0...@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
***********************
McAdams sends computer viruses to his adversaries who beat the snot outta
him with evidence/testimony>>>
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
THIS is Yo(Momma)Harvey>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/baileynme.htm
ALL in his own words.
ps;
Yo(Momma)Harvey's wife Replaced him with a Snake.
*************************
tomnln
Ok, so we have one lesbians opinion :-)
NOW, you're on sam brown's shit list.
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------