Joe Kennedy and Welles
Baldoni
his criminal past but also on account of his knowledge albeit second
hand, of J. Edgar. Hoover's perverted mannerisms which once included
being photographed sucking on a straw that was protruding from a
Chinaman's ass.
Welles had no knowledge of any of this but was extremely angry and
bitter on account of the beatings he took on account of Joe Kennedy.
Maybe Welles shooting the President was taking the grudge too far !
--
Count Baldoni
Bud
Baldoni follows the leads the other kooks are afraid to touch.
Kenneth A. Rahn
"Bud" <sirs...@fast.net> wrote in message
news:3bc9e09f-3e12-45db...@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
"Count Baldoni" is a special guy, and we should all give him credit for
being, well, er, uuuh, "unique."
Ken Rahn
Ben Holmes
Embarrassing to have such kooks on your "side", isn't it?
Sam Brown
"Ben Holmes" <ad...@khadaji.com> wrote in message
news:g6j5d...@drn.newsguy.com...
And yet the Junkie, Toothless, Gilly the bigot and Robokook bring you guys
such prestige dont they dickhead? LMAO at the dwarfs lack of insight.
>
aeffects
> "Ben Holmes" <ad...@khadaji.com> wrote in message
>
> news:g6j5d...@drn.newsguy.com...
>
>
>
>
> >>Bud,
>
> >>"Bud" <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote in message
> >>news:3bc9e09f-3e12-45db...@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> >>> On Jul 26, 4:39 pm, Baldoni <baldoni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Joe Kennedy was likely to have been disabled by the FBI on account of
> >>>> his criminal past but also on account of his knowledge albeit second
> >>>> hand, of J. Edgar. Hoover's perverted mannerisms which once included
> >>>> being photographed sucking on a straw that was protruding from a
> >>>> Chinaman's ass.
>
> >>>> Welles had no knowledge of any of this but was extremely angry and
> >>>> bitter on account of the beatings he took on account of Joe Kennedy.
> >>>> Maybe Welles shooting the President was taking the grudge too far !
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Count Baldoni
>
> >>> Baldoni follows the leads the other kooks are afraid to touch.
>
> >>"Count Baldoni" is a special guy, and we should all give him credit for
> >>being, well, er, uuuh, "unique."
>
> >>Ken Rahn
>
> > Embarrassing to have such kooks on your "side", isn't it?
>
> And yet the Junkie, Toothless, Gilly the bigot and Robokook bring you guys
> such prestige dont they dickhead? LMAO at the dwarfs lack of insight.
>
>
oh-my-gawd.... Samantha got a little, the doctor must be in.... like
Flynn -- lay a little cyber-sex on us hon! Remember, both hands on the
keyboard, perv! Talk about lack of insight, what happens when you
boast about your sexual preferences, hon! KUTGW! ROTFLMFAO!
Sam Brown
"aeffects" <aeffe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:19e6472d-ca33-4edb...@k36g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
You really are a grubby little loser aren't you Junkie?
tims...@gmail.com
What a SUPERB effort by the venerable Count this post is!
This scenario is FAR more plausible than Ben Holmes's *Lady In Yellow
Pants In The Nix Film Indicates Zapruder Film Alteration* nonsense.
What a STINKER that particular theory was! :-)
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
muc...@gmail.com
> TOP POST
>
> What a SUPERB effort by the venerable Count this post is!
>
> This scenario is FAR more plausible than Ben Holmes's *Lady In Yellow
> Pants In The Nix Film Indicates Zapruder Film Alteration* nonsense.
>
> What a STINKER that particular theory was! :-)
Hi Tim,
I had almost forgotten about that one. Ben was so sensitive about his
discovery that you could hardly voice any sort of reservation or doubt
without being called "liar" or "coward". However, come to think of it,
perhaps that's just his normal reaction to being asked to support his
argument. Oh, and killfiling people.
Has Ben ever admitted, in public, or to you privately, that he was
wrong in this particular instance?
-Mark
aeffects
> On 28 Jul., 14:22, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > TOP POST
>
> > What a SUPERB effort by the venerable Count this post is!
>
> > This scenario is FAR more plausible than Ben Holmes's *Lady In Yellow
> > Pants In The Nix Film Indicates Zapruder Film Alteration* nonsense.
>
> > What a STINKER that particular theory was! :-)
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> I had almost forgotten about that one. Ben was so sensitive about his
> discovery that you could hardly voice any sort of reservation or doubt
> without being called "liar" or "coward". However, come to think of it,
> perhaps that's just his normal reaction to being asked to support his
> argument. Oh, and killfiling people.
marky-mark how is it hangin son? Great to see you hoisting up old
Timmy dress.... LMFAO!
aaronhi...@yahoo.com
1. Are you alleging that the Kennedys had enought dirt on Hoover to
counteract the dirt that Hoover had on them?
2. Are you alleging that Welles, (I assume Sumner Welles) was in on
the JFK hit?
3. This is the Sumner Welles who had to resign from FDR's Cabinet
because of a scandal related to his homosexuality?
4. Is this the Sumner Welles who died in 1961 and therefore could not
have been part of the JFK assassination?
Aaron Hirshberg
Bud
<snicker> Did Sumner Welles know Buster Crabbe? Get up to speed,
Aaron, search Baldoni`s previous postings, and be treated to a rich
tapestry of murder and intrigue. "Sumner" Welles, indeed.
Bud
> In article <g6i08l0...@news3.newsguy.com>, Kenneth A. Rahn says...
>
>
>
>
>
> >Bud,
>
> >"Bud" <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote in message
"Our side"? I think Baldoni is a proponent of celebrity-driven
conspiracy (When you think about it, who else but Errol Flynn could
convince Mrs Markham to say it was Oz she saw shoot Tippit?). At least
as valid as anything else your side has to offer.
aeffects
> "aeffects" <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Oh Samantha, I want to let our "lesbian" friends worldwide understand
what a complete fraud you are, you give lesbians everywhere a bad
name.... much like your best friend (on this board) Justme1952 that
simple minded, neo-nazi, lesbian impersonator (admitted)....
Sam Brown
Junkie loser.
justm...@gmail.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
Let's see the link LIAR!
BTW....you do look like Frankenstein, only Frankenstein had a better
complextion ROFLMAO
aeffects
wrote:
I've made you a star and this is the way you show benevolence...
you're a real two-timing scum bucket, Joey
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Mark,
Now that you mention it, no, Ben never did admit that he was wrong
about that particular theory of his.
Funny thing was that Ben, a guy who accused so many others posters of
cowardice over the years, simply ran when confronted with the
shortcomings of his own theory, LOL!
His only supporter in the matter was David *aeffects* Healy, who made
up some lie about possessing a *galley proof* copy of the UPI book
Four Days in a futile attempt to prop up Ben's theory.
It was a very shabby effort all round by the pair of them, as I'm sure
you probably recall. :-)
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
aeffects
> TOP POST
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Now that you mention it, no, Ben never did admit that he was wrong
> about that particular theory of his.
>
> Funny thing was that Ben, a guy who accused so many others posters of
> cowardice over the years, simply ran when confronted with the
> shortcomings of his own theory, LOL!
>
> His only supporter in the matter was David *aeffects* Healy, who made
> up some lie about possessing a *galley proof* copy of the UPI book
> Four Days in a futile attempt to prop up Ben's theory.
>
> It was a very shabby effort all round by the pair of them, as I'm sure
> you probably recall. :-)
son, we know... it's as simple as that -- you're outclassed troll....
now, if you have some inclination concerning the evidence we'd give
you a second chance.... as it is, you're on probation around here....
now dig deep, gird those aussie loins of yours and get to work.....
marky-mark can pull his pud in the corner over there that'll keep the
asshole busy....
Ben Holmes
aeffects says...
>
>On Aug 1, 8:59 pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
>> TOP POST
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Now that you mention it, no, Ben never did admit that he was wrong
>> about that particular theory of his.
>>
>> Funny thing was that Ben, a guy who accused so many others posters of
>> cowardice over the years, simply ran when confronted with the
>> shortcomings of his own theory, LOL!
>>
>> His only supporter in the matter was David *aeffects* Healy, who made
>> up some lie about possessing a *galley proof* copy of the UPI book
>> Four Days in a futile attempt to prop up Ben's theory.
>>
>> It was a very shabby effort all round by the pair of them, as I'm sure
>> you probably recall. :-)
>
>son, we know... it's as simple as that -- you're outclassed troll....
>now, if you have some inclination concerning the evidence we'd give
>you a second chance.... as it is, you're on probation around here....
>now dig deep, gird those aussie loins of yours and get to work.....
>marky-mark can pull his pud in the corner over there that'll keep the
>asshole busy....
Tis funny how many trolls their are today - and how wonderful killfilters are!
aeffects
> In article <799a4743-31cd-44e8-9474-a90edf39d...@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
> aeffects says...
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Aug 1, 8:59 pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> TOP POST
>
> >> Hi Mark,
>
> >> Now that you mention it, no, Ben never did admit that he was wrong
> >> about that particular theory of his.
>
> >> Funny thing was that Ben, a guy who accused so many others posters of
> >> cowardice over the years, simply ran when confronted with the
> >> shortcomings of his own theory, LOL!
>
> >> His only supporter in the matter was David *aeffects* Healy, who made
> >> up some lie about possessing a *galley proof* copy of the UPI book
> >> Four Days in a futile attempt to prop up Ben's theory.
>
> >> It was a very shabby effort all round by the pair of them, as I'm sure
> >> you probably recall. :-)
>
> >son, we know... it's as simple as that -- you're outclassed troll....
> >now, if you have some inclination concerning the evidence we'd give
> >you a second chance.... as it is, you're on probation around here....
> >now dig deep, gird those aussie loins of yours and get to work.....
> >marky-mark can pull his pud in the corner over there that'll keep the
> >asshole busy....
>
> Tis funny how many trolls their are today - and how wonderful killfilters are!
Unfortunately [depending on the day] I don't have a killfilter....
What I'm seeing when it comes to Lone Nuts morons and this *latest*
incarnation of veteran .johnnies is simple -- laziness... not to
mention stupidity --
The loons are circling their wagons! Think I should tell them they're
circling in the middle of a swimming pool?
The fact remains the subscription rate for this USENET board is
climbing and NOT going down, has nothing to do with it.... :)
You've added greatly to the side of TRUTH... the large cadre of
lurkers extend their thanks Ben Holmes...
Ben Holmes
Unlike the late 60's or early 70's, there's a ton of evidence and information
available now for those who are really interested in the truth.
Anyone who's really interested will stick around long enough to figure out who's
telling the truth, and who's lying.
Bud
> In article <57fa7f6d-44e9-460a-89e3-6376031f9...@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com>,
> aeffects says...
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Aug 2, 9:11 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@khadaji.com> wrote:
> >>In article <799a4743-31cd-44e8-9474-a90edf39d...@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
> >> aeffects says...
>
> >> >On Aug 1, 8:59 pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> TOP POST
>
> >> >> Hi Mark,
>
> >> >> Now that you mention it, no, Ben never did admit that he was wrong
> >> >> about that particular theory of his.
>
> >> >> Funny thing was that Ben, a guy who accused so many others posters of
> >> >> cowardice over the years, simply ran when confronted with the
> >> >> shortcomings of his own theory, LOL!
>
> >> >> His only supporter in the matter was David *aeffects* Healy, who made
> >> >> up some lie about possessing a *galley proof* copy of the UPI book
> >> >> Four Days in a futile attempt to prop up Ben's theory.
>
> >> >> It was a very shabby effort all round by the pair of them, as I'm sure
> >> >> you probably recall. :-)
>
> >> >son, we know... it's as simple as that -- you're outclassed troll....
> >> >now, if you have some inclination concerning the evidence we'd give
> >> >you a second chance.... as it is, you're on probation around here....
> >> >now dig deep, gird those aussie loins of yours and get to work.....
> >> >marky-mark can pull his pud in the corner over there that'll keep the
> >> >asshole busy....
>
> >>Tis funny how many trolls their are today -
It would be funnier to read your posts if you didn`t have the
benefit of a spellchecker.
>and how wonderful killfilters are!
i`m sure Depends are great also, but I find it easier to just not
shit myself.
> >Unfortunately [depending on the day] I don't have a killfilter....
> >What I'm seeing when it comes to Lone Nuts morons and this *latest*
> >incarnation of veteran .johnnies is simple -- laziness... not to
> >mention stupidity --
You probably didn`t notice that Ben used "their" instead of
"there".
> >The loons are circling their wagons! Think I should tell them they're
> >circling in the middle of a swimming pool?
Sharks always circle their prey.
> >The fact remains the subscription rate for this USENET board is
> >climbing and NOT going down, has nothing to do with it.... :)
Could be that people don`t bother to unsubscribe, even when they
don`t visit.
> >You've added greatly to the side of TRUTH... the large cadre of
> >lurkers extend their thanks Ben Holmes...
The lurkers appointed a junkie to be their spokesperson?
> Unlike the late 60's or early 70's, there's a ton of evidence and information
> available now for those who are really interested in the truth.
Bugliosi`s book, for instance.
> Anyone who's really interested will stick around long enough to figure out who's
> telling the truth, and who's lying.
You better hope thats not true.
aeffects
says who, YOU? Stinky boyo!
tims...@gmail.com
Tis funny how many days have ticked past without any substantive
effort by Ben Holmes to prop up his *Lady In Yellow Pants In Nix Film
Equals Zapruder Film Alteration* nonsense.
Looks like his whole Z369 spiel is kaput, LOL!
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Aug 3, 2:11 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@khadaji.com> wrote:
> In article <799a4743-31cd-44e8-9474-a90edf39d...@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects
> effort by Ben Holmes to prop up his *Lady In Yellow Pants In Nix Film
> Equals Zapruder Film Alteration* nonsense.
what's hysterical is you support Zapruder film alteration....
ROTFLMFAO!
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52e50f48-1fb9-4c4a...@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Tis funny how many days have ticked past without any substantive
effort by Ben Holmes to prop up his *Lady In Yellow Pants In Nix Film
Equals Zapruder Film Alteration* nonsense.
Looks like his whole Z369 spiel is kaput, LOL!
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe he's trying to reconsile the Fake oswald in Mexico City that you
believe was....
5 ft. 3 inches tall
Blond Haired
119 pounds.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tims...@gmail.com
Hi Toots,
Say, I thought you were a published author on the matter of Z film
alteration?
You now no longer contend that the Zapruder film has been altered, ol'
Toots-E-Roll David *aeffects* Healy fella?
I thought you were the author of a whole chapter on the matter in a
book edited by Jim Fetzer, noted 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist.
What's up with that then, ol' Toots-E-Roll fella?
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
justm...@gmail.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
How can Healy defend the Z film being altered when he doesn't even
believe that Zapruder filmed the assassination in the first place?
ROFLMAO
aeffects
>
> Say, I thought you were a published author on the matter of Z film
> alteration?
>
> You now no longer contend that the Zapruder film has been altered, ol'
> Toots-E-Roll David *aeffects* Healy fella?
>
> I thought you were the author of a whole chapter on the matter in a
> book edited by Jim Fetzer, noted 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist.
oh Tim *Sydney's [whichyour not from] infamous toots-e-roll*
Brennan... c'mon hon... you can tell us the truth. NOW you supoport Z-
film alteration (what's with your, led by Justme1952 cheerleading
section, btw?) concerned, serious JFK assassination researchers such
as yourself begging for support from the like of lesbian
impersonators.... That's why no one takes you seriously Timmy from
down-undah ... you're all over the map, hon!
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
You seem unwilling to accept the fact that Mrs Duran gave her
description to the HSCA, along with other descriptors about Oswald,
and they concluded that she HAD met the REAL Oswald.
The HSCA invesigators, Lopez and Cornwell, wrote that in their report.
The HSCA final report published the same conclusion.
You seem very unwilling to accept reality, tomnln.
There can be no doubt Oswald was in Mexico City, as he himself
claimed.
The HSCA investigators conceded that the WC had established that
Oswald went to Mexico, tomnln. They said that the research done on
that point in the sixties was so good that it was an established fact
that Oswald went to Mexico at the time in question, tomnln.
Are you going to dispute that, tomnln?
It wouldn't be a very wise idea, in my view.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Sep 18, 8:42 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:52e50f48-1fb9-4c4a...@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> Tis funny how many days have ticked past without any substantive
> effort by Ben Holmes to prop up his *Lady In Yellow Pants In Nix Film
> Equals Zapruder Film Alteration* nonsense.
>
> Looks like his wholeZ369spiel is kaput, LOL!
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2052b705-2ec1-42d6...@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
You seem unwilling to accept the fact that Mrs Duran gave her
description to the HSCA, along with other descriptors about Oswald,
and they concluded that she HAD met the REAL Oswald.
The HSCA invesigators, Lopez and Cornwell, wrote that in their report.
The HSCA final report published the same conclusion.
You seem very unwilling to accept reality, tomnln.
There can be no doubt Oswald was in Mexico City, as he himself
claimed.
The HSCA investigators conceded that the WC had established that
Oswald went to Mexico, tomnln. They said that the research done on
that point in the sixties was so good that it was an established fact
that Oswald went to Mexico at the time in question, tomnln.
Are you going to dispute that, tomnln?
It wouldn't be a very wise idea, in my view.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Oswald Impersonator in Mexico City spoke "Broken Russian" Timmy.
You probably didn't know that Either.
You probably believe that the photo the CIA sent to the Warren Commission is
the real Oswald also.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tims...@gmail.com
concerning his absurd 5' 3" Mexico City midget Oswald nonsense.BTW,
tomnln, I couldn't help but notice that also on your Mexico City page
you have photos of *Lee Oswald* and *Harvey Oswald*.Do you, tomnln,
seriously believe that there were TWO Oswalds, as proposed by that
fellow Armstrong, or whatever his name is?It would be hardly
surprising if you did, tomnln. LOL! That would be par for the course,
tomnln.Regards,Tim BrennanSydney, Australia*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Sep 21, 2:38 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:>
<timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message> > news:2052b705-2ec1-42d6-b8e6-
e2375c...@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com...> TOP POST> > Hi tomnln,>
> You seem unwilling to accept the fact that Mrs Duran gave her>
description to the HSCA, along with other descriptors about Oswald,>
and they concluded that she HAD met the REAL Oswald.> > The HSCA
invesigators, Lopez and Cornwell, wrote that in their report.> > The
HSCA final report published the same conclusion.> > You seem very
unwilling to accept reality, tomnln.> > There can be no doubt Oswald
was in Mexico City, as he himself> claimed.> > The HSCA investigators
conceded that the WC had established that> Oswald went to Mexico,
tomnln. They said that the research done on> that point in the sixties
was so good that it was an established fact> that Oswald went to
Mexico at the time in question, tomnln.> > Are you going to dispute
that, tomnln?> > It wouldn't be a very wise idea, in my view.> >
Regards,> > Tim Brennan> Sydney, Australia> *Newsgroup(s)
Commentator*>
> The Oswald Impersonator in Mexico City spoke "Broken Russian"
Timmy.> > You probably didn't know that Either.> > You probably
believe that the photo the CIA sent to the Warren Commission is> the
real Oswald also.>
> > On Sep 18, 8:42 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:> > > > >
<timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message> > >news:
52e50f48-1fb9-4c4a...@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com...>
> TOP POST> > > Tis funny how many days have ticked past without any
substantive> > effort by Ben Holmes to prop up his *Lady In Yellow
Pants In Nix Film> > Equals Zapruder Film Alteration* nonsense.> > >
Looks like his wholeZ369spiel is kaput, LOL!> > > Regards,> > > Tim
Brennan> > Sydney, Australia> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*> >
> > Maybe he's trying to reconsile the Fake oswald in Mexico City that
you> > believe was....> > > 5 ft. 3 inches tall> > Blond Haired> > 119
pounds.> > > HAHAHAHAHAHA> >
Show quoted text -
tims...@gmail.com
Hey, Looks like tomnln has been avoiding this response for over a
month now.
I'll just *tidy it up* Ben *Yellow Pants* Holmes style and repost it:
LOL! Looks like tomnln has finally thrown in the towel
concerning his absurd 5' 3" Mexico City midget Oswald nonsense.
BTW, tomnln, I couldn't help but notice that also on your Mexico City
page
you have photos of *Lee Oswald* and *Harvey Oswald*.
Do you, tomnln, seriously believe that there were TWO Oswalds, as
proposed by that
fellow Armstrong, or whatever his name is? It would be hardly
surprising if you did, tomnln.
LOL! That would be par for the course, tomnln.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Sep 21, 10:16 pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
> TOP POSTLOL! Looks like tomnln has finally thrown in the towel
> concerning his absurd 5' 3" Mexico City midget Oswald nonsense.BTW,
> tomnln, I couldn't help but notice that also on your Mexico City page
> you have photos of *Lee Oswald* and *Harvey Oswald*.Do you, tomnln,
> seriously believe that there were TWO Oswalds, as proposed by that
> fellow Armstrong, or whatever his name is?It would be hardly
> surprising if you did, tomnln. LOL! That would be par for the course,
> tomnln.Regards,Tim BrennanSydney, Australia*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> On Sep 21, 2:38 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:><timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message> > news:2052b705-2ec1-42d6-b8e6-
>
> e2375cd50...@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com...> TOP POST> > Hi tomnln,>> You seem unwilling to accept the fact that Mrs Duran gave her>
>
> description to the HSCA, along with other descriptors about Oswald,>
> and they concluded that she HAD met the REAL Oswald.> > The HSCA
> invesigators, Lopez and Cornwell, wrote that in their report.> > The
> HSCA final report published the same conclusion.> > You seem very
> unwilling to accept reality, tomnln.> > There can be no doubt Oswald
> was in Mexico City, as he himself> claimed.> > The HSCA investigators
> conceded that the WC had established that> Oswald went to Mexico,
> tomnln. They said that the research done on> that point in the sixties
> was so good that it was an established fact> that Oswald went to
> Mexico at the time in question, tomnln.> > Are you going to dispute
> that, tomnln?> > It wouldn't be a very wise idea, in my view.> >
> Regards,> > Tim Brennan> Sydney, Australia> *Newsgroup(s)
> Commentator*>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> The Oswald Impersonator in Mexico City spoke "Broken Russian"
>
> Timmy.> > You probably didn't know that Either.> > You probably
> believe that the photo the CIA sent to the Warren Commission is> the
> real Oswald also.>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > On Sep 18, 8:42 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:> > > > >
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message> > >news:
>
> 52e50f48-1fb9-4c4a-9d60-26f0be6e6...@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com...>> TOP POST> > > Tis funny how many days have ticked past without any
> 29, 12:32 am, much...@gmail.com wrote:> > > > >> > On 28 Jul., 14:22,timst...@gmail.com wrote:> > > > >> > > TOP POST> > > > >> > > What a
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ea0183d6-8f0a-4758...@r37g2000prr.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hey, Looks like tomnln has been avoiding this response for over a
month now.
I'll just *tidy it up* Ben *Yellow Pants* Holmes style and repost it:
LOL! Looks like tomnln has finally thrown in the towel
concerning his absurd 5' 3" Mexico City midget Oswald nonsense.
BTW, tomnln, I couldn't help but notice that also on your Mexico City
page
you have photos of *Lee Oswald* and *Harvey Oswald*.
Do you, tomnln, seriously believe that there were TWO Oswalds, as
proposed by that
fellow Armstrong, or whatever his name is? It would be hardly
surprising if you did, tomnln.
LOL! That would be par for the course, tomnln.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is YOU who believes in TWO Oswalds Timmy.
The one in Dallas
The one in /Mexico City.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------