Provable Lies of the Warren Commission
Ben Holmes
But just for the fun of it, during this series, I opened my killfile, and
cleaned it out completely - so I was reading *everyone's* posts... to include
all trolls.
And I saw no trolls OR LNT'ers attempting to refute or explain the lies of the
Warren Commission.
Unrefuted, LNT'ers have no choice but to admit that the Warren Commission lied.
And they can't explain *why*. Nor can they produce any "lies" that would have
helped Oswald rather than as those examples given, indict him. This illustrates
that these lies were quite intentional. The commission undoubtably could not
have believed the scrutiny that their work has undergone over the years... they
never suspected that anyone would doubt them, or uncover their lies.
I've turned on my killfile again - so that I don't need to wade through so much
garbage to get the nuggets of actual information about the conspiracy.
muc...@gmail.com
And I thought you had me killfiled...
Refreshingly candid of you to admit that your defaulting was due to a
lack of ability to support specific claims.
-Mark
Walt
> Sadly, the end of another set of unanswerable questions has come.
>
> But just for the fun of it, during this series, I opened my killfile, and
> cleaned it out completely - so I was reading *everyone's* posts... to include
> all trolls.
>
> And I saw no trolls OR LNT'ers attempting to refute or explain the lies of the
> Warren Commission.
>
> Unrefuted, LNT'ers have no choice but to admit that the Warren Commission lied.
>
> And they can't explain *why*. Nor can they produce any "lies" that would have
> helped Oswald rather than as those examples given, indict him. This illustrates
> that these lies were quite intentional. The commission undoubtably could not
> have believed the scrutiny that their work has undergone over the years
Yer right Ben.... The Warren Commission never anticipated that their
tome of lies would be tested and examined in the way it has. They
knew that much of the vital evidence had not been presented, and they
thought it had been hidden from inquiring eyes. Fortunately for us
they failed to realize that there are some American's with the
tenacity of a bulldog and simply will not let go. Those Americans
would not believe the B.S. being offered as the truth, and insisted on
pulling the curtain aside to see what was being hidden. Thanks to
their efforts, we now know much of what the Warren Commission knew in
1964. ......And the primary fact that we have learned is:.... The
Warren Commission was primarily a cover-up committee, appointed by
Lyin Bastard Johnson, for ulterior reasons.
bigdog
Who are you?
Ben Holmes
Walt says...
Yep. Absolutely true.
>> ... they never suspected that anyone would doubt them, or uncover their
>> lies.
>>
>> I've turned on my killfile again - so that I don't need to wade through
>> so much garbage to get the nuggets of actual information about the
>> conspiracy.
I feel sorry for those who don't have killfile ability. I was just amazed at
how much garbage posts get posted in this forum every day.
That is, undoubtably, what the trolls wish to do - dissuade anyone from reading
in this forum. And in the censored group - which is free from the garbage -
LNT'ers are allowed to get away with lying about the evidence... thus presenting
a false picture.
But that's okay - obviously according to the polls, my faith in the basic
intelligence of the average American is not misplaced.
aeffects
wrote:
> In article <26faffd5-3240-412b-8239-58b8b9795...@18g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
that door closed again....
cdddraftsman
>>
> > I feel sorry for those who don't have killfile ability. I was just amazed at
> > how much garbage posts get posted in this forum every day.
>
> that door closed again....
>
Better yet barracade the doors you wouldn't want thought or reason
to enter into that dark room of co-conspirators in this case now would
you ? .
cdddraftsman
>
> - Show quoted text -
Maybe Ben Ulms hasn't heard the basic American has shit for brains
like
himself .
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -
Holmes brings new meaning to the word "mediocre" as a human being.
Must be contagious amongst Ct's ON THIS LN NEWSGROUP.
curtjester1
> In article <26faffd5-3240-412b-8239-58b8b9795...@18g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
I think though if trolls had this killifile ability and they just were
relegated to post amongs themselves, that they would all have each
other killifiled eventually. No?
CJ
> That is, undoubtably, what the trolls wish to do - dissuade anyone from reading
> in this forum. And in the censored group - which is free from the garbage -
> LNT'ers are allowed to get away with lying about the evidence... thus presenting
> a false picture.
>
> But that's okay - obviously according to the polls, my faith in the basic
David Von Pein
I "answered" Ben's stupid "WC Lie #10":
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/98502c7c8be714b8
Naturally, he totally ignored my logical retort to his idiocy. And yet
he still is hungry for LN answerers, even though we're all invisible
to him.
Go try to figure out Mega-Kooks.
~shrug time~
>>> "I opened my killfile, and cleaned it out completely - so I was reading *everyone's* posts... to include all trolls. And I saw no trolls OR LNT'ers attempting to refute or explain the lies of the Warren Commission." <<<
You didn't look very hard then, did you, Mr. Kook?.....
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/037a05276c52079b
>>> "I've turned on my killfile again - so that I don't need to wade through so much garbage to get the nuggets of actual information about the conspiracy." <<<
Yeah, why waste your time with CS&L when you've got the amazingly-
astute theories of people like Walt and Don W. and Brian David
Andersen that you can wade through daily....right Ben?
Instead of dealing with some issues that have a semblance of common
sense and ACTUAL EVIDENCE supporting them, Ben would rather have to
swim through a sea of theories labelled -- "JFK Was Wearing A
Pyrotechnics Device And Wasn't Shot In The Head At All" and "Danny
Arce Shot JFK" and "JFK Was Shot From The Front At Z161".
Go figure Mega-Kooks. Just try to figure them out. ~shrug~
Ben Holmes
curtjester1 says...
I use a paid newsforum service called "Newsguy." Their interface allows me to
select, based on author or subject, those posts that I don't even want to see.
There are also free newsreader software programs that offer the same sort of
capability... although I couldn't recommend any ... (simply because I don't use
any - a simple Google search should find you some) Email me if you need help
finding something that will work for you.
As I said, I turned off all my killfilters for an entire week - and was simply
swamped with the huge numbers of troll posts. I truly feel sorry for anyone who
has to wade through all that just to see the latest *real* posts.
>I think though if trolls had this killifile ability and they just were
>relegated to post amongs themselves, that they would all have each
>other killifiled eventually. No?
Why would they killfile each other? They need *someone* to post to.
tomnln
"cdddraftsman" <cdddra...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ac275e63-d130-4d03...@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Maybe Ben Ulms hasn't heard the basic American has shit for brains
> like
> himself .
Spoken like a True Homosexual Nazi.
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e8e0d533-3cb2-4559...@y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Holmes brings new meaning to the word "mediocre" as a human being.
> Must be contagious amongst Ct's ON THIS LN NEWSGROUP.
The CURE for your AIDS Problem can be found in the evidence/testimony.
Wanna address these NOW?>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
WHO is Yo(Momma)Harvey?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/baileynme.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sam Brown
"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:J6F9j.7959$E01....@newsfe22.lga...
Congratulations, you have just plumbed another depth of stupidity.
YoHarvey
> "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
>
> news:J6F9j.7959$E01....@newsfe22.lga...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> Maybe Ben Ulms hasn't heard the basic American has shit for brains
> >> like
> >> himself .
>
> > Spoken like a True Homosexual Nazi.
>
> Congratulations, you have just plumbed another depth of stupidity.
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Holmes would rather read "Conally shot JFK"......"The entire Dallas
Police Department" was IN ON IT.....yep, this is the depth of Holmes
intellectualism. I figured out why Holmes will NOT defend his 45
questions in live debate. He knows he appears smarter at a computer
than he would LIVE. Ben? I'm curious. Have you always been a
disappointment IN REAL LIFE?
tomnln
"Sam Brown" <samjb...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:47671f50$0$25819$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au...
You just Dodged your own evidence/testimony AGAIN.
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
cdddraftsman
>(Snipped)
He's got shit for brains that's for sure !
tl
cdddraftsman
> (Snipped)
Yo faggot breath ! I see those zipper burns are causing you to get
scanky
wanky hanky and panky again :
Try this on evidence and testimony : It's aimed at your lost soul that
the devil
himself keeps in his pocket ! :
http://rossleysignorance.wetpaint.com/
Exposing the ignorant ! :
See your still running scared from the last ones , start running
scared
from this now ! :
Contradictions , innuendo and hearsay evidence retained in this
historical record for posterity's sake and a contemporaneous account
of that day are what some recognize as a weakness in the WCR and
others find as it's greatest strength . Greatest strength you ask
incredulously ? Yes and justifiably so , for it shows us that what
CTer's consider evidence of conspiracy is the same reason the WCR was
not allowed to be introduced into evidence at the Clay Shaw trial and
justifiably so again , because of it's hearsay evidence quality . The
FBI interviewed over 20,000* people for the WCR and perhaps those
with
doubts about it's findings could tell us how *they* would of gone
about sorting through testimony that not only contradicted other
testimony that supports conspiracy but many times contradicted
itself ?
This colossal failure in knowing the context , premise and ulitmate
goal for the existence of this fact finding body has been
disingenuously twisted by the Critical Community into another Urban
Legend to go besides their much cherished UFO , Bigfoot , Lockness
Monster Hoax's *they* have perpetrated against the American people by
a humongous conspiracy amongst themselves .
What price do you pay for misperceptions now imbeded in the public's
mind about this important historical event may be years away and as
yet undeterminable .
I know this may be a bigger task than what was asked for above from
the FBI but IMO at this late date CTer's would be making better use
of
their time getting together , weeding out , discarding unused and
untenable conspiracy hypothesis and coming up with a half dozen
cogent
counter explanations for the events of that day instead of having to
be conspiracy apologist for the 63 current assassins and helpers that
*they* have left scattered upon the assassin crowded landscape of
Dealey Plaza .
tl
* Close to 26,000 including SS , DPD , Postal Service Inspectors etc.
cdddraftsman
cdddraftsman
tomnln
"Sam Brown" <samjb...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:47671f50$0$25819$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> Congratulations, you have just plumbed another depth of stupidity.
TRANSLATION;
You STILL RUN from yopur own ervidence/testimony.
tomnln
BOTTOM LINE;
You continue to RUN from your own evidence/testimony>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
Sam Brown
tomnln
> <snicker>
Thanks for Proving my point!