ZR/Cliff and Another McAdams lie
Lisa Pease
thread:
On 24 May 1999 22:28:59 PDT, mshack <msh...@concentric.net> wrote:
>A few bits from William Davy's just-released book, Let Justice Be Done:
>New Light on the Jim Garrison Investigation, regarding QKENCHANT:
>
>
>And regarding ZRCLIFF:
>
>p. 88: Soldier of Fortune Leslie Norman Bradley considered for
>employment as a pilot with ZRCLIFF
>
>p. 297: The CIA has also refused to say what ZRCLIFF was
>
>p. 311: Operations in William Harvey's Staff D (location of ZR projects)
>routinely involved "forged and backdated" 201 files.
>
But what evidence ties Shaw to ZR/CLIFF?
You've been citing this phanton document, but you won't post it, and nobody
else will either.
If the supposed document really showed what it's supposed to show, don't you
imagine that some of the Garrisonites here would have posted it by now?
*Lisa* has access to PROBE, for heaven's sake, and
Garrisonites here are in touch with Bill Davy.
Doesn't it make you suspicious that the evidence isn't forthcoming?
I remember going through a charade just like this with the Mercy Hospital
"truth serum" session of Perry Russo. The Garrisonites had the document,
but they *concealed* it. They gave it to a few trusted people, and made
them promise not to let it go further.
Not surprisingly, when I got my hands on it and posted it, it blew Russo's
credibility entirely out of the water.
A little skepticism would be in order Martin. You won't believe the
government just on their say-so. Why believe the PROBE crowd?
.John
====
.John's FIRST lie is that Russo's hypnosis session wasn't made available.
The relevant portions were posted on my web site since the time of my first
post about it. Anyone could read it and see how clearly Russo ID'd Shaw
without being led by the hypnotist. It's still on my site, and I encourage
anyone unfamiliar with this portion of the story to check it out
(www.RealHistoryArchives.com).
.John's SECOND lie is the implication that 1) I even read his posts (caught
this one on a fluke visit - I hardly come here but once every two months),
and 2) that because something hasn't been posted in this garbage forum that
it doesn't exist. What baloney - and further evidence of why most serious
researchers have long ago stopped visiting this place.
Bill Davy cites the exact document number for the ZRCLIFF document, which
states that Shaw was considered for use in the program. But if .John was a
REAL researcher, he would have long ago found this out.
He's not. He's just a disinformationist, eager to persuade any idiot who
would actually believe him that Shaw was an innocent, uninvolved party. I'm
only halfway through Davy's incredible new book (see www.webcom.com/ctka and
click the link to Davy's page) and the evidence of Shaw's heavy involvement
with the assassination plotters is quite impressive. Kudos, Bill - not that
he wastes his time here either! :) I'll tell him in private.
Anyway - McAdams stands corrected, YET AGAIN. Yawn.