Francis X. O'Neill dies......
YoHarvey
I found this comment to Gerald Posner interesting:
In an interview with Posner, he lamented a minor mistake in his FBI
report, in which he wrongly used the word "surgery" and fueled
speculation that somehow Kennedy's body had been altered between
Dallas and Maryland. "We weren't doctors," he told Posner.
It was this "mistake" by O'Neill that prompted David Lifton's absurd
book "Best Evidence".
aeffects
> http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/obituaries/articles/2009/02/06/fran...
>
> I found this comment to Gerald Posner interesting:
>
> In an interview with Posner, he lamented a minor mistake in his FBI
> report, in which he wrongly used the word "surgery" and fueled
> speculation that somehow Kennedy's body had been altered between
> Dallas and Maryland. "We weren't doctors," he told Posner.
>
> It was this "mistake" by O'Neill that prompted David Lifton's absurd
> book "Best Evidence".
no banana ya old shuck & jive areeeeest..... ALL Lone Nutters are
completely overwhelmed by a NYTimes best seller. Your problem troll is
simple, you Nutters haven't got a writer that can write worth a
shit... back to the drawing troll!
aeffects
further.....
O'Neill: " a massive wound in the right-rear..." [of the head]
lazu...@webtv.net
write a book a couple years back, maybe there still is a manuscript?
though a lone nutter, he said 3 maor things that are irreconcilable with
the Bugliosi offcial mythology:
1: Didn't believe the Magic bullet theory at all ,and was at the autopsy
for several hours just a few feet way from the late great JFK, so his
observations do mean a lot.
2.Back of the head had a severe wound, was in no way intact like the BOH
autopsy photos.
3. He told the ARRB of signifigant brain loss,( this is one of th most
important points in the whole medical/forensic area which is never
adressed-Cerebellum was shredded and the rear of the brain was severely
damaged in complete contrast to the brain tracings of Ida Dox) too much
for the extant brain tracings by Ida Dox from unavailable photographs.
lazu...@webtv.net
in the lone nut spin...no mention was made of O'Neill's irreconcilable
beliefs with the official nonsense>...
YoHarvey
Laz old man. Apparently reading comprehension is another of your
faults:
For decades, Mr. O'Neill battled conspiracy theorists about the JFK
assassination. He later became a Connecticut state legislator and
recently finished his autobiography, entitled "A Fox Among Wolves."
"The evidence is overwhelming and undeniable that Oswald alone shot
and killed President Kennedy," Mr. O'Neill wrote, according to galleys
of his book, which is scheduled for publication this year.
YoHarvey
In 1997, Jeremy Gunn, the ARRB general counsel, showed O'Neill autopsy
photograph number 42, depicting the back of the president's head and
asked whether the potograph resembled what O'Neill saw at the time of
the autopsy thirty-four years earlier. O"Neill answered, "This
photograph looks like it's been doctored in some way. Let me rephrase
that. When I say "doctored, " I mean the breain matter has been
pushed back in, and it looks like the photograph was taken towards the
end of the autopsyt rather than the beginning. All you have to do was
put the flap of scalp back over here and the rest of the stuff is
covered up".
Of course, most conspiracy theorists only quote "this photograph looks
like it's been doctored in some way" as opposed to O'Neills entire
statement. It's not unlike what conspiracy theorists do with Oswald's
infamous "I'm just a patsy statement". They neglect to include all of
Oswald's comment which is "They only arrested me because I lived in
the Soviet Union. I'm just a patsy".
Par for the course.
YoHarvey
O'Neill: " a massive wound in the right-rear..." [of the head]
An absolute and total fabrication. Typical of the poster whoever it
is.
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -
Read Mr. O'Neill's own comments:
lazu...@webtv.net
theory never happened? That's about your speed..,how about Sibert is he
just comletely wrong too? Or is your armchair opinion better? Don't
bother responding, cause yer BS isn't worth reading.
lazu...@webtv.net
You see why we hate lone nutters so much...they lie all the time like
the Bush Crime family and LBJ, until they have no idea what the truth
is...
lazu...@webtv.net
interviewed therein is O'Neill and Sibert in depth.
YoHarvey
> An excellent, excellent book is In The Eye Of History by William Law,
> interviewed therein is O'Neill and Sibert in depth.
I am not disputing O'Neill's disagreement with the SBT. O'Neill's
position is very clear. Oswald, to the exclusion of anybody else
fired 3 shots. Shot #1 hit JFK in the back. Shot #2 hit Connally and
shot #3 was ZAP 313. He believes a bone fragment from JFK's skull
exited through JFK's neck. The question is: Is O"Neill's theory
probable? I don't believe it is. However, it doesn't change O'Neills
ultimate conclusion.
tomnln
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:65f67cdd-8317-4b39...@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
I have O'Neill on Video stating "Don't believe the Single Bullet Theory".
tomnln
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:65f67cdd-8317-4b39...@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
I have O'Neill on video saying..."Don't Believe the Single Bullet theory".
tomnln
http://whokilledjfk.net/you_asked_for_it.htm
I also have O'Neill on video saying "Don't believe the SBT"
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:33ab19eb-1b43-46fe...@40g2000prx.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
http://whokilledjfk.net/you_asked_for_it.htm
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e94d883-8a0b-4226...@y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
YoHarvey
> O'Neill's drawing of JFK's head wounds>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/you_asked_for_it.htm
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
I have O'Neill on video saying..."Don't Believe the Single Bullet
theory".
Typical Rosslenuts. Day late and a dollar short.
tomnln
THAT was Always the view.
3 shots....3 hits.
Until April 22, 1964.
When they were Forced to recognize that James Tague was wounded.
That meant a 4th shot
That meant a second shooter
That meant Conspiracy.
THAT's when they "Invented" the SBT.
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/april_22.htm
Without the SBT, you Prove Conspiracy.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -
roflmao.....you couldn't prove a chicken lays eggs roflmao.
tomnln
roflmao.....you couldn't prove a chicken lays eggs roflmao.
I Love your "Verbal Suicide".
Gil Jesus
>
> O'Neill: " a massive wound in the right-rear..." [of the head]
>
> An absolute and total fabrication. �Typical of the poster whoever it
> is.-
REALLY ? HERE HE IS ON VIDEO SAYING THAT EXACT SAME THING
Walt
Huh???..... If a single bullet didn't pass through JFK's neck and
then cause all of Connally's wounds then the SBT is untenable., and
Oswald was not the single lone gunman. That's the official position
of the Warren Commission. Their entire THEORY rests on the "Magic
Bullet". If O'Neill didn't accept the SBT then how in the world could
he believe that Oswald was a lone nut murderer???? Was he
irrational??
aeffects
dumb- dah dumb-dum -- His position is very clear? O'Neill is not in
the position to exclude anyone, ya moron... Did O'Neill see LHO in
that 6th floor window? If that's the case you may be onto
something.... Perhaps you have a cite for that?
Gil Jesus
> On Feb 6, 4:14 pm, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > O'Neill: " a massive wound in the right-rear..." [of the head]
>
> > An absolute and total fabrication. Typical of the poster whoever it
> > is.-
>
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmfqDOnZu_Q
bump