Gil's Refusal and Quote Rossley : Can you say RICOLA !

[marklanerus...@gmail.com]

Rossley :

I still want to know how JFK got that lead cough
drop stuck in is throat !

Gil Jesus :

" The same way the bullet backed its way out
of Connally's leg ...... moron . "

Mark Lane :

How did it get in his throat MORON ? THAT'S THE QUESTION !
How Does A Bullet Not Go Completely Through JFK's Throat
But Miraculously Stop In It Just To Satisfy Your Shabby , Ill
Thought Out and Stupid Construct ? ......................ml

PS : I just love hanging Gil by the balls on this one ! When
they turn blue we'll call in Rossley to take over ! Heheheh !

[tomnln]

HSCA CONTROLLED BY CIA below

http://youtube.com/watch?v=5AQdphWO2SQ

THEN, explain these?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tom_lowery.htm

<marklanerus...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175723955.9...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

[Gil Jesus]

Dear mental case:

Not all bullets go through all bodies, i.e. the bullets that entered
Tippit were recovered from the body because they did not go through.
Only military-style jacketed bullets are designed to go through
bodies. They were designed that way for humane purposes after WW I.
The caliber of ammunition and the powder load also has to do with how
deep a bullet penetrates. If the bullet that entered the neck from the
front was a reload and didn't have enough of a powder load, it is
entirely possible that it would not have penetrated too deeply, like
the back wound, which Humes could feel the end of.
Moron.

Are you really that stupid to not know that all bullets don't go
through bodies ?

Sounds like your mind is going.... and YOU'VE been penetrated once too
often.

PS: I know "t...@mail.com" is you, not Rossley.

[David Von Pein]

>>> "Not all bullets go through all bodies. ... Only military-style jacketed bullets are designed to go through bodies. ... If the bullet that entered the neck from the front was a reload and didn't have enough of a powder load, it is entirely possible that it would not have penetrated too deeply..." <<<

And these crackerjack, ace "Patsy Framers" decided they'd complicate
their one-patsy plot even FURTHER by deliberately shooting John
Kennedy with NOT ONLY ammunition that could never in a million years
be tied in any possible way to the patsy's gun (not even the same
basic type of military, FMJ bullets!)....

....But these boobs go one step further into the absurd bin by
shooting JFK with weak-sister, low-powered "reloads" (lol) that the
shooters HAVE GOT TO KNOW PROBABLY WILL *STAY INSIDE THE VICTIM*!!

Therefore, these idiots also have GOT TO KNOW that these bullets will
probably be found, collected, and marked as NON-OSWALD-TYPE evidence
in the case...thereby PROVING the very conspiracy they desire to
distance themselves from (even though these morons decided to shoot up
DP from every angle, despite the fact their one patsy was in the TSBD
only).

To borrow the hilarious and spot-on brilliant remark uttered by my LN
cohort, Bud, on April 1, 2006.....

"The assassins choose bullets that inflict non-lethal, 1-inch-deep
wounds? Instead of feeding JFK to lions, they decided to nibble him to
death by ducks?" -- Bud; 04/01/06

<LOL! LOL!>

I love that line, Bud! Love it! Can't get enough of it in fact. Thank
you.

Here's the original "duck-nibbling" conversation:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/76374edab1e80fff

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/2e4f866100d0d292

[Anthony Marsh]

Gil Jesus wrote:
> Dear mental case:
>
> Not all bullets go through all bodies, i.e. the bullets that entered
> Tippit were recovered from the body because they did not go through.
> Only military-style jacketed bullets are designed to go through
> bodies. They were designed that way for humane purposes after WW I.
> The caliber of ammunition and the powder load also has to do with how
> deep a bullet penetrates. If the bullet that entered the neck from the
> front was a reload and didn't have enough of a powder load, it is
> entirely possible that it would not have penetrated too deeply, like
> the back wound, which Humes could feel the end of.
> Moron.
>

Not quite. Close.
Military bullets as FMJ were designed to leave humane wounds or kill
cleanly in reaction to the British use of Dum Dum bullets. The issue of
going through a body or staying in the body never comes up.
No underloads were used in the Kennedy assassination. If it were a
different caliber such as a .22 then yes a bullet could penetrate only a
few inches and not exit. That was not the case in Dallas.
Producing underloads for the MC is not practical and may result in the
rifle blowing up.
Humes could only fit the tip of his finger into the back wound because
it was so small.

> Are you really that stupid to not know that all bullets don't go
> through bodies ?
>

The bullet which hit Oswald did not exit.

[Gil Jesus]

Reloads WERE used in the assassination, the proof being that after the
assassination, the FBI investigated two Dallas area gunshops that sold
reloads for the MC rifle. If reloads weren't used in the
assassination, there would have been no reason to look for gunshops
that sold them. One was owned by John Thomas Mason, the other by a man
named Johnny Bringuier. The FBI never asked the gunshop owners to WHOM
they sold the reloads, they just asked them if they ever sold reloads
to Oswald. When they denied selling them to Oswald, the FBI just
dropped it.

Apparently, if they didn't sell them to Oswald, they didn't sell them
to anybody, as far as the FBI was concerned.

[Gil Jesus]

Mr. Marsh, I understand what you're saying about the MC ammo. But what
I'm saying is that the bullet that entered the front of the throat was
NOT MC ammo.

It was fired from a different weapon in front of the limousine.

What I see in Zapruder frames 225-237, is JFK responding to an airway
obstruction. It is my opinion (for which I have been brutally abused)
that that obstruction was caused by a lead bullet that was
underpowdered and did not penetrate very far.

Kennedy's reaction in these frames is indicative of a normal reaction
to an airway obstruction, that is to try to cough the obstruction up.
His right hand is cupped over his mouth and his left hand is loosening
his tie.

Proponents of the "Thorburn position" have yet to show me a medical
case study where the subjects in the study loosened their ties in
response to a back or tracheal injury.

Again, these videos are my opinion based on my observations of the
Zapruder frames and what I know about the FBI investigation
afterwards.

In Normal Speed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3uH7FHjCeQ

In Slow Motion

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSov5IA4N8A

with closeups added:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wd1o0UTb3oc

[marklanerus...@gmail.com]

Intentionally designed to be hidden so no one could
comment on it , we'll just have to bring it out into the
sunlight and see if it holds water .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­-----------

Mr. Marsh, I understand what you're saying about the
MC ammo. But what I'm saying is that the bullet that
entered the front of the throat was NOT MC ammo.

> > Nice one Gil ! Was this other type of ammo
> > recovered ? Or is it another posited phenom of CT > > land that disappeared and left no visable trace ?

It was fired from a different weapon in front of the
limousine.

> > Again , bad location for shooting eh Gil ? In
> > front of hundreds of people , at ground level
> > with a observation tower behind this apparition
> > of yours and a sea of cars blocking a escape
> > route ?

What I see in Zapruder frames 225-237, is JFK
responding to an airway obstruction. It is my opinion
(for which I have been brutally abused)
that that obstruction was caused by a lead bullet
that was underpowdered and did not penetrate very far.

> > Where did it go afterwards ? If he couldn't cough
> > it up , it would of been in his throat at autopsy . If he
> > did cough it up , it would of been found in the limo
> > afterwards .

Kennedy's reaction in these frames is indicative of a
normal reaction to an airway obstruction, that is to try
to cough the obstruction up. His right hand is cupped
over his mouth and his left hand is loosening his tie.

> > It looks like he has his fists clenched to me and
> > millions of other people . A much more logical
> > approach would be a thru and thru wound from > > back to front . If you say otherwise then you've
> > got to explain a back wound also that fired a
> > underpowdered bullet , falling back out , seperate
> > assassin wounding JBC , also leaving no visable
> > trace , no gun , shell casings , a bruised lung , on
> > and on and on ! And your complaining about being
> > brutally abused ? What were these assassins trying
> > to do to JFK ? Make him cough or tickel him to
> > death ?

Proponents of the "Thorburn position" have yet to show
me a medical case study where the subjects in the study loosened
their
ties in response to a back or tracheal injury.

> > Your positing a falshood and then expecting someone > > to disprove your theory ? Which again is the opposite of
> > the scientific method . The established and official theory > > is the SBT . If you want to change that , it's up to you to
> > prove that your theory is not only right , but that it couldn't
> > of happened any other way then how you've described it .
> > BTW , your inaccurate observation of JFK loosening his
> > tie is no more believable than the driver shooting JFK in
> > head .

Again, these videos are my opinion based on my
observations of the Zapruder frames and what I know
about the FBI investigation afterwards.