Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Having Fun With Conspiracy Kooks
9 views
Skip to first unread message
David Von Pein
Apr 29, 2012, 1:50:31 AM4/29/12
to
Revisiting some fun with conspiracy kooks Don Jeffries and Greg
Parker:
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2012/04/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-178.html
Just as a reminder of the type of stupid things that conspiracists
like Jeffries and Parker believe in, here are some of the retarded
gems that escaped from the keyboards of those two clowns in early
2008:
"I am skeptical about all of Oswald's alleged post-assassination
actions." -- Don Jeffries
"On balance, I don't believe Oswald carried a gun into the TT
[Texas Theater]." -- Greg Parker
"I don't think any of the witnesses are believable, and I don't
think the official story of what Oswald is supposed to have done
during that time is believable." -- Jeffries
"That Baker/Truly/Oswald thing is pure, unadulterated bunk." --
Parker
"Everything about the official story of Oswald's post-shooting
movements is unbelievable. .... Every witness he supposedly
encountered was absurd. .... I am skeptical about everything Oswald is
alleged to have done on November 22, 1963." -- Jeffries
"[H. Louis] Nichols represented the Dallas status quo. His
'impromptu' press conference straight after his brief talk with Oswald
was reprehensible by normal lawyerly standards, and quite possibly
done conspiratorially for the purpose of ensuring no one was going to
come forward before Oswald could be taken care of." -- Parker
-------------------------
These two responses by me sum things up pretty well:
"You kooks can't even figure out the easy ones. Why bother
trying to figure out something harder (like this toughie: did Oswald
have two feet or three?)? .... You are an idiot who shouldn't be
looking into this case at all." -- DVP
aeffects
Apr 29, 2012, 3:35:51 AM4/29/12
to
On Apr 28, 10:50 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
<snip the DVP lunacy>
son-of-a-bitch.... you just might smarten up yet. just enough of
course to see sunshine! ya fool. so, ah... why do you spend 20 hours a
day on-line, trying to put out CT fires? The Bug isn't paying you, in
fact, you're probably paying HIM! That the deal, you're atoning for
you PR & internet book promotion sins? LMFAO!
<snip the DVP lunacy>
son-of-a-bitch.... you just might smarten up yet. just enough of
course to see sunshine! ya fool. so, ah... why do you spend 20 hours a
day on-line, trying to put out CT fires? The Bug isn't paying you, in
fact, you're probably paying HIM! That the deal, you're atoning for
you PR & internet book promotion sins? LMFAO!
Jason Burke
Apr 29, 2012, 11:41:11 AM4/29/12
to
There you go again with the asses and fucking.
Seems to be a fixation with you.
Paul^h^h^h^h Jason
aeffects
Apr 29, 2012, 11:53:01 AM4/29/12
to
there's only 18 months to go--and at this rate, by Nov 2013 you'll of
forgotten why you post to this board, hell you won't even know who JFK
was, nor .john and the worst fate of all, why the hell you're carrying
around DVP's jockey underwear.....
Ben Holmes
Apr 29, 2012, 11:58:24 AM4/29/12
to
In article <c385fd39-9f66-4604...@v22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...
Bugliosi can't be paying this kook - he's been completely unable to explain
Bugliosi's lie about Carrico's description of the original bullet wound in the
throat.
There's really just two possible explanations... either Bugliosi was simply
overwhelmingly ignorant about the medical evidence he tried to explain, or he
was so monumentally stupid as to think that the description of the injury to the
trachea could demonstrate a direction.
Those are really the only two possibilities, outside of Bugliosi simply lying.
I rather suspect that this third explanation, that he simply lied, best explains
what we have before us.
And DVP can't produce anything that will 'spin' this.
If *I* were Bugliosi, I'd fire DVP.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com
aeffects says...
Bugliosi's lie about Carrico's description of the original bullet wound in the
throat.
There's really just two possible explanations... either Bugliosi was simply
overwhelmingly ignorant about the medical evidence he tried to explain, or he
was so monumentally stupid as to think that the description of the injury to the
trachea could demonstrate a direction.
Those are really the only two possibilities, outside of Bugliosi simply lying.
I rather suspect that this third explanation, that he simply lied, best explains
what we have before us.
And DVP can't produce anything that will 'spin' this.
If *I* were Bugliosi, I'd fire DVP.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com
Jason Burke
Apr 29, 2012, 2:13:56 PM4/29/12
to
Jeff Stewart
Apr 29, 2012, 2:56:25 PM4/29/12
to
There is a marked difference between how lone gunman and conspiracy
theorists handle data surrounding the third week of November of the
year 1963.
Over the long span it is notable that there are arrows on one side and
there are ellipses on the other.
The arrows consistently point to a single individual. The ellipses
scatter about like dandelion parachutes into the air. They are always
adrift.
In short, hard facts and evidence are far more reliable than wild
speculation and conjecture. They’re just not as fun. After awhile, the
former don't move much, but the latter are always taking on new forms
and exciting possibilities.
theorists handle data surrounding the third week of November of the
year 1963.
Over the long span it is notable that there are arrows on one side and
there are ellipses on the other.
The arrows consistently point to a single individual. The ellipses
scatter about like dandelion parachutes into the air. They are always
adrift.
In short, hard facts and evidence are far more reliable than wild
speculation and conjecture. They’re just not as fun. After awhile, the
former don't move much, but the latter are always taking on new forms
and exciting possibilities.
aeffects
Apr 29, 2012, 3:40:09 PM4/29/12
to
On Apr 29, 11:56 am, Jeff Stewart <deafjeffda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is a marked difference between how lone gunman and conspiracy
> theorists handle data surrounding the third week of November of the
> year 1963.
another troll.... welcome, Paul May aka Jason Burke & Mark Ulrik need
> There is a marked difference between how lone gunman and conspiracy
> theorists handle data surrounding the third week of November of the
> year 1963.
all the nutter-troll help he can get lmfao! Get a few posts under your
belt before you jump into the fire, son.
Message has been deleted
David Von Pein
Apr 29, 2012, 4:18:50 PM4/29/12
to
>>> "This kook [DVP]...[has] been completely unable to explain Bugliosi's lie about Carrico's description of the original bullet wound in the throat." <<<
This is an outright lie by Holmes. I fully explained the Carrico
"ragged" thing in a post I wrote on July 14, 2011. And it's a
perfectly reasonable explanation too.
Kook Holmes just doesn't like my explanation, so he's going to pretend
I never offered one up at all.
But no matter how many times Holmes lies and says I've never offered
up any kind of explanation, he'll be wrong. And here's the proof:
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2011/07/reclaiming-history-errors.html
Ben Holmes
Apr 29, 2012, 6:32:23 PM4/29/12
to
In article <771c601e-7147-49f4...@2g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...
No way to tell, the lack of honesty with these kooks won't allow it...
My guess? This kook will run even faster than Ken McDonald did.
Up to you now, "Jeff" - see if you can prove me wrong.
>> Over the long span it is notable that there are arrows on one side and
>> there are ellipses on the other.
>>
>> The arrows consistently point to a single individual. The ellipses
>> scatter about like dandelion parachutes into the air. They are always
>> adrift.
>>
>> In short, hard facts and evidence are far more reliable than wild
>> speculation and conjecture. They=92re just not as fun. After awhile, the
>s a
>> > >>> day on-line, trying to put out CT fires? The Bug isn't paying you, =
>K
>> > > was, nor .john and the worst fate of all, why the hell you're carryin=
aeffects says...
>
>On Apr 29, 11:56=A0am, Jeff Stewart <deafjeffda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> There is a marked difference between how lone gunman and conspiracy
>> theorists handle data surrounding the third week of November of the
>> year 1963.
>
>another troll.... welcome, Paul May aka Jason Burke & Mark Ulrik need
>all the nutter-troll help he can get lmfao! Get a few posts under your
>belt before you jump into the fire, son.
Another troll? Or just another name of a troll we already see often?
>On Apr 29, 11:56=A0am, Jeff Stewart <deafjeffda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> There is a marked difference between how lone gunman and conspiracy
>> theorists handle data surrounding the third week of November of the
>> year 1963.
>
>another troll.... welcome, Paul May aka Jason Burke & Mark Ulrik need
>all the nutter-troll help he can get lmfao! Get a few posts under your
>belt before you jump into the fire, son.
No way to tell, the lack of honesty with these kooks won't allow it...
My guess? This kook will run even faster than Ken McDonald did.
Up to you now, "Jeff" - see if you can prove me wrong.
>> Over the long span it is notable that there are arrows on one side and
>> there are ellipses on the other.
>>
>> The arrows consistently point to a single individual. The ellipses
>> scatter about like dandelion parachutes into the air. They are always
>> adrift.
>>
>> In short, hard facts and evidence are far more reliable than wild
>> former don't move much, but the latter are always taking on new forms
>> and exciting possibilities.
>>
>> and exciting possibilities.
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2:13=A0pm, Jason Burke <Burke_Ja...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 4/29/2012 8:53 AM, aeffects wrote:
>>
>> > > On Apr 29, 8:41 am, Jason Burke<Burke_Ja...@comcast.net> =A0wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 4/29/2012 8:53 AM, aeffects wrote:
>>
>> > >> On 4/29/2012 12:35 AM, aeffects wrote:
>>
>> > >>> On Apr 28, 10:50 pm, David Von Pein<davevonp...@aol.com> =A0 =A0wro=
>>
>te:
>>
>> > >>> <snip the DVP lunacy>
>>
>> > >>> son-of-a-bitch.... you just might smarten up yet. just enough of
>> > >>> course to see sunshine! ya fool. so, ah... why do you spend 20 hour=
>>
>> > >>> <snip the DVP lunacy>
>>
>> > >>> son-of-a-bitch.... you just might smarten up yet. just enough of
>s a
>> > >>> day on-line, trying to put out CT fires? The Bug isn't paying you, =
>in
>> > >>> fact, you're probably paying HIM! That the deal, you're atoning for
>> > >>> you PR& =A0 =A0internet book promotion sins? LMFAO!
>> > >>> fact, you're probably paying HIM! That the deal, you're atoning for
>>
>> > >> There you go again with the asses and fucking.
>>
>> > >> Seems to be a fixation with you.
>>
>> > >> Paul^h^h^h^h Jason
>>
>> > > wound up tighter than a drum (sic) eh, shithead? suck it up hon,
>> > > there's only 18 months to go--and at this rate, by Nov 2013 you'll of
>> > > forgotten why you post to this board, hell you won't even know who JF=
>> > >> There you go again with the asses and fucking.
>>
>> > >> Seems to be a fixation with you.
>>
>> > >> Paul^h^h^h^h Jason
>>
>> > > wound up tighter than a drum (sic) eh, shithead? suck it up hon,
>> > > there's only 18 months to go--and at this rate, by Nov 2013 you'll of
>K
>> > > was, nor .john and the worst fate of all, why the hell you're carryin=
>g
>> > > around DVP's jockey underwear.....
>>
>> > Yawn. Still no evidence of conspiracy, Zippy.
>
>> > > around DVP's jockey underwear.....
>>
>> > Yawn. Still no evidence of conspiracy, Zippy.
>
0 new messages