Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The "BOH" (Yet Again)

0 views
Skip to first unread message

David Von Pein

unread,
Nov 10, 2007, 1:27:03 AM11/10/07
to

www.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_thread/thread/7980824643f68e83


JOHN CANAL SAID:


>>> "If my recollection serves me, once you said we could possibly be right about there being a BOH wound...but, since VB's book came out, you now say it'd be "impossible"?" <<<


DVP NOW SAYS:

Yes, I have remarked in the past about the "possibility" of something
like what you think occurred having actually occurred (i.e., JFK was
hit by one bullet from behind, but his skull cracks like an egg--sort
of--and the back of his head, as well as the exit point for the bullet
in the right-front, splits open into multiple fragments).

But, unless I'm wrong about the chronology of our discussions, one of
our latest exchanges (the one linked below from May 7, 2007) has me
saying:

"But as of this moment, it's my belief that a large-sized BOH
wound (i.e., a big HOLE) did not exist at all in the back of JFK's
head." -- DVP; 05/07/07

www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/9d74b90344959920


And just a few days prior to that (on April 23rd), I said this in a
post directed at John Canal:

"There was simply no logical reason, IMO, for the Bethesda
doctors to want to HIDE or mask info re. JFK's wounds (BOH or
otherwise), especially in light of the fact that the autopsy report
that all three of the doctors will be affixing their signatures to
will be declaring in bright, bold, unambiguous-as-can-be letters that
President Kennedy was struck by ONLY TWO BULLETS THAT BOTH CAME FROM
ABOVE AND BEHIND THE LEVEL OF THE DECEASED. There is/was NO REASON for
the Bethesda doctors to hide the existence of even a larger "BOH"
wound given the above "Only From Behind" autopsy conclusions." -- DVP;
04/23/07

www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/d9ace52779b8f808


But my November 9th post above wasn't talking about a scenario which
has Kennedy being shot from BEHIND ONLY. If I wasn't clear enough, I
apologize. But I specifically started that November 9 post with these
words:

"I wonder if anybody has yet figured out a way for a high-speed
bullet entering John Kennedy's head from the RIGHT-FRONT (i.e., Grassy
Knoll), per many/most CTer beliefs, to leave behind a huge gaping hole
in the FAR-RIGHT-REAR of JFK's head, and yet have this Magical Missile
(somehow!) LEAVE THE SCALP IN THE BACK OF KENNEDY'S HEAD COMPLETELY
INTACT AND UNDAMAGED IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER." -- DVP; 11/09/07

www.DavidVonPein.blogspot.com

Phil Ossofee

unread,
Nov 10, 2007, 5:36:18 AM11/10/07
to
You are a pure piece of shit Von Pein. Everyone who saw the back of the
head between Parkland and Bethesda the day and night of the
Assassination said there was a big hole there.

YoHarvey

unread,
Nov 10, 2007, 10:20:02 AM11/10/07
to

Very articulate Phil. Typical CT language. Of course, you choose to
ignore the physical evidence which trumps ALL witness testimony. The
ZAP film says it all. NO BOH wound. None. Zero. Zilch. Funny
thing Phil, no matter how many times one watches that film it never
changes!!

Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Nov 10, 2007, 7:53:46 PM11/10/07
to
>>> "Everyone who saw the back of the head between Parkland and Bethesda the day and night of the Assassination said there was a big hole there." <<<

So, CTers think that a bullet went crashing through the BACK of JFK's
head (via a shot from the front of the limo)....and yet the back of
JFK's head came out looking like this (via this proven-unaltered
photo)...right?:

www.jfklancer.com/photos/autopsy_slideshow/images/autop04.jpg

Of course, despite the fact that such a CT scenario is utterly
impossible, it won't deter the kooks. The CT clowns can just insist,
as per the CT-Kook norm, that the picture above is a fake of some
kind, even though it's been proven to be authentic.

Gotta love them kooks.

Gil Jesus

unread,
Nov 11, 2007, 7:57:19 AM11/11/07
to

Let's see if pathological liar and disinformation specialist Von Pein
is at it (yet again):

The Large Back-Of-Head Wound

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh0-2Sthn9A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhWJowvbtxs

FBI agent: "There was a large wound at the right rear"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmfqDOnZu_Q

Autopsy Docs agreed with Parkland Docs on LBOH wound to HSCA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4PcJLdiZhM

Dealey Plaza witnesses: "The back of his head blew off"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVhZdryIs_A

can we trust ANYTHING the Warren Commission said ?

http://www.youtube.com/GJJdude

David Von Pein

unread,
Nov 11, 2007, 8:38:42 AM11/11/07
to
>>> "There was a large wound at the right rear." <<<


And just exactly what type of bullet was used that caused a "LARGE
WOUND AT THE RIGHT REAR" of JFK's head, being fired from the FRONT
(per nearly all CTers), with that same bullet miraculously not causing
a bit of damage to the REAR SCALP of JFK's head (located a millimeter
or two from this "LARGE WOUND AT THE RIGHT REAR" of Kennedy's
cranium)?

Any ideas (besides resorting to the normal "THE PICS ARE FAKED"
mantra)?

http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/autopsy_slideshow/images/autop04.jpg

David Von Pein

unread,
Nov 11, 2007, 9:28:42 PM11/11/07
to
I'll try a reprise....because I like this question:

=======================

0 new messages