McADAMS COMM ENTS
tomnln
"John McAdams" <john.m...@marquette.edu> wrote in message
news:5lo2u41q5n837mcir...@4ax.com...
> On 11 Apr 2009 23:39:57 -0400, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"John McAdams" <john.m...@marquette.edu> wrote in message
>>news:49e0d732....@news.supernews.com...
>>> On 10 Apr 2009 23:34:44 -0400, Peter Fokes <borea...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Apr 10, 7:02=A0pm, John McAdams <john.mcad...@marquette.edu> wrote:
>>>>> On 10 Apr 2009 01:00:07 -0400, Peter Fokes <boreal4...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >Doesn't appear she was asked if she ever saw the Militant or the
>>>>> >Worker in her house before the assassination.
>>>>>
>>>>> >Did she?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure how that matters, because Oswald clearly had a copy of
>>>>> THE MILITANT and THE WORKER in his hands when the backyard photos were
>>>>> taken.
>>>>>
>>>>> .John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hi John,
>>>>
>>>>Hosty mulled over the possibility he might have been able to prevent
>>>>the assassination. "Could I have somehow prevented President Kennedy's
>>>>assassination," he wrote in his book Assignment Oswald. Remember he
>>>>dropped by Ruth Paine's house twice, and spoke to her about Oswald.
>>>>Even after talking to Ruth twice, Hosty felt he had "no information to
>>>>indicate Lee was violent or capable of killing anyone, much less the
>>>>president." On his second visit, Paine told Hosty that Oswald was a
>>>>"real character" and had told Ruth he was a "Trotskyite." Apparently
>>>>she didn't mention his subscription to the Militant; a tidbit of
>>>>information that might have raised Hosty's level of concern. Hosty
>>>>admits he would have been "forbidden from interviewing Lee about his
>>>>Mexico City trip before the assassination because we didn't want to
>>>>compromise our sources and methods in Mexico City."
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is interesting, although I doubt the average Trotskyite or even
>>> the average CPUSA Stalinist was much inclined to violence in 1963.
>>>
>>> The CPUSA was throughly infiltrated with FBI assets, so Hosty probably
>>> knew of no *real* connection between Oswald and the CPUSA. Just
>>> writing letters to the headquarters in New York sucking up to top
>>> party officials wouldn't trip many alarms.
>>>
>>> Both Stalinists and Trotskyists could pretty much be classified as
>>> crackpots and malcontents. But that's not the same thing as a (say)
>>> cell of radical Islamists today, or the Weatherman faction of SDS in
>>> the late 60s.
>>>
>>> .John
>>> --
>>> The Kennedy Assassination Home Page
>>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Refusing to give Official Citations is what SUNK you on the radio debate
>>John
>>
>>
>>WHY in heck would you STILL employ those tactics???
>>
>>
>
> Tom, you seem proud that you got to debate me on radio.
>
> More comments like this one, and I'll see that that never happens
> again.
>
> .John
> --------------
> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
SORRY John;
I won't make any more comments;
I'll let the actual audio speak for themselves from now On.
Of Course that means that you will have to Quell the comments by YOUR
Followers ! ! !
If you thinl for a N Y Second that I'll RUN from the Bile from Your
Supporters, you don't Understand Americans.
tims...@gmail.com
>
> news:5lo2u41q5n837mcir...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> > On 11 Apr 2009 23:39:57 -0400, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >>news:49e0d732....@news.supernews.com...
> >>> On 10 Apr 2009 23:34:44 -0400, Peter Fokes <boreal4...@gmail.com>
If you thinl [sic] for a N Y Second [sic] ??!!
This is just CLASSIC tomnln!
KUTGW, Tommy, LOL!
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dec97d84-7f8a-4d07...@w35g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
KUTGW, Tommy, LOL!
Regards,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Classic Timmy is HERE>>>
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tims...@gmail.com
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:dec97d84-7f8a-4d07...@w35g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 13, 11:08 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In caseMcAdamsdon't post this one;
>
>
> >news:5lo2u41q5n837mcir...@4ax.com...
>
> > > On 11 Apr 2009 23:39:57 -0400, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > >>news:49e0d732....@news.supernews.com...
> > >>> On 10 Apr 2009 23:34:44 -0400, Peter Fokes <boreal4...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
>
You mean that page that simply shows that you lied and ignored
evidence/testimony in the form of CE 2121?
That document shows that Mrs Duran IDd Oswald the evening of 11.23.63,
not 11.25.63 as claimed on your website.
In fact, you claim on that webpage of yours that it was only AFTER
some tapes were sent by the CIA to the FBI in Dallas by 11.25.63 that
Mrs Duran *then and only then* identified Oswald!
That's pretty much a flat out lie by you, isn't it, tomnln?
Why did you lie and ignore evidence/testimony on your website, tomnln?
Got an explanation?
bigdog
>
> news:5lo2u41q5n837mcir...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 11 Apr 2009 23:39:57 -0400, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >>news:49e0d732....@news.supernews.com...
> >>> On 10 Apr 2009 23:34:44 -0400, Peter Fokes <boreal4...@gmail.com>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Rossley complaining about vile comments from others? Now that's rich.
Nothing like the pot calling the kettle black.
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b5f214ba-7e34-4975...@y34g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got an explanation?
Regards,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from one who is STILL looking for the "Midget Oswald" Who was
Impersonating Oswald in Mexico City.
SEE >>> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
Remember Timmy;
You're trying to protect those who "Screw " their OWN ! ! !
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/screw_your.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YoHarvey
Rossley? Do what you do best. Fetch some burgers and fries for the
LN's.!
tims...@gmail.com
I'm not looking for any midget Oswald, tomnln. That was just some
pathetic argument you dreamed up, showing your lack of ability as a
researcher.
BTW, if the Oswald who visited the Cuban Embassy and met Mrs Duran was
a 5' 3" midget, as you CLAIM, tomnln, the how did Duran's name and
phone number get into the REAL Oswald's noetbook, tomnln?
Duran says she gave her name and number to the person she met who
identified himself as Oswald.
Got any ideas, tomnln? You're batting zero on CE 2121, tomnln.
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2976b4d5-0efd-4f7e...@s38g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
Regards,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's ALL STILL here Tim;
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
WOW !
It's NOT my claim that Oswald was >>>
5 foot 3 inches tall
Blond Haired
119 pounds
Photo looked like a NFL linebacker
Spoke Broken Russian
Was at Sylvia Odio's in Dallas at ther same time
HSCA believed Odio
Audio tape CIA had was NOT the real Oswald
THAT description came from YOUR witness Slyvia Duran Tim ! ! !'
I Love it when you people "IMPEACH" your own witnesses !
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eb6a00bc-ff58-4881...@e18g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
Considering that you have all the time in the world by never addressing
evidence/testimony......
GO FEED THE BOA.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
"bigdog" <jecorb...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ab1a72ac-5f4d-4c64...@e18g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
bigdog wrote;
Rossley complaining about vile comments from others? Now that's rich.
Nothing like the pot calling the kettle black.
I write;
Here's what's "rich" bigdog.
ALL of you "Bullies" RUN when an underdog RETALIATES ! ! ! !
PROOF>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/rogue.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gil Jesus
>
> Rossley? �Do what you do best. �Fetch some burgers and fries for the
Is that all you fat bastards ever think of........food ?
CARRY ON HUMPBACKS
ROFLMAO
tims...@gmail.com
Silvia Duran said THREE times that the person she met is the same
person shown in Oswald's August 1963 mugshot.
The 5' 3" exchange is simply banter that no CREDIBLE researcher would
base their whole argument on.
Why are you impeaching your own witness, tomnln?
When are you going to deal with CE 2121 that shows you IGNORE evidence/
testimony, tomnln?
Let's hear the next pathetic excuse from you.
David Von Pein
>>> "The 5' 3" exchange is simply banter that no CREDIBLE researcher would base their whole argument on." <<<
Not to mention the fact that such "5-foot-3 and blond hair" crap
totally flies in the face of the kind of "imposter" nonsense believed
in by many CT-Kooks.
I.E.,
What kind of moron (i.e., brain-dead) plotters were organizing this
Mexico City "ruse" anyway? They send in an "imposter" for Lee Oswald
who is only 5'3" tall with BLOND hair?!!
Yeah...that guy is SURE to fool everybody at the Embassies into
thinking it was the real 5-foot-9 and dark-haired Oswald, huh?
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b7b15cae-2aad-464d...@z16g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
Silvia Duran said THREE times that the person she met is the same
person shown in Oswald's August 1963 mugshot.
AFTER BEING ARRESTED/INTIMIDATED
The 5' 3" exchange is simply banter that no CREDIBLE researcher would
base their whole argument on.
THE HSCA SAW FIT TO PUBLISH IT
Why are you impeaching your own witness, tomnln?
STEALING MY LINES NOW TIMMY?
tomnln
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:c8216a12-40c8-44c9...@r8g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
Correct David;
People aren't fooled that easily.
Look at the 10% who believe in the Single Bullet Theory.
ps;
Your WCR was "Thrown Out" of a U S Court Room !
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tims...@gmail.com
LOL! She said it to three times to the HSCA in 1978, tomnln. Was she
being ARRESTED/INTIMIDATED [sic] then?
> The 5' 3" exchange is simply banter that no CREDIBLE researcher would
> base their whole argument on.
>
> THE HSCA SAW FIT TO PUBLISH IT
>
Yeah, and then the guys who interviewed her concluded that she'd met
Oswald, didn't they tomnln? They also saw fit to publish her three IDs
of Oswald, which clearly outweighed your precious 5' 3" gibberish,
tomnln. Did they write a report that they concluded that she'd met a
5' 3" Oswald impersonator, tomnln? I don't think so.
> Why are you impeaching your own witness, tomnln?
>
> STEALING MY LINES NOW TIMMY?
>
Turning your own nonsense back on you, tomnln. Duran clearly
identified Oswald as the person she met. You look like a fool hanging
on to this 5' 3" nonsense. Only an idiot would read your MC webpage
and find it convincing.
> When are you going to deal with CE 2121 that shows you IGNORE evidence/
> testimony, tomnln?
>
You seemed to duck this one, tomnln. Why was that?
> Let's hear the next pathetic excuse from you.
>
Come on tomnln, what's your pathetic excuse for ignoring evidence/
testimony in the form of CE 2121?
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6ecb01ce-f0cd-480d...@z8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
Regards,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timmy keeps Regutitating the same old CE 2121 knowing it was AFTER Duran was
Arrested/Intimidated.
Multiple exhibits of Proof that Oswald was Impersonated in Mexico City are
HERE>>>
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Let's look at your response:
QUOTE ON:
Timmy keeps Regutitating the same old CE 2121 knowing it was AFTER
Duran was
Arrested/Intimidated.
Multiple exhibits of Proof that Oswald was Impersonated in Mexico City
are
HERE>>>
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
QUOTE OFF
What we're wondering is why that webpage of yours that you linked to
STILL claims that Mrs Duran didn't identify Oswald until 25 November,
1963, when CE 2121 clearly shows she identified him the evening of 23
November in a signed statement, tomnln.
Nothing about her being *arrested/intimidated* tomnln; the issue is
why you are lying on your website. You've lied and gone against the
*evidence/testimony* in the form of CE 2121.
Why did you lie about/ignore the *evidence/testimony* shown in CE 2121
on your website, tomnln? Do you now FEAR evidence/testimony?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> Come on tomnln, what's your pathetic ...
>
> read more »
aeffects
this is way above your pay grade troll...... perhaps you should send
in the Marines....
tomnln
"aeffects" <aeffe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8b6501b5-0d6e-46e2...@x29g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Apparently they were Friends of Timmy's judging on how he defends them.