Top Five Lone Nut Trolls
Phil Ossofee
2. Dr. Ken Wrong some idiot living 50 years ago when J. Edna was a
yankee doodle dandy.
3."Mad Max" Holland a well paid dupe who gets his pet theory in the new
york times about how the first shot came before zapruder started
filmng, can you say shithead!
4. Dale" Oscar" Myers in a heap of hot water over monkeying with the
measurements in the Presidential Limo.
5. Vinnie" Da whining wop" Bugliosi, everybody's wrong but me, I know
everything I am uh..what's that word? Ubiquitous and uh uh uh,
Omniscient.
OK toots, better let the varsity show you how to put that jockstrap on.
Now keep both hands on the keyboard Chuckie Da Shoe, Yo Harvey, and
JOOOEEEEEE!!! Phil D.
Gil Jesus
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Phil:
It's taken a small army of trolls to come in here and try to disrupt
the discussion of a handful of Warren Commission non-believers.
The Cters here are WAY outnumbered by the trolls and yet we keep
kicking their Keisters with evidence and testimony.
Asking questions they can't answer.
Repeatedly pointing out their lies with links to their postings.
Demonstrating to the world the conflicts in evidence.
Seeing and hearing from the witnesses who were THERE in their OWN
words.
The McAdamia nuts have sent in reinforcements in the likes of Vaughan
and Brennan to shore up the sagging and ineffectual attempts made by
Ed, Joey, Lowry, Von Pein, Shyster, Dolan and the rest of the trolls.
Seems like fewer and fewer people are responding troll posts.
And that's not good for the bad guys.
Kenneth A. Rahn
Er, uhhh ... Only the first two of your list of five "trolls" actually
post here. Better check the definition of "Internet troll" again.
By the way, thanks for including me. I didn't make the last couple of
lists posted here, and was beginning to feel left out.
Ken Rahn
"Phil Ossofee" <summersa...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:8722-482F...@storefull-3233.bay.webtv.net...
YoHarvey
> Phil,
>
> Er, uhhh ... Only the first two of your list of five "trolls" actually
> post here. Better check the definition of "Internet troll" again.
> By the way, thanks for including me. I didn't make the last couple of
> lists posted here, and was beginning to feel left out.
>
> Ken Rahn
>
>
> news:8722-482F...@storefull-3233.bay.webtv.net...
>
>
>
> > 1. Davey"once a Bugliosi Butt Boy" Von Pein
> > 2. Dr. Ken Wrong some idiot living 50 years ago when J. Edna was a
> > yankee doodle dandy.
> > 3."Mad Max" Holland a well paid dupe who gets his pet theory in the new
> > york times about how the first shot came before zapruder started
> > filmng, can you say shithead!
> > 4. Dale" Oscar" Myers in a heap of hot water over monkeying with the
> > measurements in the Presidential Limo.
> > 5. Vinnie" Da whining wop" Bugliosi, everybody's wrong but me, I know
> > everything I am uh..what's that word? Ubiquitous and uh uh uh,
> > Omniscient.
>
> > OK toots, better let the varsity show you how to put that jockstrap on.
> > Now keep both hands on the keyboard Chuckie Da Shoe, Yo Harvey, and
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ken, I know how you feel. Making that list would be an honor.
Ben Holmes
Gil Jesus says...
>
>On May 17, 4:02=EF=BF=BDpm, summersalmostg...@webtv.net (Phil Ossofee) wrote=
>:
>> 1. Davey"once a Bugliosi Butt Boy" Von Pein
>a
>> yankee doodle dandy.
>> 3."Mad Max" Holland a well paid dupe who gets his pet theory in the new
>> filmng, can you say shithead!
>> 4. Dale" Oscar" Myers in a heap of hot water over monkeying with the
>> measurements in the Presidential Limo.
>> 5. Vinnie" Da whining wop" Bugliosi, everybody's wrong but me, I know
>> everything I am uh..what's that word? Ubiquitous and uh uh uh,
>> Omniscient.
>>
>> OK toots, better let the varsity show you how to put that jockstrap on.
>> Now keep both hands on the keyboard Chuckie Da Shoe, Yo Harvey, and
>> JOOOEEEEEE!!! Phil D.
>
>----------
>Hey Phil:
>
>It's taken a small army of trolls to come in here and try to disrupt
>the discussion of a handful of Warren Commission non-believers.
>
>The Cters here are WAY outnumbered by the trolls and yet we keep
>kicking their Keisters with evidence and testimony.
>
>Asking questions they can't answer.
>
>Repeatedly pointing out their lies with links to their postings.
>
>Demonstrating to the world the conflicts in evidence.
>
>Seeing and hearing from the witnesses who were THERE in their OWN
>words.
>
>The McAdamia nuts have sent in reinforcements in the likes of Vaughan
>and Brennan to shore up the sagging and ineffectual attempts made by
>Ed, Joey, Lowry, Von Pein, Shyster, Dolan and the rest of the trolls.
>
>Seems like fewer and fewer people are responding troll posts.
>
>And that's not good for the bad guys.
I tell ya, life is too sweet to waste time on the trolls... just killfile 'em
and move on.
David Von Pein
www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/1e99a77983fa0608
>>> "Only the first two of your list of five "trolls" actually post here." <<<
Those were my thoughts exactly after having seen Phil's silly thread-
starter. Plus, Ken Rahn very rarely posts at all. So I wonder how that
kind of light activity (overall) can equate to Ken being the #2
"troll", per Phil's chart? That's a bit curious.
But, then too, it's about par for the Kook Kourse -- i.e., rabid
conspiracy theorists can't seem to get anything right. So why should
this "Troll" thread be any exception?
Also -- I noticed that Phil was apparently doing his Dave Healy
impression in his thread-starting post above. It sounded just like the
type of babble Healy normally posts. Maybe Ossofee is trying to make
everyone think that he and Healy are the same conspiracy-happy kook.
Sure sounds like it in this thread anyway.
Well, just so I don't disappoint anybody (and in order to maintain the
grand honor of being labelled "#1 Lone-Nut Troll"), allow me to flood
the LN river a little more. Ten-Four? (Hey, there's no sense in
letting a good "trolling" opportunity go to waste, now is there?
Besides, Vince B. pays time-and-a-half on weekends.) .....
www.amazon.com/gp/customer-media/product-gallery/0393045250
www.eotacforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=50341
www.hometheaterforum.com/htf/3200858-post.html
www.box.net/static/flash/box_explorer.swf?widgetHash=7f8im4pic0&v=1
Phil Ossofee
what they say, thanks to you, and others the conspiracists have won.
What's that line in JFK," fundamentally, people are suckers for the
truth". Americans do not truck a liar, whether it is " tricky Dick",
George Bush, or lying about a Presidents death. When they get educated
on the matter, and are still lied to repeatedly, no matter where, and
who it comes from, they won't be believed again. Phil D.
justm...@gmail.com
Phil has his head buried up his ass again...must have been last call
at the bar. Thanks to Gilda? ROFLMAO the biggest misleading liar
besides Holmes. LOL....have another drink Phil, I'm sure that bottle
of ripple you keep under your pillow is still there. Why don't you
name it Gilda, he likes sleeping with men LOL
David Von Pein
Violins behind the above conspiracy-happy soliloquy would have been
useful.
Here, use mine.....
Todd W. Vaughan
> On May 17, 4:02�pm, summersalmostg...@webtv.net (Phil Ossofee) wrote:
>
> > 1. Davey"once a Bugliosi Butt Boy" Von Pein
> > 2. Dr. Ken Wrong some idiot �living 50 years ago when J. Edna was a
> > yankee doodle dandy.
> > 3."Mad Max" Holland a well paid dupe who gets his pet theory in the new
> > york times about how the first shot �came before zapruder started
> > filmng, can you say shithead!
> > 4. Dale" Oscar" Myers in a heap of hot water over monkeying with the
> > measurements in the Presidential Limo.
> > 5. Vinnie" Da whining wop" Bugliosi, everybody's wrong but me, I know
> > everything I am uh..what's that word? Ubiquitous and uh uh uh,
> > Omniscient.
>
> > OK toots, better let the varsity show you how to put that jockstrap on.
> > Now keep both hands on the keyboard Chuckie Da Shoe, Yo Harvey, and
> > JOOOEEEEEE!!! Phil D.
>
> Hey Phil:
>
> It's taken a small army of trolls to come in here and try to disrupt
> the discussion of a handful of Warren Commission non-believers.
>
> The Cters here are WAY outnumbered by the trolls and yet we keep
> kicking their Keisters with evidence and testimony.
>
> Asking questions they can't answer.
>
> Repeatedly pointing out their lies with links to their postings.
>
> Demonstrating to the world the conflicts in evidence.
>
> Seeing and hearing from the witnesses who were THERE in their OWN
> words.
>
> The McAdamia nuts have sent in reinforcements in the likes of Vaughan
Yep. We were sent in.
In fact we received secret coded Telexes giving us the details of our
mission, much like those of Roscoe White.
What a fucking nut you are.
Kenneth A. Rahn
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b06c6a4b-f682-4704...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On May 17, 5:14 pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> On May 17, 4:02?pm, summersalmostg...@webtv.net (Phil Ossofee) wrote:
>
> > 1. Davey"once a Bugliosi Butt Boy" Von Pein
> > 2. Dr. Ken Wrong some idiot ?living 50 years ago when J. Edna was a
> > yankee doodle dandy.
> > 3."Mad Max" Holland a well paid dupe who gets his pet theory in the new
> > york times about how the first shot ?came before zapruder started
KAR: Todd, how many times do I have to tell you--don't reveal that
stuff!!!!!
Ken Rahn
robcap...@netscape.com
> Todd,
>
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:b06c6a4b-f682-4704...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
Two guys with NO proof to back their ridiculous theory up with are all
giggles. Since the NAA was shown to be a fraud, I would tone down the
laughter a bit if I had supported a phony science. But that is just
me, and besides they are supporting a phony theory anyway.
>
> >made by
> > Ed, Joey, Lowry, Von Pein, Shyster, Dolan and the rest of the trolls.
>
> > Seems like fewer and fewer people are responding troll posts.
>
> > And that's not good for the bad guys.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Kenneth A. Rahn
"robcap...@netscape.com" <robc...@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:1222e980-85b8-4801...@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 22, 8:15 pm, "Kenneth A. Rahn" <kr...@uri.edu> wrote:
> Todd,
>
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> messagenews:b06c6a4b-f682-4704...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On May 17, 5:14 pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 17, 4:02?pm, summersalmostg...@webtv.net (Phil Ossofee) wrote:
>
> > > 1. Davey"once a Bugliosi Butt Boy" Von Pein
> > > 2. Dr. Ken Wrong some idiot ?living 50 years ago when J. Edna was a
> > > yankee doodle dandy.
> > > 3."Mad Max" Holland a well paid dupe who gets his pet theory in the
> > > new
> > > york times about how the first shot ?came before zapruder started
> > > filmng, can you say shithead!
> > > 4. Dale" Oscar" Myers in a heap of hot water over monkeying with the
> > > measurements in the Presidential Limo.
> > > 5. Vinnie" Da whining wop" Bugliosi, everybody's wrong but me, I know
> > > everything I am uh..what's that word? Ubiquitous and uh uh uh,
> > > Omniscient.
>
> > > OK toots, better let the varsity show you how to put that jockstrap
> > > on.
> > > Now keep both hands on the keyboard Chuckie Da Shoe, Yo Harvey, and
> > > JOOOEEEEEE!!! Phil D.
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------限-----------
> > Hey Phil:
>
> > It's taken a small army of trolls to come in here and try to disrupt
> > the discussion of a handful of Warren Commission non-believers.
>
> > The Cters here are WAY outnumbered by the trolls and yet we keep
> > kicking their Keisters with evidence and testimony.
>
> > Asking questions they can't answer.
>
> > Repeatedly pointing out their lies with links to their postings.
>
> > Demonstrating to the world the conflicts in evidence.
>
> > Seeing and hearing from the witnesses who were THERE in their OWN
> > words.
>
> > The McAdamia nuts have sent in reinforcements in the likes of Vaughan
> > and Brennan to shore up the sagging and ineffectual attempts...
>
> Yep. We were sent in.
>
> In fact we received secret coded Telexes giving us the details of our
> mission, much like those of Roscoe White.
>
> KAR: Todd, how many times do I have to tell you--don't reveal that
> stuff!!!!!
>
> Ken Rahn
>
> What a fucking nut you are.
Two guys with NO proof to back their ridiculous theory up with are all
giggles. Since the NAA was shown to be a fraud, I would tone down the
laughter a bit if I had supported a phony science.
KAR: Robcap, I have bad news for you. The NAA, at least as applied to the
JFK case, was not shown to be a fraud. Both articles purporting to debunk it
failed. The chemical matching tests as used by the FBI were actually
supported by the much-discussed NRC report, but with certain areas to be
tightened.
Ken Rahn
David Von Pein
"LHO SHOT NO ONE THAT DAY." -- Rob "Super Kook" Caprio; Oct. 2007
How Rob can stand to look at his mug in the mirror after uttering the
above words of idiocy last October is beyond me.
tomnln
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b06c6a4b-f682-4704...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
Todd W. Vaughan
Ken,
John has a long mustache.
The chair is against the wall.
The gravy boat is full.
ZXW345 00012 nneoadfwl
Todd
> Ken Rahn
>
> What a fucking nut you are.
>
>
>
> >made by
> > Ed, Joey, Lowry, Von Pein, Shyster, Dolan and the rest of the trolls.
>
> > Seems like fewer and fewer people are responding troll posts.
>
Todd W. Vaughan
wrote:
"Two guys"???
Hey Rob, find one instance where I ever used the NAA to support
anything.
Try and keep up.
LOL.
Todd W. Vaughan
> WHO is toad vaughan?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
Tomnln,
You're a nut too.
Todd
>
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:b06c6a4b-f682-4704...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
robcap...@netscape.com
> Robcap,
>
> "robcap...@netscape.com" <robcap...@netscape.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1222e980-85b8-4801...@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On May 22, 8:15 pm, "Kenneth A. Rahn" <kr...@uri.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Todd,
>
> > "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:b06c6a4b-f682-4704...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> > On May 17, 5:14 pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 17, 4:02?pm, summersalmostg...@webtv.net (Phil Ossofee) wrote:
>
> > > > 1. Davey"once a Bugliosi Butt Boy" Von Pein
> > > > 2. Dr. Ken Wrong some idiot ?living 50 years ago when J. Edna was a
> > > > yankee doodle dandy.
> > > > 3."Mad Max" Holland a well paid dupe who gets his pet theory in the
> > > > new
> > > > york times about how the first shot ?came before zapruder started
> > > > filmng, can you say shithead!
> > > > 4. Dale" Oscar" Myers in a heap of hot water over monkeying with the
> > > > measurements in the Presidential Limo.
> > > > 5. Vinnie" Da whining wop" Bugliosi, everybody's wrong but me, I know
> > > > everything I am uh..what's that word? Ubiquitous and uh uh uh,
> > > > Omniscient.
>
> > > > OK toots, better let the varsity show you how to put that jockstrap
> > > > on.
> > > > Now keep both hands on the keyboard Chuckie Da Shoe, Yo Harvey, and
> > > > JOOOEEEEEE!!! Phil D.
>
You are wrong, it was shown to be a fraud across the board, besides
what did it acutally prove in the JFK case again? I'm not talking
about articles, I'm talking about the FBI pulling it and basically
admitting it was of no value. How do you explain all the petitions to
set people free who were convicted on the basis of this fraud if it
was not shown to be of no value? If it can match bullets based on
composition, why couldn't it match the two fragments found in the
limo?
robcap...@netscape.com
Easily, BECAUSE you CAN'T provide ANY proof LHO shot anyone. NONE.
NADA. ZILCH.
How can Dave look in the mirror when he writes lies constantly about
what happened to our 35th president?
robcap...@netscape.com
You need to take reading lessons Todd as the "two guys" comment was in
the first sentence that did NOT mention NAA. As for keeping up you
are in reverse so that is not difficult to do.
tomnln
ALL in her own words ! ! !
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bfab7a34-43c6-40e1...@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Todd W. Vaughan
Tomnln,
You're a nut too.
Todd
> WHO is toad vaughan?>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
>
> ALL in her own words ! ! !
>
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:bfab7a34-43c6-40e1...@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
On May 23, 12:15 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
Tomnln,
You're a nut too.
Todd
I write;
toad;
You're a "NUT-SUCKER".
Your wife is Better at that than you are TOO.
How long are you gonna RUN from your own evidence/testimony?>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd W. Vaughan
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:a50ce51b-77ff-43a7...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 12:15 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Tomnln,
>
> You're a nut too.
>
> Todd
>
> I write;
>
> toad;
> You're a "NUT-SUCKER".
>
> Your wife is Better at that than you are TOO.
Ellen.
aeffects
> Phil,
>
> Er, uhhh ... Only the first two of your list of five "trolls" actually
> post here. Better check the definition of "Internet troll" again.
ya fit the definition exactly, Ken.... Truck on, son....
> By the way, thanks for including me. I didn't make the last couple of
> lists posted here, and was beginning to feel left out.
>
> Ken Rahn
>
> "Phil Ossofee" <summersalmostg...@webtv.net> wrote in message