TODAY'S "KOOK QUOTE"
David Von Pein
Actually, this is a replay of a "Kook Quote" from March 2008, but it's
so insane and moronic, it deserves to be propped up another time --
just for today's laugh:
"We [THE ANYBODY-BUT-OSWALD KOOKS] do NOT ignore the physical
evidence, that is why we know that LHO fired at NO one on 11/22/63!"
-- Robert Caprio; March 4, 2008
Papa Andy
Two points, David
1) I question the value of these posts. I don't believe that people
are moved to become LNs or CTs by random posts on the Internet. Not
when there is a huge volume of serious writing on these subjects
readily available. Not to mention the evidence itself
2) You are very free with words like 'kook,' 'insane' and 'moronic,'
yet this a quote without actual comment. For your victim to actually
be insane and/or moronic, it would have to be exceptionally clear that
LHO did fire shots on 11/22/63. You certainly believe that he did,
but the case is circumstantial without any direct evidence. No
fingerprints on the trigger, no eyewitnesses (in the usual sense of
the word), no confession, no manifesto or shouts of 'sic semper
tyrannis' or anything of that sort. By the same token, you could
argue that your victim can't know for sure that LHO did not fire any
shots although he too could point to an array of circumstances to
support that view
I think that disagreement can be tolerated without such biased and
pointless name calling
A
aeffects
> On Jul 1, 4:59 am, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Actually, this is a replay of a "Kook Quote" from March 2008, but it's
> > so insane and moronic, it deserves to be propped up another time --
> > just for today's laugh:
>
> > "We [THE ANYBODY-BUT-OSWALD KOOKS] do NOT ignore the physical
> > evidence, that is why we know that LHO fired at NO one on 11/22/63!"
> > -- Robert Caprio; March 4, 2008
>
> Two points, David
>
> 1) I question the value of these posts. I don't believe that people
> are moved to become LNs or CTs by random posts on the Internet. Not
> when there is a huge volume of serious writing on these subjects
> readily available. Not to mention the evidence itself
DavidVP get paid by word poundage... besdies he's auditioning for an
associate script writer slot for an upcoming (if its not already
shelved) HBO segment.... He NEEDS to be seen!
> 2) You are very free with words like 'kook,' 'insane' and 'moronic,'
> yet this a quote without actual comment. For your victim to actually
> be insane and/or moronic, it would have to be exceptionally clear that
> LHO did fire shots on 11/22/63. You certainly believe that he did,
> but the case is circumstantial without any direct evidence. No
> fingerprints on the trigger, no eyewitnesses (in the usual sense of
> the word), no confession, no manifesto or shouts of 'sic semper
> tyrannis' or anything of that sort. By the same token, you could
> argue that your victim can't know for sure that LHO did not fire any
> shots although he too could point to an array of circumstances to
> support that view
great paragraph Andy, I'm sure its *firm logic* went right over DVP's
head, not to mention the other lone Nut dolts that post here
Gil Jesus
<playiso...@email.com> wrote:
>
>I think that disagreement can be tolerated without such biased and
>pointless name calling
>
>A
But such biased and pointless name-calling is the last sanctuary for
those with nothing else.
Burly...@gmail.com
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 07:14:25 -0700 (PDT), Papa Andy
>
>
> >I think that disagreement can be tolerated without such biased and
> >pointless name calling
>
> >A
>
> But such biased and pointless name-calling is the last sanctuary for
> those with nothing else.
All one has to do is sift through your own posts and take a look at
the many names you have called people.
tomnln
"Gil Jesus" <GJJ...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ce9l645tlv34dace4...@4ax.com...
I personally like the RETALIATION Part.
Burly...@gmail.com
> "Gil Jesus" <GJJm...@aol.com> wrote in message
Which doesn't say much for the CT.
robcap...@netscape.com
Dave, you are free to dispute it and refute it anytime, but all you do
is say how crazy it is. Where is your proof and evidence again?
robcap...@netscape.com
Well said Andy, DVP is a moron! :-)
David Von Pein
>>> "I think that disagreement can be tolerated without such biased and pointless name calling." <<<
Sure it can. But where's the fun in that?
Bland tolerance is boring.
But calling a verified conspiracy-happy moron a "kook" is fun. (Not to
mention wholly accurate.)
YMMV (of course). ;)
David Von Pein
>>> "great paragraph Andy, I'm sure its *firm logic* went right over DVP's head..." <<<
LOL. Papa Andy's "firm logic" is nothing more of the same old CT
mantra that we've seen for lo these many decades -- i.e., Papa's
conveniently just IGNORING the mountain of "OSWALD SHOT JFK"
evidence.
To believe that Oswald fired no shots at ANYONE on 11/22, you've got
to toss out a Mount Everest of physical and circumstantial evidence.
And only a complete idiot who desperately WANTS Oz to be innocent
would even begin to do that.
Rob and Mr. Healy, based on their posts on these forums, easily
qualify for charter status in that "idiot" club.
tomnln
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:aa90c0a3-3461-4d02...@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Burly wrote;
Which doesn't say much for the CT.
I write;
It's the American way burly;
Something you wouldn't understand.
Ask your friends.....
Nazi Germany
Imperial Japan
Muslim Terrorists.
I'm SO glad you decided to trade insults Burly.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
aeffects
son, find someone to quote willya? Left with your own thoughts, ya
can't cut it!