Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Goal of the Newsgroup Troll

8 views
Skip to first unread message

Gil Jesus

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 6:25:36 AM10/27/07
to
A troll's main goal is usually to arouse anger and frustration among
the message board's other participants, and will write whatever it
takes to achieve this end. One popular trolling strategy is the
practice of Winning by Losing. While the victim is trying to put
forward solid and convincing facts to prove his position, the troll's
only goal is to infuriate its prey.

The troll takes (what it knows to be) a badly flawed, wholly illogical
argument, and then vigorously defends it while mocking and insulting
its prey. The troll looks like a complete fool, but this is all part
of the plan. The victim becomes noticeably angry by trying to
repeatedly explain the flaws of the troll's argument.

Provoking this anger was the troll's one and only goal from the very
beginning.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

justm...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 6:54:45 AM10/27/07
to

Amazing, this part of the paragraph describes you and Holmes to a tee:

The troll takes (what it knows to be) a badly flawed, wholly
illogical
argument, and then vigorously defends it while mocking and insulting
its prey. The troll looks like a complete fool

So not only are you a Bigot, you're a Troll too! Thanks for
clarifying yourself further.

Bud

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 8:13:49 AM10/27/07
to

Gil Jesus wrote:
> A troll's main goal is usually to arouse anger and frustration among
> the message board's other participants, and will write whatever it
> takes to achieve this end.

I know I love taking the enjoyment away that you kooks get from
this kook hobby.

>One popular trolling strategy is the
> practice of Winning by Losing. While the victim is trying to put
> forward solid and convincing facts to prove his position,

Usually opinions, assumptions and suspicions, and stupid ones at
that.

> the troll's
> only goal is to infuriate its prey.

Annoyance is good enough. Anyone as purposely stupid as you kooks
are deserve to be tormented.

> The troll takes (what it knows to be) a badly flawed, wholly illogical
> argument,

Yah, who would think that the political fantatic who was seen on
the floor the shots were fired from, and who`s rifle was found on,
shown to be the weapon that fired shots into the limo be a suspect?
Totally illogical, it had to be an unknown person in a sewer.

> and then vigorously defends it while mocking and insulting
> its prey.

OJ probably doesn`t like it when people shout out "murderer"
everywhere he goes. Micheal Vick probably wouldn`t want to be pelted
with dog biscuits everywhere he goes. But they brought this response
on themselves by their actions, as do kooks.

> The troll looks like a complete fool, but this is all part
> of the plan. The victim becomes noticeably angry by trying to
> repeatedly explain the flaws of the troll's argument.

Usually this provocation brings out the kook`s irrational side, and
lurkers conclude that the LNers are right, you guys really are just
kooks.

> Provoking this anger was the troll's one and only goal from the very
> beginning.

For myself, I torment you kooks because I despise your purposeful
stupidity.

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

YoHarvey

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 9:03:54 AM10/27/07
to
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I agree tottally with the posting by Chico Jesus in defining a
"troll".

However, since this is now an "LN" newsgroup, the trolls are those
such as Jesus who waste our time with ludicrous imaginations and
theories that belong in the Twilight Zone. Questions?

cdddraftsman

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 10:02:09 AM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 6:03 am, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I agree tottally with the posting by Chico Jesus in defining a
> "troll".
>
> However, since this is now an "LN" newsgroup, the trolls are those
> such as Jesus who waste our time with ludicrous imaginations and
> theories that belong in the Twilight Zone. Questions?- Hide quoted text -
>

I say hellaluya brother ! and pass the MC ammo ! :-) ............tl
Gil and Rossley are Toxic Avengers ! :
http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc291/cdddraftsman/?action=view&current=PieceofShitGil.jpg


curtjester1

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 10:24:07 AM10/27/07
to

That's the CIA's mantra against JFK research, and it's even in memo
form to subvert it. JFK tried to squelch the CIA's subversive
behavior, and with the assassination, it just gave them more impetus
to thumb their nose at any Presidential authority. It's always the
money, and these clowns are probably are on just some whore payroll to
troll.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_louise_01_03_03_mockingbird.html


CJ

YoHarvey

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 11:11:10 AM10/27/07
to
> CJ- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Your name should be Courtjester rather than Curtjester!!! You know
not what you speak. Those of YOU who subvert and destroy this country
with ideas so ludicrous deserve to be scoffed at. The Government
doesn't pay me. I do it for free. It's call PATRIOTISM!!

curtjester1

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 11:23:28 AM10/27/07
to
> doesn't pay me. I do it for free. It's call PATRIOTISM!!- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Get off your Welfare booze, and go apply to the Covert Dept of the
CIA. Uncle Sammy is looking for a few good swishes.

CJ

YoHarvey

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 11:25:43 AM10/27/07
to

You can't even show creativity or intelligence in your rebuttal to
me. I can now understand why you would support Jesus/Robacp. You a
homophobic, racist as well???

curtjester1

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 11:30:22 AM10/27/07
to
> homophobic, racist as well???- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

We're not as ORGANized as The Company. We don't have meetings to
answer to the perverted Trollies in publication form as of yet.

CJ

YoHarvey

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 11:34:26 AM10/27/07
to

WTF??? People, the is YOUR typical CT. Incoherent and uneducated.
Hardly competition.

tomnln

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 11:40:34 AM10/27/07
to
Lying & Attacking people is Patriotism in Nazi Germany/Communist Russia.

"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193497870....@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...

justm...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 12:56:53 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 11:40 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> Lying & Attacking people is Patriotism in Nazi Germany/Communist Russia.
>
> "YoHarvey" <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > doesn't pay me. I do it for free. It's call PATRIOTISM!!- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Then should we start calling you "Hitler", Rossley?

YoHarvey

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 1:29:58 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 12:56 pm, "justme1...@gmail.com" <justme1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Then should we start calling you "Hitler", Rossley?- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Lying & Attacking people is Patriotism in Nazi Germany/Communist
Russia.

You write in the present tense you insipid idiot. Nazi Germany no
longer exists and Russia is no longer communist. Help society; get
an education. It's never to late.

justm...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 1:50:42 PM10/27/07
to
> an education. It's never to late.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

He not only writes in the present tense, he lives in it. The proof is
in his outdated website and the original cries for conspiracy that
have been buried almost as long as President Kennedy.

Kenneth A. Rahn

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 1:55:49 PM10/27/07
to
Gil,

If a post bothers you in some way, you can always just ignore it. What's
the big deal?

Ken Rahn

"Gil Jesus" <gjj...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1193480736.9...@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...

justm...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 2:03:10 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 1:55 pm, "Kenneth A. Rahn" <kr...@uri.edu> wrote:
> Gil,
>
> If a post bothers you in some way, you can always just ignore it. What's
> the big deal?
>
> Ken Rahn
>
> "Gil Jesus" <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote in message

>
> news:1193480736.9...@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> >A troll's main goal is usually to arouse anger and frustration among
> > the message board's other participants, and will write whatever it
> > takes to achieve this end. One popular trolling strategy is the
> > practice of Winning by Losing. While the victim is trying to put
> > forward solid and convincing facts to prove his position, the troll's
> > only goal is to infuriate its prey.
>
> > The troll takes (what it knows to be) a badly flawed, wholly illogical
> > argument, and then vigorously defends it while mocking and insulting
> > its prey. The troll looks like a complete fool, but this is all part
> > of the plan. The victim becomes noticeably angry by trying to
> > repeatedly explain the flaws of the troll's argument.
>
> > Provoking this anger was the troll's one and only goal from the very
> > beginning.
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Ken,
Gil gets his panties in a knot when he's knocked off the Conspiracy
King throne. You know how those wanna be famous CT's are. They resort
to any type of behavor to try and achieve their goal.
justme

bigdog

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 2:08:27 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 6:54 am, "justme1...@gmail.com" <justme1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> clarifying yourself further.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Ditto. As I was reading this, I immediately thought of Holmes. While
many of the misguided CTs seem to genuinely believe their flawed
premise, Holmes seems to take pleasure in just playing word games.
He'll seem to say one thing and when your refute that position, he'll
deny he ever said it. This is why Holmes is one troll on this board I
just ignore. There is absolutely no point in even trying to engage in
a dialogue with him.

tomnln

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 2:42:16 PM10/27/07
to
You Started it you Eva Braun Cunt. (thanks for that)

I'm just BETTER at it than you. (like everything else)

You keep runnin shit SCARED of your own evidence/testimony.
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm


<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193504213.3...@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...

tomnln

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 2:44:18 PM10/27/07
to
You sound Pissed over the video of me & your wife.

Wanna address these?>>>

"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1193506198.0...@o38g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

tomnln

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 2:45:20 PM10/27/07
to
Hey justme;
You ever been married? (to a man)


<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193507442....@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

tomnln

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 3:08:54 PM10/27/07
to
Get used to the Retaliation justme.

Hey justme1952;

You never told us exactly which "Case you Rested"?

Syphilis or, Gonorrhea

<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193508190....@o3g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

tomnln

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 3:19:03 PM10/27/07
to
Hey lapdog;

Did the authorities Destroy evidence?

Is destruction of evidence a Felony?

"bigdog" <jecorb...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1193508507.0...@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

YoHarvey

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 4:31:05 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 3:19 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> Hey lapdog;
>
> Did the authorities Destroy evidence?
>
> Is destruction of evidence a Felony?
>
> "bigdog" <jecorbett1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > a dialogue with him.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Retliation??? Rosley? A third grade student uses that kind of
retaliation. You're impressed with yourself for having the
vocabulary of an 8 year old. Is that what you're telling this
newsgroup??

Message has been deleted

aeffects

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 4:35:59 PM10/27/07
to

tea young fella?

aeffects

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 4:37:35 PM10/27/07
to
TOP POST

Amazing, ALL the acj. lone neuter trolls on one thread, even Danc'n
Ken Rahn, eek!

David Von Pein

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 4:38:05 PM10/27/07
to
>>> "A troll's main goal is usually to arouse anger and frustration among the message board's other participants, and will write whatever it takes to achieve this end." <<<


All it really takes for an LNer to "achieve this end" is to cite just
a handful of proven facts with respect to the events of
11/22/63....facts that the CT-Kooks can't possibly UNprove, e.g.:

1.) Oswald was positively on the Floor of Death just shortly before
the assassination and asked a fellow worker to send an elevator back
up to him on that sixth floor (a fact that CTers would probably prefer
not to think about, because it could conjure up ideas of Oswald being
a bit sneaky and "plotting", as he wants to disable one of the
elevators on his SIXTH floor, and then possibly use it for a quick
escape after shooting at the President).

But thoughts like that one re. the elevator must always be
automatically rejected as "crazy" by the CT-Kook crowd, because
letting that kind of thought enter a CTer's head would lend some
credence to the idea that Saint Oswald was possibly involved in some
way with JFK's murder. And THAT would never do.

2.) Oswald's rifle is found on the same 6th Floor, the floor from
where an "Oswald-like" person was seen firing a rifle at JFK's car.
(Amazing co-inky there, huh, if it wasn't BOTH the real Oswald and his
real gun being seen doing the shooting at 12:30?)

3.) Gobs of "Oswald Was Here" evidence is strewn in the exact place
(the Sniper's Nest) from where the Oswald-like individual was firing
at JFK. Plus: Bullets from Oswald's gun are found in JFK's car and in
the hospital where the limo victims were taken right after the
shooting. (Probably all "planted" there or something, per the kooks.
So, let's just dismiss those piddly ballistics tidbits that ALL go
directly toward Oz's weapon.)

4.) Oswald leaves the building within minutes of the most exciting
event in Dealey Plaza history, totally disinterested in the pulse-
pounding activity going on within yards of the doorstep of his working
establishment. Go figure that. (Lee probably just wanted to catch that
movie in Oak Cliff. Yeah, that's a better explanation than an LNer's
scenario any day of the week.)

5.) Oswald spends $1.00 for an unusual cab ride home on November 22.
Obviously, Lee's in a pretty big hurry to get home. But why (if he was
merely leaving work early to go see Van Heflin at the movies)?

6.) Oswald shoots and kills Officer J.D. Tippit on 10th Street. This
was probably just another co-inky though. After all, Oswald probably
always carried around a fully-loaded revolver (plus at least 9 extra
bullets in his pocket when he exits his roominghouse on Beckley) after
leaving work in a hurry (sans permission to do so) within minutes of
U.S. Presidents being killed a stone's throw from where Oswald also
was located just 45 minutes earlier.

Yeah, Tippit's being murdered by Book Depository employee Lee Oswald
was prob'ly just a funny coincidence. Besides, you know how boys are
in Texas, "When they've got a gun, they just carry it".

7.) Oswald enters the Texas Theater without paying. (He was probably
saving the $13.87 in his pocket to buy Junie those shoes and to buy
Marina some flowers to make up with her after their Thursday-night
quarrel; you know what a great husband and daddy Lee was.)

8.) Oswald is nabbed in the theater by police as LHO pulls his gun and
tries to shoot more policemen within the theater. But, here again, it
was probably just a strange coincidence. It was probably merely nerves
on Lee's part. He was just a high-strung boy. And LHO's comments
attributed to him in the theater are probably meaningless too (if
you're a CT-Kook, that is) -- "It's all over now" and/or "This is it".

Either one of those statements is pretty incriminating in my LN book.
But, to the kooks, those words probably indicate Lee's frustration at
the cops for grabbing him in the middle of the feature presentation at
the Texas Theater. And nobody's got a right to interrupt a good war
movie (even if you did sneak in the theater for nothing). Not even the
Dallas Police have any right to do that.

The above items (plus so much more, including LHO's numerous lies that
he told after his arrest) usually manage to raise a tad bit of ire in
the CT-Kooks.

But, to a kook, all of this stuff was "faked" or pre-planned in some
way by OTHER (non-Oswald) people in order to frame poor innocent Lee
Harvey.

Do you think a jury -- ANY jury in the world! -- would even BEGIN to
buy such "He Was Framed" nonsense after hearing the huge list of
evidence against this guy named Oswald?

Apparently, many kooks DO think that every jury is composed of the
"O.J. Twelve".

>>> "One popular trolling strategy is the practice of Winning by Losing." <<<

Now Gil seems to be talking about a CTer's strategy.

>>> "While the victim {i.e., a poor "CTer" in Gil-Kook's mind here} is trying to put forward solid and convincing facts to prove his position, the troll's only goal is to infuriate its prey." <<<


Yeah, "solid and convincing facts" like "JFK was trying to cough up
the bullet that entered from the front but didn't exit" (paraphrasing
a kook).

And other "solid" facts like Walt's insanity about Howard Brennan
"DESCRIBING" the assassin in the "west-end" window instead of the east-
side window that Brennan TWICE CIRCLED on WC exhibits. (That's one of
my favorite "solid facts" that Gil was probably talking about.)

And then there's also Walt's lovely theory about how JFK was shot in
the throat from the front (with the bullet exiting his back) at
approx. Z-Frame 161....with Kennedy then continuing to wave and SMILE
to the crowd for almost THIRTY more Zapruder Film frames. (Nice one,
Walt.)

And don't forget resident kook Don Willis....who has placed a rifle in
the hands of 18-year-old Danny Arce. Willis said that Arce shot JFK
from the TSBD's FIFTH floor. (Beautiful "fact" there, huh?)

Is there any need to continue? Or can your bladder handle any more of
these "solid and convincing facts" without bursting from the intense
laughfest that results from such made-up "facts"?

Okay. I'll stop then. (But there's plenty more, of course. Just ask
Ben.)


>>> "The troll takes (what it knows to be) a badly flawed, wholly illogical argument, and then vigorously defends it while mocking and insulting its prey." <<<


Yep, Gil's got to be talking about CTers as the "trolls" here. There
is no other entity that fits the above description. That's for dang
for sure.

>>> "The troll looks like a complete fool..." <<<


Yep. CTers indeed. (Has Gil flipped sides here? Kinda sounds like it.)


>>> "The victim becomes noticeably angry by trying to repeatedly explain the flaws of the troll's argument." <<<


I like the way Gil now thinks that he and his fellow kooks have
somehow been transformed into "victims" by the LN crowd. Too cool,
Gil.

But, as is typical with the kook mindset, they've got everything topsy-
turvy. But I've enjoyed your whining Gil. Please post "Part 2" of this
thread sometime in the future. After all, even us LN/CIA operatives
need a healthy laugh once in a while, right?

www.DavidVonPein.blogspot.com

aeffects

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 4:48:48 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 1:38 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>> "A troll's main goal is usually to arouse anger and frustration among the message board's other participants, and will write whatever it takes to achieve this end." <<<
>
>

All the regular acj Lone Nut-Kook trolls.... LMAO!

unfortunately for Lone Nutter Kook and SBT theorists plus their tiny
following[s], you Dave posting by the pound doesn't help the Nutter-
Lone Nut Kook cause one bit..... The sooner you admit to fucking up
the internet PR campaign waged for daBug's "Reclaiming *mega-flop*
History", sooner you're on the road to recovery......

<snip for the sake of bandwidth pollution>

Carry on troop!

YoHarvey

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 4:53:37 PM10/27/07
to

Nominated and won various industry awards for broadcast/corporate
media production, animation-compositing and post production technical
excellence...

So Healey, you claim above to have won various industry awards. Such
as? Citations available? OR, is this just more bullshit?

robc...@netscape.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 5:01:32 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 6:25 am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> A troll's main goal is usually to arouse anger and frustration among
> the message board's other participants, and will write whatever it
> takes to achieve this end. One popular trolling strategy is the
> practice of Winning by Losing. While the victim is trying to put

> forward solid and convincing facts to prove his position, the troll's
> only goal is to infuriate its prey.
>
> The troll takes (what it knows to be) a badly flawed, wholly illogical
> argument, and then vigorously defends it while mocking and insulting
> its prey. The troll looks like a complete fool, but this is all part
> of the plan. The victim becomes noticeably angry by trying to

> repeatedly explain the flaws of the troll's argument.
>
> Provoking this anger was the troll's one and only goal from the very
> beginning.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

Right on the mark Gil. I bet if we could bug their offices/houses/
cell phones we would find ou they too believe in conspiracy. Any
normal, intelligent adult with a good understanding of this case would
have to believe in more than one man doing this, especially when one
considers the enemies JFK created during his presidency. Your right
on target, they are just here to frustrate us into quiting the board.

robc...@netscape.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 5:14:36 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 11:11 am, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Your name should be Courtjester rather than Curtjester!!! You know
> not what you speak. Those of YOU who subvert and destroy this country
> with ideas so ludicrous deserve to be scoffed at. The Government
> doesn't pay me. I do it for free. It's call PATRIOTISM!

Something else YoLaymo doesn't know. A patroit is one who defends his
country against its government. This term came into being because in
the history of countries there have rarely been governments that cared
about their people. We are a means to an end. Sad, but true. Why do yo
think we were the model to the world prior to 11/22/63? Because at
one time our government did care about us. We see it different than
you YoDimWit, we say the the patriot thing to do is find out what
happened to our government due to the assassination.

Here are some facts for YoDensehead:

44 million Americans live on $12,000 or less per year
Over 2 million people are homeless (40% of these are veterans)
The entire media system is owned by 6 media conglomerates
We have the highest rate of crime in the word (compared to all
countries not at war - Iraq doesn't count as it means a war within
your own boarders)
We have the world's largest prison population
25% of children under 12 live in poverty
We have the world's highest teen suicides

You can hide your head or you can say this is not good enough for the
U.S. It all starts with the JFK assassination. There has been a
decline in this country ever since that event. So you should be
looking at what you are told and start wondering if it is the whole
truth and nothing but the truth.


YoHarvey

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 5:15:58 PM10/27/07
to
> on target, they are just here to frustrate us into quiting the board.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

I'll begin with a Healey moment ROFLMAO. The resident lunatic on this
forum, Chico Jesus is ONE MORE TIME conversing with HIMSELF as
Robcap. Well, when ya got NO friends, I guess ya have to improvise!!!

aeffects

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 5:18:20 PM10/27/07
to

shit hon.... dat be me.... I'm the one that Dale Myers doesn't want to
speak with.... Know who he is, Gloria?

And your excuse other than that $20 dollar check you recieive to pay
off that huge education loan you've burden us taxpayers with. And when
you deal with superiors son, best get the name spelled correctly,
Healy.

robc...@netscape.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 5:18:27 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 1:50 pm, "justme1...@gmail.com" <justme1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> He not only writes in the present tense, he lives in it. The proof is
> in his outdated website and the original cries for conspiracy that
> have been buried almost as long as President Kennedy.

Yeah and you are so interested in an open and honest society too,
right? Talk about a conspiracy frame of mind - "justme1952"? Are you
afraid someone might see your real name? Why are you hiding if you
are so strong in your convictions?

What's is your real name?


robc...@netscape.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 5:20:04 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 1:55 pm, "Kenneth A. Rahn" <kr...@uri.edu> wrote:
> Gil,
>
> If a post bothers you in some way, you can always just ignore it. What's
> the big deal?
>
> Ken Rahn

Ken,

That goes for LNers too, especially when they are on the conspiracy
page! But you are right, just ignore it if it bothers you.

Robert

YoHarvey

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 5:23:47 PM10/27/07
to

Healy? You're a 61 year old faiilure making ONE last attempt to
impress. You can't Healy. I asked you for documentation on the
awards YOU SAY you've won. You can't. You claim to have expertise in
animation and yet
when Dale Meyers award winning animation is presented, you belittle
it. This is type of human being you are.....a failure in life. Live
with it.+

David Von Pein

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 5:25:31 PM10/27/07
to
>>> "I {Healy the Mega-Kook} am the one that Dale Myers doesn't want to speak with." <<<

Gee, I wonder why?

YoHarvey

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 5:27:50 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 5:25 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>> "I {Healy the Mega-Kook} am the one that Dale Myers doesn't want to speak with." <<<
>
> Gee, I wonder why?

^5 David

Kenneth A. Rahn

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 5:43:48 PM10/27/07
to
Robert,

I do ignore the great majority of posts here, especially the ones with
name-calling and the specious arguments that we have been hearing for so
long.

Ken Rahn

<robc...@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:1193520004.9...@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...

tomnln

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 6:25:34 PM10/27/07
to

"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193517065.7...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Retliation??? Rosley? A third grade student uses that kind of
> retaliation. You're impressed with yourself for having the
> vocabulary of an 8 year old. Is that what you're telling this
> newsgroup??

Yo(Momma)Harvey;
1 I beat the snot outta you with evidence/testimony.

2 You decided to start insulting me.
I Beat the SHIT outta you there also. (10 fold)

3 You Threatened to pay me a visit.
That would have resulted in the LAST 20 second Lesson of your Life so,
you CHICKENED OUT.

YOU'RE A THREE TIME LOSER.


tomnln

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 6:34:07 PM10/27/07
to

<robc...@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:1193519907....@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

How many CONVICTIONS has she had????


tomnln

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 6:37:00 PM10/27/07
to
You have 83 people doin your wife LOSER.

You're the "Failure".

WHO is Yo(Momma)Harvey?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/baileynme.htm

ALL in her/his own words.


"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1193520227....@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

tomnln

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 6:39:12 PM10/27/07
to
I don't recall you complaining about the name-calling when the LN side
Started them.

You only Wimped out when we Beat the shit outta them with RETALIATION.


"Kenneth A. Rahn" <kr...@uri.edu> wrote in message
news:fg0bd...@news2.newsguy.com...

Sam Brown

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 8:13:09 PM10/27/07
to
Thats funny coming from Gilly the Bigot, who is so dishonest he's been
caught numerous times using various aliases. What a dweeb.

<robc...@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:1193519907....@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

Sam Brown

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 8:44:23 PM10/27/07
to

<robc...@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:1193519676....@o3g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

> On Oct 27, 11:11 am, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Your name should be Courtjester rather than Curtjester!!! You know
>> not what you speak. Those of YOU who subvert and destroy this country
>> with ideas so ludicrous deserve to be scoffed at. The Government
>> doesn't pay me. I do it for free. It's call PATRIOTISM!
>
> Something else YoLaymo doesn't know. A patroit is one who defends his
> country against its government.

I'd like to see a citation for that Bigot boy. The Concise Oxford English
Dictionarys' definition is "a person who is devoted to and ready to support
or defend his or her country". Nothing at all in there about "Government".


This term came into being because in
> the history of countries there have rarely been governments that cared
> about their people.

This term is derived from the French word 'patriote' via the late Latin
'patriota' from Greel 'Patriotes', via 'Patrios' "of ones fathers" from
'patris' (father).
Its apparent that you lack of accuracy extends beyond the JFK assassination
Gilly.

We are a means to an end. Sad, but true. Why do yo
> think we were the model to the world prior to 11/22/63?


Sorry? In what way was the US a "model" to the world before 1963 and for how
long? The US was one model but certainly not "the" model. Don't forget
'that' model included segregation, not something that was eagerly picked up
universally. Lets remove your rose coloured glasses for a while. Oh but I
forgot, Gilly the Bigot likes segregation.

Because at
> one time our government did care about us.


'Course they did, if you were white.


We see it different than
> you YoDimWit, we say the the patriot thing to do is find out what
> happened to our government due to the assassination.

You are nothing more than yet another fringe-dwelling lunatic with a
persecution complex.


>
> Here are some facts for YoDensehead:
>
> 44 million Americans live on $12,000 or less per year

Over 2 million people are homeless (40% of these are veterans)
> The entire media system is owned by 6 media conglomerates
> We have the highest rate of crime in the word (compared to all
> countries not at war - Iraq doesn't count as it means a war within
> your own boarders)
> We have the world's largest prison population
> 25% of children under 12 live in poverty
> We have the world's highest teen suicides

And Kennedy would have prevented all these things? Christ, the air must be
thin in Kookville.


>
> You can hide your head or you can say this is not good enough for the
> U.S. It all starts with the JFK assassination. There has been a
> decline in this country ever since that event. So you should be
> looking at what you are told and start wondering if it is the whole
> truth and nothing but the truth.

You are just plain paranoid. Why are you wasting your time on something that
was solved over forty years ago ? Start using that energy to end the
corruption that is so blatant in your current administration. I bet you
really believe you are on to something don't you? Moron.

>
>

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 11:21:46 PM10/27/07
to
In article <fg0bd...@news2.newsguy.com>, Kenneth A. Rahn says...

>
>Robert,
>
> I do ignore the great majority of posts here, especially the ones with
>name-calling and the specious arguments that we have been hearing for so
>long.
>
>Ken Rahn


Of course, Ken would be hard pressed to point out any 'good' arguments...

Since the evidence doesn't favor the LNT'er side - there's little that Ken can
actually debate and not look like a fool.

aeffects

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 11:26:01 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 5:44 pm, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> <robcap...@netscape.com> wrote in message


Sammy from down-undah, you haven't a clue hon... oh, and what the fuck
does a dolt such as yourself care about the JFK assassination for? Oh,
that's right you know nothing of the assassination, do you?

aeffects

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 11:34:11 PM10/27/07
to
On Oct 27, 5:13 pm, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> Thats funny coming from Gilly the Bigot, who is so dishonest he's been
> caught numerous times using various aliases. What a dweeb.

oh come on now you ole muncher you. We know you know nothing of the
assassination, therefore you're here under false pretenses, therefore
you're the ultimate liar, lying to yourself of course. We all know
you're a fraud, right along with your homey partner Justme1952. I
suggest you feel guilty over the sins you've committed in the past and
are looking for forgiveness here on .acj. Which is kinda weird and
kinky, won't you agree? We know you need a public platform, and mega
attention.... That close to the truth, hon?


> <robcap...@netscape.com> wrote in message

Sam Brown

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 12:50:24 AM10/28/07
to
More Bigotry and hate filled vitriol from Healey, what a surprise. Gilly,
Toothless and Grandad, a triple pack of dumb!


"aeffects" <aeff...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193542451....@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

Sam Brown

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 12:51:52 AM10/28/07
to

"aeffects" <aeff...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193541961....@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Anything wrong with the content of my post? Apparently not as Healey reverts
to his parrot-like adherence to the fantasy that is conspiracy.

aeffects

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 1:20:51 AM10/28/07
to
On Oct 27, 5:44 pm, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> <robcap...@netscape.com> wrote in message


Muncher, you're not worthy to speak about matters concerning
America.... carry on, hon -- Nice tush though!

Sam Brown

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 1:34:43 AM10/28/07
to

"aeffects" <aeff...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193548851.3...@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

More hate and bigotry, proud of yourself Grandad?

you're not worthy to speak about matters concerning
> America....

THEN STOP RESPONDING TO ME DUMBARSE!

carry on, hon -- Nice tush though!

I know.

justm...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 6:10:53 AM10/28/07
to
On Oct 28, 1:34 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> "aeffects" <aeffe...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> really believe you are on to something don't you? Moron.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Healy believes hes human, nuff said.

Burly...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 10:54:19 AM10/28/07
to
On Oct 27, 6:25 am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> A troll's main goal is usually to arouse anger and frustration among
> the message board's other participants, and will write whatever it
> takes to achieve this end. One popular trolling strategy is the
> practice of Winning by Losing. While the victim is trying to put
> forward solid and convincing facts to prove his position, the troll's
> only goal is to infuriate its prey.
>
> The troll takes (what it knows to be) a badly flawed, wholly illogical
> argument, and then vigorously defends it while mocking and insulting
> its prey. The troll looks like a complete fool, but this is all part
> of the plan. The victim becomes noticeably angry by trying to
> repeatedly explain the flaws of the troll's argument.
>
> Provoking this anger was the troll's one and only goal from the very
> beginning.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll


In your very first response to me when I first came here, after I
mentioned your Hargis "That man slowed down" Youtube video, you asked
me if I was "the asshole'' who left a comment concerning its contents,
at Youtube. You are just as guilty of ''provoking'' people as those
you accuse.

And, I might add that, when refering people to the Holy Bible, you
might also remember that the Bible also teaches not to use the type of
language you used with me, i.e. "asshole'' and other verbiage you and
some of the others round here use, then cite that the Bible states
this and that. You obvioulsy are just as guilty of not obeying God as
those you accuse, and so ''look at the speck/beam in your own eye" as
Christ taught.

aeffects

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 12:24:31 PM10/28/07
to

douche-bag, it's YOUR job to convince us non-WCR/SBT/LHO did it all by
his lonesome that the Lone neuter's got it right.... Now get to it,
stop your damn whining, sell us!

Oh, were you that ASSHOLE? Forget the speck and beam, when you get out
of the Redwood Forest we'll speak, till then continue your might
quest: climbing the WCR!

aeffects

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 12:26:42 PM10/28/07
to
On Oct 27, 10:34 pm, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> "aeffects" <aeffe...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

you whine so beautifully though..... you're not going to change this
board, hon.....

muc...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 12:36:29 PM10/28/07
to

Actually, it's the job of guys (and I use the term loosely) like you
to convince guys like us that your suspicions have merit. So far you
have been doing a piss poor job.

> Oh, were you that ASSHOLE? Forget the speck and beam, when you get out
> of the Redwood Forest we'll speak, till then continue your might
> quest: climbing the WCR!

Troll.

aeffects

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 12:40:52 PM10/28/07
to

keep coming back gorgeous.... we NEED you!

justm...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 2:40:53 PM10/28/07
to
> keep coming back gorgeous.... we NEED you!- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Our side already won idiot....its YOUR job to convince us there was a
conspiracy...and you CAN'T...loser

curtjester1

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 2:56:07 PM10/28/07
to
On 27 Oct, 17:14, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
> On Oct 27, 11:11 am, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Your name should be Courtjester rather than Curtjester!!! You know
> > not what you speak. Those of YOU who subvert and destroy this country
> > with ideas so ludicrous deserve to be scoffed at. The Government
> > doesn't pay me. I do it for free. It's call PATRIOTISM!
>
> Something else YoLaymo doesn't know. A patroit is one who defends his
> country against its government. This term came into being because in

It's actually in the Declaration of Independence.

> the history of countries there have rarely been governments that cared

> about their people. We are a means to an end. Sad, but true. Why do yo
> think we were the model to the world prior to 11/22/63? Because at
> one time our government did care about us. We see it different than


> you YoDimWit, we say the the patriot thing to do is find out what
> happened to our government due to the assassination.
>

> Here are some facts for YoDensehead:
>
> 44 million Americans live on $12,000 or less per year
> Over 2 million people are homeless (40% of these are veterans)
> The entire media system is owned by 6 media conglomerates
> We have the highest rate of crime in the word (compared to all
> countries not at war - Iraq doesn't count as it means a war within
> your own boarders)
> We have the world's largest prison population
> 25% of children under 12 live in poverty
> We have the world's highest teen suicides
>

Looks like a country adopting the Communist Way. Of course, they
won't accept that the Coup of 1963 had anything to do with it.

> You can hide your head or you can say this is not good enough for the
> U.S. It all starts with the JFK assassination. There has been a
> decline in this country ever since that event. So you should be
> looking at what you are told and start wondering if it is the whole
> truth and nothing but the truth.

I am sure the WindFallists from the Coup could care less if it's not
made in U.S.A.

CJ


Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 3:00:23 PM10/28/07
to
In article <1193589389.8...@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
muc...@gmail.com says...

Au Contraire!

It's our purpose to use your lies, evasions, and inability to answer simple
questions about the evidence to allow lurkers to see the evidence, and make up
their own minds.

In other words, you're merely a blackboard on which we expose the facts &
evidence in this case.


There's never any intention of trying to convince liars and cowards that they
are backing the wrong theory.


>So far you have been doing a piss poor job.


That wouldn't be your judgement to make. That would be the judgement of lurkers
who read these posts in order to educate themselves.

aeffects

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 4:09:27 PM10/28/07
to
On Oct 28, 11:40 am, "justme1...@gmail.com" <justme1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

then what are you here for, hon -- amongst your other foibles you into
abuse, too?

justm...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 5:32:23 PM10/28/07
to
> abuse, too?- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

There's never any intention of trying to convince liars and cowards


that they
are backing the wrong theory.


Your 100% right Tatoo...we aren't trying to convince you that your a
liar and a coward backing the wong theory....we already know it, and
your too stupid to see the truth. It's our purpose to expose the
idiotic garbage you post with no proof of any of it. I'd tell you what
you could do with your 45 questions, but that spot is already taken
with Healys head.

Sam Brown

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 9:52:24 PM10/28/07
to

"aeffects" <aeff...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193589652.5...@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

Be quiet TROLL!! LOL Much!
>

Sam Brown

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 9:54:21 PM10/28/07
to
Can't help yourself can you defects? LOL

"aeffects" <aeff...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:1193588802.1...@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

Sam Brown

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 9:56:06 PM10/28/07
to

"curtjester1" <curtj...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193597767.1...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

> On 27 Oct, 17:14, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
>> On Oct 27, 11:11 am, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Your name should be Courtjester rather than Curtjester!!! You know
>> > not what you speak. Those of YOU who subvert and destroy this country
>> > with ideas so ludicrous deserve to be scoffed at. The Government
>> > doesn't pay me. I do it for free. It's call PATRIOTISM!
>>
>> Something else YoLaymo doesn't know. A patroit is one who defends his
>> country against its government. This term came into being because in
>
> It's actually in the Declaration of Independence.

Who gives a shit, the word existed long before that. Fucking philistine.

I know I couldn't.

>
> CJ
>
>

curtjester1

unread,
Oct 29, 2007, 10:20:47 AM10/29/07
to
On 28 Oct, 21:56, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> "curtjester1" <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:1193597767.1...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On 27 Oct, 17:14, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
> >> On Oct 27, 11:11 am, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Your name should be Courtjester rather than Curtjester!!! You know
> >> > not what you speak. Those of YOU who subvert and destroy this country
> >> > with ideas so ludicrous deserve to be scoffed at. The Government
> >> > doesn't pay me. I do it for free. It's call PATRIOTISM!
>
> >> Something else YoLaymo doesn't know. A patroit is one who defends his
> >> country against its government. This term came into being because in
>
> > It's actually in the Declaration of Independence.
>
> Who gives a shit, the word existed long before that. Fucking philistine.
>
>
And so is Conspiracy, which many people have fallen victim to
Conspirators all throughout history, in the name of Patriotism. They
get duped so bad in Conspiratorial influence, they actually think they
were being Patriotic by defending the wiles of the Conspiracy. Kind
of rings a bell for modern times too.

Yah, the less corporations the better. Pretty soon, Mickey D's will
be buying out Taco Bell, then the economy will be just one Happy Meal.

CJ

>
>
>
>
> > CJ- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

bigdog

unread,
Oct 29, 2007, 4:04:39 PM10/29/07
to
On Oct 27, 5:15 pm, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 27, 5:01 pm, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
>

> I'll begin with a Healey moment ROFLMAO. The resident lunatic on this
> forum, Chico Jesus is ONE MORE TIME conversing with HIMSELF as
> Robcap. Well, when ya got NO friends, I guess ya have to improvise!!!- Hide quoted text -


>
> - Show quoted text -

Chico has lots of friends, all of them imaginary. I haven't figured
out yet if he just makes them up or he genuinely has a multi-
personality disorder and they all take their turns at the keyboard.

aeffects

unread,
Oct 29, 2007, 4:10:19 PM10/29/07
to
On Oct 28, 6:56 pm, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> "curtjester1" <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:1193597767.1...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On 27 Oct, 17:14, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
> >> On Oct 27, 11:11 am, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Your name should be Courtjester rather than Curtjester!!! You know
> >> > not what you speak. Those of YOU who subvert and destroy this country
> >> > with ideas so ludicrous deserve to be scoffed at. The Government
> >> > doesn't pay me. I do it for free. It's call PATRIOTISM!
>
> >> Something else YoLaymo doesn't know. A patroit is one who defends his
> >> country against its government. This term came into being because in
>
> > It's actually in the Declaration of Independence.
>
> Who gives a shit, the word existed long before that. Fucking philistine.

you're Fresno fan club won't appreciate you degrading the US
Constitution -- Sammy, do they pay you to be this stupid?

Sam Brown

unread,
Oct 29, 2007, 7:59:24 PM10/29/07
to

"aeffects" <aeff...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193688619....@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

> On Oct 28, 6:56 pm, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> "curtjester1" <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1193597767.1...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On 27 Oct, 17:14, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
>> >> On Oct 27, 11:11 am, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > Your name should be Courtjester rather than Curtjester!!! You know
>> >> > not what you speak. Those of YOU who subvert and destroy this
>> >> > country
>> >> > with ideas so ludicrous deserve to be scoffed at. The Government
>> >> > doesn't pay me. I do it for free. It's call PATRIOTISM!
>>
>> >> Something else YoLaymo doesn't know. A patroit is one who defends his
>> >> country against its government. This term came into being because in
>>
>> > It's actually in the Declaration of Independence.
>>
>> Who gives a shit, the word existed long before that. Fucking philistine.
>
> you're Fresno fan club won't appreciate you degrading the US
> Constitution -- Sammy, do they pay you to be this stupid?

If you can't follow a conversation then piss orf defects. The US
Consititution and the dec' of inde' has NOTHING to do with what we were
discussing. Once again. STOP STALKING ME YOU UGLY LITTLE BIGOT!
Why would anyone pay me to be stupid, when you do it for free?

0 new messages