McADAMS SUNK HIMSELF
tomnln
"John McAdams" <john.m...@marquette.edu> wrote in message
news:neftt4t8p64q9dps9...@4ax.com...
> On 9 Apr 2009 20:22:52 -0400, David Von Pein <davev...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>Addendum/Correction:
>>
>>When I said this above....
>>
>> "So, Rossley's got Kennedy AND Connally being shot from the front --
>>a sort of "SBT in reverse", it would seem (although Rossley thinks they
>>were hit by separate FRONTAL bullets; and Rossley also has Connally being
>>hit by TWO bullets, which means his anti-SBT theory has to account for
>>FOUR disappearing bullets, in order to replace the SBT's one single
>>bullet)."
>>
>>....I was slightly in error, because I just remembered that Rossley only
>>needs a mere THREE bullets to replace the SBT, and that's because Rossley
>>believes (and said so during the 4/5/09 radio debate) that the shot that
>>he says hit JFK in his throat from the front EXITED the President's upper
>>back and then struck the pavement on Elm Street.
>>
>>But even a "mere" 3-bullet SBT replacement is absurd and everyone with
>>some common sense should know why.
>
> He didn't seem aware that there was an abrasion collar on Kennedy's
> back, showing that that was a wound of entry.
>
> .John
> --------------
> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
When you folks don't like the official evidence/testimony states, you claim
it False & attribute it to me.
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/
McAdams sunk himself last Sunday evening during our debate by NOT giving
official Citations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bigdog
>
> news:neftt4t8p64q9dps9...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 9 Apr 2009 20:22:52 -0400, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Rossley, we had very low expectations for you and couldn't even live
up to those. You we're the joke we've always know you were.
tomnln
"bigdog" <jecorb...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a04f2fca-83cc-4233...@l1g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
Go Lick McAdam's Wounds Lackey .
We notice YOU RAN from a chance to debate me ! ! !
ANOTHER OFFICIAL RECORD ! ! !
HAHAHAHAHA
justm...@gmail.com
> "bigdog" <jecorbett1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
I wonder if Rossley has but that big Gold Star on the front of his
house yet? Maybe he should get a PR person and start signing
autographs at the local Senior Center. He actually thinks he won this
debate, now that's something to ROFLMAO over.
Rossley: Can I give the name of my website??? Its www dot who killed
JFK all one word dot net. That's www dot who killed JFK dot net. It's
all on my website, It's all on my website....blah blah blah like a
broken record. That was 80% of your debate Rossley. Dull, boring and
the same old shit you've been spewing for years.
You sounded just as pathetic and agitated as you do in your Paltalk
Chat room, trying to make everyone listen to you like you are the only
one that is right and the rest of the world is wrong.
YoHarvey
wrote:
Rossley, barely able to get through high school believes one wins a
debate based on volume of bullshit as opposed to quality of bullshit.
One question Rossley? You claimed to have worked for a Hartford
newspaper as I recall. Exactly how long did you deliver papers and
what type of bicycle did you ride?
tomnln
<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dc07f412-48d7-4d4c...@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
justme wrote;
I wonder if Rossley has but that big Gold Star on the front of his
house yet? Maybe he should get a PR person and start signing
autographs at the local Senior Center. He actually thinks he won this
debate, now that's something to ROFLMAO over.
Rossley: Can I give the name of my website??? Its www dot who killed
JFK all one word dot net. That's www dot who killed JFK dot net. It's
all on my website, It's all on my website....blah blah blah like a
broken record. That was 80% of your debate Rossley. Dull, boring and
the same old shit you've been spewing for years.
You sounded just as pathetic and agitated as you do in your Paltalk
Chat room, trying to make everyone listen to you like you are the only
one that is right and the rest of the world is wrong.
I write;
Your 10% does NOT represent "the rest of the world".
Do you wanna "Pinch-Hit" for McSAdams at the Next debate?
btw;
You are also Featured on that website>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/guess_who_wrote.htm
Found under >>> http://whokilledjfk.net/rogue.htm
The ONLY time you addressed evidence/testimony, you got Knocked on your ass>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1cd43f13-bfa1-4777...@g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
Yo(Momma)Harvey wrote;
Rossley, barely able to get through high school believes one wins a
debate based on volume of bullshit as opposed to quality of bullshit.
One question Rossley? You claimed to have worked for a Hartford
newspaper as I recall. Exactly how long did you deliver papers and
what type of bicycle did you ride?
I write;
Right about now, I'll bet McAdams is Wishing it was You who was trying to
debate me;
That debate would NOT have included one issue of evidence/testimony.
Either address evidence/testimony OR, GO FEED THE BOA !
It's not too late Bunky;
My good friend McAdams & I can still arrange for you to enter the debate.
Whatta ya say?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chuck Schuyler
> I write;
>
> Right about now, I'll bet McAdams is Wishing it was You who was trying to
> debate me;
>
> That debate would NOT have included one issue of evidence/testimony.
>
> Either address evidence/testimony OR, GO FEED THE BOA !
>
> It's not too late Bunky;
>
> My good friend McAdams & I can still arrange for you to enter the debate.
>
> Whatta ya say?
For starters, I'd say that McAdams isn't your 'good friend'.
tomnln
"Chuck Schuyler" <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote in message
news:6d29b940-b551-46a0...@k19g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How often do you take the liberty of answering for other people?
Professor McAdams got along very well during that debate.
We even Complimented each other.
We treated each other with mutual Respect;
One of us a little more than the other but, still mutual respect.
A Concept that's Totally Foreign to YOU ! ! !
SOOOOOO;
Do you wanna "Pinch-Hit" for McAdams or, NOT???
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YoHarvey
Hey coffin dweller? You didn't tell us what kind of bicycle you rode
delivering those newspapers in Hartford.
tomnln
Hey coffin dweller? You didn't tell us what kind of bicycle you rode
delivering those newspapers in Hartford.
I write;
I guess you RUNNING from TWO invitations to debate on the radio would have
been TOO much for you.
That's why you decided to reply with insults.
Once a Coward....Always a Coward David ! ! !
Instead of exposing your Stupidity of evidence/testimony, why don't you try
to learn some of it HERE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/radio_debate.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
snl1...@yahoo.com
You are certainly showing no respect towards him by starting
threads with the title that this one has, Tom. Don't insult people's
intelligence.
I'd say John was very, very patient with you. All I heard was a lot
of hostility in your voice, whereas John was very calm and collected.
You were rude, and interrupted him on several occasions, and I thought
John showed great patience. More than I **ever** could!
justm...@gmail.com
> "YoHarvey" <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Rossley? What makes you think that Anton Batey would allow you to
debate on his radio station again?
David Von Pein
www.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/87797f6807407a12
>>> "McAdams sunk himself last Sunday evening during our debate by NOT giving official Citations." <<<
Yeah...since McAdams didn't "cite" exact page numbers from the 26
volumes, that means that the dozens of pieces of evidence against
Rossley's favorite patsy have suddenly disappeared altogether. Right,
Tom R.?
And I love how Rossley thinks his citation leading to CE2983 somehow
buttresses his argument that it WAS Dan Rather, after all, who saw
Oswald at Ruby's club prior to the assassination....when, in point of
fact, CE2983 proves just the OPPOSITE, with that exhibit showing that
Rather never claimed to be inside the Carousel Club at any time--ever.
CE2983:
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh26/html/WH_Vol26_0259a.htm
The upside-down world of a CTer must be a real bitch. How can you go
to the bathroom while contorted in an upside-down manner like that all
the time, Tom?
tomnln
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:dc5f7f23-1ef5-4af7...@a23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
Didn't that request from the Warren Commission to the FBI specifically ask
for the Video tape that they even gave the tape number for???
tomnln
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:47bc936b-44bf-4aa9...@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> www.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/87797f6807407a12
>
>>>> "McAdams sunk himself last Sunday evening during our debate by NOT
>>>> giving official Citations." <<<
>
> volumes,
> that means that the dozens of pieces of evidence against Rossley's
> favorite patsy have suddenly disappeared altogether. Right, Tom R.?
>
> And I love how Rossley thinks his citation leading to CE2983 somehow
> buttresses his argument that it WAS Dan Rather, after all, who saw
> Oswald
> at Ruby's club prior to the assassination....when, in point of fact,
> CE2983 proves just the OPPOSITE, with that exhibit showing that Rather
> never claimed to be inside the Carousel Club at any time--ever.
>
> to the bathroom while contorted in an upside-down manner like that all
> the time, Tom?
The FBI did NOT fill the Commission';'s request did they David?
The request was fo the Video tape.
Not much of an investigator are you David !
tomnln
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:cd206ab9-089f-4e70...@r36g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
> www.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/87797f6807407a12
>
>
>
>>>> "McAdams sunk himself last Sunday evening during our debate by NOT
>>>> giving official Citations." <<<
>
> volumes,
> that means that the dozens of pieces of evidence against Rossley's
> favorite patsy have suddenly disappeared altogether. Right, Tom R.?
>
> And I love how Rossley thinks his citation leading to CE2983 somehow
> buttresses his argument that it WAS Dan Rather, after all, who saw
> Oswald
> at Ruby's club prior to the assassination....when, in point of fact,
> CE2983 proves just the OPPOSITE, with that exhibit showing that Rather
> never claimed to be inside the Carousel Club at any time--ever.
>
> The upside-down world of a CTer must be a real bitch. How can you go
> to
> the bathroom while contorted in an upside-down manner like that all
> the
> time, Tom?
VERY EASILY;
I just sit on your Chinny-Chin-Chin.
Gettin back to the issue;
The Commission Specifically asked the FBI to get the Video tape.
tomnln
<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7e41fed6-6be8-4f48...@e12g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
justme wrote;
Rossley? What makes you think that Anton Batey would allow you to
debate on his radio station again?
I write
You don't Hear any better than you read.
ALL three of us AGREED to do so.
Next time I think he's gonna look for a more Qualified Opponent for me.
Do you wanna Participate????
I'm SURE my good friend McAdams & I can arrange it.
SEE/HEAR>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/radio_debate.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
<snl1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:84c6bbff-de2e-4eed...@f11g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
You are certainly showing no respect towards him by starting
threads with the title that this one has, Tom. Don't insult people's
intelligence.
I'd say John was very, very patient with you. All I heard was a lot
of hostility in your voice, whereas John was very calm and collected.
You were rude, and interrupted him on several occasions, and I thought
John showed great patience. More than I **ever** could!
I write;
Must I point out where I said "sorry, I have to interrupt your
Interruption"????
Guess your Hearing ain't very good after all.
We knew that several years ago didn't we steverino ! ! !
btw;
How many Ambulances has your Lawyer caught by now?
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/law_suits.htm
Found under >>> http://whokilledjfk.net/rogue.htm
Maybe you along with toad/rob could combine as the Three Gay Cabolleroos
"Pinch-Hit" for Mcadams next radio debate.
David Von Pein
>>> "The [Warren] Commission specifically asked the FBI to get the videotape [re. Dan Rather's supposed statement about seeing Oswald at the Carousel Club, via KRLD-Radio in Dallas]." <<<
So what?
CE2983 provides ample proof that Dan Rather NEVER, EVER was in the
Carousel Club at any time.
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh26/html/WH_Vol26_0259a.htm
You obviously think Dan Rather is a liar, right Tom?
(Silly question, of course Tom thinks Rather is a liar.)
But let's look at this from a "common-sense" perspective, okay? (Are
you up for that, Tom?)
Let's say (for the sake of argument) that Dan Rather of CBS News
really HAD been in the Carousel Club prior to 11/22/63 and he really
DID see Lee Oswald in that nightclub.
Now, fast forward to 11/24/63 --- Dan Rather, who is heavily involved
in the Dallas coverage for CBS-TV that November weekend in 1963, would
have had a golden opportunity to reveal to the WORLD (via live
television) that he, HIMSELF, had actually SEEN Lee Harvey Oswald a
few days before JFK's assassination in the VERY SAME CLUB OWNED BY
OSWALD'S MURDERER!
But does Dan Rather reveal this bombshell on nationwide TV on 11/24/63
(or at anytime thereafter)?
No. Instead, Dan Rather interviews nightclub comedian Bill DeMar on
CBS-TV on the afternoon or early evening of Sunday, November 24th,
1963, and it's DeMar who tells the world that it was he (DeMar) who
had supposedly seen Oswald in the Carousel about "8 or 9 days" prior
to 11/24/63. (DeMar also said "last week" when he was asked by Rather
when exactly DeMar had seen Oswald at the club.)
Also -- Via that Rather/DeMar interview on 11/24/63 (video linked
below), Dan Rather obviously has NO IDEA WHATSOEVER what kind of club
the Carousel is....hence, Rather asks DeMar questions like, "What kind
of club is it?" and "Is it a rough place?".
Now, if Dan Rather HIMSELF had been inside the Carousel Club at some
point in time shortly prior to Kennedy's assassination, why would he
need to even ASK such questions of somebody else? He would have known
what kind of club it was HIMSELF.
Of course, I'm sure that Tom Rossley (and other CT-Kooks equally as
unhinged as Tom) want to believe that Mr. Rather was merely keeping
quiet about being at Jack Ruby's Carousel Club prior to the
assassination (and seeing Oswald there). Right, Tom?
Dan Rather really KNEW what kind of club the Carousel was, right? And
he really had seen Lee Oswald there on 11/21/63 (even though we know
that Oswald couldn't even have been there that night, because he drove
out to Irving with Buell Frazier to spend that night with Marina and
his kids [and to get his rifle, of course]). Right, Tom?
But Rather was, in a way, lying his ass off by KEEPING QUIET about
these things on November 24, 1963, when he interviewed Bill DeMar.
Right, Tom?
Dan Rather, with a golden opportunity (per Kook Rossley) to toot his
own horn (so to speak), and to gain even more attention than he
already had gained as of 11/24/63, decides to CLAM UP entirely about
having physically SEEN Lee Harvey Oswald at Jack Ruby's nightclub
prior to the assassination of the President.
Right, Tom-Kook?
(Tell me I'm right about those things, Tom. I always enjoy watching a
kook hang himself with his own stupid beliefs.)
========================================
DAN RATHER INTERVIEWS BILL DeMAR (11/24/63):
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqOUQWpIzpc&fmt=18
www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FFD6CCCB72B1CB73
========================================
tims...@gmail.com
> <snl141...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Hi tomnln,
Say, it would be interesting if Anton Batey were to read THIS response
by you.
Not sure he'd take such a benign view of you, were he to do so.
KUTGW, tomnln, LOL! Truth will out!
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dc9b8b51-a24f-4459...@y10g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
Hi tomnln,
Regards,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you know something about Anton Batey that the rest of us Don'y know??
Timmy??
ps;
Did you find your Pigmy Oswald Yet???
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f5d68f22-d119-42da...@v9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
Rather is a Proven Liar David;
Thje WC asked the FBI to get the Film of Rather making the statement.
The FBI did NOT do that, they interviewed Rather INSTEAD.
What Rather said on that film FORCED Ruby to kill Oswald.
Which "Compromises" Ruby.
Because Ruby DID kill Oswald, they didn't NEED the film of Rsather's
statement.
The question was......
Did the Warren Commission ask the FBI to retreive the "FILM"????
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/ratherlies.htm
Pretty LOUD for a Whimp who RAN from the radio debate.
Rather did NOT Need to state it publickly, because Ruby DID kill Oswald.
(It's called "LEVERAGE" David.
That's how the FEDS Operate.
SEE Books I, II, III, IV & V HERE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/church.htm
You make it EASY to see WHY you RAN from the radio debate.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
justm...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>> "The [Warren] Commission specifically asked the FBI to get the
> >>>> videotape [re. Dan Rather's supposed statement about seeing Oswald at
> >>>> the Carousel Club, via KRLD-Radio in Dallas]." <<<
>
> > So what?
>
> > CE2983 provides ample proof that Dan Rather NEVER, EVER was in the
> > Carousel Club at any time.
>
I have a funny feeling that Anton has already seen the ramblings of
the lunatic Rossley. Rosselys ready to take on the world, hide your
children and pets ROFLMAO
David Von Pein
www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/946bc60dacdb55b4
Hey everybody!! Over here!! Gather around!!
You guys want to see a kook/idiot in all his moronic glory? Okay, take
a look at this gem from The Nutsack:
"What [Dan] Rather said on that film FORCED Ruby to kill
Oswald." -- Thomas Rossley; 04/11/2009
That's an instant classic, Tom.
I'm going to bookmark that Nutsack quote for future reference, and
I'll place it in my file labelled: "INTERNET POSTS THAT DEMONSTRATE
THE MIND-NUMBING IDIOCY DISPLAYED BY RETARDED CONSPIRACY THEORISTS".
tims...@gmail.com
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
The rest of us Don'y [sic] know??
LOL! You're sure racking up the typos, tomnln.
Whatever are you doing that FO0R [sic] tomnln?
As for the 5' 3" Oswald, he's YOUR creation, tomnln. You find him.