On May 8, 11:07 am, bigdog <jecorbett1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 8, 7:56 am, mainframetech <mainframet...@yahoo.com> wrote:I see you can't remember anything you've been told.
> > > > > What you are saying is your litmus test for whether to believe a
> > > > Not necessarily. Aside from the statement making some sense, I like
> > > You don't know any of these fucking people. How could you make an
> > First, their stories were immediately put down by you, which gives
> Oh, goody. Another of your dumbfuck litmus tests.
> > Second, many of the stories
> Another dumbfuck observation. Hoffman claimed what he saw and Rishel
> > Third,LOL! Does that mean that yuou have been waiting for me? You've been
> > I also watched them in the videos and decided from their mannerisms
> > and way of speaking whether they were dependable, just like we all
> > have to do when picking a president.
> You're the kind of dumbfuck con artists dream about.
tryingto con everybody here for a long time...:)
Well stupid, to get a simple little answer out of you, let's make it
> > I suspect your criteria is whether they support the wacky WC
> > > My criteria has been consistent throughout. If testimony can be
> > Hmm. Welp, if you get a case where testimony is refuted by other
> The physical evidence almost always trump eyewitness testimony
that both witnesses are eyewitnesses. Now how do you decide?
> > And howAnd you picked the last president too I bet!
> > do you decide whether a witness is lying or has been set up by the
> > authorities to say what they're told and not what happened?
> I could take the dumbfuck approach like you do and just decide I like
Ah, but one of them placed Ruby there after the 'big event', and in
> > > > > As noted already, Ruby (or whoever it was) had time to get to
> > > > > Right dumbfuck, Wanda Walker saw Ruby at the DMN shortly before the
> > > > Julia Ann Mercer also saw Ruby before the assassination at Dealey
> > > Why would I. Two people placed Ruby at the DMN and it was normal for
time for Ruby to get there from the Dealey Plaza area.
> > While you don't believe Julia Ann Mercer, I don't particularSo you agree that you have no backup for Wanda Walker being present
> > believe that Wanda Walker got her timing right. Not that you have any
> > backup for her anyway...:)
> What is there to corroborate Mercer?
a half hour before the 'big event'? Reemmber that you brought her up
long before I mentioned Julia Ann Mercer. And I'm still waiting for
the backup on Walker, which apparently is not going to be forthcoming,
You telling me Walker was somewhere is just about useless. No
> > > > And where's your
> > > She is one of two people who saw him at the DMN and as noted above,
backup, then it didn't happen.
Not this one.
> > Actually, it makes more sense than your puny efforts.
> It probably does to a dumbfuck.
> > He was
> Gee, he's probably the only person in the country who was shaken and
> > Why would a low class sleazeball be disturbed
Hmm. Why are you giggling like Beavis or Butthead? Feeling OK?
> You don't think a lot of low class sleazeballs were upset that JFK had
Ut-oh. Then I better stop listening to you...:)
> > All his
> Are you making this up as you go? Sorry. That question pretty much
> > > > > Once again you ignore what Lee Bowers said under oath and on camera
> > > > Nope. Rishel was more believable
> > > Why?
> > For one, because you say he wasn't.
> Back to the dumbfuck litmus test.
> > That always gives importance to
> Of course not. Nobody would given him a nickel for his silly story.
> > And he spoke very straight and not hesitant or
> That's usually how con men speak.
Interesting that you would lie so obviously. The FBI is really a
> > Three, we already have statements about the efforts of
> If you mean we have a lot of bozos putting up websites making that
thorn in your side I see. I've givenyou 3-4 people that said it
themselves tha the FBI wanted them to change their statements or shut
up altogether. And I've pointed it out to you at the time. Funny how
you forget things like that to keep from embarrassing yourself.
Funny how you're forgetting things again. Many on the GK saw the
> > If Bowers had a bigger story to tell,
> No, YOU can be sure of that. Intelligent people would only think that
> > Four,
> Careful. If you count much higher, you'll have to use your other hand.
> > the bigger story meshes with other stories from
> There were lots of people who thought they heard shots from the GK but
smoke that appeared right after a shot from the stockade fence.
> > > > and the idea that fear wasOdd that you come up with no evidence for your silly conclusions,
> > > > guiding Bowers' statements makes sense,
> > > Why?
> > Because many people have succumbed to fear and in such situations
> So you start with the assumption that Bowers was intimidated by the
> > > > since the FBI had been called
> Yes, there are many dumbfucks out there with websites
but you sound so proud of the empty things.
What an idiot! The fact that Bowers told him such flammable stuff
> > > Where is your evidence that the FBI tried to intimidate Bowers?
> > The fact that you are acting like it didn't happen makes it more
> I asked for evidence that the intiimidated Bowers and you give us your
> > > > That Bowers
> > > Where is your evidence that Rishel was a close friend?
> > My lord! How dumb can you get? If he was told such flammable
> So you have no evidence that he was a close friend of Bowers.
was proof that he was a close friend.
Notice that he was shut up, and killed off not too long after, to be
> If he knew something so explosive, why didn't somebody try to shut him
sure he wouldn't have second thoughts.
Nope. Won't do. You got an answer. If your not able to handle it,
> > > > also makes sense if he didn't want to get in
> > > You know nothing about Rishel except what you saw on a YouTube video.
> > Well, that's not true. As noted to you before, he's a witness that
> So the only thing you know about Rishel is what you saw on a YouTube
go get a crying towel.
You're repeating yourself because you're running out of objections.
> > > > Having a friend that your family doesn't
> > > There is nothing to corroborate anything Rishel said. You believe him
> > Nope. Won't do.
> It will until you give us another reason to believe him.
> > You have been informed of the reasons above for
> The only reasons you have is that you want to believe him and I don't
That's been answered. By now you have enough information t owrite a
book. I'll wait for it.
What an ass! You know that he didn't say anything beyond
> > > > > But
> > Nope. Rishel's story fits in with others, as noted above.
> Really? Name one other person that Bowers told that he had been
essentially the original statement to the WC. But in the video he was
careful to point out that the FBI wanted him to change his testimony
about the second and third shots being very close together. He said
they were close, and they said (in effect) 'but you're not an expert'
to convince him that that the shots weren't so close together. If he
had dwelled on the closeness of the shots it would imply a second
shooter because if there was a person shooting a bolt action rifle,
then there wouldn't be time to load a third bullet and fire it in
LOL! "Real' evidence? What have so many people been yelling about
> > You
> I'm not disturbed at all by it. I love it. It shows how wacky and
for so many years? The fact that there is very little 'real' evidence
in this case. Not after the body was stolen and the limo was stolen
and the FBI walked off with a rifle and shells. And the FBI grabbed
the fragments that the SS SAID they found in the limo. Broken
procedures and chains of evidence everywhere. Fouled up autopsy,
possibly a 'secret' autopsy of the brain. A real mess, but not 'real'
evidence. Break the chain of evidence, and the evidence loses it's
value, as many law enforcement people know.
He's asking me where to find you...:)
> > > > > > I guess you can't follow multiple timelines at the same time. No
> > > > > Einstein couldn't follow your ridiculous thought processes.
> > > > A bit too much for you, I see. You'll just have to take a back seat
> > > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
> > Uh-oh! Sounds like you're going off the reservation again. The
> You might want to look over your shoulder at the guy with the net.
Nope. Just repeated what was on the video.
> > > You are good for at least one belly laugh a day and this was it. I
> > > > Simple stuff. Things happen simultaneously
> > > Simpleton better describes you.
> > > > > You've got on guy telling a story about a guy in overalls fleeing
> > > > On top of which, we don't know if there was any boxcars on the
> > > Which does nothing to improve you silly story.
> > > > > > Yep. But it had no value, since it was perfectly possible for the
> > > > > It speaks volumes that even your fellow CTs think this is too
> > Because YOU say so? That's not enough to blow anyone's nose. It
> So Tilson said he saw a guy who looked like Ruby but didn't say it was
Why is it that you're all hung up on the man being Ruby? It wasn't
> > Maybe he knew about this other stuff with
> Maybe you're just a dumbfuck. Sorry. No maybe about that.
> > He knew what he saw, even if
> He saw a guy dressed in a dark suit who from a distance and while
said that he was, even though I've shown that it could be.
And it was easy to refute. There was time for 'Ruby' to make it
> > > > So far, you haven't provided anything that shows that someone saw
> > > We have two witnesses who positively IDed Ruby at the DMN before and
> > We have nothing of the kind! You provided nothing to show that was
> I don't base my beliefs on YouTube videos. I gave you Saunders
there and appear.
Of course, but don't limit yourself...I could predict many things
> > Nothing. You just say things, as noted before and actually expect to
> I don't expect dumbfucks to beleive me.
> > > > > > As A side issue, I never bought that dumb story that a sleazy
> > > > > Of course that is clear to a dumbfuck. There is no evidence that
> > > > Nope. I don't say it's gospel. I'm only pointing out a few things
> > > So now you are playing psychologist.
> > Nope. But most people have a bit of learning about other people,
> You mean when you say dumbfuck things, you know I will call you a
about you based on your low class manner of ad hominem style...:)
> > > > And Ruby'sAs did you just above...:)
> > > > involvement in Cuba with 2-3 trips there he made.
> > > Lots of people traveled to Cuba before Castro took over. It was a
> > It wa a mafia run gambling location, like Las Vegas. With the
> You have no idea why Ruby went anywhere so that leaves you to assume
> > > > There is also a
Hmm. Sounds like a WC sycophant and suckup. Faith that no matter
> > > Michael Griffith. There's a hell of a source. He's almost as dumb as
> > Ah! Thank you! I wasn't sure about him at first, but now that you
> The two of you were made for each other.
> > He seems to keep his religious beliefs out of his work on the
> His embracing of creationism shows he is willing to believe things
how wild and stupid a theory is, if it came from the WC and their
bosses, it's good as gold...:)
For those that might have missed it, here are some of the names and
> > and is respected among writers in his chosen area.
> He is respected by his fellow dumbfucks.
> > His
> He obviously researched his materially maticulously and then fucked it
statements about happenings at the Grassy Knoll:
1. Lee Bowers, Walter Rishel, Penn Jones, Ed Hoffman
2. Beverly Oliver (film taken), gordon arnold (film taken by FBI),
3. Ed Hoffman, Gordon Arnold, Sen. Yarborough, "Badgeman"
4. Bill Newman, Gayle Newman, Lee Bowers, Charles Brehm, Emmett
5. Sam Holland
6. Aquilla Clemmons (Tippit murder) sw different killer and FBI
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.