Fed To Lions Or "Nibbled By Ducks"? Which Would Have Been The Wiser Assassination Plan?
David Von Pein
www.amazon.com/forum/Fx2TVHW5I0UEY9A/TxR9QNQTFC20JF/32/ref=cm_cd_et_md_pl/?%5Fencoding=UTF8&cdMsgNo=784&cdAnchor=0393045250&cdSort=oldest&cdMsgID=Mx1E9JJYKEKDPO8#Mx1E9JJYKEKDPO8
>>> "If you take a look at Dr. Chapman's research (something VB does not do in his tree-killing spree), you will see he said CE544 has indications of being a partial dud. He said the projectile would be fired at low velocity." <<<
Yeah, I always enjoy hearing from conspiracy theorists about the
proverbial "low velocity" type of bullets and weapons that were
evidently (per those CTers) being used by the professional "Mob"
assassins in a very important PRESIDENTIAL ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT in
November of 1963.
Allow me to borrow a certain hilarious remark concerning this
incredibly-silly "low velocity" topic (which is a remark that was made
in April 2006 by a fellow LNer {Bud}; and I've never forgotten this
hysterical comment and the spot-on accuracy of it):
"The assassins choose bullets that inflict non-lethal, 1-inch-deep
wounds? Instead of feeding JFK to lions, they decided to nibble him to
death by ducks?" -- Bud; 04/01/06
www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/a461342cf74de03e
>>> "The autopsy doctors admitted on 11/22 there was CLEARLY no point of exit and they can only trace the wound to the knuckle on their pinky. .... David, it's not hard to understand." <<<
No, it's not hard to understand, Richard. I agree with you.
President Kennedy's back muscles had stiffened and the path that
bullet CE399 had taken through Kennedy's body had (in effect) "closed"
itself up between 12:30 PM and the time of the "pinky probe" (which
was sometime after 8:00 PM EDT on November 22nd).
That's certainly a more reasonable explanation (given the "NO DAMAGE
OR BULLETS INSIDE KENNEDY'S NECK AND BACK" sum total of evidence) than
to believe that TWO bullets ("low velocity" or otherwise) went into
John F. Kennedy's body, never exited, then disappeared, with neither
of those two bullets causing any substantial bodily damage whatsoever.
So, you're right, Richard.....it's not hard to understand at all. All
you need is some common sense. I'd suggest borrowing some from a
friend (preferably not a fellow rabid conspiracy theorist, however).