Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Rossley vs. Walt...a classic Kook Fight in the works!

10 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

cdddraftsman

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 4:46:04 AM9/23/08
to
On Sep 22, 9:41 pm, Chuck Schuyler <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote:
>
> A few words to Walt and Rossley:
>
> C'mon, boys...kiss and make up.
>
>

Hahahahahhaha ! Good post !

Common Rossley post a video of you brown-nosing old walts crusty butt
hole !

5-Star Smack Down

OooooooooYaaaaaaaa !

Rossley's really good at kissing ass assination sheeple butt .

I think the original outbreak of Conspiranitis in the US was
attributed to the Conn. area where he lives .

But I'II have to check the 'Official Records' !

:-)

tl

cdddraftsman

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 5:55:59 AM9/23/08
to
On Sep 22, 9:41 pm, Chuck Schuyler <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote:
>
> Please, fellas...for the good of THE CAUSE, couldn't you maybe
> compromise on this issue?
>
> the Rossley/Cakebread MC sling mount compromise of 2008.
>
>

Using sling slang per Tim :

"Bunfight II"

as the compromise also sounds good .

:-)

tl

Gil Jesus

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 7:32:32 AM9/23/08
to
This is why CTers need to remember not to air our differences in a
public forum.

Part of their agenda is to divide and conquer.

It's ORGASMIC to the trolls when we do.

justm...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 9:57:22 AM9/23/08
to

ROFLMAO.....its because you idiots can't even agree on anything
between yourselves, let alone the rest of the world.

Message has been deleted

tomnln

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 10:23:52 AM9/23/08
to

<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e2e9ee1f-46a3-47be...@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

On Sep 23, 7:32 am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> This is why CTers need to remember not to air our differences in a
> public forum.
>
> Part of their agenda is to divide and conquer.
>
> It's ORGASMIC to the trolls when we do.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
justme wrote;

ROFLMAO.....its because you idiots can't even agree on anything
between yourselves, let alone the rest of the world.


I write;

The "Inconsistancies" started with your side.

http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm


Your "Inconsistancies" amount to Felonies.

That's why you're a Minority of 10%.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

tomnln

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 10:28:13 AM9/23/08
to

"Chuck Schuyler" <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote in message
news:449b4e36-df7a-4c27...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

I certainly have no agenda-other than to laugh at the foolishness of a
group of unemployed grown men that think they're going to help 'crack'
the JFK assassination by designing childish websites, posting pirated
YouTube videos, and participating in the nonsense at this forum.

The fact that Tom Rossley would even SUGGEST that Walt Cakebread is
anything other than a dyed-in-the-wool believer in a massive
conspiracy surrounding the death of JFK speaks ill of Tom, and I think
it makes Tom look completely unhinged. Actually, we LNers have known
that Rossley is unhinged for years. You CTers should vote to steal
his box of Crackerjack and take away his JFK secret decoder ring.

The fact that any of you CTers actually think you are doing important
work here is hilarious.

Until I stumbled upon this site a few years back, I had no idea-really-
how many kooks there are in this country that believe in massive
government plots to control our lives. The world of a kook is a
frighteningly dark place inhabited by Black Ops helicopters, secret
deals among the ruling illuminati, shadowy forces that kill those that
represent true 'change', like JFK, etc.

And you CTers are the only true patriots in the world that can see
through all of the fog piped in by the evil right wing Chimpy
McBushitler CheneyBurton ruling junta (an offshoot of the Trilateral
Commission and John Birch Society). You sit around all day doing your
'research'...trying your best to sound the alarm, a la Paul Revere,
about the 'reality' of 11/22/63...hoping to bring Final Justice to
JFK's killers, and comfort to the Kennedy family (or what's left of
'em).

You're all pathetic losers.

Your Insult to 90% of the American people is Duly noted! ! !

That website contains YOUR evidence/testimony of which you know NOTHING.

http://whokilledjfk.net/

Walt

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 1:53:46 PM9/23/08
to

I disagree totally Gil, I'm sick and tired of some CT's who post
complete nonsense ( Rob Caprio, Tom Rossley, et al)

I believe we need to clean up our own house......A lie is a lie no
matter which side says it. And you can't find the path to the truth
if you follow lies. I have always tried to gently steer a errant CT
back from a lie by pointing out where they are getting on the wrong
track. ( Have I not pointed out an error you were making?...think
about it) There are some who refuse to back off from the wrong path
and become abusive and nasty.(Rossley) I'm no longer going to try to
be nice or keep my mouth shut when a CT presents false data. I'll
attempt to show him the problem but if he doesn't present good sound
logic backed up by facts I'm going to emasculate him.

robcap...@netscape.com

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 2:09:41 PM9/23/08
to
On Sep 23, 1:53 pm, Walt <papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:
> On 23 Sep, 06:32, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > This is why CTers need to remember not to air our differences in a
> > public forum.
>
> > Part of their agenda is to divide and conquer.
>
> > It's ORGASMIC to the trolls when we do.
>
> I disagree totally Gil,   I'm sick and tired of some CT's who post
> complete nonsense ( Rob Caprio, Tom Rossley, et al)

LOL!!!! Who CAN'T prove their claims again Walt??

I do agree with you, we NEED to clean up our house and see who is
really a CTer.


>
> I believe we need to clean up our own house......A lie is a lie no
> matter which side says it.  And you can't find the path to the truth
> if you follow lies.  

I guess you are SUNK then.

>I have always tried to gently steer a errant CT
> back from a lie by pointing out where they are getting on the wrong
> track. ( Have I not pointed out an error you were making?...think
> about it)  

You are the one making ALL the errors as you CAN'T prove anything you
say. I asked for proof that CE-133A is real and you just ignore it.
You are making stuff up, that IS why I don't agree with you, NOT
because you are speaking the truth and I just won't accept it.


> There are some who refuse to back off from the wrong path
> and become abusive and nasty.(Rossley)

Sounds like your description to me.

> I'm no longer going to try to
> be nice or keep my mouth shut when a CT presents false data. I'll
> attempt to show him the problem but if he doesn't present good sound
> logic backed up by facts I'm going to emasculate him.

When have you EVER been nice? When have you EVER produced "FACTS"?

aeffects

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 2:13:02 PM9/23/08
to
On Sep 23, 6:57 am, "justme1...@gmail.com" <justme1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

both hands on the keyboard, troll......

Walt

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 2:13:29 PM9/23/08
to

Hey Gil,.... Can ya see what Just (Clueless) me wrote..... It pains
me to admit she's right.

We are a widely diverse group....and the views of members of out
contingent range from complete lunacy like "the driver did it" to very
scholarly views like those of Dr Mantik. It's high time that we get
the lunatics in line.... And the LNer's just as well know that we are
beefing up our contingent by cleaning up the bullshit.

aeffects

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 2:14:00 PM9/23/08
to
On Sep 23, 7:10 am, Chuck Schuyler <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote:
> I certainly have no agenda-other than to laugh at the foolishness of a
> group of unemployed grown men that think they're going to help 'crack'
> the JFK assassination by designing childish websites, posting pirated
> YouTube videos, and participating in the nonsense at this forum.

you too, both hands on the keyboard Chuck Schuyler.

Message has been deleted

Walt

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 4:33:59 PM9/23/08
to
On 23 Sep, 13:23, Chuck Schuyler <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote:
> Good for you, Walt. I totally disagree with your belief that LBJ was
> behind JFK's death, but the CT side  has done a HORRIBLE job sorting
> the wheat from the chaff. When some newbie comes to the site with a
> question about poison dart firing umbrellas or the infamous Three
> Tramps, for example, it's also up to you CTers to steer this person
> away from such silliness. Rossley criticizes all  investigations that
> have found innocent explanations for the 'chaff'. Ditto for robcap,
> who hasn't met a conspiracy theory he doesn't like.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Hey Schmuck..... Your guilty of painting all CT's with a wide
brush. You've accredited me with ideas that I find utterly
ridiculous simply because some stupid bastard CT like Rob has spewed
the garbage. THAT'S why I'm angry, Im sick and tired of having
lunatics who are wearing our jersey make asses of us all. They either
have to sit down and be quiet until they have something intelligent to
say or they've got to turn in their jerseys.

Message has been deleted

Walt

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 8:13:05 PM9/23/08
to
On 23 Sep, 13:09, "robcap...@netscape.com" <robcap...@netscape.com>
wrote:

Hey I was nice once. Why just last month I even defended you against a
slur. Don't you rember when that Lner said that you stunk.... And I
replied "like shit he does"

Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Sep 24, 2008, 12:11:31 AM9/24/08
to


>>> "A lie is a lie no matter which side says it. And you can't find the path to the truth if you follow lies." <<<


The above quote is pure gold-plated hilarity being uttered by Walter
Cakebread, coming as it does from the lips of a kook who has said the
following things in the past (let's have a quick gander, and then go
back and read the above-cited quote once again; pure hypocrisy in
action):


"He [Howard Brennan] DESCRIBED the location where he saw the
gunman aiming the rifle from the window, and he did NOT describe the
window on the EAST end of the sixth floor." -- Walt


"If the truth be known, the gunman was probably planting the
spent shells when Brennan saw him." -- Walt


"[David] Belin twisted the events that happened BEFORE the
shooting to make it look like Brennan was talking about what he saw
DURING the shooting." -- Walt


"The photo Croft took shows a tiny piece of JFK's white shirt
being blown out through the BACK of his dark suit jacket. The FBI knew
that Croft had taken photos during the shooting and wanted to see
them. Croft was traveling through Dallas and was changing trains at
the time. He had boarded a train immediately after the shooting and
continued on his way to Denver. The FBI hunted him down that night and
confiscated his film. They kept the photo of the bullet EXITING JFK's
back hidden for twenty years. Why would they supress [sic] evidence if
it didn't show anything important??? The Croft photo is proof that one
bullet did transit JFK's body." -- Walt


www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/7d3264251021ff76

www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/211bf3a959b994f5

============

Whew! That last quote from Walt (from August 2006) is a real
doozy....quite possibly the granddaddy of all "This Takes The
Cake[bread]" unprovable, conspiracy-flavored idiocy.

And what was it Walt said today about "lies"? ---

"A lie is a lie no matter which side says it. And you can't find

the path to the truth if you follow lies." -- Walt The Hypocrite;
09/23/2008

Hilarious.

Walt

unread,
Sep 24, 2008, 8:48:58 AM9/24/08
to

Your desperation is boiling over Von Pea Brain..... What's the
problem? Have you been called onto the carpet for your failure to stop
us "kooks" from presenting the truth.?? Is that the problem? I'll
bet it is....and your paycheck is in jeopardy. Are ya about ta get
sacked Pea Brain? Don't worry there are always jobs for whores like
you......

Walt

unread,
Sep 24, 2008, 9:23:17 AM9/24/08
to
On 23 Sep, 22:16, Chuck Schuyler <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote:
> > say or they've got to turn in their jerseys.- Hide quoted text -

>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I paint with the brush needed, Walt.
>
> Until your 'side' can actually shun the idiots like robcap and
> Rossley, you guys are going to go around in circles for anotehr 45
> years.
>
> In real crime solving, theories are discarded over time in favor of
> testable scenarios that hold up under scrutiny. Rossley is still hung
> up on the Three Tramps...even though this interesting little bit of
> JFK assassination lore was put to bed-I think conclusively-by pro CT
> researchers. Rossley still hasn't made up his mind about the Umbrella
> Man. When challenged, the best he can do is churlishly respond with
> some drivel about how the CIA was working on a weapon like that...no
> give on ANY PART of the assassination. To 'researchers' like Rossley
> and robcap, the ENTIRE CASE is a lie...all of the evidence is tainted,
> forged, duplicated, manufactured.
>
> I'm sorry, Walt, but this type of thinking is so juvenile that it
> deserves to be laughed at.

You're absolutely right..... About those screwballs that cling to bits
of brass and think they have a golden nugget.

They keep adding those bits of brass to their collection of nuggets
and think they have a bag of gold.

I've been frustrated with the likes of them for years. Rob is the
epitomy of a lunatic who doesn't know his ass from a hole in the
ground but just keeps drooling and babbling away like the village
idiot.

Someone has to stand up and tell them to take off that jersey with the
CT on it because they are not an asset to the team. I'll be that
"someone" and take the abuse they'll fling at me, but I would
appreciate the support of the more level headed members of our
team.

David Von Pein

unread,
Sep 24, 2008, 1:20:47 PM9/24/08
to

More supreme hyprocrisy being slung by Walt The Kook above.

Does he really not realize how much of a hypocrite he is when he says
shit like that?

Amazing.

Anyway, keep fighting that kook fight, Walt. One of these days a non-
C2766 bullet might turn up--probably coming from a 4th tramp who
suddenly pops out of the woodwork with a smashed Mauser bullet in
hand.

And guess who will be there to embrace that new tramp with open arms?

robcap...@netscape.com

unread,
Sep 24, 2008, 1:49:23 PM9/24/08
to

LOL!!!! Yeah, I'm the ONE saying things I can't prove and support the
LNer side, right Walt???? You even have Chuck defending you NOW!!!

I may not know my butt from a hole in a ground but I know your face
and my butt are identical!!


> Someone has to stand up and tell them to take off that jersey with the
> CT on it because  they are not an asset to the team. I'll be that
> "someone"  and take the abuse they'll fling at me, but I would
> appreciate the support of the more level headed members of our
> team.


Calm down McAdams, remember your blood pressure. I'm NOT an asset to
the team according to Walt/McA while he is saying things to
incriminate LHO and supports the lone nut theory! Priceless.

Walt

unread,
Sep 24, 2008, 4:20:10 PM9/24/08
to
On 24 Sep, 12:20, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> More supreme hyprocrisy being slung by Walt The Kook above.
>
> Does he really not realize how much of a hypocrite he is when he says
> shit like that?
>
> Amazing.
>
> Anyway, keep fighting that kook fight, Walt.

Don't need your encouragment.....I fully intend to keep kickin yer ass
until your boss realizes how ineffective you are and sends you off to
the sand lot.

But keep pluggin away with your worthless drivel...... and I'll keep
shovin it up yer nose.

Walt

unread,
Sep 24, 2008, 4:41:10 PM9/24/08
to
On 24 Sep, 12:49, "robcap...@netscape.com" <robcap...@netscape.com>
wrote:

Did you say that the Warren Commission never ever acknowledged that
the Klein ad was clipped from the Feb issue of the American
Rifleman?? Well..... did you say that??

Did you say that the Clip would have been flung from the rifle like a
clip from an M1 Garand, in an effort to make the point that there was
no clip in the rifle when it was found. Did you argue until you were
out of breath that the clip was EJECTED from the rifle??

Did you say that there are at least FOUR distinctly different ( made
from different negatives) backyard photos ?

ROTFLMAO.......

You even have Chuck defending you NOW!!!
>
> I may not know my butt from a hole in a ground but I know your face
> and my butt are identical!!
>
> > Someone has to stand up and tell them to take off that jersey with the
> > CT on it because  they are not an asset to the team. I'll be that
> > "someone"  and take the abuse they'll fling at me, but I would
> > appreciate the support of the more level headed members of our
> > team.
>
> Calm down McAdams, remember your blood pressure.  I'm NOT an asset to
> the team according to Walt/McA while he is saying things to

> incriminate LHO and supports the lone nut theory!  Priceless.- Hide quoted text -

robcap...@netscape.com

unread,
Sep 24, 2008, 5:30:22 PM9/24/08
to


How does this prove LHO oredered a 40.2 inch M-C again? Or stupidly
posed with it while morphing his chin from a cleft configuration to
one of a square configuration?


> Did you say that the Clip would have been flung from the rifle like a
> clip from an M1 Garand, in an effort to make the point that there was
> no clip in the rifle when it was found.  Did you argue until you were
> out of breath that the clip was EJECTED from the rifle??

Did you say you CAN'T hand-load the M-C but insist there was a clip in
the rifle when found despite the first on scence investigators saying
they did NOT see one or noting it on their evidence inventory lists?

> Did you say that there are at least FOUR distinctly different ( made
> from different negatives)  backyard photos ?

Yes. Prove me wrong, of course we know you WON'T as you NEVER provide
any proof, NO LNer ever does.
>
> ROTFLMAO.......

All LNers laugh when they have NO proof to provide.

>
>  You even have Chuck defending you NOW!!!
>
>
>
>
>
> > I may not know my butt from a hole in a ground but I know your face
> > and my butt are identical!!
>
> > > Someone has to stand up and tell them to take off that jersey with the
> > > CT on it because  they are not an asset to the team. I'll be that
> > > "someone"  and take the abuse they'll fling at me, but I would
> > > appreciate the support of the more level headed members of our
> > > team.
>
> > Calm down McAdams, remember your blood pressure.  I'm NOT an asset to
> > the team according to Walt/McA while he is saying things to
> > incriminate LHO and supports the lone nut theory!  Priceless.- Hide quoted text -
>

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

Walt

unread,
Sep 24, 2008, 6:45:40 PM9/24/08
to
On 24 Sep, 16:30, "robcap...@netscape.com" <robcap...@netscape.com>

Don't evade.... Did you saythat the Warren Commission never ever


acknowledged that the Klein ad was clipped from the Feb issue of the
American Rifleman?? Well..... did you say that??

>


> > Did you say that the Clip would have been flung from the rifle like a
> > clip from an M1 Garand, in an effort to make the point that there was
> > no clip in the rifle when it was found.  Did you argue until you were
> > out of breath that the clip was EJECTED from the rifle??
>
> Did you say you CAN'T hand-load the M-C but insist there was a clip in
> the rifle when found despite the first on scence investigators saying
> they did NOT see one or noting it on their evidence inventory lists?

Don't evade you stupid lying bastard.... Did you say that the Clip


would have been flung from the rifle like a
clip from an M1 Garand, in an effort to make the point that there was
no clip in the rifle when it was found. Did you argue until you were
out of breath that the clip was EJECTED from the rifle??

> > Did you say that there are at least FOUR distinctly different ( made
> > from different negatives)  backyard photos ?


>
> Yes. Prove me wrong, of course we know you WON'T as you NEVER provide
> any proof, NO LNer ever does.

CE 133A---- CE 133B---- 133C That's it... can you count to
three ?...you stupid bastard.


>
>
>
> > ROTFLMAO.......
>
> All LNers laugh when they have NO proof to provide.


Perhaps.... But I laugh at Stupid Bastards.

0 new messages