Kook Quickie Quiz #5
David Von Pein
Since you (a conspiracy-happy kook) believe that the Single-Bullet
Theory is really the POST (Pile Of Shit Theory), how many shots/
bullets do you think must replace the SBT's one single bullet
(CE399)?:
2 shots/bullets?
3 shots/bullets?
4 shots/bullets?
Or 5 or more shots/bullets?
And please elaborate on just exactly how these 2, 3, 4, or more shots/
bullets somehow lined themselves up to form a wound pattern on the two
victims' bodies [JFK/JBC] that aligns itself very nicely with the SBT?
And also please state your opinion as to what happened to each of
these mystery bullets after pelting President Kennedy and/or Governor
Connally? Where did all of these missiles go?
Gil Jesus?
Walt?
Healy?
robcap?
Ben Holmes?
Curt Jester?
tomnln?
muc...@gmail.com
This is so exciting! Some of the world's leading authorities on the
subject of the JFK assassination invited to take part in a G-E-N-U-I-N-
E opinion poll - WOW !!!
What a great initiative by Bud and DVP. I think a bit of history is
going to be created here.
robcap...@netscape.com
> Since you (a conspiracy-happy kook) believe that the Single-Bullet
> Theory is really the POST (Pile Of Shit Theory), how many shots/
> bullets do you think must replace the SBT's one single bullet
> (CE399)?:
>
> 2 shots/bullets?
> 3 shots/bullets?
> 4 shots/bullets?
> Or 5 or more shots/bullets?
Well, this is a good and valid question as it was NEVER proven CE399
was ever inside either victim, therefore, the SBT is NOT valid. The
evidence, I mean the real evidence not what the WC called evidence,
suggests 6 plus shots were fired from at least three directions (some
say four). Agent Kellerman said JFK was hit FOUR times not the two
the WC said. This was confirmed by Agent Hill and the doctors at
Parkland. Most doctors at Parkland initially said Gov. Connally was
hit twice and had a fragment in his thigh. That is six shots there,
but there is the shot that missed and hit Tague, the shot that hit the
windshield frame, the shot that went through the windshield, the shot
that hit the street near the limo (and probably damaged the side-view
mirror), the shot Buddy Walthers seems to be picking up, the shot that
damaged the curb near the manhole cover and the shot that hit the
Stemmons Freeway sign. 13 shots according to the damage, but I am
willing to admit several of these could be tied to together as one
bullet did several parts of the damage. More in likely 10 shots are
the maximum, but who knows if there were really 4 shooters?
> And please elaborate on just exactly how these 2, 3, 4, or more shots/
> bullets somehow lined themselves up to form a wound pattern on the two
> victims' bodies [JFK/JBC] that aligns itself very nicely with the SBT?
This is a false premise as you are making us "line up" reality with a
made up theory. IN order for you to ask this you had to PROVE the SBT
to be the ONLY valid theory, and this just has NOT happened. From
what I have read JFK was hit in the throat from the front, the upper
back to the right (T-3 level), once in the head from the back, and
once in the head from the front. These last two were close together
with the back shot entering the hole the front shot caused and this is
why we see the "whale" spray of blood in the Z-film.
> And also please state your opinion as to what happened to each of
> these mystery bullets after pelting President Kennedy and/or Governor
> Connally? Where did all of these missiles go?
Are you really this naive or are you playacting? Where did the
Stemmons Freeway sign go?
David Von Pein
>>> "I mean the real evidence, not what the WC called evidence..." <<<
Yeah, we have to understand that a goof named "Robcap" gets to decide
what the "real evidence" is in the case. The WC and/or the DPD & FBI
don't have any say-so with respect to what is "real evidence" in the
case. That all-important determination is decided by a mega-kook named
Robby sitting at his keyboard.
Good work, Robert. Excellent.
>>> "Are you really this naive or are you playacting?" <<<
Are you really this retarded? Or are you just pretending to be?
>>> "Where did the Stemmons Freeway sign go?" <<<
You mean this sign that we can see in the 5/24/64 photos taken during
the FBI/WC reconstruction of the assassination from Zapruder's POV?:
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh18/html/WH_Vol18_0051a.htm
Is the sign that we see in CE889 and CE890 just a "fake" sign of some
ilk? Or did some plotter(s) remove the Stemmons sign that was there on
November 22 and replace it with another sign before 5/24/64?
(Just make up something stupid when you answer the above question,
Rob. I'm sure you've got it in mind to do that very thing
anyway....just like every silly, unsupportable answer you have come up
with re. the evidence since your arrival here at Kook Stadium in
October 2007.)
robcap...@netscape.com
> >>> "I mean the real evidence, not what the WC called evidence..." <<<
>
> Yeah, we have to understand that a goof named "Robcap" gets to decide
> what the "real evidence" is in the case. The WC and/or the DPD & FBI
> don't have any say-so with respect to what is "real evidence" in the
> case. That all-important determination is decided by a mega-kook named
> Robby sitting at his keyboard.
Hey, they had the SAY SO in what was put forth as evidence in this
case. The problem/question I have for you is - is "evidence" really
evidence when it does NOT support your theory/scenario? I mean NONE
of the "evidence" the WC put forth PROVES LHO shot either JFK or JDT.
It would have been their decision to use it in court, but it is NOT
the common practice of the prosecutor to present "evidence" that
proves their theory to be false. Is it?
> Good work, Robert. Excellent.
I thought so too, thanks!
> >>> "Are you really this naive or are you playacting?" <<<
>
> Are you really this retarded? Or is it in the Caprio genes?
I like how he skipped the WHOLE part about the stupid SBT and returns
to insults. Lurkers, this is how you can tell you have sunk the
official theory when they can't refute it but launch personal attacks
instead.
> >>> "Where did the Stemmons Freeway sign go?" <<<
>
> You mean this sign that we can see in the 5/24/64 photos taken during
> the FBI/WC reconstruction of the assassination from Zapruder's POV?:
>
> http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh18/html/WH_Vol18_0...
>
> Is the sign that we see in CE889 and CE890 just a "fake" sign of some
> ilk? Or did some plotter(s) remove the Stemmons sign that was there on
> November 22 and replace it with another sign before 5/24/64?
It is not the same sign as the one on 11/22/63. The replacement sign
would disappear in 1965 for good. The sign of 11/22/63 was taken down
quickly and stored in the basement of the TSBD, from there to places
unknown (my guess is it was melted down). The replacement sign was
needed for the re-enactments and the walk through of the Commission.
> (Just make up something stupid when you answer the above question,
> Rob. I'm sure you've got it in mind to do that very thing
> anyway....just like every silly, unsupportable answer you have come up
> with re. the evidence since your arrival here at Kook Stadium in
> October 2007.)
The only stupid, unsupportble stuff is the WCR and its 26 volumes.
David Von Pein
robcap...@netscape.com
> Kook Time!
Sure it is. Dave can't refute a damn thing so it has to be "kook
time", this is really funny stuff. Why can't Dave PROVE his
assertions?
David Von Pein
>>> "Why can't Dave PROVE his assertions?" <<<
I don't really need to. The DPD & WC did the proving a long, long time
ago. But, being the CT-loving kook/idiot you are, you fail to
recognize this basic point.
robcap...@netscape.com
LOL!!!
Reprise:
LOL!!!
The DPD and the WC proved their assertions "a long, long time ago"
according to Dave! LOL!!!!