> > On 13 Oct, 12:05, "robcap...@netscape.com" <robcap...@netscape.com>
> > wrote:

> > > On Oct 13, 11:18 am, Walt <papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:

> > > > On 13 Oct, 09:58, Walt <papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:

> > > > > On 13 Oct, 09:05, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:

> > > > > > On Oct 13, 9:57 am, "Sam McClung" <mccl...@newsguy.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > Where is all the information that has been publicized?

> > > > > > > That will clear this discrepancy up.-

> > > > > > Here it is again:

> > > > > > this article by Jack White in Fourth Decade, July 1995, indicates that
> > > > > > Walt was one of several researchers who pointed this out to him.

> > > > > That's correct, Gil.....  And I must say I was surprised when Jack
> > > > > White wrote that, because I had never heard of any other person
> > > > > mentioning the bottom sling swivel in CE 133A.   Not that others
> > > > > couldn't have seen the very same thing that I saw, I had just never
> > > > > heard of anybody else noticing it.   I believe there have been
> > > > > inventions and sceintific discoveries that have been discovered
> > > > > simultaneously by two different men in widely separated locations.  So
> > > > > It's not beyond the realm of possibility that somebody else could have
> > > > > mentioned it to Jack White.....  I don't know, But he DID accredit me
> > > > > with the discovery in that article, and I would think that he would
> > > > > have mentioned it before if he had known it previously. After-all  his
> > > > > primary interest was proving that the BY photos were fake....And I
> > > > > handed him the proof.

> > > > After-all  his primary interest was proving that the BY photos were
> > > > fake....And I handed him the proof.

> > > > PS After writing the above I thought I'd better clarify that
> > > > statement.......For Dumbasses like Tom and Rob...

> > Walt wrote:

> >  NOT ALL BACK YARD PHOTOS ARE FAKE....... CE 133A is the original an
> >  authentic Back Yard Photo, that Marina took at Lee's request.

> > Rob retorted:
> >  Sure it is, NOW where is your PROOF to show us it is the real
> >  deal???????

> > Your asking the impossible.....I can't show you anything while you
> > have your head up your ass....

> LOL!!!! My head is up my butt while Walt claims LHO CHANGED his chin
> shape to look tougher and more mean!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > Rob if you think CE 133A is a fake ......How do you explain George De
> > Morhenschildt having a copy of that photo??

> Easy, it was made and given to him as he was supposed to be assisting
> in setting up LHO.

> > The De.M copy is inscribed with the  FOR Hunter of Nazis
> > inscription..  Now reread what I just wrote....

> And it appears it was written by Marina.

> > That's correct the inscription reads FOR    FOR   Hunter of Nazis
> > Ha,ha,ha.......

> Of couse, they were trying to make him into a Communist, but it is
> most likely something Marina wrote upon instructions from DeM. or
> someone else (like Ruth Paine).

> > I can't read Russian but that is what two different Russian immigants
> > told me that inscription said...

> This has been translated for like 41 years.

> > Do you understand that Oswald was presenting that photo to a hunter of
> > Nazis  ....and he gave it to George De M.

> And this proves what?? You can't prove it was done by LHO as it does
> NOT match the offiical two photos.

> > That tiny word changes the way the photo is viewed...

> Or how one is mislead into believing it had real worth beyond showing
> us they had quite a few photos ready to frame LHO with.

> > The Warren Commission would have us believe that the photo DEPICTS a
> > hunter of Nazis when in reality it was being given TO a hunter of
> > Nazis.

> It CAN'T be proven to be given to DeM. by LHO as he was dead when it
> was found and the government never proved anything in regard to it.

> > Incidentally, the Russian immigrants who translated that inscription
> > for me said that they thought the writing on the back of the De M
> > print apeared to have been written by a woman.

> Yes, Marina.

> > The De M copy is UNCROPPED.... So it could not have been made from CE
> > 133A ....Unless CE 133A was cropped after the copy was made.  Marina
> > said that Lee had gave her an inscribed  copy of the photo to give to
> > his daughter Junie.

> It was NOT made from the same negative as CE-133A, and yest the
> writing was probably done by Marina.

> > Lee KNEW that he was playing a very dangerous game by trying to
> > present himsely as a communist revolutionary who could infiltrate Cuba
> > just as he had the USSR.    He knew that he could wind up as a target
> > in front of Castros firing squad, and he wanted Junie to have that
> > photo of her dad.

> More speculation, where is the proof for this IF you think this really
> happened???- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -