NEW "RECLAIMING HISTORY" NEWSGROUP
David Von Pein
NEW "GOOGLE GROUPS" WEBSITE........
======================================================
"RECLAIMING HISTORY: THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY":
www.google.com/group/Reclaiming-History/topics?tsc=1
======================================================
David Von Pein
www.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_thread/thread/bf322decd63127cd
>>> "David, Is this [a Google Group devoted solely to VB's book "Reclaiming History"] really necessary?" <<<
Well, of course it's not really "necessary". None of these silly JFK-
related forums is really "necessary". It's all a huge waste of time
and energy, as we all know, because nobody is changing anybody's mind
about the John F. Kennedy assassination one way or the other.
I've never, ever ONCE heard somebody say this as a result of reading
any LNer's comments on the various newsgroups/forums: "You know what,
that guy makes a lot of sense; I was wrong; I now think Oswald acted
alone."
Has that ever happened to anybody here? If so, I've yet to hear about
it. It certainly hasn't happened to me. And I KNOW I make a lot of
"sense". <wink>
So, as I said, these forums are purely for FYI and entertainment and
opponent-bashing purposes only....as is quite obvious by reading
pretty much anything written in the newsgroups.
Having spouted the above forthright rant, I will also say that I'd
like to think that a few of my LN-favoring posts, reviews, and
assorted articles have met with some degree of approval and favorable
head-nodding over the years....although certainly not by any members
of the entrenched "Conspiracy" crowd (naturally).
And since Google allows people to start up these "Newsgroups" for free
and with very little effort, I decided to start one up devoted
exclusively to Vince Bugliosi's "Book For The Ages" ["Reclaiming
History"].
I'm not allowing anybody else to post anything at all to the RH site,
however, because I don't want it ruined by a bunch of meaningless
"Bugliosi's nothing but a liar" crap from CTers (which would, of
course, inevitably happen over the course of time).
If that's called "censorship", so be it. Then I'm a censor. But since
Google gives the group's "owner" a right to decide who can post and
who can't, I'm going to take advantage of those options and
"ownership" rights.
So, is my "RH" Google site "necessary"? Hell, no. Of course it isn't.
But I don't care. I like it anyway. :)
Maybe next month I'll start up a new NG called: "The Wonders Of
Watching Grass Grow".
That site won't be the slightest bit "necessary" either; and it'll
probably attract about the same number of visitors as my new "RH" site
(anywhere from 0 to 2 per month). <Cheshire grin>
aeffects
standby, daBug coffee cups will be for sale soon -- ROTFLMFAO
aeffects
Son, we drove your sorry ass out of here, I suspect your Amazon fling
blew up on ya too..... Ya got fold'em when you know the game is over
son..... that is of course unless your Davie Reitzes..... LMFAO!
David Von Pein
>>> "We're finally going to get rid of [David V.P.]." <<<
I wonder what would make Mr. Crackpipe think the above statement is
accurate?
aeffects
its okay, you can quote me correctly... ya fucking douche bag....
LMFAO You provide way to much entertainment....
David Von Pein
>>> "It seems strange to start a discussion group where no discussion is permitted." <<<
But I never intended for my "RH" site to be a "Discussion" group.
Hence, the definition "Announcement Only" being put into the
description of the group by Google.
It's more-or-less a "Bulletin Board" for "Reclaiming History". And
that's just exactly what I wanted, without having to put up with any
of the "Bugliosi is a WC shill" nonsense that always occurs when the
topic of VB's book surfaces on the open discussion forums.
http://groups.google.com/group/reclaiming-history/topics
>>> "If you want to archive your posts, why not register a domain name and start your own website?" <<<
I've already done that (for free), at www.DavidVonPein.blogspot.com.
Yes, that's only a "blog", but most blogs can really be deemed
"websites" all their own too. In fact, I took note of this "Blog"
definition in Wikipedia (although Wiki can be wrong many times about
certain things, but I continue to be amazed by the sheer scope of
material that is searchable at the Wikipedia site):
"A blog (an abridgment of the term 'web log') is a website,
usually maintained by an individual, with regular entries of
commentary, descriptions of events, or other material such as graphics
or video."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog
>>> "Your work will have more visibility, and you can get a basic hosting plan for six dollars a month." <<<
Thanks for the link, Dave. But the free blog set-up works just fine
for my JFK purposes.
>>> "HTML coding is easy. I started my website on a whim and had my first few pages up in a day or two." <<<
Yes, I've gotten pretty good at HTML coding too. I always edit my blog
using only HTML mode; it's easier that way, once you get accustomed to
what you're doing. Although it's no doubt quite intimidating to
someone who has never edited or written something directly using HTML.
It confused the heck out of me for a while (and sometimes still does).
Plus, Blogger.com has a mind of its own on occasion too, which always
elicits a few cries of agony and anguish. ;)
robcap...@netscape.com
> www.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_thread/thread/bf322...
IF you thought you and Bugliosi spoke the truth you would have NO fear
of us CTers. We know it is just another propaganda site and Davy is
trying to get a bump in his salary.
robcap...@netscape.com
> www.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_thread/thread/bf322...
>
"But I never intended for my "RH" site to be a "Discussion" group.
Hence, the definition "Announcement Only" being put into the
description of the group by Google."
OF COURSE NOT as one board of lambasting is enough for anyone!!! Why
get destroyed at his Vinny Bugliosi "shrine" site as well?
robcap...@netscape.com
I now know where to go IF I CAN'T sleep at night. Saves me money on
sleep aids.
YoHarvey
wrote:
Can's sleep at night? Do what your alter ego does; go polish some
bumpers in your back yard.
tomnln
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:acb72767-db5a-4a8b...@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On May 20, 2:07 pm, "robcap...@netscape.com" <robcap...@netscape.com>
wrote:
> On May 19, 4:04 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 18, 11:37 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > >>> "We're finally going to get rid of [David V.P.]." <<<
>
> > > I wonder what would make Mr. Crackpipe think the above statement is
> > > accurate?
>
> > its okay, you can quote me correctly... ya fucking douche bag....
> > LMFAO You provide way to much entertainment....
>
> I now know where to go IF I CAN'T sleep at night. Saves me money on
> sleep aids.
Yo(Momma)Harvey wrote;
Can's sleep at night? Do what your alter ego does; go polish some
bumpers in your back yard.
I write;
Nobody can "Polish" the way your wife "Polishes OUR (17) Knobs ! ! !
Wanna address these NOW???
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Von Pein
www.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_thread/thread/bf322decd63127cd
>>> "In other words, you spit on Freedom of Speech. Why do I not find that surprising for a WC defender?" <<<
Here's a challenge for you, Tony ---
Go to CT-leaning website operators like Debra Conway, John Simkin, and
Rich DellaRosa and say those very same words to them --- "You spit on
Freedom of Speech".
Since July 28, 2005, I've been banned from all of the supposedly open-
minded John F. Kennedy forums that are owned and/or operated by the
three above-named individuals (and for three supposedly different
reasons too).
But we all know the REAL reason for those three expulsions....don't we
Tony?
You'll never in a million years get Ms. Conway, Mr. Simkin, and Mr.
DellaRosa to admit to that "real" underlying reason, of course. But we
know the reason. Right, Anthony?
Tony stated the reason fairly nicely, in fact -- "You spit on Freedom
of Speech."
Or, to put it more bluntly (and truthfully) -- "We don't really care
where the sum total of evidence leads us in the JFK murder case; our
minds are made up that the 35th U.S. President was killed as a result
of a vast conspiracy and we don't need any WC/VB shills wasting our
time saying otherwise."
David Von Pein
CONSPIRACY THEORIST DEAN JACKSON SAID:
>>> "There is no forward movement of JFK, only the violent backwards motion." <<<
DVP SAYS:
Oh, goodie! The kook named Jackson has now branched out into full-
fledged provable "lies". I can confidently label the above Jackson
quote as a "lie" because everyone here knows that Jackson HAS seen
this often-linked Z-Film toggling head-shot clip previously; and if he
hasn't seen it, he's ignoring some crucial Z-Film evidence....
Oh, yeah, I forgot! -- [slaps forehead] -- That Zapruder clip has been
"altered"/"faked"; right, Jackson? Is that what you're going to say
next?
It's funny, though, that if the Zapruder Film is a "fake", as many
CTers actually believe is the case (i.e., a "fake" film that was
designed to ELIMINATE all possible notions of "conspiracy"), it would
still have the VIOLENT REAR HEAD SNAP visible in its final
"faked"/"altered" form, huh?
Go figure kooks. And then go and try to figure out the even-kookier
plotters who faked the Z-Film, but forgot to get rid of the very thing
within the film that spells "conspiracy" to millions of people more
than any other single thing -- the "Rear Head Snap".
~LOL Break~
Lone
Van Peinlich: Keep on reclaiming your history...we CTers keep on
reclaiming the truth.
David Von Pein
>>> "...we CTers keep on reclaiming the truth..." <<<
...And mangling the evidence.
Some enduring legacy.
Lone
> >>> "...we CTers keep on reclaiming the truth..." <<<
>
> ...And mangling the evidence.
>
No..."piecing together the evidence", mangled by G. Ford, the WC-
members and their willing creatures, as Specter, Belin...etc.
Why dont you swing your axe elswhere, van Peinlich?
Gil Jesus
> NEW "GOOGLE GROUPS" WEBSITE........
>
> ======================================================
>
>
> www.google.com/group/Reclaiming-History/topics?tsc=1
>
> ======================================================
Two weeks into this group and I'm sure that every LNer would want to
become a member.
How many members do ya have now ?
YoHarvey
its okay, you can quote me correctly... ya fucking douche bag....
LMFAO You provide way to much entertainment....
Hey Healy? I believe you have DVP confused with your wife. She's the
only douche bag I know still walking the streets of Vegas. Apparently
she's not doing to well; you still live in that slum apartment. How
you paying for tha crack pipe? roflmao.
lazu...@webtv.net
lazu...@webtv.net
deny the testimony of nurses, doctors, x-ray techs, police officers..you
know all the people that would be believed no question in any other
murder case...Laz
Bud
Yah, I don`t like Mark Lane either.
Gil Jesus
aeffects
> Here are the "groups'" stats:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/reclaiming-history/about
David Von Pein is expecting a crowd, "himself" LMFAO
Gil Jesus
Well, that makes up the 3 members......me, myself and I.
Gil Jesus
wrote:
>On May 31, 12:59?pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On May 31, 4:49 am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Here are the "groups'" stats:
>>
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/reclaiming-history/about
>>
>> David Von Pein is expecting a crowd, "himself" ?LMFAO
>
>
>Well, that makes up the 3 members......me, myself and I.
Seriously, tho....one thing I can say about Von Pein that I can't say
about the rest and that is that he is sharp enough to realize that
robcap and I are not the same person.
I gotta give him that much.
Bud
Gil Jesus wrote:
> Here are the "groups'" stats:
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/reclaiming-history/about
What ever happened to that jerk-circle, "no LN allowed" kook group
you startedr? Seems the kooks prefer the golden showers they recieve
here.
Ben Holmes
aeffects says...
Who's the other two idiots, I wonder...
lazu...@webtv.net
Bugliosi...
lazu...@webtv.net
officers- this is when cooroborated, but in certain instances only
Custer,Jenkins, Rydberg, David, O'Conner,Sibert, O'neill etc would know
what they saw and did, re: certain things where the head wound was
located, amount of brain missing, location of back wound...any person
that is not an ultra conformist, clone droned lone nutter until death,
will most likely be convinced of conspiracy reading In The Eye Of
History by Wlliam Law that has in depth chapter length interviews of the
afforementioned...
Lone
> NEW "GOOGLE GROUPS" WEBSITE........
>
> ======================================================
>
>
> www.google.com/group/Reclaiming-History/topics?tsc=1
>
> ======================================================
And what can we expect you breed in in this inbreeding group? A lone
nut namend Oswald?
Van Peinlich--you are small.
Ben Holmes
says...
>
>Ben Holmes said" who's the other two idiots, I wonder?" Reitzes and
>Bugliosi...
>
I'm under the impression that Bugliosi isn't computer literate... so would not
be one of the three subscribers to that forum.
Bud
Maybe so, but Bugliosi is big, and powerful. His shadow casts kooks
into darkness, where they tremble in fear and soil their panties.
aeffects
"golden showers" ? Stay away from those porn sites ya fucking Lone Nut
perv.....
justm...@gmail.com
Healy likes his own golden showers.....he pisses into he wind. No
wonder the stench is so bad he can't even find and infected hooker to
get within 10 feet of him.
David Von Pein
FYI........
A nice perk that comes from starting a non-"Usenet" (non-"alt." type)
Google Group is the ability to upload files (photos and other files)
right into the group's archives.
I had no idea when I created my "Reclaiming History" group that Google
even permitted file uploading as part of a group's archives. (No such
"Files" area exists at this acj newsgroup.)
But it's a nice bonus, because I've collected a bunch of great JFK-
related pictures to use in my "Files" area at the "RH" site (with some
of them being rather rare, at least as far as my own experience and
exposure to Kennedy photographs over the years).
Here's my current batch (which I'll probably add to in the future):
http://groups.google.com/group/reclaiming-history/files?grid=1
================================================
Today's "FILE (PHOTO) OF THE DAY" is this one, with the caption
written by yours truly:
================================================