A major difference here being: Dr. Richard Kimble was able to actually
PROVE his innocence by tracking down the "one-armed man" and getting
him to confess in Episode #120.
When can we expect you JFK conspiracy kooks to come up with YOUR
version of Fred Johnson (aka: the one-armed man)? Can I be looking for
that to happen sometime before 2063?
BTW, James E. Files doesn't count as a killer. He's an obvious liar.
So he's not eligible.
who knows what LHO would of said on the witness stand, eh?
> When can we expect you JFK conspiracy kooks to come up with YOUR
> version of Fred Johnson (aka: the one-armed man)? Can I be looking for
> that to happen sometime before 2063?
never fear my grandchildren will tack the final anaylasis to your
tombstone
> BTW, James E. Files doesn't count as a killer. He's an obvious liar.
> So he's not eligible.
Brennan doesn't count as a witness, he's an obvious liar -- not
eligible
if the rifle don't fit, you MUST acquit -- you Lone Nut kooks haven't
learned in damn thing in 40+ years....
<snip the Lone Nut desperation passes>
>>> "Brennan doesn't count as a witness, he's an obvious liar -- not eligible." <<<
Go ahead and disqualify Brennan. It doesn't matter. He's just icing on
an already well-frosted cake. Because the evidence isn't going
anywhere (gun, bullets, shells, prints, paper bag)...all linked to
your hero, Mr. Oswald. Plus, Oswald's own actions tell us almost as
much as that evidence does.
Why would Lee start killing cops within an hour of JFK's murder if he
was totally "innocent"? (The idiotic "innocent" quote comes courtesy
of Phil Ossofee.)
Let me guess -- You don't think the evidence is strong enough against
your hero with respect to Tippit's slaying either...right kook? Right.
Maybe a "one-armed man" named "Fred" killed J.D. Tippit, huh? Fred was
one mean son-of-a-bitch alright. I'd look into that one-armed man
angle if I were you.
Here's the man you're looking for, btw:
MR ;^D
0020Sep307