Some sloppy cop simply used the word "steel" where he should have
wrote the word "metal" and Tom isn't smart enough to realize that
simple error.
I was invited to one pistol qualification range for a large metropolitan
police force. The instructor who invited me told me of an officer who showed
up for his annual qualification, toting an automatic he had been carrying on
the job and protecting citizens with for three years; the first shot jammed
the automatic. Feel safer?
Tom The Sack O' Nuts isn't smart enough to realize he's been wearing
feces-caked underwear since Thursday afternoon, February 25, 1904.
So, what can you possibly expect from him -- sudden brilliance?
Then, too, Walt isn't exactly Mr. Super Sleuth when it comes to
anything connected to the JFK murder case either.
When the blind tries to teach the blind to see, it's likely that
neither one will end up with 20/20 vision.
"some sloppy cop"?????
We're talking about "Seasoned" Detectives from the 14th largest city in the
U. S. A. in 1963.
1500 officers on the rolls of the DPD.
Does that sound like Barney Fife to you Walt?
How about the metalurgical breakdown on that "Magic Bullet Wally?
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
Evidence/testimony BEATS your "Wild Speculations" Every Time Wally.
Here's Your "score-card">>> http://whokilledjfk.net/wally_world.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is it you don't understand now, ya stupid asshole?? Have you
taken yer medication??
I'm not gonna waste my time deciphering the chart for you if ya
haven't taken yer meds.
I remember how you couldn't understand simple arithmetic and use it to
find the length of the rifle in the Klein ad,and thought it was
"Mickey Mouse".
>
> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>
> Evidence/testimony BEATS your "Wild Speculations" Every Time Wally.
>
> Here's Your "score-card">>> http://whokilledjfk.net/wally_world.htm
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add David Von Pain (in the ass) to Walt's "Cheer-Leaders".
How come ALL "mistakes" favor the WCR???
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f6d8812b-a8ef-49d7...@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
What is it you don't understand now, ya stupid asshole?? Have you
taken yer medication??
I'm not gonna waste my time deciphering the chart for you if ya
haven't taken yer meds.
I remember how you couldn't understand simple arithmetic and use it to
find the length of the rifle in the Klein ad,and thought it was
"Mickey Mouse".
Walt RUNS AGAIN! ! !
Anybody Surprised???
See what Walt Snipped>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HUh??? How does all of this BS change the fact that ALL of those
cops were HUMAN???
And since the detective was HUMAN he was susceptible to making human
errors....Like saying "steel jacketed" when the correct term was
"metal jacketed".
>
> How about the metalurgical breakdown on that "Magic Bullet Wally?
>
> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>
> Evidence/testimony BEATS your "Wild Speculations" Every Time Wally.
>
> Here's Your "score-card">>> http://whokilledjfk.net/wally_world.htm
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROVE this to be the case Walt... you like to claim "inner knowledge"
of what actually happened but then of course provide NO proof to back
it up. How do you know this is what happened?
Furthermore, was he sloppy when he noted the bullet was of a 30.06
caliber too?
This means Walt is lying through his teeth and CAN'T support another
claim. Notice how DVP is defending him too.
> > SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>
> > Evidence/testimony BEATS your "Wild Speculations" Every Time Wally.
>
> > Here's Your "score-card">>> http://whokilledjfk.net/wally_world.htm
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
HUh??? How does all of this BS change the fact that ALL of those
cops were HUMAN???
And since the detective was HUMAN he was susceptible to making human
errors....Like saying "steel jacketed" when the correct term was
"metal jacketed".
I write;
Ask Walt to "Prove" Human Error in ID'ing the Walker bullet?
Ask Walt if HE would call this bullet "Steel Jacketed"???
http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm (figure #3.)
Notice that ALL of Walt's "Assumptions" benefit the WCR! ! !
Thank you for compiling my posts and providing a link to the
collection. ( I think you've missed a few)
You've done me a great service by compiling my posts and providing the
link to them. I hope all lurkers will read them.
Thank you .....for being S-T-U-P-I-D
DVP AND CHUCK;
Quite a Cheer Leading Squad for Walt.
> > SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
>
> > Evidence/testimony BEATS your "Wild Speculations" Every Time Wally.
>
> > Here's Your "score-card">>> http://whokilledjfk.net/wally_world.htm
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------限-------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for compiling my posts and providing a link to the
collection. ( I think you've missed a few)
You've done me a great service by compiling my posts and providing the
link to them. I hope all lurkers will read them.
Thank you .....for being S-T-U-P-I-D
You never proved that 133-a had "Dual Sling Mounts".
When are you gonna Prove that LHO worked for RFK???
You never proved thast Walker called Germany.
You never proved Oswald ordered a 40 inch rifle.
You're a Warren Commission Shill! ! !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------нн-----------------------------------------------------
I know that logical thinking is not one of your strong points....In
fact in your case it appears to be a totally alien concept
However if you could apply logic to your statement that I'm a WC
shill..... the wouldn't logic dictate that I would agree with the
Warren Commission on things like...Oswald trued to kill Walker. What
is my position on this?? I totally dis agree,though the evidence does
support the claim that Oswald was there behind walkers house that
night...There isn't one iota of evidence that it was he who fired the
shot that merely put a bullet hole in Walkers window. He MAY have
fired that shot but he damned sure wasn't "trying to kill
Walker" .....because if that was his intention he could NOT have
failed. The target was less than 100 feet away and sitting still in a
well lit room....NOBODY could miss a target like that, and even if he
had missed for some reason with the first shot he had ample time to
fire several more shots until he succeeded. The FACT that Walker was
not hit means that Oswald never intended to hit him, and some sort of
publicity stunt was in the making.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
I know that logical thinking is not one of your strong points....In
fact in your case it appears to be a totally alien concept
However if you could apply logic to your statement that I'm a WC
shill..... the wouldn't logic dictate that I would agree with the
Warren Commission on things like...Oswald trued to kill Walker. What
is my position on this?? I totally dis agree,though the evidence does
support the claim that Oswald was there behind walkers house that
night...There isn't one iota of evidence that it was he who fired the
shot that merely put a bullet hole in Walkers window. He MAY have
fired that shot but he damned sure wasn't "trying to kill
Walker" .....because if that was his intention he could NOT have
failed. The target was less than 100 feet away and sitting still in a
well lit room....NOBODY could miss a target like that, and even if he
had missed for some reason with the first shot he had ample time to
fire several more shots until he succeeded. The FACT that Walker was
not hit means that Oswald never intended to hit him, and some sort of
publicity stunt was in the making.
I write;
WHY would you Repeatedly ask someone without logical skills for
evidence/testimony????
You're "On Record" as stating that it was Oswald who fired the shot at
Walker's house on April 10, 1963.
You're a Warren Commission SHILL! ! ! >>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/wally_world.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABSOLUTELY TRUE.... BUT there is a HUGE difference between shooting a
hole in a window sash and killing Walker.
>
> You're a Warren Commission SHILL! ! ! >>>http://whokilledjfk.net/wally_world.htm
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
LOL!!!! This is like DVP logic here!!! I could you say "LHO killed"
Walker when he was alive and well???? The point you constantly lie
about is the evidence does NOT prove LHO even fired at Gen. Walker.
Why you lie that he did is what is suspicious.
>
> > You're a Warren Commission SHILL! ! ! >>>http://whokilledjfk.net/wally_world.htm
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Dear Stupid Bastard.... Please present a single post where I sais
Oswald fired... AT...General Walker.
What I've said is: Oswald fired at Walker's HOUSE and put a bullet
hole in the WINDOW SASH.
Now he splitting hairs. Walt is now saying LHO went to Gen. Walker's
house to shoot at the window frame!!!! LOL!!!
I guess he was getting in a little practice, huh???
Walt still doesn't get there is NO proof for this weird take on things
either.
Dear Stupid Bastard.... Have you no ability to THINK.....
Isn't it obvious to you that the event actually happened? Isn't it
equally obvious that it was somekind of publicity stunt??
I believe the stunt had a twofold purpose.....It gave Walker free
publicity in his quest for the governor of Texas, and It was intended
to give Oswald credibility as a violent communist revolutionary.
NO it isn't obvious to me since there is NO proof to show this to be
the case. IF you think it is I again ask, where is the proof to
support your claim?
> I believe the stunt had a twofold purpose.....It gave Walker free
> publicity in his quest for the governor of Texas, and It was intended
> to give Oswald credibility as a violent communist revolutionary.
I'll play along for a minute then. Why did the DPD have to cut out
the license plate number of the car in the driveway if LHO really did
the crime? Why did the DPD have to change their own original
assessment that a 30.06 "steel-jacketed" bullet was used from a "high-
powered" rifle if LHO really did the crime? Why did the DPD have to
ignore the only witness who said there were two men involved and they
handed something to a third man who put it into the backseat of the
his car if LHO committed the crime?
Boy, you sound just like a LNer, igore ALL the real evidence that does
NOT point to LHO, and then claim LHO did the crime.
Yes,.... I knew after I asked the question that it was a dumb question
to ask a stupid bastard.
Rob the Stupid Bastard Asked:
Why did the DPD have to cut out the license plate number of the car
in the driveway if LHO really did
the crime?
Why did the DPD have to change their own original assessment that a
30.06 "steel-jacketed" bullet was used from a "high- powered" rifle if
LHO really did the crime?
Why did the DPD have to ignore the only witness who said there were
two men involved and they handed something to a third man who put it
into the backseat of the his car if LHO committed the crime?
I'd love to offer you the answers to those questions...But you think
I'm a liar and don't know what I'm talkin about.
Which brings me to a question for you...... Aren't you displaying
your stupidity by askin for answers from someone that you think has
zero credibility??
Thre is NO "think" about it, you do have ZERO credibility in my book.
I again, use these questions to show the real evidence the police
found, and how you are manipulating it to come to your own conclusion,
which just happens to concur with the WC's conclusion.