Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.conspiracy.jfk
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion David's Anniversary
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
David Von Pein  
View profile  
 More options Feb 19 2008, 10:21 pm
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk
From: David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:21:19 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Feb 19 2008 10:21 pm
Subject: Re: David's Anniversary
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

>>> "David, you should spend some time watching the PBS documentary on Oswald." <<<

I have. Several times. The 1993 "WHO WAS LEE HARVEY OSWALD?"
documentary is very good indeed.

More:

www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/oswald

>>> "1. Oswald had nowhere near enough money to pay for his trip to Russia." <<<

You are quite obviously dead-wrong about this, since Oswald paid
$220.75 for a one-way trip to Russia on September 17, 1959:

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh26/html/WH_Vol26_0...

Oswald was a frugal penny-pinching miser (by all accounts). There's no
reason whatsoever why he couldn't have saved up $220.75 during his 3-
year Marine hitch. And, obviously, he did just that.

>>> "2. The CIA lied (and continues to lie) about debriefing Oswald when he returned." <<<

S.O.P. for Central Intelligence, it would appear. Vince Bugliosi
possibly sums up the CIA best in the Endnotes for his JFK book:

      "The CIA had nothing to hide in thousands of previous documents
the agency initially refused to release voluntarily but ultimately did
release under court order. The CIA specializes in always acting
guilty, even when it is not, and always being, from a public relations
standpoint, its own worst enemy." -- VB

>>> "3. The CIA lied, claiming that they retained no photos of Oswald in Mexico City." <<<

The following VB quote probably doesn't apply to this point, but I'll
repeat it again anyway:

      "The CIA specializes in always acting guilty, even when it is
not, and always being, from a public relations standpoint, its own
worst enemy." -- VB

>>> "4. The CIA lied, claiming that they retained no wiretap recordings of Oswald when he was in M.C." <<<

The following VB quote probably doesn't apply to this point, but I'll
repeat it again anyway:

      "The CIA specializes in always acting guilty, even when it is
not, and always being, from a public relations standpoint, its own
worst enemy." -- VB

>>> "Didn't you ever wonder why Oswald almost broke into tears when he was told he couldn't have a 4 day visa to Cuba, while on his way to Russia? Do you think he was just broken hearted about not getting to play tourist?" <<<

Yeah, prob'ly.

Anyway, any explanation for this supposed 'crying jag' of Oswald's put
forth by Bob Harris will undoubtedly be filled with pure speculation
and conjecture and ZERO pieces of hard evidence to back it up.

So, what difference does it really make? You'd never believe any kind
of ordinary or innocuous explanation for ANYTHING Oswald (or the CIA)
did from 1959 through 1963 anyway.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google