MUST BE A FULL MOON
David Von Pein
There must be a full moon. The conspiracy-loving retards are out in
force.
I don't suppose the CT-Kooks have even the slightest desire to bash
the total nonsense that was being spouted by "one of their own"--
Thomas Rossley--during the 4/5/09 WHPR radio debate...right?
Such nonsense as the following (and this is only the tip of the
iceberg when it comes to the hilarious and retarded stuff that Rossley
regurgitated endlessly for 3-and-a-half hours on WHPR-Radio on
4/5/09):
1.) When Rossley said that he actually thinks John Connally's chest
wound was a wound of ENTRY instead of exit.
2.) When Rossley said that Jack Ruby was "forced" to kill Lee Oswald
because of something that was supposedly said by Dan Rather to KRLD on
11/23/63.
3.) When Rossley stated his belief that it was Oswald in the doorway
of the TSBD. (Even the most rabid of CT retards don't believe that one
anymore.)
4.) When Rossley totally contradicted himself when he propped up SS
agent Glen Bennett's "four inches down from the right shoulder"
statement....i.e., indicating that JFK was actually shot from the REAR
in the upper back, even though Rossley had said earlier in the debate
that Kennedy's back wound was a wound of EXIT.
5.) During the debate, Rossley magically turned every verified EXIT
wound into an ENTRY wound, and he magically turned every verified
ENTRY wound into an EXIT wound for the sake of rewriting history THE
ROSSLEY WAY.
And Rossley even performed this "magic" with Governor Connally's
wounds too....becoming the first mega-kook in HISTORY (that I'm aware
of) who has ever even HINTED at the idea that John B. Connally was
shot in the chest from the FRONT.
Rossley deserves praise for being inventive and really retarded in his
beliefs about the case, I will say that.
But all of those things will just roll off the backs of the conspiracy
theorists at the various forums. They already have, in fact, with not
one single CTer daring to disagree with the above sample batch of
insane nuttiness that was spewed forth by Tom Rossley on the radio on
Sunday, April 5, 2009.
Well, like they say...birds of a feather. I guess as long as the
conspiracy-happy kooks can pretend that Saint Oswald didn't fire a
shot, those retarded members of the "Anybody But Oswald" club are
satisfied (even if "one of their own" named Rossley says really stupid
sh*t on the Internet airwaves, like he did on April 5, 2009).
For the actual evidence (and common sense), you can always go here. of
course:
======================================
WHPR Radio Debate (John McAdams vs. Tom Rossley); April 5, 2009;
Unedited audio version:
Part 1 -- http://RapidShare.com/files/219864254/FULL1.mp3.html
Part 2 -- http://RapidShare.com/files/219903064/FULL2.mp3.html
======================================
David Von Pein
Source Thread (IMDB.com):
tomnln
Commission's 26 Volumes.
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/radio_debate.htm
David has been a SNEASK for Yeasrs.
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/frick.htm
Davis is way down near the bottom of the page (subject # 7)
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e8e22b99-f2d4-4e66...@h28g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
aeffects
we understand your incompetence, fear and outright lying capability,
you stay in your hidey-hole like a good little coward and maybe Vince
will come and drag your sorry ass back out in the daylight.....
We'll do well without you hon, but, you might lend Steve-o-reno a
hand, the troll isn't use to CTer's who know case evidence (either do
you, but what-the-hell)....
aeffects
> Source Thread (IMDB.com):
>
> www.imdb.com/title/tt0102138/board/flat/133251215
I think its absolutely wonderful you spend the entire day transcribing
Tom's debate with .johnny, time would be better spent polishing
Vince's knob, but you know that, don't ya?....
tomnln
Apparently David is "UNfamiliar" with what Volume/page numbers mean.
HAHAHAHAHA
The Same David who RAN from an invitation to debate me on the radio.
(FOR DAMNED GOOD REASON>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/radio_debate.htm)
HOHOHOHOHOHOHO
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e8e22b99-f2d4-4e66...@h28g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>
>