QUESTION FOR VON PEIN
Gil Jesus
guilt of Oswald and your reverance for the Warren Commission's
findings.
In the past 6 years, you've posted all hours of the day and night in
your battle to rid the world of "kooks" with your "commons sense" and
"logic".
Exactly how many "kooks" have you sucessfully "converted" to LNers ?
aeffects
frankly, I can only think of one possibility.... Robert *Bob* Vernon
bigdog
Kooks are not qualified to be LNers. To be an LNer, you have to be
rational. We would never allow someone like you in the club.
aeffects
Mr. Corbett you don't know shit so please sit down and wait for your
mother, she'll be here shortly.... thank you.
David Von Pein
>>> "Exactly how many "kooks" have you sucessfully "converted" to LNers?" <<<
The answer, of course, is zero. Because if you're a "JFK Conspiracy
Kook" to start with, you cannot be reasoned with (via things like the
ACTUAL EVIDENCE in the JFK case). As Vincent Bugliosi said: "Talking
to them about logic and common sense is like talking to a man without
ears" ["RH"; p.1438].
We've seen this play out over and over again here at the acj newsgroup/
asylum. The actual evidence is placed before a kook....and the kook
ignores or distorts it. Time after time.
It's all a game for the kooks/retards. And Gil's one of the main
players/hobbyists.
Gil certainly knows the actual evidence hangs Oswald seven ways to
Sunday (or even Monday). How could anyone who studies this case NOT
realize that fact? But Gil is too deep in Conspiracy Fantasy Land to
actually admit it.
Author Jim Moore, in his 1990 book "Conspiracy Of One", said something
interesting that relates to what I just stated above. Here's Moore's
quote:
====================================
"I have watched Robert Groden, Josiah Thompson, G. Robert Blakey
and others come to Dealey Plaza. The first thing these writers and
researchers always do is look up at that sixth-floor window. If they
truly believe Oswald innocent of the assassination, why do they crane
their heads to stare upward at the sniper's perch?
"The answer is that, deep in the secret recesses of their minds
and hearts, nearly all these people accept what will ultimately be
history's verdict: Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, killed the
President.
"But to show that acceptance would be anathema to the critics,
for they have too much at stake. Down the drain would go political
causes they champion, money they stand to make, and their personal and
professional reputations. Those are hefty reasons for keeping their
voices shrill and their platitudes unreasonable." -- Jim Moore; Page
208 of "Conspiracy Of One"
====================================