Breaking News---JFK Assassination solved: video
SecretServiceguy
SOLVED*******************
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE8b2CCDPqw
Vince Palamara
http://www.google.com/profiles/vincepalamara
Chuck Schuyler
Shameful and disingenious YouTube post, Vince.
You announced some time ago that VB had convinced you that Oswald was
the shooter. You seem to be backing away from that statement now.
What changed?
The SS didn't kill JFK--Oswald did. In hindsight, many things could've
been done differently that may have saved JFK's life that fateful
day--46 years ago tomorrow.
Blaming the SS for JFK's death is like blaming an attractively dressed
woman for being raped.
mucher1
> On Nov 21, 9:44 am, SecretServiceguy <vincebet...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > BREAKING NEWS-11/21/09: PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S ASSASSINATION
> > SOLVED*******************
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE8b2CCDPqw
>
> > Vince Palamarahttp://www.google.com/profiles/vincepalamara
>
> Shameful and disingenious YouTube post, Vince.
>
> You announced some time ago that VB had convinced you that Oswald was
> the shooter. You seem to be backing away from that statement now.
>
> What changed?
Not much, I'm afraid. Vince is (still) like a child screaming for
attention.
Gil Jesus
> You announced some time ago that VB had convinced you that Oswald was
> the shooter. You seem to be backing away from that statement now.
>
> What changed?
Intelligent people can't be BS'd for long.
He must have read DiEugenio's reviews.
http://www.ctka.net/2008/bugliosi_review.html
Welcome back, Vince.
Robert Harris
<88ce4af4-59b9-42a2...@33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>,
SecretServiceguy <vince...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE8b2CCDPqw
Aren't you a fan of Bugliosi these days? Why did you bring down your
video, claiming that Oswald alone, carried out the attack and that you
thought Bugliosi was god?
As for your moronic claim that the Secret Service was responsible for
the assassination because they were negligent, how exactly were they
supposed to have prevented it?
And why do you continue to promote the lie that Rybka was told to stand
down from the back of the limousine, when you KNOW that agents were
NEVER assigned to stand there, that Rybka made no attempt whatsoever, to
climb onto the trunk, and that Rybka was assigned to stay at Love field
that day, as he stated in his own report??
But hey! I think you found your soulmate in Bugloisi.
Robert Harris
tomnln
Rybka was assigned to the follow up car.
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
(photo 4)
"Robert Harris" <reha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:reharris1-C2CF8...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net...
David Von Pein
Vince Palamara never was really "converted" to the "LN" side of the
fence, and I said as much 1.5 years ago, in this June 2008 newsgroup
post [excerpted below]:
www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/66ceef57607ad041
"Vincent Palamara doesn't seem to know which side of the fence he's
on.
Many months after fully endorsing Vincent Bugliosi's lone-assassin
book, "Reclaiming History", we're treated to this strange 5-Star
review written by Mr. Palamara for Jim Douglass' conspiracy-flavored
book:
www.amazon.com/review/R1SCRUKKJ2YSKQ
It's perfectly fine to ride the JFK fence forever -- Jerry Dealey at
JFKLancer.com does that very nicely, in fact. And I've enjoyed talking
with Jerry on several occasions in the past.
But Vince Palamara seems to be in a different category. And to be
perfectly honest, I'm not entirely sure WHAT category of "JFK
researcher" Mr. Palamara currently resides in. But he seems to be
trying his darndest to play the entire field and to have it both ways.
By reading some of his reviews for both anti-CT and pro-CT material,
it would appear that Mr. Palamara believes in a unique "No Conspiracy
Conspiracy" with respect to the death of John F. Kennedy.
~shrug~
To quote Mr. Palamara directly, he claims that Vincent Bugliosi's book
"is a devastating knock-out blow to those who, like me, once believed
there was a conspiracy in the death of JFK. .... It is time to get a
life, America: Oswald did indeed kill Kennedy, acting alone. Vince
Bugliosi has done what I once thought was the impossible: he has
convinced me of this notion".
www.ReclaimingHistory.com/?page_id=8
And yet, months later, Vince P. continues to write positive reviews
for pro-conspiracy publications (probably because Mr. Palamara's name
is in the index of most or all of these conspiracy-favoring books).
Strange behavior, IMO. But, YMMV." -- DVP; June 17, 2008
Robert Harris
"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> WRONG HARRIS.
>
> Rybka was assigned to the follow up car.
This video explains what happened. It includes Rybka's own report.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gl3F9mfC1bA
Robert Harris
curtjester1
> WRONG HARRIS.
>
> Rybka was assigned to the follow up car.
>
> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
> (photo 4)
>
have been diagnosed with a chest wound? It looks way too low for
that. And DEFINITELY way too low for a LAPEL FLIP.
CJ
> "Robert Harris" <reharr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:reharris1-C2CF8...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net...
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <88ce4af4-59b9-42a2-99d0-5f898b180...@33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>,
> > SecretServiceguy <vincebet...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE8b2CCDPqw
>
> > Aren't you a fan of Bugliosi these days? Why did you bring down your
> > video, claiming that Oswald alone, carried out the attack and that you
> > thought Bugliosi was god?
>
> > As for your moronic claim that the Secret Service was responsible for
> > the assassination because they were negligent, how exactly were they
> > supposed to have prevented it?
>
> > And why do you continue to promote the lie that Rybka was told to stand
> > down from the back of the limousine, when you KNOW that agents were
> > NEVER assigned to stand there, that Rybka made no attempt whatsoever, to
> > climb onto the trunk, and that Rybka was assigned to stay at Love field
> > that day, as he stated in his own report??
>
> > But hey! I think you found your soulmate in Bugloisi.
>
> > Robert Harris- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Robert Harris
<a321bc38-3107-4753...@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
curtjester1 <curtj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 22, 1:47�am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> > WRONG HARRIS.
> >
> > Rybka was assigned to the follow up car.
> >
> > SEE>>> �http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
> > � � � � � � � � � � � �(photo 4)
> >
> I looked at the photo of JBC's coat jacket. I wonder how he could
> have been diagnosed with a chest wound? It looks way too low for
> that. And DEFINITELY way too low for a LAPEL FLIP.
There was no "lapel flip". The bullet exited well to the right
(Connally's right) of the lapel.
What happened was, that when the bullet exited Connally at 223, it blew
open the right side of his jacket, exposing much of the white shirt in
that area. Because Connally's arm was resting on his jacket, he held the
coat taut so that it snapped immediately back afterward.
After it snapped back, covering the shirt again, it gave the appearance
of the lapel "flipping".
Robert Harris
curtjester1
> In article
> <a321bc38-3107-4753-acb3-131cd8b75...@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
It would HAVE to be one CRAZY bullet for it to be a potential SBT
bullet (trajectory wise)!!
CJ
robcap...@netscape.com
> On Nov 21, 9:44 am, SecretServiceguy <vincebet...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > BREAKING NEWS-11/21/09: PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S ASSASSINATION
> > SOLVED*******************
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE8b2CCDPqw
>
> > Vince Palamarahttp://www.google.com/profiles/vincepalamara
>
> Shameful and disingenious YouTube post, Vince.
>
> You announced some time ago that VB had convinced you that Oswald was
> the shooter. You seem to be backing away from that statement now.
>
> What changed?
Good luck with this one as he NEVER told us why Bugliosi changed his
mind in the first place.
> The SS didn't kill JFK--Oswald did. In hindsight, many things could've
> been done differently that may have saved JFK's life that fateful
> day--46 years ago tomorrow.
>
> Blaming the SS for JFK's death is like blaming an attractively dressed
> woman for being raped.
LOL!! This guy isn't even comparing apples to apples. The SS IS
REPSONSIBLE FOR THE LIFE OF THEIR charge, thus when they allow the
charge to die they are RESPONSIBLE in some way!
They blamed themselves on some level, but ChuckieCon thinks they are
totally innocent.
An attractive woman in a nice short outfit does NOT give you an excuse
to rape her, but I guess in ChuckieCon's hometown they do things
differently, huh?
Robert Harris
<24713dd6-2803-404b...@j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
curtjester1 <curtj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Not if it was fired by the only professional criminal in DP that day,
who just happened to be with Jack Ruby, the night before, and had
connections to Marcello/Ferrie.
Look at my video on the SBT. ALL the trajectory problems go away when
you look at a shot from the third floor of the Daltex.
Robert Harris
>
> CJ
curtjester1
before. Any of them? Even LHO was seen the night before or after the
assassination by the waitress next door to the Vegas Club. Ruby and
Oswald regular breakfast customers at an OakCliff restaurant. John
Curington, L. Hunt's right hand man, saw LHO, Ruby, DeMorenshildt, and
L. Hunt together at various times.
> Look at my video on the SBT. ALL the trajectory problems go away when
> you look at a shot from the third floor of the Daltex.
>
Well first you would have to accept that the JFK throat shot and the
Connally wounds were seperate. I guess your basing it on how far JBC
might have been turned? I put more trust in the film and what it
might be first. Homer McMahon was instructed to go over the film soon
after the assassination, and saw six to eight shots for both men, and
it is not quite the same film as is out in the market today.
CJ
> Robert Harris
>
>
>
>
>
> > CJ- Hide quoted text -