The CTs are getting desperate
bigdog
in that in demonsrates the the disillusionment one long time CT is
feeling as he recognizes that the CT movement is going nowhere and his
decades of effort appear to have been an excercise in futility. Of
course he is 100% correct about that. Perhaps just as revealing is to
take a look at all the discussion generated by the thread "Why did
Oswald buy a Coke?"
Maybe they were out of Pepsi, but the fact that this sort of
triviality is what CTs have been reduced to speaks volumes. They've
been shooting blanks for decades but they keep reloading and firing
away. They make a lot of noise but aren't doing any damage.
Chuck Schuyler
Have CTers put up anything substantive in the last several decades?
When one listens to the McAdams/Rossley radio debate, it's obvious
that Rossley, like most CTers, has nothing but tired old worn-out
"factoids" (as McAdams calls the pseudo facts rife within the JFK CT
community) to put up against cold hard facts. Some of what Rossley
trotted out in the debate, and much of what CTers bring out in general
at discussion boards like this, is stuff that was debunked DECADES
ago.
Trivial baloney, easily swatted down.
When CTers run into real trouble, as is the case with the physical
evidence in the case which points directly toward their hero, Lee
Oswald, they trot out the other tactic they've fallen in love with:
All the physical evidence is forged/planted.
Z film? Altered in a photo lab.
Autopsy photos? Fake.
CE399? Planted/switched later.
Rifle belonging to LHO on the 6th floor? Not his. Possibly a Mauser.
Switched.
The list is much, much longer.
When I listened to Rossley's debate with McAdams, I realized just how
bankrupt people like Rossley are. What an empty life he must lead to
have wasted 40 years of his life chasing phantoms--some 'hunch' that
there's something else out there lurking in the shadows that will blow
the JFK case wide open, and that he has the investigative skills to
bring this about.
It's really quite sad and pathetic.
The CT poster from another forum that YoHarvey noted at the thread,
"CT world in shambles per a CT!" is almost pathetic in his attempt to
keep the CT "game" alive. He's like the little kid, alone with his
bat, ball and glove, watching his friends get called in for supper and
bedtime as the sun fades behind the homes in the subdivision. One can
almost here this CTer crying out, "hey, gang! There's still some
daylight left! Let's play a little bit longer!"
Put the bat, ball and glove away, CTers.
Game over. Your attempts to alter history and ruin innocent lives
failed.
tomnln
"Chuck Schuyler" <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote in message
news:960ce2df-644e-44eb...@k2g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
Autopsy photos? Fake.
CE399? Planted/switched later.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell us WHY you RAN from an Opportunity to participate in the radio
debate????
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Von Pein
>>> "It's obvious that Rossley, like most CTers, has nothing but tired old worn-out "factoids"..." <<<
Oh, I don't know about that -- Rossley has placed on the table some
"new" stuff (hilarious, but somewhat "new")....such as the stuff I
talk about at the link below:
www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/ae81c1e5ba212311
E.G.: Rossley (in true-blue form of getting everything backwards)
thinks that Connally's chest wound was a wound of ENTRY, and he thinks
(as all retarded kooks do) that JFK's throat wound was a wound of
ENTRY as well.
And Tom thinks that both of those wounds of "entry" resulted in the
bullets exiting out the two victims' upper backs.
So, we're dealing with a case of a mega-kook (that's Rossley) taking a
look at the evidence and then turning the known facts completely
around to satisfy the kook's pro-conspiracy needs, such as when
Rossley takes BOTH of the verified EXIT wounds on JFK's and Connally's
bodies and magically turns EACH of them into (voila!) ENTRY wounds.
And then Rossley conveniently (and magically) takes BOTH victims'
verified ENTRY wounds in their upper backs and turns each of these
wounds into (voila!) EXIT wounds.
That's called "rewriting history" to fit a kook's requirements. And
retards like Thomas Rossley perform that task better than anyone else
on the planet.
And the crap that Rossley talked about during the radio debate
regarding Dan Rather supposedly having seen Oswald at the Carousel
Club on November 21st is a real howl too.
I failed to make the following observation in my above-linked critique
of the debate (which was a debate that Mr. McAdams won with
ease...seeing as how John has all the evidence to support his position
and Rossley has none to support his)....
How could Dan Rather (or anyone!) have POSSIBLY seen Lee Oswald at
Jack Ruby's Carousel nightclub on Thursday night, November 21st, 1963,
when we know exactly where Oswald was located during that whole night?
Oswald was at the Paine house in Irving that night.
Does Rossley think that Oswald borrowed Ruth Paine's station wagon and
took a trip down to Ruby's club on Thursday night without anyone at
the Paine house noticing?
BTW, as a side note -- I'm wondering when and where Thomas Rossley met
Jim Garrison?
aeffects
> >>> "It's obvious that Rossley, like most CTers, has nothing but tired old worn-out "factoids"..." <<<
>
> Oh, I don't know about that -- Rossley has placed on the table some
> "new" stuff (hilarious, but somewhat "new")
and THEN there is Vin Bugliosi, the latest in what the Nutter have to
offer the USENET world, the largest book publishing debacle in
publishing history! Yep you trolls really know how to set the
conspiracy world on fire....
-and-
and NO advertising shithead! Just another gentle reminder... What is
the world to think, reading you quoting yourself? Puh-leeeeze!
<snip the nutter lunacy>
aeffects
45 questions shithead...... get busy or return to pulling nutter pud!
YoHarvey
I listened to one tape of the debate. It's everything I knew it would
be. Rossley believes you win a debate based on the quantity of
material; not the quality. That debate should have occurred 30 years
ago. That's basically the age of the crap Rossley attempted to peddle.
justm...@gmail.com
Along with trying to peddle his website, did you notice on the very
first segment, the first thing he asked Anton was if he could give the
address to his website. McAdams just said jfk assassination...not
rossley he had to spell it out ROFLMAO
tomnln
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:62d85be9-6225-4f11...@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
Every time I give you Official Citations that you don't like, you claim it's
something I made up.
You forgot to mention everything you posted above came from YOUR
evidence/testimony.
You reject your own official Records ! ! !
Because you don't know what the 26 volumes contain.
btw;
I met Garrison at what I believe was the First National JFK Conference at
the U of H in 1975.
When did you meet him????
David Von Pein
>>> "When did you meet him [Earling C. Garrison]????" <<<
Every time I dream about mega-kooks.
And here:
tomnln
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6b1f7e39-1cc5-44a0...@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 9, 4:28 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 9, 5:51 am, bigdog <jecorbett1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > YoHarvey's thread "CT world in shambles per a CT!" is quite revealing
> > in that in demonsrates the the disillusionment one long time CT is
> > feeling as he recognizes that the CT movement is going nowhere and his
> > decades of effort appear to have been an excercise in futility. Of
> > course he is 100% correct about that. Perhaps just as revealing is to
> > take a look at all the discussion generated by the thread "Why did
> > Oswald buy a Coke?"
> > Maybe they were out of Pepsi, but the fact that this sort of
> > triviality is what CTs have been reduced to speaks volumes. They've
> > been shooting blanks for decades but they keep reloading and firing
> > away. They make a lot of noise but aren't doing any damage.
>
> 45 questions shithead...... get busy or return to pulling nutter pud!
Yo(Momma)Harvey wrote;
I listened to one tape of the debate. It's everything I knew it would
be. Rossley believes you win a debate based on the quantity of
material; not the quality. That debate should have occurred 30 years
ago. That's basically the age of the crap Rossley attempted to peddle.
I write;
My good friend McAdams & I KNEW you wouldmn't Understand any of it.
Seeing that you NEVER made the Starting Team, would you like to "Pinch-Hit"
for McAdams nect time?
GOD knows McAdams NEEDS the Rest.
WHO is Yo(Momma)Harvey?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/baileynme.htm
Found under the "Rogue's Gallery" Button.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
I give the KOOK-SUCKER "Nightmares".
tomnln
YoHarvey
> "David Von Pein" <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote in messagenews:36edb612-1437-4617...@g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> >>>> "When did you meet him [Earling C. Garrison]????" <<<
>
> > Every time I dream about mega-kooks.
>
> > And here:
>
> >www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=08167F5DF1E5565D
>
> I give the KOOK-SUCKER "Nightmares".
Rossley? To waste time debating an individual who doesn't even
believe Oswald was in Mexico City, would be like getting another bj
from Ellen. Terribly unsatisfying.
tomnln
On Apr 10, 2:48 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> "David Von Pein" <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote in
> messagenews:36edb612-1437-4617...@g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> >>>> "When did you meet him [Earling C. Garrison]????" <<<
>
> > Every time I dream about mega-kooks.
>
> > And here:
>
> >www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=08167F5DF1E5565D
>
> I give the KOOK-SUCKER "Nightmares".
Yo(Momma)Harvey wrote;
Rossley? To waste time debating an individual who doesn't even
believe Oswald was in Mexico City, would be like getting another bj
from Ellen. Terribly unsatisfying.
I write;
TRANSLATION......"CHICKENSHIT"
McAdams knew you were "behind hin".
He didn't Realize that you were MILES behind him.
GO FEED THE BOA !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bigdog
> So, we're dealing with a case of a mega-kook (that's Rossley) taking a
> look at the evidence and then turning the known facts completely
> around to satisfy the kook's pro-conspiracy needs, such as when
> Rossley takes BOTH of the verified EXIT wounds on JFK's and Connally's
> bodies and magically turns EACH of them into (voila!) ENTRY wounds.
>
> And then Rossley conveniently (and magically) takes BOTH victims'
> verified ENTRY wounds in their upper backs and turns each of these
> wounds into (voila!) EXIT wounds.
>
I hate to say this but maybe Rossley is on to something. Maybe
everything is just the opposite of what it seems. Maybe the Z-film
we've seen is actually running backwards. Maybe the motorcade backed
into Dealey Plaza from the west and JFK was not in the front of the
motorcade but actually was at the end. Maybe I picked a bad week to
quit sniffing glue.
tomnln
"bigdog" <jecorb...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1ecf2bf3-53de-4c11...@e5g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
You SURE did pick the Right Week to RUN from a radio debate ! ! ! !
bigdog
> "bigdog" <jecorbett1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
That will be the day I have to run from a 25 watt bulb like you. All
you have to do is set it up.
aeffects
hon, a 10watt bulb like yourself is running right to him.... carry on,
troll!