Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

CTers are the Men from R.E.T.A.R.D.

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Bud

unread,
Dec 17, 2010, 8:29:38 PM12/17/10
to

Reality
Evading
Truth
Avoiding
Retarded
Dunces

Walt

unread,
Dec 17, 2010, 9:43:18 PM12/17/10
to

Here's an excellent example of the old axiom.... If you can't compete
with the competition, on an intellectual basis...call em names.

Pssst Bud, It's not a very effective statagem....And most thinking
people can see the desperation caused by the lack of knowledge, and
the lack of courage to accept that you've been played for a sucker.

Gil Jesus

unread,
Dec 17, 2010, 10:49:42 PM12/17/10
to

Here's one for ya:

Butt
Ugly
D*ckhead

drummist1965

unread,
Dec 18, 2010, 12:13:55 AM12/18/10
to

Oh. So Christ like of you, Gil. Just what type of church is it that
you attend, anyway?

Bud

unread,
Dec 18, 2010, 6:33:31 AM12/18/10
to
On Dec 17, 9:43 pm, Walt <papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 7:29 pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
>
> >   Reality
> >   Evading
> >   Truth
> >   Avoiding
> >   Retarded
> >   Dunces
>
> Here's an excellent example of the old axiom.... If you can't compete
> with the competition, on an intellectual basis...call em names.

You guys can`t even compete in name-calling, did you see the lame
response Gil tried?

> Pssst Bud, It's not a very effective statagem....

<snicker> Define "effective", retard. Are you being "effective"
here? Is there any real difference if this place never existed, if you
never concocted one of you crackpot theories?

>And most thinking
> people can see the desperation caused by the lack of knowledge, and
> the lack of courage to accept that you've been played for a sucker.

The only people who have been played for a sucker are the those who
believed Oswald`s blatant lie about being a "patsy".

curtjester1

unread,
Dec 18, 2010, 10:30:14 AM12/18/10
to

Does this guy have a Don Adams costume with a phone in the bottom of
his shoe?

CJ

bigdog

unread,
Dec 18, 2010, 1:05:35 PM12/18/10
to
On Dec 17, 8:29 pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:

And that's putting it kindly.

Bud

unread,
Dec 18, 2010, 2:02:08 PM12/18/10
to

You guys wouldn`t think to take it off before trying to place a
call.

> CJ

Bud

unread,
Dec 18, 2010, 2:03:30 PM12/18/10
to

<snicker> It a good thing Ruby didn`t claim to be a patsy or the
retards would be stumped over who killed Oswald.

timstter

unread,
Dec 18, 2010, 2:33:09 PM12/18/10
to

Walt can barely string a cogent sentence together, yet he's gonna take
on Bud? LOL!

KUTGW, Walt!

LMFAO Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

curtjester1

unread,
Dec 19, 2010, 10:45:20 AM12/19/10
to
> > CJ- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

We're ambidextious, and not stuck to one position.

CJ

Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Dec 19, 2010, 11:14:57 AM12/19/10
to

>>> "We're ambidextious, and not stuck to one position." <<<

IOW: If one impossible-to-prove conspiracy theory proves to be a dud
(like the acoustics silliness), the CTers will just forge ahead to
another impossible-to-prove conspiracy theory (such as: the "double
head shot", or "Badge Man", or "Umbrella Man", or the recent retarded
silliness being advanced by several CTers on the Internet and Retard
Radio recently about how Will Fritz' actions and reactions in the DPD
basement on Nov. 24 are "suspicious").

Kooks like DiEugenio--get this--actually are suggesting that Fritz
should have been practically covering Oswald with his (Fritz') own
body during the transfer, to ensure that nobody could slip in there
and shoot him--even though the whole idea of ALLOWING THE PRESS into
the basement that morning was so that the press could photograph
Oswald on his way out. So, quite obviously, the cops weren't going to
provide a "human shield" around the prisoner during that transfer
which was being performed SPECIFICALLY FOR THE WAITING PRESS AND
NEWSMEN.

It also apparently never occurred to nuts like DiEugenio that a person
like Sergeant Patrick Dean of the DPD, who is a person that DiEugenio
thinks positively was up to his neck in a conspiracy to kill Oswald by
allowing Ruby to gain entry into the basement, would never have
admitted to KRLD's Bob Huffaker and various other newsmen immediately
after Oswald was shot that he personally KNEW Jack Ruby.

Common sense tells a reasonable person that if Sergeant Pat Dean was
involved in some plot with Ruby, he would have never in a million
years admitted to having been acquainted with Ruby just a few minutes
after Ruby plugged Oswald.

But common sense rarely seeps into a CTer's head. Therefore, people
like DiEugenio can ignore all of the live TV interviews with Dean
where Dean admits to personally knowing Oswald's murderer.

curtjester1

unread,
Dec 19, 2010, 11:17:36 AM12/19/10
to
'TARD alert!

CJ

David Von Pein

unread,
Dec 19, 2010, 11:22:47 AM12/19/10
to

So, curtjester, do you think my last 2 points re Dean and Fritz are
"retarded"? Really?

Do you really think Dean was "in" on a plot, even though he admiited
to knowing Ruby?

And do you really think Fritz' actions in the basement are
"conspiratorial"?

(Don't disappoint me, Retard Curt. Please answer Yes to both of the
above inquiries. I just want to see it in print.)

curtjester1

unread,
Dec 19, 2010, 11:25:19 AM12/19/10
to
On Dec 19, 11:22 am, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> So, curtjester, do you think my last 2 points re Dean and Fritz are
> "retarded"? Really?
>
> Do you really think Dean was "in" on a plot, even though he admiited
> to knowing Ruby?
>
Didn't he flunk a polygraph?

David Von Pein

unread,
Dec 19, 2010, 11:32:30 AM12/19/10
to

Nice dodge.

It's just too bad for the CTers that this exists:

http://media2.myfoxdfw.com/html/JFKvideo/video/jfk023.html

curtjester1

unread,
Dec 19, 2010, 11:38:08 AM12/19/10
to

Too bad for LN'ers, Ruby was seen numerous times by news crew folk and
even in an elevator from 8:00 in the morning onward...

CJ

Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Dec 19, 2010, 11:42:47 AM12/19/10
to

Even though George Senator saw Ruby in his apt. after 10 AM, and Karen
Carlin talked to Ruby on the phone at 10:19 AM (via the phone # to
Ruby's apt.).

Who's more reliable, Curt -- the news crews? Or Senator/Carlin?

curtjester1

unread,
Dec 19, 2010, 11:58:16 AM12/19/10
to

LOL. From the parking lot attendant who said Ruby's car was already
there when he got to work, to a preacher on the elevator...to the
newscrewmen...hmmm. I mean when did he have time to chat with the
news people when he shot Oswald?

As far as Carlin, who stated by SA Warner that she thought he WAS part
of a conspiracy to murder JFK and was afraid, and provably was used by
her communication with Ruby the night before...and Senator who was
known to be shady and was in fear for his life.....I'll take my
folks....

CJ

Bud

unread,
Dec 19, 2010, 12:38:47 PM12/19/10
to

You`re open to anything, as long as it`s stupid. Thats why you are
one of the men from R.E.T.A.R.D.!


> CJ

curtjester1

unread,
Dec 19, 2010, 1:06:51 PM12/19/10
to
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

2nd TARD alert!!

CJ

0 new messages