WALTER CRONKITE
tomnln
I don't believe that McAdams is Authorized to answer for Walter Cronkite.
Cronkite read what Others Wrote for him.
Cronkite thumbed his nose at 90% of the American people on the JFK
Assassination.
"John McAdams" <john.m...@marquette.edu> wrote in message
news:4a64af9a....@news.supernews.com...
> On 20 Jul 2009 10:41:17 -0400, David Von Pein <davev...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>>> "I think he exemplified a whole era of Mainstream Media liberal bias
>>>>> as=
>> a very small group of insular, smug and self-satisfied people decided --
>> a=
>>nd thought they had the right to decide -- what was important and how the
>>w=
>>orld should be interpreted. Cronkite was one of these people and bought
>>int=
>>o this culture." <<<
>>
>>
>>Okay. Fine. (I disagree. But fine.)
>>
>
> But even if you agreed with Cronkite's politics, would you not concede
> that having a small narrow elite decide what Americans get to see and
> hear about public affairs is a perverse situation?
>
> Maybe you are a Huffington Post person, rather than a Fox News person.
> Neither existed in the era of Walter Cronkite.
>
>
>>But that's far afield from this type of crap I'm hearing about
>>Cronkite:
>>
>
> Sure. No doubt Cronkite believed everything he reported about the
> Kennedy assassination.
>
> Indeed, he was right about the vast majority of what he reported about
> the assassination.
>
>
>> "Cronkite is nothing short of a complete disgrace. .... Cronkite
>>was BAD for America. BAD for democracy. He was a BAD man."
>>
>>
>>The above kind of garbage is worthy of only contempt and disdain.
>>
>
> I would say that the media landscape that had Cronkite as a
> centerpiece was bad for democracy and bad for America.
>
> Cronkite was *not* a bad man.
>
> I found it interesing that, when Fox News did a JFK assassination
> special on the 40th Anniversary, they leaned far more conspiratorial
> than the other networks.
>
> Fair enough. It's fine to have people dispute the Mainsream Media
> consensus, even when I happen to agree with the Mainstream Media
> consensus.
>
> .John
>
> --
> The Kennedy Assassination Home Page
> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
I'mACooCy&ConspiracyNutts!
>
> Cronkite thumbed his nose at 90% of the American people on the JFK
> Assassination.
>
>
Ya Rosstards he kept his integrity . You and the 70% sold yer tiny
pecker on the I-80 for 35cts and a bad jfk construct .
BFD ?
STFU and Sit Down .
You're authorised to speak for the tarded only .
end ....
tl
tomnln
"I'mACooCy&ConspiracyNutts!" <cdddra...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:66e518ae-a6c8-4b83...@d9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Martin Shackelford
was possible
"because Oswald did it." Circular logic was a feature of the CBS programs on
the JFK
assassination.
Martin
"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:cN49m.16167$3m2....@newsfe06.iad...
David Von Pein
>>> "Remember his [Walter Cronkite's] classic explanation that the feat with the Mannlicher Carcano was possible "because Oswald did it." Circular logic was a feature of the CBS programs on the JFK assassination." <<<
SOMEBODY most definitely "did it" with Oswald's Mannlicher-Carcano
rifle #C2766. That is an irrevocable fact. (The persistent whining and
belly-aching of conspiracy kooks notwithstanding, of course.)
And the overwhelming garden-variety odds are that the "SOMEBODY" in
the above equation was the OWNER of Carcano rifle #C2766 -- Lee Harvey
Oswald.
And anyone who argues with the above Occam's-like logic is a plain
garden-variety fool. (Or is a person who has fallen in love with
Oliver Stone.)
www.google.com/group/Reclaiming-History/browse_thread/thread/28d2b874f20d7511
Walt
> >>> "Remember his [Walter Cronkite's] classic explanation that the feat with the Mannlicher Carcano was possible "because Oswald did it." Circular logic was a feature of the CBS programs on the JFK assassination." <<<
>
> SOMEBODY most definitely "did it" with Oswald's Mannlicher-Carcano
> rifle #C2766. That is an irrevocable fact.
No, it's NOT a fact at all.... You accept it as a fact without
substantiation. If you can prove that the magic bullet actually hit
one of the victims in the Lincoln and was carried to Parkland hospital
in one of their bodies then you would have an excellent point to make
your claim. However we both know that there is NO evidence that will
support that idea. You can accept the Warren Commission's THEORY that
this pristine bullet (CE 399) passed through two victims and hit
several bones as it passed through Connally.... But if you believe
that you should know that it's totally irrational and if you believe
it you might be thought of as the Village Idiot.
(The persistent whining and
> belly-aching of conspiracy kooks notwithstanding, of course.)
>
> And the overwhelming garden-variety odds are that the "SOMEBODY" in
> the above equation was the OWNER of Carcano rifle #C2766 -- Lee Harvey
> Oswald.
>
> And anyone who argues with the above Occam's-like logic is a plain
> garden-variety fool. (Or is a person who has fallen in love with
> Oliver Stone.)
>
> www.google.com/group/Reclaiming-History/browse_thread/thread/28d2b874...
tomnln
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:7e6250f5-73d8-4b83...@y7g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
That Exact Same rifle was Owned by Dr.(Urologist) John Lattimer.
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/Lattimer.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
http://whokilledjfk.net/wally_world.htm
"Walt" <papakoc...@evertek.net> wrote in message
news:3d3cbd04-f1bf-4627...@g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
lazu...@webtv.net
irrevocable fact that weapon was even fired. But, if you believe the
Magic bullet was a fact and the neurospasm was a fact and the headshot
singular came from the rear is a fact, you are one dumb piece of shit
wth your head lodged firmly between vince Bugliosi's butt cheeks.
David Von Pein
>>> "Von Pein[,] you don't know what the hell you are talking about. It's no irrevocable fact that weapon [Rifle #C2766] was even fired." <<<
Yeah...that's why fragments from a bullet from C2766 were found in the
limo.
It's been said many times before today, but deserves a replay each and
every 24-hour period.....
You conspiracy kooks are the LAST people on the planet who should be
examining the murder of John F. Kennedy.
You can't even figure out if C2766 was fired on 11/22/63, even with
fragments of a bullet from that very gun being found in the car where
Kennedy was shot.
You kooks are truly pathetic.
Robert
> In case McAdams don't post this one;
>
> I don't believe that McAdams is Authorized to answer for Walter Cronkite.
>
> Cronkite read what Others Wrote for him.
>
> Cronkite thumbed his nose at 90% of the American people on the JFK
> Assassination.
Cronkite, like all the others in the mainstream media, was a sellout.
He sold his soul so he could be on t.v. When they are praising him
now that he is dead and say he was a man of truth you want to vomit.
The JFK case, and RFK and MLK cases, shows us he was NOT for the
truth, he read and said what his bosses told him to say. He was a
highly paid puppet.
I don't think he had one investigative journalist bone in his body.
>
> "John McAdams" <john.mcad...@marquette.edu> wrote in message
>
> news:4a64af9a....@news.supernews.com...
>
>
>
> > On 20 Jul 2009 10:41:17 -0400, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com>
> >http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
tomnln
You "KOOK-SUCKERS" haven't proven WHEN those fragments were fired ! ! !
You also need to prove if they were fired through CE-139 or the Rifle owned
by Dr. (Urologist) John Lattimer
lazu...@webtv.net
conceive how awful some of these characters were who overthrew the
Govt. that he was cordial with etc.. it's like many cters who are highly
intelligent-they'll never get anywhere because their mind can't go
beyond the mob, exiles etc.
Most people liked Cronkite-now, you have extremely obnoxious preening
stuffed shirts like O'Reilly & the insufferable Chris Mathews who at
least half the country can't stand,but it doesn't matter with the modern
demographics-70% could think the guys are crap, but when all you need is
a 5 or 6 share it no longer matters.