BATTLING A JFK CONSPIRACY KOOK (A 6-PART VIDEO SERIES)

David Von Pein

unread,

Apr 5, 2009, 10:42:53 PM4/5/09

to

www.RapidShare.com/files/217926803/BATTLING_A_JFK_CONSPIRACY_KOOK__THE_COMPLETE_6-PART_SERIES_.wmv

There's an Internet-based radio show called "Black Op Radio", hosted
by Len Osanic. Each Thursday, Len talks with one or two people
connected in some way with "political conspiracy research". The bulk
of the programs usually center around the 1963 assassination of U.S.
President John F. Kennedy.

On October 9, 2008, one of Osanic's guests was assassination
researcher James DiEugenio (a link to his website is provided at the
bottom of this post). On the radio program, Mr. DiEugenio continued
his verbal "review" of author Vincent Bugliosi's 2007 JFK book,
"Reclaiming History".

Jim has posted a lengthy series of anti-Bugliosi diatribes on his
website, and he enjoys going on the "Black Op" program for hours on
end to tell the two people that are listening about how utterly
worthless Bugliosi's 2,800-page book is.

Mr. Bugliosi's book is actually magnificent, but don't ever say that
to a conspiracy-loving person like Jim D., unless you want to get into
a heated argument (or unless you have a burning desire to be labelled
a "Government Shill" or a "CIA Disinformation Agent").

The first two segments in this 6-part video series include some audio
excerpts from the 10/9/08 "Black Op" program, with text screens
inserted with my responses to the silly things being talked about by
Mr. DiEugenio.

Parts 3 and 4 feature selected audio excerpts from DiEugenio's "Black
Op Radio" appearance of November 27, 2008.

And parts 5 and 6 of this series include selected sections from two
different "Black Op" shows with DiEugenio (from September 18, 2008,
and December 11, 2008).

All six parts can be accessed here:

www.RapidShare.com/files/217926803/BATTLING_A_JFK_CONSPIRACY_KOOK__THE_COMPLETE_6-PART_SERIES_.wmv

Yes, this is probably a bit "obsessive" on my part, because I could
just steer anyone interested in this subject to my many articles on
the Internet debunking DiEugenio's pro-conspiracy garbage (which I
will do at the end of this video description).

But since my own name comes up in some of these radio programs, and
since I, myself, am occasionally being verbally attacked and
misrepresented by both Mr. DiEugenio and Mr. Osanic, I felt it would
be nice to place my responses to Jim in an "audio/video" form....which
is what I've done in this "Battling A Conspiracy Kook" series.

===============================

SOURCE LINKS:

THE COMPLETE 10/9/08 "BLACK OP RADIO" SEGMENT WITH JAMES DiEUGENIO:
www.blackopradio.com/black395a.ram

THE COMPLETE 11/27/08 "BLACK OP RADIO" SEGMENT WITH JAMES DiEUGENIO:
www.blackopradio.com/black402a.ram

THE COMPLETE 9/18/08 "BLACK OP RADIO" SEGMENT WITH JAMES DiEUGENIO:
www.blackopradio.com/black392b.ram

THE COMPLETE 12/11/08 "BLACK OP" PROGRAM CAN BE HEARD AT THE FOLLOWING
THREE LINKS:
www.blackopradio.com/black404a.ram
www.blackopradio.com/black404b.ram
www.blackopradio.com/black404c.ram

===============================

DiEUGENIO VS. BUGLIOSI (AND DVP):

===============================

aeffects

unread,

Apr 6, 2009, 12:38:43 AM4/6/09

to

On Apr 5, 7:42 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> www.RapidShare.com/files/217926803/BATTLING_A_JFK_CONSPIRACY_KOOK__TH...

>
> There's an Internet-based radio show called "Black Op Radio", hosted
> by Len Osanic. Each Thursday, Len talks with one or two people
> connected in some way with "political conspiracy research". The bulk
> of the programs usually center around the 1963 assassination of U.S.
> President John F. Kennedy.
>
> On October 9, 2008, one of Osanic's guests was assassination
> researcher James DiEugenio (a link to his website is provided at the
> bottom of this post). On the radio program, Mr. DiEugenio continued
> his verbal "review" of author Vincent Bugliosi's 2007 JFK book,
> "Reclaiming History".

He cleans your clock and for that matter Vinnie daBug's, son....isn't
he the guy on the air/record who thinks you're Dave Reitzes-Pieces?
Now wander on back to lone nut never-never land...

David Von Pein

unread,

Apr 6, 2009, 12:44:33 AM4/6/09

to

>>> "Isn't he the guy who thinks you're Dave Reitzes?" <<<

Only because of the rumor you started.

aeffects

unread,

Apr 6, 2009, 12:49:44 AM4/6/09

to

On Apr 5, 9:44 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>> "Isn't he the guy who thinks you're Dave Reitzes?" <<<
>
> Only because of the rumor you started.

mmmmmwah? A rumor as old as 24 months, troll! Carry on! I came upon it
less than 12 months ago.... look again Davey-me-boyo!

Sam Brown

unread,

Apr 6, 2009, 1:55:51 AM4/6/09

to

"aeffects" <aeffe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:55f1c1c7-a57d-46b3...@v1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 5, 9:44 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>> "Isn't he the guy who thinks you're Dave Reitzes?" <<<
>
> Only because of the rumor you started.

mmmmmwah?

Silly boy, "mmmmmwah" is a kiss. I think you're floundering for Moi? Poor
damaged little junkie. :-(

A rumor as old as 24 months, troll! Carry on! I came upon it
less than 12 months ago.... look again Davey-me-boyo!

Is Ben making you dress up as a pirate again? You and dignity have never
been introduced have you?

aeffects

unread,

Apr 26, 2009, 5:34:09 PM4/26/09

to

On Apr 5, 7:42 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:

> Mr. Bugliosi's book is actually magnificent, but don't ever say that
> to a conspiracy-loving person like Jim D., unless you want to get into
> a heated argument (or unless you have a burning desire to be labelled
> a "Government Shill" or a "CIA Disinformation Agent").
>

magnificent? It is? Ahhh.....no one bought it, biggest book publishing
disaster, ever, EVER. Care to talk about this on-camera, hon?

Ben Holmes

unread,

Apr 26, 2009, 8:16:42 PM4/26/09

to

In article <588e91c8-0f11-47cc...@u9g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...

>
>On Apr 5, 7:42=A0pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Mr. Bugliosi's book is actually magnificent,

Magnificent indeed! It demonstrates that no matter *how* many words you throw,
you'll *STILL* have to run from the evidence...

As Bugliosi provably did from the 16 Smoking Guns.

When LNT'ers who take their time writing it down, rather than debate or talk,
and *STILL* can't fit the evidence into a non-conspiratorial framework - it
simply illustrates yet again how dishonest they are forced to be.

>> but don't ever say that
>> to a conspiracy-loving person like Jim D., unless you want to get into
>> a heated argument (or unless you have a burning desire to be labelled
>> a "Government Shill" or a "CIA Disinformation Agent").
>>
>
>magnificent? It is? Ahhh.....no one bought it, biggest book publishing
>disaster, ever, EVER. Care to talk about this on-camera, hon?
>
><snip the troll's nonsense>

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com

aeffects

unread,

Apr 27, 2009, 12:20:49 AM4/27/09

to

On Apr 26, 5:16 pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In article <588e91c8-0f11-47cc-9ca8-dda31e468...@u9g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,

> aeffects says...
>
>
>
> >On Apr 5, 7:42=A0pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >> Mr. Bugliosi's book is actually magnificent,
>
> Magnificent indeed! It demonstrates that no matter *how* many words you throw,
> you'll *STILL* have to run from the evidence...
>
> As Bugliosi provably did from the 16 Smoking Guns.
>
> When LNT'ers who take their time writing it down, rather than debate or talk,
> and *STILL* can't fit the evidence into a non-conspiratorial framework - it
> simply illustrates yet again how dishonest they are forced to be.
>
> >> but don't ever say that
> >> to a conspiracy-loving person like Jim D., unless you want to get into
> >> a heated argument (or unless you have a burning desire to be labelled
> >> a "Government Shill" or a "CIA Disinformation Agent").
>
> >magnificent? It is? Ahhh.....no one bought it, biggest book publishing
> >disaster, ever, EVER. Care to talk about this on-camera, hon?
>
> ><snip the troll's nonsense>
>

looks like the trolls are heading for the hills, the 45 questions have
them really stumped, not a man amongst the nutter-trolls these day's
-- the best they can do is hope we don't notice they're fading
fast.... so they've been going after Tom the past few days --

justm...@gmail.com

unread,

Apr 27, 2009, 7:36:15 AM4/27/09

to

Healy still doesn't know the meaning of the word IGNORE