Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.conspiracy.jfk
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Harris and His "Sh*tman" JFK Conspiracy Theory
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
David Von Pein  
View profile  
 More options Feb 17 2008, 2:39 am
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk
From: David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:39:51 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Feb 17 2008 2:39 am
Subject: Re: Harris and His "Sh*tman" JFK Conspiracy Theory
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

>>> "He {King Kook Garrison} did more than anyone to discover evidence of conspiracy and the connection to Ferrie and Banister, and perhaps, Shaw." <<<

Except for the fact that none of those men (Ferrie, Banister, Shaw)
was involved in any way in any "plot" to murder John Kennedy. And
you'll never be able to prove any of them were guilty of such
conspiratorial plotting.

Will you now, Robert?

>>> "He {King Kook Garrison} was also wrong about some things, which we know now, with benefit of hindsight." <<<

Yeah, like thinking that Ferrie, Banister, and Shaw were part of some
devious plot to kill JFK.

>>> "But the bottom line here is that you have NO that is, ZERO justification for dismissing the possibility of a shot from the storm drain - correct David?" <<<

Except for the things I mentioned previously.....

1.) Not a single person in DP ran up to a cop or anyone else and
claimed to hear a shot from any storm drain. Nor did any witness (that
I'm aware of) say anything about the possibility of any "storm drain
sniper" in their WC testimony, or any affidavit.

2.) Nobody but Oswald and Oswald's bullets hit any victims.

3.) Placing a killer in the storm drain within a pre-arranged "Let's
Frame LHO" plot is just...well...idiotic. Period.*

* = And let's face it -- most of the kooks around here believe that Oz
was indeed being "set up" well in advance of Nov. 22. Don't you, Bob?
If so, you can't possibly believe that any Grand Poobah of Frame-Ups
would be stupid enough to put ANY shooters to the FRONT of the
President while attempting to frame ONLY Oswald from behind the limo.

You're left with naked speculation and guesswork, Bob. (As per
always.)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google