" For years, the only evidence outside this forensic connection
has been completely circumstantial."
What a load of horse manure . *They*(*) forgot to mention :
LHO bought the rifle , that fired the shots , that killed JFK .
LHO seen bringing in menacing looking 'curtain rods' to work that
day .
LHO where abouts unknown at time of shooting .
LHO Fired the rifle (Prints & Fibers) .
LHO Fled the scene of the crime .
LHO Killed JD Tippet .
Most is Solid Physical Evidence and Not Circumstancial !
More dishonest reporting !
tl
(*) The actual perpetraitors and co-con-spiracists !
This is the best you could do? The NAA analysis was just one minor
piece of evidence against Oswald. Even without it, there is more than
enough evidence to have easily convicted Oswald. One has been
determined is that a match through NAA may not be 100% conclusive such
a ballistic matching of bullets to a gun based on marks left by the
gun barrell, but it is still probative. It is similar to fiber
matching which also cannot prove coclusively that a particular fiber
came from a particular piece of cloth, but still it carries some
weight.
Laz. they're side is in BIG trouble when the FBI ADMITS that the
evidence against Oswald was BOGUS. We CTers have been saying this for
years and the "normal" people laughed. Now they have egg on their
faces. Now who's "normal" ?
The FBI finally admits that they HAD NO CASE AGAINST OSWALD and had to
"manufacture" evidence against him.
This is the final dagger-in-the-heart for the "Oswald did it" crowd.
Stick a fork in them. They're done. It's over. We won.
Great post A. Thanks.
This is real Christian of you, Gil Jesus.
This has been nothing--I repeat *nothing* but a game to you, and
because of people like yourself, John Kennedy will never, ever rest in
peace.
On the other hand, Lee Oswald, looking in on you from hell, is real
proud of you for sticking it to the people who have proven his guilt
in killing President Kennedy.
What will you say to the Holy and Just God when he asks you why it is
that you defended a guilty atheist who killed a man by shooting his
head off, Gil? You'll be stricken mute, and won't be able to say a
word in defense of your God, Lee Oswald.
>
> Great post A. Thanks.
Gil Jesus wrote:
> On Dec 21, 4:27�pm, lazuli...@webtv.net wrote:
> > Why don't you guys believe the only 2 FBI Agents at the Autopsy who are
> > adamant the Magic bullet Phenomenon never occurred? They were only there
> > for hours right next to Kennedy's body...also, they knw the neat little
> > cowlick entrance wound phenomenon in an intact back of the head is bogus
> > too...
>
> Laz. they're side is in BIG trouble when the FBI ADMITS that the
> evidence against Oswald was BOGUS.
What it really shows is that you kooks twist any information you
get your hands on.
>We CTers have been saying this for
> years and the "normal" people laughed. Now they have egg on their
> faces. Now who's "normal" ?
Not you. The NAA testing is rarely held up by LN as evidence of
Oz`s guilt.
> The FBI finally admits that they HAD NO CASE AGAINST OSWALD and had to
> "manufacture" evidence against him.
Of course the FBI said no such thing, but a kook can dream.
> This is the final dagger-in-the-heart for the "Oswald did it" crowd.
Again?
> Stick a fork in them. They're done. It's over. We won.
Looks like the usual "idiots misinterpreting information" to me.
> Great post A. Thanks.
Believe two lay FBI men w/ no previous experience ? If it was a plot
Jgar would of
got rid of their report ......stumble in the dark .
tl
> The FBI finally admits that they HAD NO CASE AGAINST OSWALD and had to
> "manufacture" evidence against him.
Another outright lie by the pathological lying Bigot Gil Jesus. I just
read the entire article from the Washington Post. NO WHERE is there
any comments about Oswald not being guilty or the FBI not having a
case against him. The only related information to the Kennedy
assassination was that this NAA testing was used in the Kennedy
assassination and continued to be used until it was found not to be
reliable enough to convict someone on NAA testing alone.
The original article in the Washington Post title is:
FBI's Forensic Test Full of Holes
Obviously Jonathan Elinoff who wrote the article titled:
FBI Now Admits Evidence Used to Connect Oswald to Kennedy Assasination
Was Bogus
Is a CT who does what all the kooks do, reads something and twists it
around to suit his agenda.
Leave it to Gary A and Chico Jesus to try and mislead people again
with a lie.
I'll tell you where you can stick that freaking fork Jesus....you
lying bigot piece of trash!
RRRRRRRRRAHH RAHH SHISH CUMM BAA !
THE CHEERLEADER FOR THE WORTHLESS LOST CAUSE HAS SPOKEN !
RAHH RAHH ! SHISH CUMM BAA !
NO NEW INVESTIGATION PLANNED OR FORSEEN IN FUTURE !
RAHH RAHH ! SHISH CUMM BAA !
" they HAD NO CASE AGAINST OSWALD "
( I hope and pray )
RAHH RAHH ! SHISH CUMM BAA !
NO NEW INVESTIGATION PLANNED OR FORSEEN IN THE FUTURE !
RAHH RAHH ! SHISH CUMM BAA !
" This is the final dagger-in-the-heart for the "Oswald did it"
crowd."
( Please someone believe me )
RAHH RAHH ! SHISH CUMM BAA !
NO MO RALLYING THE TROOPS PLANNED OR FORSEEN IN THE FUTURE !
RAHH RAHH ! SHISH CUMM BAA !
" We won "
( Sniffle pift :-( Booo Whooo ! )
Ah! But just like all the other eyewitnesses - they can't be believed. Only by
twisting, spinning, and downright ignoring what an eyewitness said can he or she
be used by the LNT'ers to support their faith.
If there's any eyewitness that LNT'ers can *completely* accept (initial
statements and testimony - not years later stuff...) - I don't know who it is.
Nor, apparently, do the LNT'ers - who've been unable to name one.
they're at a loss of words, that usually follows after a loss of
*sense*....
Three assertions..... NONE of them substantiated......
The first assertion is plausible....but it has never been proven, the
next two are merely assertions based on nothing.
> LHO seen bringing in menacing looking 'curtain rods' to work that
> day .
An incorrect assertion..... LHO apparently was carrying a paper sack
> LHO where abouts unknown at time of shooting .
Oswald was drinking a coke in the second floor lunchroom less than 90
seconds after the shooting, which indicates he probably had been there
in that lunchroom for awhile.
> LHO Fired the rifle (Prints & Fibers) .
Just another assertion based on NOTHING.......
> LHO Fled the scene of the crime .
The key word is "FLED".... LHO didn't "FLEE"..... Oswald did in fact
leave work after the shooting, he said it was because the supervisor
had told him there wouldn't be anymore work that day.
> LHO Killed JD Tippet .
Another assertion based on NOTHING but imagination....Witnesses
testimony indicate that Tippit's killer was NOT Oswald.
>
> Most is Solid Physical Evidence and Not Circumstancial !
Only "solid" in your solid bone head.
No we haven't won...... Justice has not been done.
>
> Great post A. Thanks.