SUMMARIZING DAVID VON PEIN'S "COMMON SENSE" APPROACH TO THE JFK ASSASSINATION
Gil Jesus
into a building where he was known,
to kill a President he admired
for no apparent reason.
Yeah, it makes perfect sense.
François Carlier
Lee Oswald took the only rifle he could get his hands on, namely his own
(which makes perfect sense),
into the building where he worked (which would be easier than into a
building where he does not work thus where he is not supposed to be), a
building that, by pure chance, a presidential party would pass that day,
to kill the representative of the Capitalist world that he despised (in his
own words)
for the reason that he wanted to "help" the Castro cause and make a big name
for himself in the History books.
It does make sense.
/F.C./
"Gil Jesus" <gjj...@aol.com> a �crit dans le message de
news:66e359eb-6060-454c...@r38g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
aeffects
> Actually, it is the other way round :
>
> Lee Oswald took the only rifle he could get his hands on, namely his own
> (which makes perfect sense),
>
> into the building where he worked (which would be easier than into a
> building where he does not work thus where he is not supposed to be), a
> building that, by pure chance, a presidential party would pass that day,
>
> to kill the representative of the Capitalist world that he despised (in his
> own words)
>
> for the reason that he wanted to "help" the Castro cause and make a big name
> for himself in the History books.
>
> It does make sense.
the above? You fucking crazy, you dilapidated, worthless puke-tard?
You're as dumb as the Indiana Flash DVP (whose NOT from Indiana, btw),
aka Dave Reitzes....
Gird your tender loins shithead, your countrymen need you, so F-A-R-T
already!
> /F.C./
>
> "Gil Jesus" <gjjm...@aol.com> a écrit dans le message denews:66e359eb-6060-454c...@r38g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
Gil Jesus
> Actually, it is the other way round :
>
> Lee Oswald took the only rifle he could get his hands on, namely his own
> (which makes perfect sense),
How many successful assassinations of US Presidents had there been
with a rifle prior to JFK ?
>
> into the building where he worked (which would be easier than into a
> building where he does not work thus where he is not supposed to be), a
> building that, by pure chance, a presidential party would pass that day,
He had a handgun which was concealable, why not just step off the curb
and kill Kennedy point blank ?
>
> to kill the representative of the Capitalist world that he despised (in his
> own words)
where did he say that ?
>
> for the reason that he wanted to "help" the Castro cause and make a big name
> for himself in the History books.
Which is why once he was arrested, all he did was proclaim his
INNOCENCE, to make a "big name for himself".
>
> It does make sense.
Sit down, Frenchy, you're WAYYY off base here.
Walt
> Actually, it is the other way round :
>
> Lee Oswald took the only rifle he could get his hands on, namely his own
> (which makes perfect sense),
>
> into the building where he worked (which would be easier than into a
> building where he does not work thus where he is not supposed to be), a
> building that, by pure chance, a presidential party would pass that day,
>
> to kill the representative of the Capitalist world that he despised (in his
> own words)
>
> for the reason that he wanted to "help" the Castro cause and make a big name
> for himself in the History books.
>
> It does make sense.
The Frog Croaked....." It does make sense."....
I gotta wonder what is NONSENSE in the Frog's world???
Oswald took a rifle that was completely traceable to him,
into a building where he was known,
to kill a President he admired
for no apparent reason.
And to cap it off.... He steadfastly denied that he had shot
anybody.... "No sir, I didn't shoot anybody"
If LHO was the person who took a rifle tracable to him, into the
building where he worked with the intention of killing killing the
President of the Umited States he would have KNOWN that he would get
caught....Which would indicate he had the desire to become instantly
famous....And yet he steadfastly denied that he had shot anybody.
What kinda nut would think this makes perfect sense???
>
> /F.C./
>
> "Gil Jesus" <gjjm...@aol.com> a écrit dans le message denews:66e359eb-6060-454c...@r38g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Oswald took a rifle that was completely traceable to him,
>
> > into a building where he was known,
>
> > to kill a President he admired
>
> > for no apparent reason.
>
> > Yeah, it makes perfect sense.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
aeffects
Francois Carlier (sic)? LMFAO!
David Von Pein
>>> "It does make sense." <<<
Indeed it does make sense, Francois.
You've just made my "Common Sense Quotes" blog. Congrats. I just now
added your last quote above to my blog:
aeffects
no JFK assassination alias advertising shithead, not to mention, who
cares!
Gil Jesus
> Indeed it does make sense, Francois.
>
> You've just made my "Common Sense Quotes" blog. Congrats. I just now
> added your last quote above to my blog:
>
> www.Quoting-Common-Sense.blogspot.com
There's the answer to your last question, Walt.
David Von Pein
>>> "Oswald took a rifle that was completely traceable to him, into a building where he was known, to kill a President he admired, for no apparent reason. Yeah, it makes perfect sense." <<<
Therefore, since Gil Jesus thinks it doesn't make perfect sense, I
guess those people who Gil thinks were setting up and framing Oswald
as the proverbial "patsy" for two murders on Nov. 22 must have been
total retards themselves when they went about the cumbersome task of
framing a man who apparently was the last person in the world who
would ever want to shoot at President Kennedy (according to another
retarded person named Gilbert J. Jesus).
Right, Gil?
Would you like a moment to re-group from your latest knee-jerk hunk of
thread-starting crackpottery, so you can come up with a stupid and
retarded answer to this question:
Were the "patsy-framers" total idiots/retards when they framed Lee
Oswald...or was Oswald a pretty good choice for their patsy?
aeffects
> >>> "Oswald took a rifle that was completely traceable to him, into a building where he was known, to kill a President he admired, for no apparent reason. Yeah, it makes perfect sense." <<<
>
> Therefore, since Gil Jesus thinks it doesn't make perfect sense, I
> guess those people who Gil thinks were setting up and framing Oswald
> as the proverbial "patsy" for two murders on Nov. 22 must have been
> total retards themselves when they went about the cumbersome task of
> framing a man who apparently was the last person in the world who
> would ever want to shoot at President Kennedy (according to another
> retarded person named Gilbert J. Jesus).
do you have any conception of how fucking stupid you appear here?
GAWD, you're the nutter-troll gift that keeps on giving.... Carry on,
shithead!
(lurkers: this is what happens when one nutter-troll has *its* entire
life based on non-sensical bullshit, the WCR. They have no conception
how far out they've really gone. And WE thank them, profusely for
that.... ROTFLMFAO)
Gil Jesus
or "they" were going to kill him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7P6_GZPQqY
Who were the "they" ? Oswald ?
2. Kennedy was "implored" to come to Texas.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z54HP5WdGPY
Who "implored" him ? Oswald ?
3. Did Oswald blackmail Kennedy to put Johnson on the ticket ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjlhz5mhQk4
4. Did Oswald prefer Johnson over Kennedy ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-L5xYwb2ls
dumbass.
Walt
> >>> "It does make sense." <<<
>
> Indeed it does make sense, Francois.
Now I understand..... You don't have enough brains to recognize
NONSENSE when it's right up yer nose.
Gil Jesus
I've demonstrated just how silly it is.
Frenchy claimed that Oswald used his own rifle because it was the
"only rifle he could get his hands on", but fails to explain why......
OSWALD preferred to kill the President AT A DISTANCE when the "MO" of
successful Presidential assassins was to shoot their victim at a
distance of three feet or less.
...and why............
OSWALD preferred to use a rifle rather than a concealable handgun,
which he also "could get his hands on" and allowed him to get as close
as possible to Kennedy.
If he were looking for fame, why did he just step off the curb, kill
Kennedy point blank, drop his weapon and surrender on the spot ?
Wouldn't that have fulfilled BOTH his "political" motive and his NEED
for recognition ?
...........and you STILL haven't explained why he'd kill a President
he admired !!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quIz6wrseQc
ROFLMAO....COMMON SENSE.....YOU PEOPLE ARE FULL OF **IT.
Walt
Gil, rolled on the floor in mirth at the absurdity of Von Pea Brain's
silliness..... "ROFLMAO....COMMON SENSE?.....YOU PEOPLE ARE FULL OF
**IT."
I could not agree more, Gil.... I'm amazed at how gullible the LNer's
are. HOW could any intelligent person allow themselves to be
deceived by an obvious "cock and bull story" like the Warren Report
is??? If they were honest they have to recognize that there isn't a
SINGLE SHRED of evidence that is unquestioned. And if they were
honest they's see that the authorities were lying and creating false
evidence.....( this FACT is easily provable) ... Since it is a FACT
that the authorities were framing Oswald... An intelligent LNer ( an
oximoron) would ask themselves...Why is it necessary to lie, create
false evidence, and deny the truth, if the man was guilty?
Robert
I would suspect this name of "Von Pein" is bogus as ONLY one section
of Germany uses the "Von" in their names. It is very rare these days
to find Germans with Von in their name because that section was taken
away from Germany after WWII for the most part.
What section of Germany used the "Von" Dave?
David Von Pein
>>> "If they [LNers] were honest[,] they have to recognize that there isn't a SINGLE SHRED of evidence that is unquestioned." <<<
And if CTers were to be honest with themselves (and if they could stop
seeing "plots" around every corner for just a few minutes), they'd
realize that it would be absolutely impossible to have a QUESTION MARK
tied around every single piece of evidence in ANY murder case.
To believe that every single piece of evidence REALLY is "in question"
or in doubt, you'd actually have to believe that every single person
who examined, handled, and/or evaluated that evidence is either "in"
on a plot to hide the truth....or: every person who handled and
evaluated the evidence (officially) is just a great-big idiot.
How likely is either choice above? Not very.
So, the solution is (quite obviously) --- It's the conspiracy kooks
who are the "idiots", and not the people who collected, handled,
tested, and evaluated the evidence in officialdom.
Of course, all reasonable people have known for a long time that my
last paragraph is true.
David Von Pein
>>> "What section of Germany used the "Von" Dave?" <<<
Who cares? I sure don't. I'm from Indiana, not Germany.
Walt
90% of the people don't accept the fairy tale that you believe to be
true...... So are you saying that only 10% of the people are
"reasonable".