Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Rossley vs. Walt...a classic Kook Fight in the works!
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Walt  
View profile  
 More options Sep 23 2008, 4:33 pm
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk
From: Walt <papakochenb...@evertek.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 4:33 pm
Subject: Re: Rossley vs. Walt...a classic Kook Fight in the works!
On 23 Sep, 13:23, Chuck Schuyler <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote:

> On Sep 23, 12:53 pm, Walt <papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:

> > On 23 Sep, 06:32, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:

> > > This is why CTers need to remember not to air our differences in a
> > > public forum.

> > > Part of their agenda is to divide and conquer.

> > > It's ORGASMIC to the trolls when we do.

> > I disagree totally Gil,   I'm sick and tired of some CT's who post
> > complete nonsense ( Rob Caprio, Tom Rossley, et al)

> > I believe we need to clean up our own house......A lie is a lie no
> > matter which side says it.  And you can't find the path to the truth
> > if you follow lies.   I have always tried to gently steer a errant CT
> > back from a lie by pointing out where they are getting on the wrong
> > track. ( Have I not pointed out an error you were making?...think
> > about it)   There are some who refuse to back off from the wrong path
> > and become abusive and nasty.(Rossley) I'm no longer going to try to
> > be nice or keep my mouth shut when a CT presents false data. I'll
> > attempt to show him the problem but if he doesn't present good sound
> > logic backed up by facts I'm going to emasculate him.

> Good for you, Walt. I totally disagree with your belief that LBJ was
> behind JFK's death, but the CT side  has done a HORRIBLE job sorting
> the wheat from the chaff. When some newbie comes to the site with a
> question about poison dart firing umbrellas or the infamous Three
> Tramps, for example, it's also up to you CTers to steer this person
> away from such silliness. Rossley criticizes all  investigations that
> have found innocent explanations for the 'chaff'. Ditto for robcap,
> who hasn't met a conspiracy theory he doesn't like.- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

Hey Schmuck.....  Your guilty of painting all CT's with a wide
brush.   You've accredited me with ideas that I find utterly
ridiculous simply because some stupid bastard CT like Rob has spewed
the garbage.   THAT'S why I'm angry, Im sick and tired of having
lunatics who are wearing our jersey make asses of us all.  They either
have to sit down and be quiet until they have something intelligent to
say or they've got to turn in their jerseys.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.