Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF CONSPIRACY IN THE JFK ASSASSINATION

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Gil Jesus

unread,
Feb 2, 2009, 5:59:31 AM2/2/09
to

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 2, 2009, 6:43:06 AM2/2/09
to
On Feb 2, 9:59 pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> http://www.geocities.com/mtgriffith1/physical.htm

LOL! Gilly has posted some seven year old guff by Michael T. Griffith,
LOL!

Only a researcher of the *crackerjack* calibre of Gilly would buy
Griffith's nonsense.

Hey, Gilly, your new video where you use Walt Cakebread's
*conclusions* to posit that there were two different MC rifles is the
very APEX of anti-intellectual thought in the matter of the JFK
assassination, I would have thought.

KUTGW, Gilly!

Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

Gil Jesus

unread,
Feb 2, 2009, 7:11:52 AM2/2/09
to
On Feb 2, 6:43�am, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Feb 2, 9:59�pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >http://www.geocities.com/mtgriffith1/physical.htm
>
> LOL! Gilly has posted some seven year old guff by Michael T. Griffith,
> LOL!


And you post the 46 year old guff of the WC, Timmy. So what's your
point ?


> Hey, Gilly, your new video where you use Walt Cakebread's
> *conclusions* to posit that there were two different MC rifles is the
> very APEX of anti-intellectual thought in the matter of the JFK
> assassination, I would have thought.

That's why you're not an intellectual, Timmy.

Gil Jesus

unread,
Feb 2, 2009, 10:04:22 AM2/2/09
to
On Feb 2, 7:11�am, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 6:43 am, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Feb 2, 9:59 pm, Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > >http://www.geocities.com/mtgriffith1/physical.htm
>
> > LOL! Gilly has posted some seven year old guff by Michael T. Griffith,
> > LOL!

>


> > Hey, Gilly, your new video where you use Walt Cakebread's
> > *conclusions* to posit that there were two different MC rifles is the
> > very APEX of anti-intellectual thought in the matter of the JFK
> > assassination, I would have thought.

THANK YOU FOR ONCE AGAIN PROVING MY POINT, TIMMY.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/3b79bcd33dc22e35

YoHarvey

unread,
Feb 2, 2009, 10:57:34 AM2/2/09
to

YoHarvey

unread,
Feb 2, 2009, 11:02:25 AM2/2/09
to


Tim, to even attempt an "intellectual" conversation with a high school
dropout such as Jesus is absurd. His entire existence is based on
conspiracy. It's the air he breathes.

tomnln

unread,
Feb 2, 2009, 12:25:42 PM2/2/09
to
HAHAHAHAHAHA

"Gil Jesus" <gjj...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:c89dd85f-4c56-4044...@x38g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...

Gil Jesus

unread,
Feb 2, 2009, 12:40:34 PM2/2/09
to
On Feb 2, 11:02�am, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tim, to even attempt an "intellectual" conversation with a high school

> dropout such as Jesus is absurd. �

SAME OLD ED......LIE....... LIE ..............LIE

HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT, huh ?

Looks like you're speculating again.

Have someone who can read, read this to you, Ed:

http://i42.tinypic.com/2iibgo2.jpg

YoHarvey

unread,
Feb 2, 2009, 3:53:32 PM2/2/09
to

roflmao, roflmao, Jesus is so proud of a 2 year degree, he's actually
posting a pic roflmo, roflmao, roflmao, roflmao and he's to
embarrassed to show the name of the school roflmao, roflmao, roflmao,
rolmao

0 new messages