Question For Gil Jesus Re DPD Officers Norvell & Brown

[tims...@gmail.com]

Hi Gil,

Say, recently you made the following statement in regards to two DPD
officers who investigated the Walker shooting:

QUOTE ON:

Funny Timmy. Neither Norvel nor Brown's names are mentioned in the 26
volumes except in the testimony of Lt. Day ( Brown ).

QUOTE OFF

When I pointed out to you that both of these officers ARE mentioned in
the 26 volumes, independent of the cite you gave, you went all silent.

Would you care to explain why, Gilly?

Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

[Gil Jesus]

On Jan 20, 10:29�pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Gil,
>
> Say, recently you made the following statement in regards to two DPD
> officers who investigated the Walker shooting:
>
> QUOTE ON:
>
> Funny Timmy. Neither Norvel nor Brown's names are mentioned in the 26
> volumes except in the testimony of Lt. Day ( Brown ).
>
> QUOTE OFF
>
> When I pointed out to you that both of these officers ARE mentioned in
> the 26 volumes, independent of the cite you gave, you went all silent.
>
> Would you care to explain why, Gilly?

I never saw your post. Timmy.

I use one newsreader with a filter to read ( Outlook ), another to
post (Google). Once in a while, when I need a good laugh, I'll scan
Google for posts.

Neither officer appeared before the Warren Commission, where they
could have been questioned. My CD of the 26 volumes doesn't allow
searches through the documents, just the testimony.

An issue as important as finding a bullet ( in any NORMAL murder
case ), would have required the officers to appear before the court
( in this case the commission ) and swear under oath that the bullet
in evidence was the bullet they found.

That establishes the first link in the chain-of-possession.

I thought that I had explained this before.

[tims...@gmail.com]

> I thought that I had explained this before.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Hi Gilly,

Say, if your CD of the 26 volumes doesn't allow searches through the
documents, just the testimony, as you claim, then it begs the
question, Gil, as to why you would make the claim that neither Norvell
nor Brown's names are mentioned in the 26 volumes, except in the
testimony of Lt. Day ( Brown ) doesn't it, Gilly.

Did you just decide to lie when you wrote that, Gilly?

[tims...@gmail.com]

> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

BUMP

[tims...@gmail.com]

> BUMP- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

BUMP Yoo hoo! Gilly!

[Sam Brown]

<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f4a83657-687c-407c...@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...

BUMP

Bumpity Bump! ROTFLMAO! Nice job Tim.

[tims...@gmail.com]

On Jan 24, 8:36 am, "Sam Brown" <samjbrow...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Hi Sam,

Looks like Gilly doesn't want to reply, LOL! Yoo hoo, Gilly! Where are
you, you ol' CRACKERJACK <snicker> researcher you? Bumpity bump! Yoo
hoo...