"Debugging DaBugman"
robc...@netscape.com
http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Essay_-_Debugging_Bugliosi
David Von Pein
The links below are much better (and much less kook-filled).........
http://jfkfiles.com/jfk/html/news/news_07190701.htm
http://jfkfiles.com/jfk/html/news/news_06190701.htm
http://jfkfiles.com/jfk/html/news/news_07050701.htm
http://jfkfiles.com/jfk/html/news/news_08010701.htm
cdddraftsman
> (Snipped)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_thread/th...
Re : Is Robert (robcap) aka : Gil Jesus ?
"just me" <justme1...@gmail.com
Tom,
This is how I found he and robcap to be the same person.
The isp address is always the same for both of them when
they post. It's true AOL has an isp pool it assigns to people
when they log in, but they don't assign the same ip address
to multiple people. Each person has a few ip addresses
assigned to their computer. Robs and Gils are the same,
therefore it is 99% accurate that they are one and the same
person. On one of the threads I posted a link to how it all works
and an example of someone else being caught using different
names the same way.
Now might be the time to ask Gil Jesus some questions
on some of his various video's (178 he claims) he
produced using other people's material and claiming
them to be his own :
a) Was JFK Trying To Cough Up A Bullet ? :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3uH7FHjCeQ
b) Was JFK Trying to Cough Up A Bullet ? - The Final Chapter :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wd1o0UTb3oc
c) The Foolishness of the Single Bullet Theory :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMsPq7gQCrk
d) Interview - Beverly Oliver :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-IXYfge2Ys
e) Interview - Jean Hill & Mary Moorman 11/22/63 :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xu99dGBPh6M
f) Witnesses: "The back of his head blew off" :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVhZdryIs_A
g) "Wound was in the back of the head slightly to the right" :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8P29j9PFZBM
h) Witness: Small wound in front, large wound in rear :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XprQQrILI28
i) FBI Man saw "large wound at the right rear" of JFK's skull :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmfqDOnZu_Q
j) Bill Newman: "The third shot came from the Knoll" :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi3hKo7dwt0
k) WBAP: "Police found a British .303 Rifle" :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HlCswKHMuE
l) Dallas Police : Rifle had NO Fingerprints :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEasB7IRZJs
m) Connally doctor: CE 399 didn't create wounds :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnawDAp_zKM
n) The Julia Ann Mercer story :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyhx0BRuVSk&mode=related&search=
o) Banister secretary: "He (Oswald) was in our office" :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kvvIA5_Efw
p) The Katzenbach Memo: Blueprint for a Coverup :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDuymlPdtyU
Just one comment posted shows you why video's
like the one's above are so harmful :
matheis wrote :
" JFK was shot 5 times , once in the throat by the driver ,
then in the head by a guy in the drainage ditch , then
another shot in the head by oswald , then 2 other shots
by a guy with a MI6 "
If you would care to know why some people continue to
perpetrate confusion and a hoax in regards to JFK's death ,
this is a opportunity to get at the heart of the matter .
tl
Some actions and a comment provided below from Gil Jesus :
Adding comments have been disabled for this video ......
" It might interest you to know that I have no intention
of debating the issues here for they are my opinion only ."
[ Odd statement for someone who claims he has destroyed the sbt ?
tl ]
robc...@netscape.com
Typical dunceman. A day late and a dollar short. I think that was
originally posted like 2 weeks ago.
robc...@netscape.com
I think this one is better because it shows what a fraud Bugman is.
Typical LNer, if the evidence doesn't fit just change it.
David Von Pein
The "pot/kettle-isms" just keep on a-flowin' from the kook named
"Rob".
Classic.
Burly...@gmail.com
Check out this rebuttal to "Debugging Bugliosi"
robc...@netscape.com
Why bother Burly when it is written by one of the writers (Steve
Barber) who is part of the above attack. Why is no other writer coming
to their defense? Of course he is going to say the above article is
inaccurate since he is helped write this stuff.
cdddraftsman
Try a day or two ago . John McAdam's doesn't like hoaxsters , I
guess
this means you won't be posting at aaj anymore either :-) Hahahaha !
....................tl PS : He's such a D U N C E !
YoHarvey
Steve Barber's response is indicative of a highly educated
individual. No wonder Jesus doesn't get it.
tomnln
In this case Neither one of you need to get the sex change operation.
Both of you are female PIGS.
"cdddraftsman" <cdddra...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1193263334....@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
lowery Adores me.
Scared shitless of me. But, Adores me.
<robc...@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:1193263509.1...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
spiffy is a Groupie for a Rock n Roll Drummer.
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193269197.9...@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1193263335.2...@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1193263807.4...@t8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
David Hates wittnesses Interviews on Video>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/gil_jesus_page.htm
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1193263335.2...@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193263820.8...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Burly...@gmail.com
> Another CARTOON fan?
"CARTOON" ? Surely you are aware that this very important animation
was verified by the nations top experts in the Forensic's field,
aren't you?
What is your background pertaining to this, sir?
>
> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >http://www.jfkfiles.com/jfk/html/news/news_07190701.htm- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Burly...@gmail.com
> Hahahahahaha
>
> spiffy is a Groupie for a Rock n Roll Drummer.
And Don Thomas studies insects. Are you a ''groupie'' for an
entomologist?
>
> "YoHarvey" <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > individual. No wonder Jesus doesn't get it.- Hide quoted text -
tomnln
>> Another CARTOON fan?
>
> "CARTOON" ? Surely you are aware that this very important animation
> was verified by the nations top experts in the Forensic's field,
> aren't you?
>
> What is your background pertaining to this, sir?
Below is what can ALSO be done by making a Computer Animation. Compare this to Dale Myers Computer Animated Catrtoon.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=NUEn5ZghNts&mode=related&search=JFK%20John%20F.%20Kennedy
More Computer Animation Results Below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7sz_JgGOuw&NR
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2928756561478705121&q=JFK&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2007593457349608778&q=JFK&hl=en
Cartoom Similar to Dale Myers Cartoon Below.
tomnln
Is it your intention to trade Insults with Me???
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193317475....@o3g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
robc...@netscape.com
Probably not t(otal) l(oser) because I make too much sense for
McAdams. It wouldn't surprise me if McAdams supports censorship. He
should know we are not the same since he has the records for sign-ups.
Burly...@gmail.com
> I've asked you before BurlyGuard.
>
> Is it your intention to trade Insults with Me???
Absolutely not, sir. I don't indulge in such childish nonsense.
I merely responded to your post in likewise fashion to your remark
regarding the acoustics.
>
> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Burly...@gmail.com
> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1193317064.7...@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
> > On Oct 25, 1:17 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> Another CARTOON fan?
>
> > "CARTOON" ? Surely you are aware that this very important animation
> > was verified by the nations top experts in the Forensic's field,
> > aren't you?
>
> > What is your background pertaining to this, sir?
>
> SURELY you are aware of WHAT can be done with "Computer Animations Sir???
> Below is what can ALSO be done by making a Computer Animation. Compare this to Dale Myers Computer Animated Catrtoon.
>
>
> More Computer Animation Results Below.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7sz_JgGOuw&NR
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2928756561478705121&q=JFK&hl=en
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2007593457349608778&q=JFK&hl=en
>
> Cartoom Similar to Dale Myers Cartoon Below.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MqNQUlXiFM&NR
>
>
>
> >> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1193263820.8...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Oct 24, 6:06 pm, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
> >> >> On Oct 24, 6:02 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> I think this one is better because it shows what a fraud Bugman is.
> >> >> Typical LNer, if the evidence doesn't fit just change it.
>
> >> > Check out this rebuttal to "Debugging Bugliosi"
>
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
May I make a suggestion? Read the report by the company that examined
Mr. Myers' computer animation, sir. The report is available at Mr.
Myers' Website.
tomnln
Computer "Animations" allow one to put ANYTHING they choose into a CARTOON.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=NUEn5ZghNts&mode=related&search=JFK%20John...
More Computer Animation Results Below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7sz_JgGOuw&NR
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2928756561478705121&q=JFK&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2007593457349608778&q=JFK&hl=en
Cartoom Similar to Dale Myers Cartoon Below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MqNQUlXiFM&NR
<Bu
rlyG...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193332393.8...@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Burly...@gmail.com
> Will that prove those animations above are NOT there?
There is no parallel here at all.
The link you provided is concerning a video game. Z-Axis Corporation
is strictly involved in Forensics e.g. Mr. Myers' animation.
>
> Computer "Animations" allow one to put ANYTHING they choose into a CARTOON.
That you consider this a ''CARTOON", sir, is indicative of your not
having read the Z-Axis report, nor understanding the method involved
in this animation.
>
> http://youtube.com/watch?v=NUEn5ZghNts&mode=related&search=JFK%20John...
>
> More Computer Animation Results Below.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7sz_JgGOuw&NR
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2928756561478705121&q=JFK&hl=en
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2007593457349608778&q=JFK&hl=en
>
> Cartoom Similar to Dale Myers Cartoon Below.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MqNQUlXiFM&NR
See above, sir. Absolutely *no* parallel here. This is a computer
game, and does not require a corporation such as Z-Axis Corp. to study
it.
> > Myers' Website.- Hide quoted text -
YoHarvey
Burly, excuse me but please understand that in attempting ANY form of
intelligent conversation with Tomnln you do yourself a disservice. He
has no education nor the ability to think and reason. You waste your
time.
Burly...@gmail.com
Thank you.
I was hoping that maybe he and I could have a civil conversation
about this. I'm trying to be as objective as possible here, but I
receive some rather hostile responses.
I don't wish any disrespect to Mr. Tomnln, and I was hoping we could
discuss this in a civil manner.
I find it terribly disrespectful for people to call the Forensic
animations "Cartoons", which I see weekly in the courtoom.
If it weren't for them, some of the murders that take place would
never, ever be solved. It is terribly painful to watch the families
of victims of murder watch a person guilty of a crime walk free, but,
many times, due to the Forensic animations, these people are proven
guilty.
tomnln
> Burly, excuse me but please understand that in attempting ANY form of
> intelligent conversation with Tomnln you do yourself a disservice. He
> has no education nor the ability to think and reason. You waste your
> time.
You should see the Edumakation I learned your wife.
She appreciates good Learnin.
She has scotch for when I'm in her home.
She has a Dildo for when You're in her home.
she & I discuss evidence/testimony after a few hours on the trampoline we
set up in her bedroom.
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
tomnln
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193364053....@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
Most likely under the same circumstances as Oswald.
No Lawyer.
No Adversary Procedure.
I didn't hear you express any pain for the families of JFK/LHO.
Respect is Earned Mr. Burly;
AGAIN, Here's what can be done with "computer animation".>>>
http://youtube.com/watch?v=NUEn5ZghNts&mode=related&search=JFK%20John...
More Computer Animation Results Below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7sz_JgGOuw&NR
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2928756561478705121&q=JFK&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2007593457349608778&q=JFK&hl=en
Cartoom Similar to Dale Myers Cartoon Below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MqNQUlXiFM&NR
Please indicate "hostile responses"?
Burly...@gmail.com
> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Thank you for your thoughts, sir.
Ben Holmes
Burly...@gmail.com says...
GIGO.
>If it weren't for them, some of the murders that take place would
>never, ever be solved. It is terribly painful to watch the families
>of victims of murder watch a person guilty of a crime walk free, but,
>many times, due to the Forensic animations, these people are proven
>guilty.
What's "terribly painful" is to see how LNT'ers duck and run all the time...
Burly...@gmail.com
> In article <1193364053.024138.92...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
> BurlyGu...@gmail.com says...
>
> - Show quoted text -
Thank you for your thoughts, Mr. Holmes.
YoHarvey
> In article <1193364053.024138.92...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
Kinda like what you teach your little karate kids huh Holmes? "Be
like me kids". "Lie and deceive but if caught RUN".
Ben Holmes
Burly...@gmail.com says...
Dead silence... you really should try looking it up if you don't know what it
means.
>> >If it weren't for them, some of the murders that take place would
>> >never, ever be solved. It is terribly painful to watch the families
>> >of victims of murder watch a person guilty of a crime walk free, but,
>> >many times, due to the Forensic animations, these people are proven
>> >guilty.
>>
>> What's "terribly painful" is to see how LNT'ers duck and run all the time...
>
>Thank you for your thoughts, Mr. Holmes.
Seems rather funny that the more knowledgeable the person, the further away
Burlyguard stays away from debating.
A good tactic for people who can't defend the WCR's theory against the actual
facts in this case.
muc...@gmail.com
If Ben wasn't such a gutless coward (not to mention child molestation
"satirist") he'd be out in the real world, trying to argue his ever-
imploding case for conspiracy to the authorities, instead of trying to
pick fights in an obscure newsgroup like this one.
Burly...@gmail.com
> In article <1193405768.969179.116...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
Ben Holmes
muc...@gmail.com says...
If you can't tell this group where *YOU* have done this, then all you've
demonstrated is hypocrisy.
Or a slavish devotion to the 'public line'.
In fact, in your case, it's even worse to begin with... for not only will you be
unable to show where you've "gone to the authorities", you can't even defend
your own beliefs right here in a news forum! You simply refuse to answer
questions BASED ON THE EVIDENCE.
And we *KNOW* that you're a liar... since you've been so kind as to demonstrate
it quite well in this forum.
aeffects
when this turd (Beettle Bailey aka, YoHah-vey aka who knows how many,
shows up.... the Nutter's have their collective backs to the wall, in
other words, it's time for a full court WHINE session..... LMAO carry
on, hon!
aeffects
Your incessant whining does you no good here.....Now about the case
evidence, testimony and exhibits -- you do know what case your suppose
to be here for, eh, hon?
aeffects
> In article <1193405768.969179.116...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
looks like the current and probably future .john crop of Lone Nut
students are more stupid than I realized. The past 3 years worth of
johnites have been screwed, blued and tattooed right out of the gate.
The lone nut cause appears finished
tomnln
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193400198....@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
You're quite Welcome.
Glad to be of service.
tomnln
"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:wsfUi.13189$BT5....@newsfe18.lga...
Burly...@gmail.com
And I, you.
Burly...@gmail.com
> Is Burly gonna point out my "hostile responses"?
Sir, I was speaking in the plural sense--this place as a whole.
However, in my stating "rather hostile" this has been from the side
commonly referred to as the "CT'er".
>
> "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
>
> news:wsfUi.13189$BT5....@newsfe18.lga...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Please indicate "hostile responses"?- Hide quoted text -
tomnln
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193423312....@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
robc...@netscape.com
Burly, I am new to this board (like 3 weeks) and I came with the same
attitude as you, but I was attacked and ridiculed and I'm still
accused of being someone else. So all I can say is if the CT group is
a little testy occassionally it is because we have been attacked by
the LNers. We do discuss the evidence though, the LNers just attack
(save for a few of them).
Robert (Not Gil)
YoHarvey
Burly, so you want the truth. Robcap is Jesus who is JMoore who is
Justin who is Justins's mom. He has issues burly, be advised.
Whichever names he chooses to use however, he's still the same
homophobic, lying racist he's always been. Enjoy.
aeffects
c'mon Beetle Bailey get honest with us here eh, who are YOU, hon?
Burly...@gmail.com
Sir,
I am afraid that in regard to the "CT'er" it is far beyond " a little
testy, occassionally".
YoHarvey
aeffects? As you are old and unemployed and incapable of holding any
job as evidenced by your income tax returns, might it help you if I
post your resume right there. You never know, somebody may need their
pools cleaned or garbage dumped.
YoHarvey
aeffects? I'm the guy who knows you never could hold a job down. I'm
the guy who has seen your income tax returns. I'm the guy who looks
at an old man like you and gets a good chuckle. Living off the state
Healey. How sad. However, it just might help if I posted your
resume here for all to see. Ya never know, somebody may need their
pool cleaned or lawn mowed. Whatcha think?
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -
No wise guy response Healey/ None of your infamous "roflmao" comments?
Burly...@gmail.com
Thank you, sir.
I have been watching the exchanges here regarding this topic.
robc...@netscape.com
> > Robert (Not Gil)
>
> Burly, so you want the truth. Robcap is Jesus who is JMoore who is
> Justin who is Justins's mom. He has issues burly, be advised.
> Whichever names he chooses to use however, he's still the same
> homophobic, lying racist he's always been. Enjoy.
See what I mean? They are too small brained to realize I'm not Gil
Jesus and then we wonder why they can't grasp anything in this case?
Go figure. They call Gil "Chico" but we are the racists? YoDimwit is
not someone I would want on my side Burly, but it is your choice.
robc...@netscape.com
> Sir,
>
> I am afraid that in regard to the "CT'er" it is far beyond " a little
> testy, occassionally".
Sir, this is nice?
Burly, so you want the truth. Robcap is Jesus who is JMoore who is
Justin who is Justins's mom. He has issues burly, be advised.
Whichever names he chooses to use however, he's still the same
homophobic, lying racist he's always been. Enjoy.
You can go look up every robcap...you can find and you will not see me
calling anyone a homo, racist or any similar type of word. Either you
need to recognize the LNer side is worse or quit complaining.
YoHarvey
Burly? Numerous people on this newsgroup have PROOF of A:LL of the
pseudonyms used by this social misfit. Shall we post them all AGAIN.
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -
Burly? Going to be a huge block party in Dartmouth, Ma, very soon.
Invitations are going into the mail!
muc...@gmail.com
> In article <1193406835.953486.24...@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> much...@gmail.com says...
Well, logical thinker you ain't. I have no conspiracy to report to the
authorities, and you are still just trying to pick fights in an
obscure newsgroup.
> And we *KNOW* that you're a liar... since you've been so kind as to demonstrate
> it quite well in this forum.
Again just trying to provoke. The notion that your credibility record
is better than mine is obviously absurd. But, if you honestly (and
that would be a first) believe that it is, wouldn't that be even more
reason for you to go to the authorities instead of me? Don't worry.
Should the investigators get that vacant, glazed-over look in their
eyes, you can always throw in some of your trademark child molestation
"satire" for effect.
Ben Holmes
muc...@gmail.com says...
>> >> like me kids". "Lie and deceive but if caught RUN".
>>
>> >If Ben wasn't such a gutless coward (not to mention child molestation
>> >"satirist") he'd be out in the real world, trying to argue his ever-
>> >imploding case for conspiracy to the authorities, instead of trying to
>> >pick fights in an obscure newsgroup like this one.
>>
>> If you can't tell this group where *YOU* have done this, then all you've
>> demonstrated is hypocrisy.
>>
>> Or a slavish devotion to the 'public line'.
>>
>> In fact, in your case, it's even worse to begin with... for not only will
>> you be unable to show where you've "gone to the authorities", you can't
>> even defend your own beliefs right here in a news forum! You simply refuse
>> to answer questions BASED ON THE EVIDENCE.
>
>Well, logical thinker you ain't.
Certainly I am. I'm pointing out that you're a hypocrite. Either that, or
rather slavishly devoted to the public line put forth by our government.
>I have no conspiracy to report
Ah! So only "conspiracies" count?
>to the authorities, and you are still just trying to pick fights in an
>obscure newsgroup.
Hmmm... so you agree with *EVERYTHING* the government has done - how nice of
you!
>> And we *KNOW* that you're a liar... since you've been so kind as to
>> demonstrate it quite well in this forum.
>
>Again just trying to provoke.
Merely telling the truth.
>The notion that your credibility record
>is better than mine is obviously absurd.
In your mind, and the mind of the trolls, I'm sure that you think that this is a
legitimate assertion.
>But, if you honestly (and
>that would be a first) believe that it is, wouldn't that be even more
>reason for you to go to the authorities instead of me? Don't worry.
>Should the investigators get that vacant, glazed-over look in their
>eyes, you can always throw in some of your trademark child molestation
>"satire" for effect.
Embarrassed at being caught lying, Mark?
Bud
Mark merely pointed out that if you position is correct, as you
claim, your response is inappropriate. The course of action you take
is an absurd one, in light of the casebreaking information you claim
to have.
> >I have no conspiracy to report
>
>
> Ah! So only "conspiracies" count?
I think his point may have been that imaginary conspiracies don`t
count for much in the real world, and you kookshit doesn`t translate
well to it.
Funny, though, that you think he should go to the authorities to
tell them what they concluded themselves, that Oz shot some people on
11-22.
> >to the authorities, and you are still just trying to pick fights in an
> >obscure newsgroup.
>
>
> Hmmm... so you agree with *EVERYTHING* the government has done - how nice of
> you!
Whatever you do, just say anything that occurs to you, don`t make
an effort to address what Mark said.
Do something meaningful for fucks sake, kook, they`re killing
people at will, grab a rifle and get up in a clocktower or something.
You ain`t making a ripple here, if *they* saw you as a threat, you`d
be dead by now.
> >> And we *KNOW* that you're a liar... since you've been so kind as to
> >> demonstrate it quite well in this forum.
> >
> >Again just trying to provoke.
>
>
> Merely telling the truth.
No, just your usual confusion that your opinions and assumptions
are somehow facts and truth.
> >The notion that your credibility record
> >is better than mine is obviously absurd.
>
>
> In your mind, and the mind of the trolls, I'm sure that you think that this is a
> legitimate assertion.
But Ben`s opinion trumps all. Just ask Ben.
> >But, if you honestly (and
> >that would be a first) believe that it is, wouldn't that be even more
> >reason for you to go to the authorities instead of me? Don't worry.
> >Should the investigators get that vacant, glazed-over look in their
> >eyes, you can always throw in some of your trademark child molestation
> >"satire" for effect.
>
> Embarrassed at being caught lying, Mark?
You`d think Ben would be, but if he is embarrased, he hasn`t shown
it.
Bud
It was finished when the Warren Commission returned it`s findings.
The question is, when doe the case for conspiracy get started?
tomnln
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193424580....@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 26, 2:00 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>> Is Burly gonna point out my "hostile responses"?
>
> Sir, I was speaking in the plural sense--this place as a whole.
>
> However, in my stating "rather hostile" this has been from the side
> commonly referred to as the "CT'er".
Your reply below is "Singular" Sir.
"I" was the subject justme was referring to.
Would you care to address these Lies of the WC?
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
tomnln
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193427735.6...@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
You got here a LITTLE TOO LATE Sir.
What you're reading is RETALIATION to the Insults/Threats originated by the
LN side.
tomnln
He better NOT throw out your Garbage wife.
She plies me with alchahol 3 times a week & takes advantage of my body.
She "cleans my pipes 3 times a week. (Thaks so much for being a (Enoch)
She's So good at it, I thought she was a professional Plumber.
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193428069.4...@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
I'm the guy who helped your wife make enough money to buy a case of scotch
and a
DILDO from her $0.35 Tricks on the Streets when I'm there.
Wanna get back to evidence/testimony Now?>>>
tomnln
Your wife wants to leave you for me.
Don't worry, If it wasn't for the blow-jobs, I'd drop her off a cliff.
tomnln
Yo(Momma)Harvey
baileynme
spiffy
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193431819....@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
> Burly? Going to be a huge block party in Dartmouth, Ma, very soon.
> Invitations are going into the mail!
COWARD;
You never kept your threat to visit me.
justm...@gmail.com
> "YoHarvey" <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1193432616....@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Oct 26, 4:50 pm, YoHarvey <bailey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Oct 26, 4:46 pm, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
>
> >> > On Oct 26, 3:42 pm, BurlyGu...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> > > Sir,
>
> >> > > I am afraid that in regard to the "CT'er" it is far beyond " a
> >> > > little
> >> > > testy, occassionally".
>
> >> > Sir, this is nice?
>
> >> > Burly, so you want the truth. Robcap is Jesus who is JMoore who is
> >> > Justin who is Justins's mom. He has issues burly, be advised.
> >> > Whichever names he chooses to use however, he's still the same
> >> > homophobic, lying racist he's always been. Enjoy.
>
> >> > You can go look up every robcap...you can find and you will not see me
> >> > calling anyone a homo, racist or any similar type of word. Either you
> >> > need to recognize the LNer side is worse or quit complaining.
>
> >> Burly? Numerous people on this newsgroup have PROOF of A:LL of the
> >> pseudonyms used by this social misfit. Shall we post them all AGAIN.-
> >> Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
>
> > Burly? Going to be a huge block party in Dartmouth, Ma, very soon.
> > Invitations are going into the mail!
>
> COWARD;
>
> - Show quoted text -
She plies me with alchahol 3 times a week & takes advantage of my
body.
She "cleans my pipes 3 times a week. (Thaks so much for being a
(Enoch)
It appears the alcoholic Rossley has had a little too much to drink
tonight. Not only are his insults stupid, He can't type more then 3
words in a row without spelling something wrong. Another uneducated CT
hard at work making a complete ass of themselves. What they don't
realize is it's not hard work at all, all they have to do is type a
sentance. Your insults about YoHarveys wife are getting old, just like
you.
BTW Rossley, did you know that spamming a newsgroup can get your
thrown off google? Keep up the good work, you'll be proving to google
that you deserve to be banned.
Burly...@gmail.com
> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1193424580....@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Oct 26, 2:00 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> Is Burly gonna point out my "hostile responses"?
>
> > Sir, I was speaking in the plural sense--this place as a whole.
>
> > However, in my stating "rather hostile" this has been from the side
> > commonly referred to as the "CT'er".
>
> Your reply below is "Singular" Sir.
>
> "I" was the subject justme was referring to.
>
> Would you care to address these Lies of the WC?http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htmhttp://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htmhttp://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>
Thank you for your thoughts, Mr Rossley.
However, in my first post here, I expressed my opinion that there are
no civil, sensible conspiracy theorists here to ''discuss'' the
''evidence'' with, so, no thank you, I do not "care to address" what
you call ''lies of the WC". It would only be a matter of time before
you would begin calling me names were I to do so.
Burly...@gmail.com
> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
I totally disagree, sir, but, thank you for your thoughts.
tomnln
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193491961.0...@o38g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 26, 8:54 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1193424580....@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Oct 26, 2:00 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >> Is Burly gonna point out my "hostile responses"?
>>
>> > Sir, I was speaking in the plural sense--this place as a whole.
>>
>> > However, in my stating "rather hostile" this has been from the side
>> > commonly referred to as the "CT'er".
>>
>> Your reply below is "Singular" Sir.
>>
>> "I" was the subject justme was referring to.
>>
>> Would you care to address these Lies of the
>> WC?http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htmhttp://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htmhttp://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
>>
> Thank you for your thoughts, Mr Rossley.
>
> However, in my first post here, I expressed my opinion that there are
> no civil, sensible conspiracy theorists here to ''discuss'' the
> ''evidence'' with, so, no thank you, I do not "care to address" what
> you call ''lies of the WC". It would only be a matter of time before
> you would begin calling me names were I to do so.
In ALL of my posts here I express there are NO LN's capable of addressing
their own evidence/testimony.
Your refusal POroves my statement.
ps;
I call LN's Names in Retaliation ONLY.
In any disagreement, there are people who can defend their position.
In any disagreement, there are people who can NOT defend their position.
tomnln
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193492045.1...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 26, 8:56 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1193427735.6...@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Oct 26, 3:23 pm, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
>> >> On Oct 26, 2:49 pm, BurlyGu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >> Burly, I am new to this board (like 3 weeks) and I came with the same
>> >> attitude as you, but I was attacked and ridiculed and I'm still
>> >> accused of being someone else. So all I can say is if the CT group is
>> >> a little testy occassionally it is because we have been attacked by
>> >> the LNers. We do discuss the evidence though, the LNers just attack
>> >> (save for a few of them).
>>
>> >> Robert (Not Gil)
>>
>> > Sir,
>>
>> > I am afraid that in regard to the "CT'er" it is far beyond " a little
>> > testy, occassionally".
>>
>> You got here a LITTLE TOO LATE Sir.
>>
>> What you're reading is RETALIATION to the Insults/Threats originated by
>> the
>> LN side.
> I totally disagree, sir, but, thank you for your thoughts.
Apparently you have NO thoughts on your own evidence/testimony.
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burly...@gmail.com
> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1193492045.1...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Oct 26, 8:56 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1193427735.6...@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Oct 26, 3:23 pm, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
> >> >> On Oct 26, 2:49 pm, BurlyGu...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> >> Burly, I am new to this board (like 3 weeks) and I came with the same
> >> >> attitude as you, but I was attacked and ridiculed and I'm still
> >> >> accused of being someone else. So all I can say is if the CT group is
> >> >> a little testy occassionally it is because we have been attacked by
> >> >> the LNers. We do discuss the evidence though, the LNers just attack
> >> >> (save for a few of them).
>
> >> >> Robert (Not Gil)
>
> >> > Sir,
>
> >> > I am afraid that in regard to the "CT'er" it is far beyond " a little
> >> > testy, occassionally".
>
> >> You got here a LITTLE TOO LATE Sir.
>
> >> What you're reading is RETALIATION to the Insults/Threats originated by
> >> the
> >> LN side.
>
>
> > I totally disagree, sir, but, thank you for your thoughts.
>
> Apparently you have NO thoughts on your own evidence/testimony.
>
> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htmhttp://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htmhttp://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
Sir,
Correct, as I have no idea what you are talking about here. It is
neither my "own evidence" nor is it my "own testimony".
tomnln
<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193477041.1...@o38g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It appears the alcoholic Rossley has had a little too much to drink
tonight. Not only are his insults stupid, He can't type more then 3
words in a row without spelling something wrong. Another uneducated CT
hard at work making a complete ass of themselves. What they don't
realize is it's not hard work at all, all they have to do is type a
sentance. Your insults about YoHarveys wife are getting old, just like
you.
BTW Rossley, did you know that spamming a newsgroup can get your
thrown off google? Keep up the good work, you'll be proving to google
that you deserve to be banned.
I didn't hear anyone holler Cunt! ! !
You tried that with my ISP.
I proved to them that it was YOU who initiated the Insults.
So, Here I am.
When I told them you've NEVER addressed any evidence/testimony even ONCE,
Even They knew what a Cunt you are now.
I Love giving you LOSERS another chance>>>
Burly...@gmail.com
> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1193491961.0...@o38g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Oct 26, 8:54 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> <BurlyGu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1193424580....@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Oct 26, 2:00 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> >> Is Burly gonna point out my "hostile responses"?
>
> >> > Sir, I was speaking in the plural sense--this place as a whole.
>
> >> > However, in my stating "rather hostile" this has been from the side
> >> > commonly referred to as the "CT'er".
>
> >> Your reply below is "Singular" Sir.
>
> >> "I" was the subject justme was referring to.
>
> >> Would you care to address these Lies of the
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Thank you for your thoughts, Mr Rossley.
>
> > However, in my first post here, I expressed my opinion that there are
> > no civil, sensible conspiracy theorists here to ''discuss'' the
> > ''evidence'' with, so, no thank you, I do not "care to address" what
> > you call ''lies of the WC". It would only be a matter of time before
> > you would begin calling me names were I to do so.
>
> In ALL of my posts here I express there are NO LN's capable of addressing
> their own evidence/testimony.
> Your refusal POroves my statement.
>
> ps;
> I call LN's Names in Retaliation ONLY.
>
> In any disagreement, there are people who can defend their position.
> In any disagreement, there are people who can NOT defend their position.
Sir,
You are, of course, entitled to your opinion(s), and obviously, you
are trying to provoke me into getting into a discussion with you over
what you wish to discuss. The fact that you enjoy "Retaliation"
proves my point that there are no civil, sensible conspiracy
theorists here to ''discuss'' the ''evidence'' with. Having said
this, I see no reason for us to carry on with this conversation.
tomnln
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193497188....@o38g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> In any disagreement, there are people who can defend their position.
> In any disagreement, there are people who can NOT defend their position.
Sir,
You are, of course, entitled to your opinion(s), and obviously, you
are trying to provoke me into getting into a discussion with you over
what you wish to discuss. The fact that you enjoy "Retaliation"
proves my point that there are no civil, sensible conspiracy
theorists here to ''discuss'' the ''evidence'' with. Having said
this, I see no reason for us to carry on with this conversation.
Thank you for identifying which of the two above catagories you fit into.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193496682.9...@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Are you admitting that you had No idea that I was referring to
evidence/testimony
of the Warren Commission which you support?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burly...@gmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Sir,
> Correct, as I have no idea what you are talking about here. It is
> neither my "own evidence" nor is it my "own testimony".
>
> Are you admitting that you had No idea that I was referring to
> evidence/testimony
> of the Warren Commission which you support?
"Admit"(ting)? Sir, you are not making any sense here.
Your post attributed "evidence/testimony" to me, as if it were mine.
Look at your post.
Burly...@gmail.com
> MIDDLE POST;
>
> > In any disagreement, there are people who can defend their position.
> > In any disagreement, there are people who can NOT defend their position.
>
> Sir,
>
> You are, of course, entitled to your opinion(s), and obviously, you
> are trying to provoke me into getting into a discussion with you over
> what you wish to discuss. The fact that you enjoy "Retaliation"
> proves my point that there are no civil, sensible conspiracy
> theorists here to ''discuss'' the ''evidence'' with. Having said
> this, I see no reason for us to carry on with this conversation.
>
> Thank you for identifying which of the two above catagories you fit into.
And thank you, for sharing your assumption, Mr. Rossley.
tomnln
<Burly...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193508755....@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > I totally disagree, sir, but, thank you for your thoughts.
>
> > Apparently you have NO thoughts on your own evidence/testimony.
>
> >http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htmhttp://www.whokilledjfk.net/Wa...
>
>
> Sir,
> Correct, as I have no idea what you are talking about here. It is
> neither my "own evidence" nor is it my "own testimony".
>
> Are you admitting that you had No idea that I was referring to
> evidence/testimony
> of the Warren Commission which you support?
"Admit"(ting)? Sir, you are not making any sense here.
Your post attributed "evidence/testimony" to me, as if it were mine.
Look at your post.
If you were that particular about the evidence/testimony, Gerry Ford would
have Died in Prison.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burly...@gmail.com
>
> > > > I totally disagree, sir, but, thank you for your thoughts.
>
> > > Apparently you have NO thoughts on your own evidence/testimony.
>
> > >http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htmhttp://www.whokilledjfk.net/Wa...
>
>
> > Sir,
> > Correct, as I have no idea what you are talking about here. It is
> > neither my "own evidence" nor is it my "own testimony".
>
> > Are you admitting that you had No idea that I was referring to
> > evidence/testimony
> > of the Warren Commission which you support?
>
> "Admit"(ting)? Sir, you are not making any sense here.
>
> Your post attributed "evidence/testimony" to me, as if it were mine.
> Look at your post.
>
> If you were that particular about the evidence/testimony, Gerry Ford would
> have Died in Prison.
You are still making no sense here. The problem lies within the
wording of your post. You should be more careful when asking a
question. Anyone who might happen upon the post would believe that
you were attributing the "evidence/testimony'' to *me* as is evidenced
by the wording of your question to me:
QUOTE ON>
Apparently you have NO thoughts on your own evidence/testimony.
QUOTE OFF<
The wording by you would lead one to think that I testified and gave
evidence to the "WC", so, I fail to see what "Gerry" Ford has to with
something you said, sir.
aeffects
wrote:
in the long run hon, ole Tom will drive your Lone Nut booty right
into the ground -- you haven't the balls (pardon the pun) to stand
with him -- LMAO!
Burly...@gmail.com
Thank you for your thoughts, your assumptions, and insults
"aeffects". I'm just trying to get a better understanding here.
-- LMAO!- Hide quoted text -
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Burly? You're finding out what all have known on this newsgroup for
some time. The CT's have the IQ of spinach. Just laugh at them and
forget about them. Healey quote = ROFLMAO.
robc...@netscape.com
wrote:
> It appears the alcoholic Rossley has had a little too much to drink
> tonight. Not only are his insults stupid, He can't type more then 3
> words in a row without spelling something wrong. Another uneducated CT
> hard at work making a complete ass of themselves. What they don't
> realize is it's not hard work at all, all they have to do is type a
> sentance. Your insults about YoHarveys wife are getting old, just like
> you.
> BTW Rossley, did you know that spamming a newsgroup can get your
> thrown off google? Keep up the good work, you'll be proving to google
> that you deserve to be banned.
What appears to be going on to me is that the LNers have accomplished
their mission yet again. This post - posted by me - was about how VB
has distorted the dictabelt findings to suit is ridiculous lone
assassin theory. But as usual the LNers have succeeded in getting the
discussion off topic since they have no clue about the topic anyway.
Spamming is the least of the problem with your group. The rude
language and accusations made by the LNers is grounds for throwing you
guys off. Calling someone a racist with no proof (and you have none)
is a serious accusation.
robc...@netscape.com
> Thank you for your thoughts, Mr Rossley.
>
> However, in my first post here, I expressed my opinion that there are
> no civil, sensible conspiracy theorists here to ''discuss'' the
> ''evidence'' with, so, no thank you, I do not "care to address" what
> you call ''lies of the WC". It would only be a matter of time before
> you would begin calling me names were I to do so.
.com/videoplay?
I am reasonable. Debate away. If not then go to aaj as you will find
more people who think like you. I have said this before to the LNers
who just name call and never discuss the particulars of the case/
theory - leave then. Why keep posting or responding if we get on your
nerves? Save yourself the aggravation and move on.
robc...@netscape.com
> Sir,
>
> You are, of course, entitled to your opinion(s), and obviously, you
> are trying to provoke me into getting into a discussion with you over
> what you wish to discuss. The fact that you enjoy "Retaliation"
> proves my point that there are no civil, sensible conspiracy
> theorists here to ''discuss'' the ''evidence'' with. Having said
> this, I see no reason for us to carry on with this conversation.
>
Burly, enough is enough. You have made your point and we get you
think we are rude. I also see you are not even discussing this case
anymore. Get back to the assassination or go over to aaj. Enough.
robc...@netscape.com
> Burly? You're finding out what all have known on this newsgroup for
> some time. The CT's have the IQ of spinach. Just laugh at them and
> forget about them. Healey quote = ROFLMAO.
That is why I have never seen YoDimWit post anything coherent about
the assassination. He can't even defend why he thinks one guy shot
JFK. He probably can't tell you a single thing about JFK's
presidency. He is just here to disrupt and insult. Move on Burly if
you don't like the board, the aaj is full of YoLaymo's.
YoHarvey
Based on the above, in front of this entire Newsgroup I HEREBY
CHALLENGE Gil Chico Jesus/Robcap to DEBATE live the facts of the JFK
Assassination and the JFK Presidency.
aeffects
none of these Lone Nut fools have a clue, so a few of us are teaching
them how to dance.... They know onl one thing: "yes sir,
professer .john, yes SIR! LMFAO
Burly...@gmail.com
Sir,
You are jumping to conclusions, and are making assumptions here.
Furthermore, you do not know how I "think".
Is this place solely for people who think only one way--and that one
way has to be that you believe a conspiracy killed JFK?
I said nothing about anyone getting on my ''nerves'' nor do I want to
"debate". Furthermore, I have not called any one names! What I *did*
say is that I will not get into this name calling/insulting like so
many of you do here.
Thank you for your concern.
aeffects
forty five question await you, hon..... get past those and we'll see
if your loins are tough enough to carry the weight of the entire Lone
Nut clan.... Carry on troop!
YoHarvey
>
> - Show quoted text -
Based on the above, in front of this entire Newsgroup I HEREBY
CHALLENGE Gil Chico Jesus/Robcap to DEBATE live the facts of the JFK
Assassination and the JFK Presidency.
Above, I challenged our resident homophobic racist Gil Chico Jesus/
Robcap to debate me on the FACTS of the JFK Assassination and
Presidency. As this coward as done so many times, he runs and hides.
Jesus/Robcap has NO backbone! He's a two bit whore for the CT crowd,
nothing more.
Burly...@gmail.com
Excuse me, sir...
Do you rule the roost here?
I was having a discussion concerning the Dale Myers animation
(therefore, ''the assassination") with Mr. Rossley, when he swayed off
topic and brought up ''evidence/testimony" that he clearly attributed
to me in his post. I just wanted to clarify this.
Ben Holmes
robc...@netscape.com says...
Yep... Burlyguard is just a coward - he wants to defend the WCR - but refuses to
actually do so. Particularly against those who know far more than he does of
this case and the evidence.
What we have to do is find someone who's completely ignorant of the evidence,
but believes that there was a conspiracy... Burlyguard would wax poetic then.
Ben Holmes
Burly...@gmail.com says...
Sadly, you can't pretend to be a LNT'er, then refuse to defend the WCR.
YoHarvey
> In article <1193518066.589797.236...@z9g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> robcap...@netscape.com says...
>
> - Show quoted text -
What we have to do is find someone who's completely ignorant of the
evidence,
but believes that there was a conspiracy... Burlyguard would wax
poetic then.
Completely ignorant of the evidence? Holmes? That would include you
and the rest of the CT misfits here. Pick one.
tomnln
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193517331.2...@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Burly? You're finding out what all have known on this newsgroup for
some time. The CT's have the IQ of spinach. Just laugh at them and
forget about them. Healey quote = ROFLMAO.
Will that give you more time to address evidence/testimony?
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
You haven't fared too well so far.
Unless you wanna compare notes on your wife?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------