http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk The Kennedy assassination. 2009-11-23T23:52:00Z Google Groups Coondog billcla...@live.com 2009-11-23T23:52:00Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/79bafffb536524d8/1a617918616c4acb?show_docid=1a617918616c4acb

I didn’t have much experience with the M-14 but I believe it ejected <br> the used clip out the top of the action. Would you happen to know? <br> Bill Clarke

Coondog billcla...@live.com 2009-11-23T23:48:35Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/79bafffb536524d8/34b8ba9466bae149?show_docid=34b8ba9466bae149

Walt answers your question but I wonder if you understand what he <br> said. The clip for the M/C is as expendable as the ammo. You use up <br> the ammo in one clip and you then reload with 6 rounds already placed <br> in a new clip. You draw your ammo pre-placed in the clip. The clip <br> was a throw away. <br> Pretty much the same with the M-16. In combat the clip is discarded

MsBurb msb...@gmail.com 2009-11-23T22:35:33Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/cebe35ba4ba342ce/3d50b591ee6b66ec?show_docid=3d50b591ee6b66ec

Like the LN theory makes JFK any less dead... <br> What's so gosh darn terrible by admitting that although many factions <br> may have had it in for BOTH the brothers, that a wacko extremist dude <br> got off a head shot first...evidence doesn't lie, because it doesn't <br> need to... <br> IF there are any CTers out there who would like to disprove what those

Sam McClung mccl...@newsguy.com 2009-11-23T22:30:26Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/055d7a21ea801b46/c3415883af8f2188?show_docid=c3415883af8f2188

because lodge was his lord and master?

cdddraftsman cdddrafts...@yahoo.com 2009-11-23T22:30:00Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/055d7a21ea801b46/de725c36c3ad3471?show_docid=de725c36c3ad3471

Wy don't you ask Greer ? <br> tl

Robert Harris reharr...@yahoo.com 2009-11-23T22:29:52Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/055d7a21ea801b46/cc81922044c9e42d?show_docid=cc81922044c9e42d

In article <br> &lt;reharris1-B0A245.10471823112. ..@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns. net&gt;, <br> Duh... Alvarez would not conclude.... <br> Someday I will learn to proofread.

Bud sirsl...@fast.net 2009-11-23T21:58:28Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/8878dcc9231bb738/3afed97ead38475e?show_docid=3afed97ead38475e

Then your work is done. Why are you still seeking an audience? <br> You couldn`t talk when you were nine? <br> In which case it can`t support the conclusion that there was another <br> shot. And it was stupid to think in the first place, how could there <br> be a fourth shot that so many people missed yet was loud enough to be

bigdog jecorbett1...@yahoo.com 2009-11-23T21:18:01Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/cebe35ba4ba342ce/c3cb7de376860679?show_docid=c3cb7de376860679

Didn't see The Ruby Connection, but ITTC was well done with the exception <br> of a technical error (placing Jackie in the wrong place). This error in no <br> way affected the key finding that the headshot came from behind. Field <br> tests invariably come down on the side of the lone assassin theory and <br> invariably the CTs will take exception to the results because those

cdddraftsman cdddrafts...@yahoo.com 2009-11-23T21:17:19Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/cebe35ba4ba342ce/19ad1c81f456e7af?show_docid=19ad1c81f456e7af

Well it wouldn't be the first time the American mobocracy prefered to <br> listen to the Soviets rather than to their own USG . 26 US citizens * <br> giving away our secrets to the USSR while working at Los Alimos during <br> WW2 because they thought 'Uncle Joe' Stalin ** was a nice guy . It's <br> digusting ! <br> Keynotes :

Robert Harris reharr...@yahoo.com 2009-11-23T21:07:22Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/8878dcc9231bb738/c8b5049ee9b4c62a?show_docid=c8b5049ee9b4c62a

In article <br> &lt;b0bafaf9-c3c8-405f-9f05-aa266 419c...@e20g2000vbb.googlegrou ps.com&gt;, <br> Migod, you are thick!! <br> We aren't talking about who is right. BOTH of them are full of shit. <br> We are talking about which side represents the mainline opinion in this <br> country, based on the government's and the people's opinion.

Gregorio Cornell cornelltvefgregorio...@gmail.com 2009-11-23T20:52:58Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/c051d975b261ad75/dde658f07ef99265?show_docid=dde658f07ef99265

. <br> ~~~^^^~~~ <br> ============================== ==================== <br> ============================== ==================== <br> ENTER HERE: <br> &gt;&gt;&gt; <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href="http://search-results.cn/1/granite-tile">[link]</a> &lt;&lt;&lt; <br> ============================== ====================

Robert Harris reharr...@yahoo.com 2009-11-23T20:52:14Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/5c5189f7ff7ab346/6328f6608150e75e?show_docid=6328f6608150e75e

In article <br> &lt;0ac743ae-4d9b-43c1-bdb8-68b6c 6c17...@v37g2000vbb.googlegrou ps.com&gt;, <br> David, you need to realize that there are only two kinds of people out <br> there, those who saw the video and those who did not. <br> When you deliberately lie about the nature of that video, you can only <br> hope to influence those who have not seen it. But you probably have them

François Carlier fra-carl...@orange.fr 2009-11-23T20:32:36Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/5c5189f7ff7ab346/a6940a0bd5583f01?show_docid=a6940a0bd5583f01

&quot;Ben Holmes&quot; &lt;ad...@burningknife.com&gt; a écrit dans le message de <br> ---&gt; Yes, they do. That's because there are a lot of &quot;Grodens&quot; out there. <br> There are several conspiracy theorists (Groden + Fetzer + White + Lifton + <br> Marrs + Aguilar + Lane + etc.), so the &quot;Groden's effect&quot; (= spreading lies <br> and disinformation and nonsense) is increased tenfold, unfortunately. It is

Spence rob.spen...@gmail.com 2009-11-23T19:42:16Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/cebe35ba4ba342ce/64bab82fbc0b310b?show_docid=64bab82fbc0b310b

I think Gary Mack is finally coming to the conclusions that we all <br> came to years ago.

John Schwanik jschw...@gmail.com 2009-11-23T19:40:29Z http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/cebe35ba4ba342ce/3c2b3e793cfe86bf?show_docid=3c2b3e793cfe86bf

Well... I'll say this, it's pretty confusing that the Discovery Channel <br> would air &quot;Did the Mob Kill JFK?&quot; which was pro-conspiracy, and &quot;JFK: The <br> Ruby Connection&quot; with was somewhat anti-conspiracy back to back. <br> Also I wanted to comment on Gary Mack. Now I respect Mack's approach but <br> it's again it's somewhat confusing that he disproves many conspiracy