Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

I suggest that you all read this JFK analysis carefully ...

9 views
Skip to first unread message

Richard Charnin

unread,
May 17, 2012, 1:44:03 AM5/17/12
to

Hey, trolls, are you up to it?
Try to follow some actual SCIENTIFIC analysis for a change.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDFSU3NVd29xWWNyekd2X1ZJYllKTnc#gid=3

I just might challenge you all with a multiple choice test at some later date.

Flash! The probability analysis will be referenced in a future book (not mine).
No questions. That's all I am going to say about that.

bigdog

unread,
May 17, 2012, 5:14:23 AM5/17/12
to
On May 17, 1:44 am, Richard Charnin <richardchar...@comcast.net>
wrote:
> Hey, trolls, are you up to it?
> Try to follow some actual SCIENTIFIC analysis for a change.
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDFSU3NVd29x...
>
> I just might challenge you all with a multiple choice test at some later date.
>
> Flash! The probability analysis will be referenced in a future book (not mine).
> No questions. That's all I am going to say about that.

What are you, a one trick pony?. How many threads are you going to
start with this same horseshit? There is absolutely nothing scientific
about your analysis. Of course you won't take questions because this
horseshit won't stand up to scrutiny. I have pointed out the
fallacies in your methods. Twice. You refuse to address any of the
points I made and instead try to pass of this bullshit in another
thread. In short, you are an irrelevant asshole who should simply be
ignored. Fuck off.

mainframetech

unread,
May 17, 2012, 6:46:33 AM5/17/12
to
Hmm. Someone's getting nervous...:)

Chris

Richard Charnin

unread,
May 17, 2012, 10:40:43 AM5/17/12
to
You already flunked. You have not debunked a thing.
Remember, I will be giving you a test. Multiple choice.
You know, like the ones you failed in H.S.

Read this and weep.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDFSU3NVd29xWWNyekd2X1ZJYllKTnc#gid=0

Richard Charnin

unread,
May 17, 2012, 11:21:49 AM5/17/12
to
On Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:14:23 AM UTC-4, bigdog wrote:
YOU TELLING ME TO FUCK OFF?
This one trick pony has trampled all over you.

How many more links will I post of the math proof?
I will post links so often that it will make you retch.
Each post exposes you as a charlatan troll,so you can expect many more.

I want everyone to see how the math proof reduces you to an irrelevancy.
I will post it until you run off with a bigdog tail between your legs.

bigdog

unread,
May 17, 2012, 1:06:29 PM5/17/12
to
On May 17, 11:21 am, Richard Charnin <richardchar...@comcast.net>
wrote:
> On Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:14:23 AM UTC-4, bigdog wrote:
> > On May 17, 1:44 am, Richard Charnin <richardchar...@comcast.net>
> > wrote:
> > > Hey, trolls, are you up to it?
> > > Try to follow some actual SCIENTIFIC analysis for a change.
>
> > >https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDFSU3NVd29x...
>
> > > I just might challenge you all with a multiple choice test at some later date.
>
> > > Flash! The probability analysis will be referenced in a future book (not mine).
> > > No questions. That's all I am going to say about that.
>
> > What are you, a one trick pony?. How many threads are you going to
> > start with this same horseshit? There is absolutely nothing scientific
> > about your analysis. Of course you won't take questions because this
> > horseshit won't stand up to scrutiny.  I have pointed out the
> > fallacies in your methods. Twice. You refuse to address any of the
> > points I made and instead try to pass of this bullshit in another
> > thread. In short, you are an irrelevant asshole who should simply be
> > ignored. Fuck off.
>
> YOU TELLING ME TO FUCK OFF?
> This one trick pony has trampled all over you.
>
Actually, you've stepped on your dick.

> How many more links will I post of the math proof?

The next one that has real proof and not junk science will be number
one.

> I will post links so often that it will make you retch.

I'm sure a lot of people will have that reaction.

> Each post exposes you as a charlatan troll,so you can expect many more.
>
Until you can address the objections I made to your analysis, it is
quite clear who the charlatan is. Valid science needs to be able to
stand up to the scrutiny of peer review. Obviously, you aren't up to
that task. You present your case an expect everyone to simply accept
your silly conclusions without question.

> I want everyone to see how the math proof reduces you to an irrelevancy.
> I will post it until you run off with a bigdog tail between your legs.

Actually, you have presented no math, just your final answer as to the
probabilities. We both know you will not reveal the steps you took in
reaching those conclusions because we both know it would be obvious
how lame your calculations are.

Jason Burke

unread,
May 17, 2012, 3:11:40 PM5/17/12
to
On 5/17/2012 8:21 AM, Richard Charnin wrote:
> On Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:14:23 AM UTC-4, bigdog wrote:
>> On May 17, 1:44 am, Richard Charnin<richardchar...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>> Hey, trolls, are you up to it?
>>> Try to follow some actual SCIENTIFIC analysis for a change.
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDFSU3NVd29x...
>>>
>>> I just might challenge you all with a multiple choice test at some later date.
>>>
>>> Flash! The probability analysis will be referenced in a future book (not mine).
>>> No questions. That's all I am going to say about that.
>>
>> What are you, a one trick pony?. How many threads are you going to
>> start with this same horseshit? There is absolutely nothing scientific
>> about your analysis. Of course you won't take questions because this
>> horseshit won't stand up to scrutiny. I have pointed out the
>> fallacies in your methods. Twice. You refuse to address any of the
>> points I made and instead try to pass of this bullshit in another
>> thread. In short, you are an irrelevant asshole who should simply be
>> ignored. Fuck off.
>
> YOU TELLING ME TO FUCK OFF?
> This one trick pony has trampled all over you.
>
> How many more links will I post of the math proof?

Based on what you've shown so far, I'm SURE you'll be able to snag the
remaining six Clay Institute problems in an hour or two. Make sure to
take a picture of yourself bathing in that six mil!

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 17, 2012, 11:27:54 PM5/17/12
to
bigdog <jecorb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 17, 1:44=A0am, Richard Charnin <richardchar...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
> > Hey, trolls, are you up to it?
> > Try to follow some actual SCIENTIFIC analysis for a change.
> >
> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDFSU3NVd29x
> > ..=
> .
> >
> > I just might challenge you all with a multiple choice test at some
> > later =
> date.
> >
> > Flash! The probability analysis will be referenced in a future book
> > (not =
> mine).
> > No questions. That's all I am going to say about that.
>
> What are you, a one trick pony?. How many threads are you going to
> start with this same horseshit? There is absolutely nothing scientific
> about your analysis. Of course you won't take questions because this
> horseshit won't stand up to scrutiny. I have pointed out the
> fallacies in your methods. Twice. You refuse to address any of the
> points I made and instead try to pass of this bullshit in another
> thread. In short, you are an irrelevant asshole who should simply be
> ignored. Fuck off.


WHO SHOULD BE IGNORED, ARE THE ASSHOLES WHO DISCUS THIS SUBJECT WITHOUT
EVER HAVING READ THE EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY IN THE 26 VOLUMES.LIKE
BIGDOG/McADAMS.

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 17, 2012, 11:29:55 PM5/17/12
to
bigdog <jecorb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 17, 11:21=A0am, Richard Charnin <richardchar...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:14:23 AM UTC-4, bigdog wrote:
> > > On May 17, 1:44=A0am, Richard Charnin <richardchar...@comcast.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hey, trolls, are you up to it?
> > > > Try to follow some actual SCIENTIFIC analysis for a change.
> >
> > > >https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDFSU3NVd
> > > >29=
> x...
> >
> > > > I just might challenge you all with a multiple choice test at some
> > > > la=
> ter date.
> >
> > > > Flash! The probability analysis will be referenced in a future book
> > > > (=
> not mine).
> > > > No questions. That's all I am going to say about that.
> >
> > > What are you, a one trick pony?. How many threads are you going to
> > > start with this same horseshit? There is absolutely nothing
> > > scientific about your analysis. Of course you won't take questions
> > > because this horseshit won't stand up to scrutiny. =A0I have pointed
"YOU" ARE THE ONE OFFERING "OPINIONS'. BY YOUR OPWN ADMISSION YOU HAVE
NEVER READ HE EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY IN THE 26 VOLUMES..

YOURRR OPINIONS HAVE
"NO BASIS".

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 17, 2012, 11:31:32 PM5/17/12
to
JASON IS ANOTHER ASSHOLE WHO HAS NOT READ THE EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY IN THE 26
VOLUMES..

OPINION WITH "NO BASIS".

Jason Burke

unread,
May 18, 2012, 9:46:20 AM5/18/12
to
By your own admission, fucktard, you have absolutely no evidence
pointing to conspiracy.

Jason Burke

unread,
May 18, 2012, 9:46:37 AM5/18/12
to
By your own admission, fuckface, you have absolutely no evidence
pointing to conspiracy.

Jason Burke

unread,
May 18, 2012, 9:47:21 AM5/18/12
to

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 20, 2012, 10:44:06 PM5/20/12
to
hey child-molester;

YOUARE SUPPOSED TO DO TH PROVING UNLESS YOU THINK YOU'RE STILL IN IRAN .

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 20, 2012, 10:45:38 PM5/20/12
to
\


YOU ULESS LITTLE PUSSY;

HO WOULD YOU LIKE TO DEBATE ME? ? ?

Jason Burke

unread,
May 21, 2012, 3:30:46 AM5/21/12
to
Yes, HO describes your mama to a 'T', fucktard.

Jason Burke

unread,
May 21, 2012, 3:30:51 AM5/21/12
to
WOW Rosstard! Thanks for the coherency! Once again, since your
stupidity-addled brain can't seem to parse much of anything, we're not
it a court here. Just trying to find out what happened. And, of course,
the WC report has stood the test of time.

What do you have? (Well, besides the inability to type or make yourself
coherent.)

Oh, so now I'm a child-molester (sic) because I believe in the truth!
I'll bet your mommy is SO proud of you!



tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 21, 2012, 10:42:37 PM5/21/12
to
WE DOPN'T HAVE TO YOU COMMIE BASTARD;

YOU MUST PROVE GUILT OF A LON ASASSIN.

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 21, 2012, 10:46:41 PM5/21/12
to
SOMETHING YOU ASHOLES MISSED BY NOT READING THE WARREN REPORT.>
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Navigation/cASE%20OPEN.htm

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 21, 2012, 10:49:33 PM5/21/12
to
JASON, YOU IGNORANT SLUT ! ! !

YOUR PRECIOUS WARREN rEPORT WS "tHROWN OUT" OF A u s cOURT IN THE cLAY sHAW
tRIAL.

NO WONDER YOU'RE TOO CHICKENSHIT TO DEBATE ME ! ! !.

Jason Burke

unread,
May 21, 2012, 11:11:04 PM5/21/12
to
Again with your pathetic excuse for a web site, Rosstard?

Jason Burke

unread,
May 21, 2012, 11:10:36 PM5/21/12
to
Ah, I see. The last time you had a coherent thought was in the early
days of SNL!

>
> YOUR PRECIOUS WARREN rEPORT WS "tHROWN OUT" OF A u s cOURT IN THE cLAY sHAW
> tRIAL.
>

The Clay Shaw trial!!! PLEASE don't tell me you're that delusional.

> NO WONDER YOU'RE TOO CHICKENSHIT TO DEBATE ME ! ! !.
>

Rosstard, your ass has been wiped all over the floor every time I've
seen you try to debate. Lemme guess! You've suddenly become more coherent?

Jason Burke

unread,
May 21, 2012, 11:14:12 PM5/21/12
to
Oh, so now we're in court again, fuckface?

The Lone Assassin is the only thing that makes sense. It's the only
thing that fits the evidence. It's the only thing that's EVER made
sense. And it will still be the only thing that will ever make sense
long after the what's left of your 'brain' turns into worm food.

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 22, 2012, 7:40:07 PM5/22/12
to
no. I just found someone less informed on the official evidence/testimony
than McAdams/Dogshit (YOU)

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 22, 2012, 7:41:43 PM5/22/12
to
THAT EBSITE IS THE CLOSEST YOU FELON SUPPORTERS WILL EVER COME TO THE
OFFICISL EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY JERK-OFF ! ! !

Jason Burke

unread,
May 22, 2012, 7:43:04 PM5/22/12
to
Dream on, fuckface.

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 22, 2012, 7:43:49 PM5/22/12
to
I WONDER HOW MANY TRAFFIC TICKETS YOU'VE GOYTTEN BECAUSE YOUR REDING
ABILITIES ARE THAT OF ONE WITH DYSLEXIA ! ! !

Jason Burke

unread,
May 22, 2012, 10:18:59 PM5/22/12
to
Oh come on. This is HILARIOUS!
Probably the stupidest thing EVER to come form Rosstard's pie-hole.

And that's saying something.

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 23, 2012, 4:16:15 PM5/23/12
to
continue on chickenshit ! ! !

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 23, 2012, 4:19:57 PM5/23/12
to
never any evidence/testimony from you clowns ! ! !

aeffects

unread,
May 23, 2012, 5:01:54 PM5/23/12
to
On May 23, 1:16 pm, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> Jason Burke <Burke_Ja...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > On 5/22/2012 4:40 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > > Jason Burke<Burke_Ja...@comcast.net>  wrote:
> > >> On 5/21/2012 7:49 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > >>> Jason Burke<Burke_Ja...@comcast.net>   wrote:
> > >>>> On 5/20/2012 7:44 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > >>>>> Jason Burke<Burke_Ja...@comcast.net>    wrote:
> > >>>>>> On 5/17/2012 8:27 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
Paul May never walked away from an alias he liked. Paul May<----- aka
Jason Burke & Mark Ulrik

> --
> --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------

Jason Burke

unread,
May 23, 2012, 5:45:11 PM5/23/12
to
Tsk, tsk, fuckface.
Again, I ask:

Got any evidence yet? Still waiting after 49 years.

Jason Burke

unread,
May 23, 2012, 5:45:58 PM5/23/12
to
I have nothing to 'continue on' about, dillweed. What the WR said has
stood the test of time. You can't even stand up.

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 23, 2012, 11:14:55 PM5/23/12
to
I HAAVE ALREADY PROVEN THAT THE AUTHORIIIES TAMPERED WITH EVIDENCE.

SEE> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm

YOU COMMIES SEEN TO APPROVE OF THAT.

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 23, 2012, 11:16:49 PM5/23/12
to
REPET;
THE WAREN RPORT WA "THROWN OUT" OF S UNITED STATES COURT ROOM.

Jason Burke

unread,
May 23, 2012, 11:44:22 PM5/23/12
to
And yet you admit that you have NO evidence that anyone other than
Oswald was involved!

You haven't had a coherent thought in over a score of years. Face it, NO
ONE take you seriously.

Jason Burke

unread,
May 23, 2012, 11:43:38 PM5/23/12
to
Oooh, back to the retard sentence structure. And you were doing so well
there for a minute.

aeffects

unread,
May 24, 2012, 2:49:28 PM5/24/12
to
On May 23, 8:43 pm, Jason Burke <Burke_Ja...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 5/23/2012 8:16 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jason Burke<Burke_Ja...@comcast.net>  wrote:
> >> On 5/23/2012 1:16 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> >>> Jason Burke<Burke_Ja...@comcast.net>   wrote:
> >>>> On 5/22/2012 4:40 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> >>>>> Jason Burke<Burke_Ja...@comcast.net>    wrote:
> >>>>>> On 5/21/2012 7:49 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> >>>>>>> Jason Burke<Burke_Ja...@comcast.net>     wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 5/20/2012 7:44 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Jason Burke<Burke_Ja...@comcast.net>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/17/2012 8:27 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
and old Tom has you dangling like a dingleberry.... no place to run-no
place to hide, turd!

Jason Burke

unread,
May 24, 2012, 3:27:50 PM5/24/12
to
Right, fucktard.

Got any evidence of conspiracy? Any at all?

Thought so.

aeffects

unread,
May 24, 2012, 3:46:47 PM5/24/12
to
you look mavvvvvvellllll-ous puke, stink like hell as dingleberry's
are wont to do, but mavvvvvvellllll-ous no-the-less....
ROTFLMFAO! ! ! !

Jason Burke

unread,
May 24, 2012, 4:09:04 PM5/24/12
to
Again with the floor and asses. Big surprise there, snookums.
Face it, you have nothing except your own stupidity on which to rely.

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 27, 2012, 1:12:53 AM5/27/12
to
rright;

some of you ashols can "NOT" be taught.

Jason Burke

unread,
May 27, 2012, 11:10:13 AM5/27/12
to
Well, that was almost a sentence, Rossshit.

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 28, 2012, 8:47:31 PM5/28/12
to
Jason, hyou illeterate cunt;

Do you even kbnow what the 26 olumes are? ? ?

Samantha Brown

unread,
May 28, 2012, 9:06:06 PM5/28/12
to

<tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:20120528204731.005$T...@newsreader.com...
ROTFLMAO! I thought once was a typo, but here you are proving what an amoeba
you really are. KUTGW Toothless, you're hilarious!


>
> Do you even kbnow what the 26 olumes are? ? ?


What's an "olume" fuckwit? Do you "kbnow"?

Jason Burke

unread,
May 28, 2012, 9:21:06 PM5/28/12
to
Hilarious, Rosstard!

>
> Do you even kbnow what the 26 olumes are? ? ?
>

No, Rosstard, I don't kbnow what the 26 olumes are. Try again, dipshit!

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 30, 2012, 12:49:42 AM5/30/12
to
I "KNEW" THAT THE 26 VOLUMES WOULD BE "THAT" FOREIGN TO YOU CHICKENSHIT 1 1
1

Samantha Brown

unread,
May 30, 2012, 1:12:02 AM5/30/12
to

<tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:20120530004942.513$7...@newsreader.com...
I bet you just shit your pants typing that out didn't you? You filthy old
pervert............Ellen? He's done it again........time to get the hose.

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 30, 2012, 11:48:21 AM5/30/12
to
why don't you walk accross the room so we can retrieve that Town Car ! ! !
0 new messages