Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

LAUGHABLE MR. SIMKIN

2 views
Skip to first unread message

David Von Pein

unread,
Nov 30, 2008, 5:52:37 PM11/30/08
to

After reading this silliness written by John Simkin of The Education
Forum, it's no surprise that many conspiracy theorists would want to
keep their pet theories about the JFK assassination under their hats
(for the most part).

Because who would possess any desire to have such laughable crap as
this linked to their own name?:

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=13758&st=0&p=159187&#entry159187

aeffects

unread,
Nov 30, 2008, 6:28:51 PM11/30/08
to
> http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=13758&st=0&p=15...

painful getting your ass thrown off The Education Forum, isn't it.....
LMFAO!

YoHarvey

unread,
Nov 30, 2008, 7:33:18 PM11/30/08
to


roflmao....this coming from Healy who is ridiculed and laughed at with
each of his Education Forum postings....take a look:

From todays Education Forum:

Yes, David ... guys who post real data are jokes and guys who have
web
pages created about their psychotic vulgar foul mouthed behavior are
not jokes.


Now speaking of jokes ... are you not going to request to examine the
original Zapruder film? If not, then why not?? If you are, then what
is taking so long??? This lack of action on your part is starting to
look like a joke.


Bill Miller


bigdog

unread,
Nov 30, 2008, 9:27:28 PM11/30/08
to
> http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=13758&st=0&p=15...

When I started to read it, I thought I was finally going to get a CT
to present an comprehensive alternative to the WCR. He started out
naming names and I thought It ought to be real interesting to see how
he ties this theory to the evidence. Then I get to the bottom and
under EVIDENCE he claims the evidence has been repeated so many times
that he wouldn't bother to repeat it again. It was at that point I
realized he was just another lame-brained CT kook, just like the ones
who infest this forum.

In 45 years, has there ever been even one CT who has attempted to
present a comprehensive alternative to the WCR which is backed up by
hard evidence. If so, I sure as hell have never seen one. Ask a CT
what he thinks really happened and they will mumble several names from
the thousands on the List of Usual Suspects but will absolutely avoid
discussing how they are tied to the crime by the available evidence or
how it all ties together the way the WC did it, the way Gerald Posner
did it, and the way Vincent Bugliosi did it.

0 new messages