In article <64f9ccdd-281d-4d8f-b3c2-9522950ca667@googlegroups.com>, aeffects
says...
>On Friday, August 31, 2012 3:20:15 PM UTC-7, timstter wrote:
>> On Aug 31, 11:37=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> > In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane showed that the Warren Commission
>> > could not accept Drs. Humes & Boswells' testimony about the "unlikely"
>> > possibility that C.E. 399 caused Governor Connally's wounds.
>> > "Dr. Shaw also told the Commission that he did not believe that C.E.
>> > 399 had inflicted the wounds:
>> > 'But the examination of the wrist both by X-ray and at the time of
>> > surgery showed some fragments of metal that make it difficult to believe
>> > that the same missile could have caused these two wounds [Connally's
>> > chest and wrist wounds]. There seems to be more than three grains of
>> > metal missing as far as the - I mean in the wrist.'
>> > Dr Shaw testified that had the bullet in question caused the wounds it
>> > would not be intact: there would have been 'more in the way of loss of
>> > substance to the bullet or deformation of the bullet'."
>> > Mark Lane is showing that the Warren Commission was forced to ignore
>> > all of the medical evidence that went against their theory that C.E.
>> > 399 caused the wounds.
>> LOL! Er, Holmes, you were in the West Coast Marine Corps Rifle Team
>> for ten years or so, right?
Nope. Far less than that... little over a year.
You see, only someone who's never served would even *think* that *ANY* military
personnel stay at the same spot for 10 years. Oversea unaccompanied deployments
are commonly a single year, most assignments are for around 3 years and it's
rare indeed for someone to spend more than 4 years at a single location.
Of course, we *know* that you don't know anything about weapons or the military,
so I'm happy to correct you.
>> You don't KNOW what a FMJ bullet like the one Oswald shot at Kennedy
>> is likely to do?
Yep... we have the scientific examples that were conducted at the request of the
Warren Commission showing what happens to FMJ bullets that hit bone.
And, of course, we have the medical testimony that you can't face... that Mark
Lane detailed above and in previous quoted paragraphs.
>> It's VERY likely that the bullet is going to go straight through him
>> and go on to hit something or someone else, isn't it, Holmes?
Nope. You have too many presuppositions in that question. First, you presume
that the bullet *DID* transit JFK. There's only speculation for that theory.
Next, you have the presupposition that the angles would allow for a single
bullet to hit both men.
Next, you try to claim that C.E. 399 was *that* bullet, despite *ALL* of the
informed medical evidence.
Finally, you can't admit that Mark Lane, once again, told the truth... truth
that you can't face.
>focus my fat little buddy, F-O-C-U-S!
>You're in no position to claim you're a ballistics expert, moron!
The kook can't even martial a good logical argument.
>> Case closed!
Nah, I think you were searching for the thought that your *MIND* is closed. For
as I just demonstrated, you provided *no* evidence, and simply skipped past the
known evidence to make an unproven claim.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com
