Gil Jesus: The RIFLE...

[aeffects]

Gil nails it!

http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm

[Bud]

On May 24, 2:56 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gil nails it!
>
> http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm

Gil is having sex with a rifle?

[Jason Burke]

So, which one is the guy?

[timstter]

On May 25, 4:56 am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gil nails it!
>
> http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm

The only thing that Gil ever nailed was what a damn liar he was.

Bald Goose's <snicker> *research* is GARBAGE, Dave/Ringo.

Informative Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

[tom...@cox.net]

YOU ABOVE ALL OTHERS WOULD RECOGNIZE THE GUY'S RIFLE! ! !

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

[Jason Burke]

On 5/24/2013 3:16 PM, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> Jason Burke <Burke...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 5/24/2013 1:15 PM, Bud wrote:
>>> On May 24, 2:56 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Gil nails it!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
>>>
>>> Gil is having sex with a rifle?
>>>
>>
>> So, which one is the guy?
>
> YOU ABOVE ALL OTHERS WOULD RECOGNIZE THE GUY'S RIFLE! ! !
>

Yawn.

Hey, Rossshit!
Can we all listen to the part of your debate vs. Corbett again where you
flat out admit that you have absolutely no evidence that anyone other
that Oswald was involved?

I know Batey was doing such a poor job of holding in his laughter that
it came through loud and clear.

[curtjester1]

On May 24, 2:56 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Gil nails it!
>
> http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm

I like the JFK Forum here where it's largely the same stuff where Gil
has formualted into 10 steps that are easy to follow, that prove the
'rifle' is not what an Oswald could have possibly ordered or been
apart of in a photo:

http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=3&topic_id=85804&mesg_id=85804
la
Kudos to John Armstrong also for researching all of this many years
ago.

CJ

[aeffects]

On May 24, 6:50 pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 24, 2:56 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Gil nails it!
>
> >http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
>
> I like the JFK Forum here where it's largely the same stuff where Gil
> has formualted into 10 steps that are easy to follow, that prove the
> 'rifle' is not what an Oswald could have possibly ordered or been
> apart of in a photo:
>

> http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=3&top...

> la
> Kudos to John Armstrong also for researching all of this many years
> ago.

and all the nutters have is, "so-and-so is a liar"! What a bunch of
incompetent wuzzes those .john-ites are these days, not a man amongst
this latest alt.assassination.jfk crowd.

We NOW know the Warren Commission lied when it suited their 'LHO did
it all by his lonesome purposes'. Pitiful! ! ! !

And the naive .johnites swallowed the WCR tripe hook-line and sinker.
Tim Brennan (aka Tim Shell: failed standup comic swallowed it all the
way down to his pea sized balls. His first and ONLY orgasm, and of
course, he told his mom....

Go gett'em Gil Jesus... they're on the run, AGAIN!

> CJ

[curtjester1]

On May 24, 10:04 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 24, 6:50 pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 24, 2:56 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Gil nails it!
>
> > >http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
>
> > I like the JFK Forum here where it's largely the same stuff where Gil
> > has formualted into 10 steps that are easy to follow, that prove the
> > 'rifle' is not what an Oswald could have possibly ordered or been
> > apart of in a photo:
>
> >http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=3&top...
> > la
> > Kudos to John Armstrong also for researching all of this many years
> > ago.
>
> and all the nutters have is, "so-and-so is a liar"! What a bunch of
> incompetent wuzzes those .john-ites are these days, not a man amongst
> this latest alt.assassination.jfk crowd.
>

Realtime evidence in the form of pics to documents is like kryptonite
to the Superman souls!

> We NOW know the Warren Commission lied when it suited their 'LHO did
> it all by his lonesome purposes'. Pitiful! ! ! !
>

More than that, the WC was formed by LBJ a conspirator, as well as key
JFK haters and conspirator like Dulles who met with LBJ at his Ranch
prior to the assassination, and brought in pamphlets to the new WC
recruits to in the form of a lone-gunman character profile to
basically show what they wanted done. The cover up was already
hatched before the assassination, and when you have the CIA
assassination dept. in Angelton, the FBI with Hoover, everything could
be 'adjusted' and covered as part of huge 'corporate project' in
coveruping's. So we see the evidentiary trail along with the big
machine behind it much clearer now!

> And the naive .johnites swallowed the WCR tripe hook-line and sinker.
> Tim Brennan (aka Tim Shell: failed standup comic swallowed it all the
> way down to his pea sized balls. His first and ONLY orgasm, and of
> course, he told his mom....
>

Part of the cover up is national mind control. Make the real truthers
look like inconsiderate traitors and morons, and the conspirators as
people deservedly in the right to assassnate or do whatever it takes
to make their form of slavery-capitalism seem 'all-American' and with
the character 'right stuff'. It's quite a game and some have
swallowed more than Linda Lovelace ever could have imagined..:).

> Go gett'em Gil Jesus... they're on the run, AGAIN!
>
>

One for the Gipper!..lmao.

CJ

>
> > CJ

[timstter]

LOL! All Dave/Ringo has INVECTIVE, he can't demonstrate even a SECOND
of his vaunted case evidence, of which he apparently knows NOTHING!

If you KNEW case evidence, Dave/Ringo, you'd KNOW that the HSCA found
a distintive gouge mark on the rifle in the backyard photos that was
ALSO on the rifle retrieved from the TSBD.

That blows Gil's contrived nonsense all to HELL, Dave/Ringo, since his
is simply based on wishful thinking, NOT science and reason.

Your purported grasp of case evidence is quite LAUGHABLE, Dave/Ringo.

[curtjester1]

> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...

>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

Just because an LNT'er has a gauge mark in their head, does not mean
the same spittle will translate into the dribble of another LNT'er
with a gauge mark in their head.

CJ

[timstter]

Just because you skulk behind a stupid screen name like Curt Jester
and believe the insane ramblings of John Armstrong and his <snicker>
*Harvey & Lee* schtick doesn't mean that you are actually right.

It more likely means the dead opposite.

Informative Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[aeffects]

so they actually pay you to post insanity like this, eh shithead?
LMFAO!

> It more likely means the dead opposite.
>
> Informative Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>

[timstter]

Did you see how Bud pinged YOU as a lobotomised CHEERLEADER, rah-
rahing PATHETICALLY on the sidelines for ol' Benny and his PITIFUL
Mark Lane nonsense, Dave/Ringo?

PERFECTLY characterised you THERE, Dave/Ringo!

Say, will you be demonstrating your <snicker> grasp of *case evidence*
anytime soon, Dave/Ringo?

I didn't think so, Dave/Ringo.

LMFAO@U Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[curtjester1]

I thought Gil's ten steps would be the last hope of dumbing something
down enough that a LNTer could grasp it. One down.

CJ

[aeffects]

look whose cheerleading you fat incomprehensible, overweight loser
you.... LMFAO!

And Bud who? You mean that worm of a wordmerchant, tin foiled beanie,
bicycle riding 'let me smell you bike seat', lycra molding pencil dick
Sculley square wannabe? That Bud....? Who the fuck cares what a .john
mcadams-ite Dudster slug thinks.

> PERFECTLY characterised you THERE, Dave/Ringo!
>
> Say, will you be demonstrating your <snicker> grasp of *case evidence*
> anytime soon, Dave/Ringo?
>
> I didn't think so, Dave/Ringo.

as I've told you before Chubbs when you want an autograph from a
published author, a published author concerning JFK assassination
evidentiary concerns, simply ask, I'm here to serve no-nothing,
disinfo agents like you... Carry on toots-e-roll!

...

[aeffects]

they do and Chubbs certainly understands it... these .john-ites are
full blown WCR addicts... if its dressed up in the flag, these morons
will shoot-up a load of it into their arm.... sick puppies these
latter day nutters are!

[timstter]

You are NOTHING but RUBBISH, Dave/Ringo.

And I can ASSURE you that NOBODY wants your completely WORTHLESS
scrawl of an autograph, Dave/Ringo.

BTW, it was AMUSING that even fellow JFK-CTers debunked your PATHETIC,
Fetzer edited ramblings, wasn't it, Dave/Ringo?

Right HERE, Dave/Ringo:

http://home.earthlink.net/~joejd/jfk/zaphoax/healy.html

KUTGW, clown!

LMFAO Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[Bud]

How does Gil explain what is in evidence tying Oswald to the rifle?

> CJ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Informative Regards,
>
> > Tim Brennan
> > Sydney, Australia
> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
>
> > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

All it is is justifications retards have come up with so they can
contrive reasons to ignore what obviously occurred. In this way stupid
people can deceive themselves that they are in pursuit of the truth
when they are actually trying their best to avoid it. It`s all part of
the silly games retards have been playing with this event for decades,
it doesn`t mean anything. We`ll never see anyone put an explanation of
this event put on the table by conspiracy retards that can contend
with the WC`s conclusions. All their ideas are bad, requiring ever
escalating complexity, impossible levels of control and anticipation
with whatever contortions are needed to get this event to fit into how
the retards perceive the world.

[Walt]

On May 24, 1:56 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gil nails it!
>
> http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm

Gil has done an excellent job of presenting the evidence that the man
in the TSBD was NOT using a Mannlicher Carcano. Virtually all of
the witnesses who reported seeing a rifle in the window reported
seeing a HIGH POWERED rifle and "high powered rifle" is just another
way of saying "HUNTING RIFLE.

[Mark Ulrik]

So hunting rifles are more powerful than military rifles? I didn't
know that. What makes you so sure ordinary folks do?

[timstter]

The handling of the location of the strap on the rilfe, as analysed by
Jesus, would be some of the most dishonest JFK work you could find
anywhere, outside of a Richard Hooke graphic.

It was amusing that even people like DiEugenio started to take Gil's
nonsense seriously and were gibbering about it on the Ed Forum @ the
time.

Alarmed Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[aeffects]

On May 24, 11:56 am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gil nails it!
>
> http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm

we have 2 of Paul May aliases posting in this thread.... wow, how
lucky we are....

[aeffects]

On May 26, 12:35 pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:

noice to see you suffering Fatboy, that's why lying does forto your
soul, hon! suck-it-up toothless!

[tom...@cox.net]

DO YOU REALLY PRACTISE NAZI JUSTICE WHERE THE ACCUSED MUST PROVE HIS
INNOSENCE? ? ?

IN THIS COUNTRY, THE ACCUSER MUST PROVE GUILT OR GO TO JAIL HIMSELF.

HERE'S WHERE YOU CAN GET MILES OF ACTUAL TESTIMONY FROM THE 26 VOLUMES YOU

KNOW NOTHING ABOUT>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/_glenn_emmett_smith.htm

I EVENM COTORGORIZED IT FOR YOU ASSHOLES WHO "C AN'T" READ..

[tom...@cox.net]

timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 26, 1:46=A0am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 25, 1:53=A0am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 25, 12:04=A0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On May 24, 6:50=A0pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > > > > On May 24, 2:56=A0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Gil nails it!
> >
> > > > > >http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
> >
> > > > > I like the JFK Forum here where it's largely the same stuff where

> > > > > G=

> il
> > > > > has formualted into 10 steps that are easy to follow, that prove

> > > > > th=

> e
> > > > > 'rifle' is not what an Oswald could have possibly ordered or been
> > > > > apart of in a photo:
> >

> > > > >http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=3Dshow_mesg&forum=
> > > > >3D=

> > > head...http://www.=

> history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
> >
> > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > Just because an LNT'er has a gauge mark in their head, does not mean
> > the same spittle will translate into the dribble of another LNT'er
> > with a gauge mark in their head.
> >
> > CJ
>
> Just because you skulk behind a stupid screen name like Curt Jester
> and believe the insane ramblings of John Armstrong and his <snicker>
> *Harvey & Lee* schtick doesn't mean that you are actually right.
>
> It more likely means the dead opposite.
>
> Informative Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0

> 14= 4a.htm

>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

COMING FROM A FUCKING CRIMINAL WHO HAS USED SEVERAL ALIASES DUE TO ME
BURYING HER WITH EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY.

[tom...@cox.net]

timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 26, 1:24=A0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 25, 4:41=A0pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 26, 8:33=A0am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On May 25, 2:18=A0pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On May 26, 1:46=A0am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On May 25, 1:53=A0am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On May 25, 12:04=A0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > On May 24, 6:50=A0pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > w=

> rote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > On May 24, 2:56=A0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com>

> > > > > > > > > wrote=

> :
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Gil nails it!
> >
> > > > > > > > > >http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
> >
> > > > > > > > > I like the JFK Forum here where it's largely the same

> > > > > > > > > stuff=

> where Gil
> > > > > > > > > has formualted into 10 steps that are easy to follow,

> > > > > > > > > that =

> prove the
> > > > > > > > > 'rifle' is not what an Oswald could have possibly ordered

> > > > > > > > > o=

> r been
> > > > > > > > > apart of in a photo:
> >

> > > > > > > > >http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=3Dshow_mes
> > > > > > > > >g&=
> forum=3D3&top...

> > > > > > > > > la
> > > > > > > > > Kudos to John Armstrong also for researching all of this

> > > > > > > > > ma=

> ny years
> > > > > > > > > ago.
> >
> > > > > > > > and all the nutters have is, "so-and-so is a liar"! What a

> > > > > > > > bu=

> nch of
> > > > > > > > incompetent wuzzes those .john-ites are these days, not a

> > > > > > > > man=

> amongst
> > > > > > > > this latest alt.assassination.jfk crowd.
> >
> > > > > > > > We NOW know the Warren Commission lied when it suited their

> > > > > > > > '=

> LHO did
> > > > > > > > it all by his lonesome purposes'. Pitiful! ! ! !
> >
> > > > > > > > And the naive .johnites swallowed the WCR tripe hook-line

> > > > > > > > and=

> sinker.
> > > > > > > > Tim Brennan (aka Tim Shell: failed standup comic swallowed

> > > > > > > > it=

> all the
> > > > > > > > way down to his pea sized balls. His first and ONLY orgasm,

> > > > > > > > a=

> nd of
> > > > > > > > course, he told his mom....
> >
> > > > > > > > Go gett'em Gil Jesus... they're on the run, AGAIN!
> >
> > > > > > > > > CJ
> >
> > > > > > > LOL! All Dave/Ringo has INVECTIVE, he can't demonstrate even

> > > > > > > a =

> SECOND
> > > > > > > of his vaunted case evidence, of which he apparently knows

> > > > > > > NOTH=

> ING!
> >
> > > > > > > If you KNEW case evidence, Dave/Ringo, you'd KNOW that the

> > > > > > > HSCA=

> found
> > > > > > > a distintive gouge mark on the rifle in the backyard photos

> > > > > > > tha=

> t was
> > > > > > > ALSO on the rifle retrieved from the TSBD.
> >
> > > > > > > That blows Gil's contrived nonsense all to HELL, Dave/Ringo,

> > > > > > > si=

> nce his
> > > > > > > is simply based on wishful thinking, NOT science and reason.
> >
> > > > > > > Your purported grasp of case evidence is quite LAUGHABLE,

> > > > > > > Dave/=

> Ringo.
> >
> > > > > > > Informative Regards,
> >
> > > > > > > Tim Brennan
> > > > > > > Sydney, Australia
> > > > > > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > > > > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head

> > > > > > > or=

> the
> > > > > > > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > > > > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII

> > > > > > > 261-2=

> 62.
> >
> > > > > > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > > > > > > head...htt=

> p://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
> >
> > > > > > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > > > > > Just because an LNT'er has a gauge mark in their head, does not

> > > > > > m=

> ean
> > > > > > the same spittle will translate into the dribble of another

> > > > > > LNT'e=

> r
> > > > > > with a gauge mark in their head.
> >
> > > > > > CJ
> >
> > > > > Just because you skulk behind a stupid screen name like Curt
> > > > > Jester and believe the insane ramblings of John Armstrong and his

> > > > > <snicker=

> >
> > > > > *Harvey & Lee* schtick doesn't mean that you are actually right.
> >
> > > > so they actually pay you to post insanity like this, eh shithead?
> > > > LMFAO!
> >
> > > > > It more likely means the dead opposite.
> >
> > > > > Informative Regards,
> >
> > > > > Tim Brennan
> > > > > Sydney, Australia
> > > > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or
> > > > > the neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII
> > > > > 261-262.
> >
> > > > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > > > > head...http://=

> 14= 4a.htm

>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

HEY TIM ROB AZCUE ASSHOLE;

HAS ANYONE EVER ASKED YOU FOR "YOUR" AUTOGRAPH? ? ?
I HAVE SO, FUCK YOU.

[tom...@cox.net]

timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 26, 11:19=A0am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 25, 5:18=A0pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 26, 1:46=A0am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On May 25, 1:53=A0am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On May 25, 12:04=A0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On May 24, 6:50=A0pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote=
> :

> >
> > > > > > > On May 24, 2:56=A0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > Gil nails it!
> >
> > > > > > > >http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
> >
> > > > > > > I like the JFK Forum here where it's largely the same stuff

> > > > > > > whe=

> re Gil
> > > > > > > has formualted into 10 steps that are easy to follow, that

> > > > > > > prov=

> e the
> > > > > > > 'rifle' is not what an Oswald could have possibly ordered or

> > > > > > > be=

> en
> > > > > > > apart of in a photo:
> >

> > > > > > >http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=3Dshow_mesg&fo
> > > > > > >ru=
> m=3D3&top...

> > > > > > > la
> > > > > > > Kudos to John Armstrong also for researching all of this many

> > > > > > > y=

> ears
> > > > > > > ago.
> >
> > > > > > and all the nutters have is, "so-and-so is a liar"! What a

> > > > > > bunch =

> of
> > > > > > incompetent wuzzes those .john-ites are these days, not a man

> > > > > > amo=

> ngst
> > > > > > this latest alt.assassination.jfk crowd.
> >
> > > > > > We NOW know the Warren Commission lied when it suited their

> > > > > > 'LHO =

> did
> > > > > > it all by his lonesome purposes'. Pitiful! ! ! !
> >
> > > > > > And the naive .johnites swallowed the WCR tripe hook-line and

> > > > > > sin=

> ker.
> > > > > > Tim Brennan (aka Tim Shell: failed standup comic swallowed it

> > > > > > all=

> the
> > > > > > way down to his pea sized balls. His first and ONLY orgasm, and

> > > > > > o=

> f
> > > > > > course, he told his mom....
> >
> > > > > > Go gett'em Gil Jesus... they're on the run, AGAIN!
> >
> > > > > > > CJ
> >
> > > > > LOL! All Dave/Ringo has INVECTIVE, he can't demonstrate even a

> > > > > SECO=

> ND
> > > > > of his vaunted case evidence, of which he apparently knows
> > > > > NOTHING!
> >
> > > > > If you KNEW case evidence, Dave/Ringo, you'd KNOW that the HSCA

> > > > > fou=

> nd
> > > > > a distintive gouge mark on the rifle in the backyard photos that

> > > > > wa=

> s
> > > > > ALSO on the rifle retrieved from the TSBD.
> >
> > > > > That blows Gil's contrived nonsense all to HELL, Dave/Ringo,

> > > > > since =

> his
> > > > > is simply based on wishful thinking, NOT science and reason.
> >
> > > > > Your purported grasp of case evidence is quite LAUGHABLE,

> > > > > Dave/Ring=

> o.
> >
> > > > > Informative Regards,
> >
> > > > > Tim Brennan
> > > > > Sydney, Australia
> > > > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or
> > > > > the neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII
> > > > > 261-262.
> >
> > > > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > > > > head...http://=

> www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
> >
> > > > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > > > Just because an LNT'er has a gauge mark in their head, does not
> > > > mean the same spittle will translate into the dribble of another
> > > > LNT'er with a gauge mark in their head.
> >
> > > > CJ
> >
> > > Just because you skulk behind a stupid screen name like Curt Jester
> > > and believe the insane ramblings of John Armstrong and his <snicker>
> > > *Harvey & Lee* schtick doesn't mean that you are actually right.
> >
> > > It more likely means the dead opposite.
> >
> > I thought Gil's ten steps would be the last hope of dumbing something

> > down enough that a LNTer could grasp it. =A0One down.

> >
> > CJ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Informative Regards,
> >
> > > Tim Brennan
> > > Sydney, Australia
> > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> > > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
> >
> > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > > head...http://www.=

> history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
> >
> > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>
> The handling of the location of the strap on the rilfe, as analysed by
> Jesus, would be some of the most dishonest JFK work you could find
> anywhere, outside of a Richard Hooke graphic.
>
> It was amusing that even people like DiEugenio started to take Gil's
> nonsense seriously and were gibbering about it on the Ed Forum @ the
> time.
>
> Alarmed Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0

> 14= 4a.htm

>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

HEY ASSHOLE;

HOW DO YOU EXPLAN THAT FOUR (4) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS SAID IT WAS A
"MAUSER" IN THE PRESENCE OF CAPT. FRITZ AND LT. DAY? ? ? ?

SEE>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/finding_the_rifle.htm

[tom...@cox.net]

aeffects <aeffe...@gmail.com> wrote:

HOW CAN WE DETERMINE THE REASL PAUL MAY? ? ? ?

EASY JUST LOOK FOR THE ONE WITH A PUSSY..

[timstter]

> >http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...

> > 14= 4a.htm
>
> > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>
> HEY TIM ROB AZCUE ASSHOLE;
>
> HAS ANYONE EVER ASKED YOU FOR "YOUR" AUTOGRAPH? ? ?
> I HAVE   SO, FUCK YOU.
>
> --
> --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB

Que?

I was under the impression that you COULDN'T write your own name and
that you were illiterate, clownnln.

I mean judging by your abysmal efforts here...

Speaking of X MARKing the spot, though, Tommy, read on below!

Helpful Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[tom...@cox.net]

aeffects <aeffe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 26, 12:35=A0pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> noice to see you suffering Fatboy, that's why lying does forto your
> soul, hon! suck-it-up toothless!

THAT'S NO WAY TO TALK TO A CUNT ! ! !

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

[tom...@cox.net]

timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 27, 11:09=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > On May 26, 1:24=3DA0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On May 25, 4:41=3DA0pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On May 26, 8:33=3DA0am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On May 25, 2:18=3DA0pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On May 26, 1:46=3DA0am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > On May 25, 1:53=3DA0am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > On May 25, 12:04=3DA0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wr=
> ote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > On May 24, 6:50=3DA0pm, curtjester1
> > > > > > > > > > <curtjest...@hotmail.=
> com>
> > > > > > > > > > w=3D
> > > rote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > On May 24, 2:56=3DA0pm, aeffects
> > > > > > > > > > > <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote=3D

> > > :
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Gil nails it!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > I like the JFK Forum here where it's largely the same

> > > > > > > > > > > stuff=3D
> > > =A0where Gil

> > > > > > > > > > > has formualted into 10 steps that are easy to follow,

> > > > > > > > > > > that =3D

> > > prove the
> > > > > > > > > > > 'rifle' is not what an Oswald could have possibly

> > > > > > > > > > > order=
> ed
> > > > > > > > > > > o=3D

> > > r been
> > > > > > > > > > > apart of in a photo:
> >

> > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=3D3Dsh
> > > > > > > > > > >ow=
> _mes
> > > > > > > > > > >g&=3D
> > > forum=3D3D3&top...

> > > > > > > > > > > la
> > > > > > > > > > > Kudos to John Armstrong also for researching all of

> > > > > > > > > > > thi=
> s
> > > > > > > > > > > ma=3D

> > > ny years
> > > > > > > > > > > ago.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > and all the nutters have is, "so-and-so is a liar"!

> > > > > > > > > > What =
> a
> > > > > > > > > > bu=3D

> > > nch of
> > > > > > > > > > incompetent wuzzes those .john-ites are these days, not

> > > > > > > > > > a man=3D
> > > =A0amongst

> > > > > > > > > > this latest alt.assassination.jfk crowd.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > We NOW know the Warren Commission lied when it suited

> > > > > > > > > > the=
> ir
> > > > > > > > > > '=3D

> > > LHO did
> > > > > > > > > > it all by his lonesome purposes'. Pitiful! ! ! !
> >
> > > > > > > > > > And the naive .johnites swallowed the WCR tripe

> > > > > > > > > > hook-line and=3D
> > > =A0sinker.

> > > > > > > > > > Tim Brennan (aka Tim Shell: failed standup comic

> > > > > > > > > > swallowe=
> d
> > > > > > > > > > it=3D
> > > =A0all the

> > > > > > > > > > way down to his pea sized balls. His first and ONLY

> > > > > > > > > > orgas=
> m,
> > > > > > > > > > a=3D

> > > nd of
> > > > > > > > > > course, he told his mom....
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Go gett'em Gil Jesus... they're on the run, AGAIN!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > CJ
> >
> > > > > > > > > LOL! All Dave/Ringo has INVECTIVE, he can't demonstrate

> > > > > > > > > eve=
> n
> > > > > > > > > a =3D

> > > SECOND
> > > > > > > > > of his vaunted case evidence, of which he apparently

> > > > > > > > > knows NOTH=3D

> > > ING!
> >
> > > > > > > > > If you KNEW case evidence, Dave/Ringo, you'd KNOW that

> > > > > > > > > the HSCA=3D
> > > =A0found

> > > > > > > > > a distintive gouge mark on the rifle in the backyard

> > > > > > > > > photos tha=3D

> > > t was
> > > > > > > > > ALSO on the rifle retrieved from the TSBD.
> >
> > > > > > > > > That blows Gil's contrived nonsense all to HELL,

> > > > > > > > > Dave/Ringo=
> ,
> > > > > > > > > si=3D

> > > nce his
> > > > > > > > > is simply based on wishful thinking, NOT science and

> > > > > > > > > reason=

> .
> >
> > > > > > > > > Your purported grasp of case evidence is quite LAUGHABLE,

> > > > > > > > > Dave/=3D

> > > Ringo.
> >
> > > > > > > > > Informative Regards,
> >
> > > > > > > > > Tim Brennan
> > > > > > > > > Sydney, Australia
> > > > > > > > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > > > > > > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the

> > > > > > > > > hea=
> d
> > > > > > > > > or=3D
> > > =A0the

> > > > > > > > > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > > > > > > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII

> > > > > > > > > 261-2=3D

> > > 62.
> >
> > > > > > > > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > > > > > > > > head...htt=3D

> > > p://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
> >
> > > > > > > > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > > > > > > > Just because an LNT'er has a gauge mark in their head, does

> > > > > > > > n=
> ot
> > > > > > > > m=3D

> > > ean
> > > > > > > > the same spittle will translate into the dribble of another

> > > > > > > > LNT'e=3D

> > > r
> > > > > > > > with a gauge mark in their head.
> >
> > > > > > > > CJ
> >
> > > > > > > Just because you skulk behind a stupid screen name like Curt
> > > > > > > Jester and believe the insane ramblings of John Armstrong and

> > > > > > > h=
> is
> > > > > > > <snicker=3D

> >
> > > > > > > *Harvey & Lee* schtick doesn't mean that you are actually

> > > > > > > right=

> .
> >
> > > > > > so they actually pay you to post insanity like this, eh
> > > > > > shithead? LMFAO!
> >
> > > > > > > It more likely means the dead opposite.
> >
> > > > > > > Informative Regards,
> >
> > > > > > > Tim Brennan
> > > > > > > Sydney, Australia
> > > > > > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > > > > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head
> > > > > > > or the neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > > > > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII
> > > > > > > 261-262.
> >
> > > > > > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > > > > > > head...http://=3D

> > >www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
> >
> > > > > > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > > > > Did you see how Bud pinged YOU as a lobotomised CHEERLEADER, rah-
> > > > > rahing PATHETICALLY on the sidelines for ol' Benny and his
> > > > > PITIFUL Mark Lane nonsense, Dave/Ringo?
> >
> > > > look whose cheerleading you fat incomprehensible, overweight loser
> > > > you.... LMFAO!
> >
> > > > And Bud who? You mean that worm of a wordmerchant, tin foiled
> > > > beanie, bicycle riding 'let me smell you bike seat', lycra molding

> > > > pencil dic=

> > > 14=3D 4a.htm

> >
> > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > HEY TIM ROB AZCUE ASSHOLE;
> >
> > HAS ANYONE EVER ASKED YOU FOR "YOUR" AUTOGRAPH? ? ?

> > I HAVE =A0 SO, FUCK YOU.
> >
> > --
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > =A0$=

> 9.95/Month 30GB
>
> Que?
>
> I was under the impression that you COULDN'T write your own name and
> that you were illiterate, clownnln.
>
> I mean judging by your abysmal efforts here...
>
> Speaking of X MARKing the spot, though, Tommy, read on below!
>
> Helpful Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0

> 14= 4a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

I'D BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO WRITE YOUR OBITUARY ASSHOLE.

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

[timstter]

On May 27, 11:14 am, tom...@cox.net wrote:

The REASL Paul May?

Simply CLASSIC tomnln in action!

KUTGW, clownnln!

LMFAO Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[tom...@cox.net]

timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 27, 11:14=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > On May 24, 11:56=3DA0am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Gil nails it!
> >
> > > >http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
> >
> > > we have 2 of Paul May aliases posting in this thread.... wow, how
> > > lucky we are....
> >
> > HOW CAN WE DETERMINE THE REASL PAUL MAY? ? ? ?
> >

> > EASY =A0 JUST LOOK FOR THE ONE WITH A PUSSY..
> >
> > --
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------

> > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > =A0$=

> 9.95/Month 30GB
>
> The REASL Paul May?
>
> Simply CLASSIC tomnln in action!
>
> KUTGW, clownnln!
>
> LMFAO Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0

> 14= 4a.htm

>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

CLASS IS A WORD THAT I DISDN'T THINK YOU KNEW HOW TO SPELL! ! !

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

[timstter]

> >http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...

> > 14= 4a.htm
>
> > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>
> I'D BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO WRITE YOUR OBITUARY ASSHOLE.
>
> --

> --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB

Don't stumble into the woodchipper, clownnln.

THIS is the kind of CRAP character Anton Batey is planning to give
airtime to??

Disgusted Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[tom...@cox.net]

timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 27, 11:17=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > On May 27, 11:09=3DA0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > > > timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > On May 26, 1:24=3D3DA0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On May 25, 4:41=3D3DA0pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On May 26, 8:33=3D3DA0am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote=
> :
> >
> > > > > > > > On May 25, 2:18=3D3DA0pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote=
> :
> >
> > > > > > > > > On May 26, 1:46=3D3DA0am, curtjester1
> > > > > > > > > <curtjest...@hotmail.=
> com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > On May 25, 1:53=3D3DA0am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > On May 25, 12:04=3D3DA0pm, aeffects
> > > > > > > > > > > <aeffect...@gmail.c=
> om>
> > > > > > > > > > > wr=3D
> > > ote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On May 24, 6:50=3D3DA0pm, curtjester1
> > > > > > > > > > > > <curtjest...@hotmail.=3D
> > > com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > w=3D3D
> > > > > rote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 24, 2:56=3D3DA0pm, aeffects
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote=3D3D

> > > > > :
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gil nails it!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I like the JFK Forum here where it's largely the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > sa=
> me
> > > > > > > > > > > > > stuff=3D3D
> > > > > =3DA0where Gil

> > > > > > > > > > > > > has formualted into 10 steps that are easy to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > follo=
> w,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that =3D3D

> > > > > prove the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 'rifle' is not what an Oswald could have possibly

> > > > > > > > > > > > > order=3D
> > > ed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > o=3D3D

> > > > > r been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > apart of in a photo:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=3D

> > > > > > > > > > > > >3D=
> 3Dsh
> > > > > > > > > > > > >ow=3D
> > > _mes
> > > > > > > > > > > > >g&=3D3D
> > > > > forum=3D3D3D3&top...

> > > > > > > > > > > > > la
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Kudos to John Armstrong also for researching all

> > > > > > > > > > > > > of thi=3D
> > > s
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ma=3D3D

> > > > > ny years
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ago.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > and all the nutters have is, "so-and-so is a liar"!

> > > > > > > > > > > > What =3D
> > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > bu=3D3D

> > > > > nch of
> > > > > > > > > > > > incompetent wuzzes those .john-ites are these days,

> > > > > > > > > > > > n=
> ot
> > > > > > > > > > > > a man=3D3D
> > > > > =3DA0amongst

> > > > > > > > > > > > this latest alt.assassination.jfk crowd.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > We NOW know the Warren Commission lied when it

> > > > > > > > > > > > suited the=3D
> > > ir
> > > > > > > > > > > > '=3D3D

> > > > > LHO did
> > > > > > > > > > > > it all by his lonesome purposes'. Pitiful! ! ! !
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > And the naive .johnites swallowed the WCR tripe

> > > > > > > > > > > > hook-line and=3D3D
> > > > > =3DA0sinker.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Tim Brennan (aka Tim Shell: failed standup comic

> > > > > > > > > > > > swallowe=3D
> > > d
> > > > > > > > > > > > it=3D3D
> > > > > =3DA0all the

> > > > > > > > > > > > way down to his pea sized balls. His first and ONLY

> > > > > > > > > > > > orgas=3D
> > > m,
> > > > > > > > > > > > a=3D3D

> > > > > nd of
> > > > > > > > > > > > course, he told his mom....
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Go gett'em Gil Jesus... they're on the run, AGAIN!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > CJ
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > LOL! All Dave/Ringo has INVECTIVE, he can't

> > > > > > > > > > > demonstrate eve=3D
> > > n
> > > > > > > > > > > a =3D3D

> > > > > SECOND
> > > > > > > > > > > of his vaunted case evidence, of which he apparently

> > > > > > > > > > > knows NOTH=3D3D

> > > > > ING!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > If you KNEW case evidence, Dave/Ringo, you'd KNOW

> > > > > > > > > > > that the HSCA=3D3D
> > > > > =3DA0found

> > > > > > > > > > > a distintive gouge mark on the rifle in the backyard

> > > > > > > > > > > photos tha=3D3D

> > > > > t was
> > > > > > > > > > > ALSO on the rifle retrieved from the TSBD.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > That blows Gil's contrived nonsense all to HELL,

> > > > > > > > > > > Dave/Ringo=3D
> > > ,
> > > > > > > > > > > si=3D3D

> > > > > nce his
> > > > > > > > > > > is simply based on wishful thinking, NOT science and

> > > > > > > > > > > reason=3D

> > > .
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your purported grasp of case evidence is quite

> > > > > > > > > > > LAUGHABL=
> E,
> > > > > > > > > > > Dave/=3D3D

> > > > > Ringo.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Informative Regards,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Tim Brennan
> > > > > > > > > > > Sydney, Australia
> > > > > > > > > > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike

> > > > > > > > > > > the hea=3D
> > > d
> > > > > > > > > > > or=3D3D
> > > > > =3DA0the

> > > > > > > > > > > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > > > > > > > > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as:

> > > > > > > > > > > XV=
> II
> > > > > > > > > > > 261-2=3D3D

> > > > > 62.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > > > > > > > > > > head...htt=3D3D
> > > > > p://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vo
> > > > > l.=

> ..
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Just because an LNT'er has a gauge mark in their head,

> > > > > > > > > > do=
> es
> > > > > > > > > > n=3D
> > > ot
> > > > > > > > > > m=3D3D

> > > > > ean
> > > > > > > > > > the same spittle will translate into the dribble of

> > > > > > > > > > anoth=
> er
> > > > > > > > > > LNT'e=3D3D

> > > > > r
> > > > > > > > > > with a gauge mark in their head.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > CJ
> >
> > > > > > > > > Just because you skulk behind a stupid screen name like

> > > > > > > > > Cur=

> t
> > > > > > > > > Jester and believe the insane ramblings of John Armstrong

> > > > > > > > > a=
> nd
> > > > > > > > > h=3D
> > > is
> > > > > > > > > <snicker=3D3D

> >
> > > > > > > > > *Harvey & Lee* schtick doesn't mean that you are actually

> > > > > > > > > right=3D

> > > .
> >
> > > > > > > > so they actually pay you to post insanity like this, eh
> > > > > > > > shithead? LMFAO!
> >
> > > > > > > > > It more likely means the dead opposite.
> >
> > > > > > > > > Informative Regards,
> >
> > > > > > > > > Tim Brennan
> > > > > > > > > Sydney, Australia
> > > > > > > > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > > > > > > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the

> > > > > > > > > hea=

> d
> > > > > > > > > or the neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > > > > > > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII
> > > > > > > > > 261-262.
> >
> > > > > > > > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > > > > > > > > head...http://=3D3D

> > > > >www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
> >
> > > > > > > > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > > > > > > Did you see how Bud pinged YOU as a lobotomised CHEERLEADER,

> > > > > > > ra=

> h-
> > > > > > > rahing PATHETICALLY on the sidelines for ol' Benny and his
> > > > > > > PITIFUL Mark Lane nonsense, Dave/Ringo?
> >
> > > > > > look whose cheerleading you fat incomprehensible, overweight

> > > > > > lose=

> r
> > > > > > you.... LMFAO!
> >
> > > > > > And Bud who? You mean that worm of a wordmerchant, tin foiled
> > > > > > beanie, bicycle riding 'let me smell you bike seat', lycra

> > > > > > moldin=
> g
> > > > > > pencil dic=3D

> > > > >Vo=
> l.
> > > > >..
> > > > > 14=3D3D 4a.htm

> >
> > > > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > > > HEY TIM ROB AZCUE ASSHOLE;
> >
> > > > HAS ANYONE EVER ASKED YOU FOR "YOUR" AUTOGRAPH? ? ?

> > > > I HAVE =3DA0 SO, FUCK YOU.
> >
> > > > --
> > > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> > > > Usenet Newsgroup Service =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0
> > > > =
> =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0
> > > > =3DA0$=3D

> > > 9.95/Month 30GB
> >
> > > Que?
> >
> > > I was under the impression that you COULDN'T write your own name and
> > > that you were illiterate, clownnln.
> >
> > > I mean judging by your abysmal efforts here...
> >
> > > Speaking of X MARKing the spot, though, Tommy, read on below!
> >
> > > Helpful Regards,
> >
> > > Tim Brennan
> > > Sydney, Australia
> > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> > > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
> >
> > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

> > >http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol.
> > >..
> > > 14=3D 4a.htm
> >
> > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >

> > I'D BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO WRITE YOUR OBITUARY ASSHOLE.
> >
> > --
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------

> > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > =A0$=
> 9.95/Month 30GB
>

> Don't stumble into the woodchipper, clownnln.
>
> THIS is the kind of CRAP character Anton Batey is planning to give
> airtime to??

WRONG AGAIN CUNT;

HE TAKES PRIDE IN THE FACT THAT AN UNKNOWN STUDENT BURRIED A PHD PROFESSOR
WITH EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY FROM THE OFFICIAL RECORDS.

HERE>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/debates.htm

> Disgusted Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0

> 14= 4a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

[aeffects]

On May 26, 6:18 pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
...

>
> > HOW CAN WE DETERMINE THE REASL PAUL MAY? ? ? ?
>
> > EASY   JUST LOOK FOR THE ONE WITH A PUSSY..
>
> > --
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> > Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB
>
> The REASL Paul May?
>
> Simply CLASSIC tomnln in action!

focus shithead, it's not hard. Well for you maybe it is.... LMAO!
...

[timstter]

> >http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...

> > 14= 4a.htm
>
> > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>
> --

> --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB

An UNKNOWN student?!!

LOL!

How OLD are you, you PATHETIC old KOOK??

I he takes pride in GARBAGE like YOU he sure AIN'T my kinda person,
piece-of-trashnln!

Dismissive Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[timstter]

> >http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...

> > 14= 4a.htm
>
> > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>
> HEY ASSHOLE;
>
> HOW DO YOU EXPLAN THAT FOUR (4) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS SAID IT WAS A
> "MAUSER" IN THE PRESENCE OF CAPT. FRITZ AND LT. DAY? ? ? ?
>
> SEE>>http://www.whokilledjfk.net/finding_the_rifle.htm
>
> --
> --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB

I don't EXPLAN anything, clownnln.

That's because I don't make it a habit to EXPLAN to bewildered third-
raters who make fools of themselves on beat up radio programs and who
can't even spell, shitnln.

I hope this EXPLANATION was within your <snicker> ken, piece-of-
crapnln.

LMFAO@U Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[curtjester1]

A major typo here. He explains what is in evidence *NOT* tying Oswald
to the rifle found in the TSBD or the BY Photos.

>
>
>
> > CJ
>
> > > Informative Regards,
>
> > > Tim Brennan
> > > Sydney, Australia
> > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> > > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
>
> > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>
>   All it is is justifications retards have come up with so they can
> contrive reasons to ignore what obviously occurred. In this way stupid
> people can deceive themselves that they are in pursuit of the truth
> when they are actually trying their best to avoid it. It`s all part of
> the silly games retards have been playing with this event for decades,
> it doesn`t mean anything. We`ll never see anyone put an explanation of
> this event put on the table by conspiracy retards that can contend
> with the WC`s conclusions. All their ideas are bad, requiring ever
> escalating complexity, impossible levels of control and anticipation
> with whatever contortions are needed to get this event to fit into how
> the retards perceive the world.

Bud is like the arsonist committing crime that no one will ever catch
him because he is just too 'clever'. He compounds his inanity by
going to the scene of the crime acting like the 'concerned citizen',
only to get arrested for his obvious behaviors that make him a prime
suspect which he is 'concerned' about. Cuff the man, and give him the
heave-h0!!...:)

CJ

[tom...@cox.net]

timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 27, 11:13=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > On May 26, 11:19=3DA0am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On May 25, 5:18=3DA0pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On May 26, 1:46=3DA0am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > wrote=
> :
> >
> > > > > > On May 25, 1:53=3DA0am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On May 25, 12:04=3DA0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > On May 24, 6:50=3DA0pm, curtjester1
> > > > > > > > <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote=3D

> > > :
> >
> > > > > > > > > On May 24, 2:56=3DA0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com>

> > > > > > > > > wro=

> te:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Gil nails it!
> >
> > > > > > > > > >http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
> >
> > > > > > > > > I like the JFK Forum here where it's largely the same

> > > > > > > > > stuff whe=3D

> > > re Gil
> > > > > > > > > has formualted into 10 steps that are easy to follow,

> > > > > > > > > that prov=3D

> > > e the
> > > > > > > > > 'rifle' is not what an Oswald could have possibly ordered

> > > > > > > > > o=
> r
> > > > > > > > > be=3D

> > > en
> > > > > > > > > apart of in a photo:
> >

> > > > > > > > >http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=3D3Dshow_m
> > > > > > > > >es=
> g&fo
> > > > > > > > >ru=3D
> > > m=3D3D3&top...

> > > > > > > > > la
> > > > > > > > > Kudos to John Armstrong also for researching all of this

> > > > > > > > > ma=
> ny
> > > > > > > > > y=3D

> > > ears
> > > > > > > > > ago.
> >
> > > > > > > > and all the nutters have is, "so-and-so is a liar"! What a

> > > > > > > > bunch =3D

> > > of
> > > > > > > > incompetent wuzzes those .john-ites are these days, not a

> > > > > > > > man amo=3D

> > > ngst
> > > > > > > > this latest alt.assassination.jfk crowd.
> >
> > > > > > > > We NOW know the Warren Commission lied when it suited their

> > > > > > > > 'LHO =3D

> > > did
> > > > > > > > it all by his lonesome purposes'. Pitiful! ! ! !
> >
> > > > > > > > And the naive .johnites swallowed the WCR tripe hook-line

> > > > > > > > and sin=3D

> > > ker.
> > > > > > > > Tim Brennan (aka Tim Shell: failed standup comic swallowed

> > > > > > > > it all=3D
> > > =A0the

> > > > > > > > way down to his pea sized balls. His first and ONLY orgasm,

> > > > > > > > a=
> nd
> > > > > > > > o=3D

> > > f
> > > > > > > > course, he told his mom....
> >
> > > > > > > > Go gett'em Gil Jesus... they're on the run, AGAIN!
> >
> > > > > > > > > CJ
> >
> > > > > > > LOL! All Dave/Ringo has INVECTIVE, he can't demonstrate even

> > > > > > > a SECO=3D

> > > ND
> > > > > > > of his vaunted case evidence, of which he apparently knows
> > > > > > > NOTHING!
> >
> > > > > > > If you KNEW case evidence, Dave/Ringo, you'd KNOW that the

> > > > > > > HSCA fou=3D

> > > nd
> > > > > > > a distintive gouge mark on the rifle in the backyard photos

> > > > > > > tha=
> t
> > > > > > > wa=3D

> > > s
> > > > > > > ALSO on the rifle retrieved from the TSBD.
> >
> > > > > > > That blows Gil's contrived nonsense all to HELL, Dave/Ringo,

> > > > > > > since =3D

> > > his
> > > > > > > is simply based on wishful thinking, NOT science and reason.
> >
> > > > > > > Your purported grasp of case evidence is quite LAUGHABLE,

> > > > > > > Dave/Ring=3D

> > > o.
> >
> > > > > > > Informative Regards,
> >
> > > > > > > Tim Brennan
> > > > > > > Sydney, Australia
> > > > > > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > > > > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head
> > > > > > > or the neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > > > > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII
> > > > > > > 261-262.
> >
> > > > > > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > > > > > > head...http://=3D

> > >www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
> >
> > > > > > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > > > > > Just because an LNT'er has a gauge mark in their head, does not
> > > > > > mean the same spittle will translate into the dribble of
> > > > > > another LNT'er with a gauge mark in their head.
> >
> > > > > > CJ
> >
> > > > > Just because you skulk behind a stupid screen name like Curt
> > > > > Jester and believe the insane ramblings of John Armstrong and his

> > > > > <snicker=

> >
> > > > > *Harvey & Lee* schtick doesn't mean that you are actually right.
> >
> > > > > It more likely means the dead opposite.
> >
> > > > I thought Gil's ten steps would be the last hope of dumbing

> > > > something down enough that a LNTer could grasp it. =3DA0One down.

> >
> > > > CJ
> >
> > > > > Informative Regards,
> >
> > > > > Tim Brennan
> > > > > Sydney, Australia
> > > > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or
> > > > > the neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII
> > > > > 261-262.
> >
> > > > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the

> > > > > head...http://www.=3D

> > > history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
> >
> > > > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > > The handling of the location of the strap on the rilfe, as analysed
> > > by Jesus, would be some of the most dishonest JFK work you could find
> > > anywhere, outside of a Richard Hooke graphic.
> >
> > > It was amusing that even people like DiEugenio started to take Gil's
> > > nonsense seriously and were gibbering about it on the Ed Forum @ the
> > > time.
> >
> > > Alarmed Regards,
> >
> > > Tim Brennan
> > > Sydney, Australia
> > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> > > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> > > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
> >
> > > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> > >http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol.
> > >..

> > > 14=3D 4a.htm

> >
> > > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
> >
> > HEY ASSHOLE;
> >
> > HOW DO YOU EXPLAN THAT FOUR (4) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS SAID IT WAS A
> > "MAUSER" IN THE PRESENCE OF CAPT. FRITZ AND LT. DAY? ? ? ?
> >
> > SEE>>http://www.whokilledjfk.net/finding_the_rifle.htm
> >
> > --
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------

> > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > =A0$=

> 9.95/Month 30GB
>
> I don't EXPLAN anything, clownnln.
>
> That's because I don't make it a habit to EXPLAN to bewildered third-
> raters who make fools of themselves on beat up radio programs and who
> can't even spell, shitnln.
>
> I hope this EXPLANATION was within your <snicker> ken, piece-of-
> crapnln.
>
> LMFAO@U Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0

> 14= 4a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

why would someone like you "laugh her ass off? ? ?

thsat w3ould measn you'll never get any more lovin ! ! !

knpw what i mean punk ! ! !

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

[Bud]

> >http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...

> > 14= 4a.htm
>
> > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>
> why would someone like you "laugh her ass off? ? ?
>
> thsat w3ould measn you'll never get any more lovin ! ! !
>
> knpw what i mean punk ! ! !
>
> --

> --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB

Tom is the all-time Top Poster in this newsgroup. This is one of his
more coherent contributions.

[Sam McClung]

the fool from sydney don't evn know the king is still alive

http://www.elvis.com.au/

that places the fool from sydney lower than a worm, not even a hound dog

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MnmIVBSZYM

[tims...@gmail.com]

DISDN'T? DISDN'T?!! DISDN'T!!!

Absolutely CLASSIC tomnln on display!

KUTGW!

LMFAO Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[curtjester1]

Wow, he outlived Michael Jackson, and surely can rocknroll dance
better than Michael!

CJ

[tom...@cox.net]

GIL CETAINLY DOES HIS HOMEWORK.

[aeffects]

On May 24, 11:56 am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gil nails it!
>
> http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm

and nails it good. and nutters are bellyaching to the high heavens....
kutgw, Gil Jesus!

[tims...@gmail.com]

Gil CETAINLY [sic] is good at telling lies.

But tomnln CETAINLY [sic] isn't any good at spelling.

Corrective Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[tims...@gmail.com]

Planning on producing any <snicker> *case evidence* at any time, Dave/Ringo?

Say, they're even calling you Ringo over @ the Amazon forum now, Dave/Ringo!

KUTGW, Dave/Ringo!

LMFAO@U Regards,

[tom...@cox.net]

===========================================================================
===== TOMNLN IS EXCELLANT AT BURYING YOU WITH OFFICIAL EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY
THOUGH ! ! !
===========================================================================
====

> Corrective Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

[tims...@gmail.com]

EXCELLANT? EXCELLANT?!! LOL!!! More CLASSIC tomnln on display!!!

Keep 'em coming, milord clownnln!

LMFAO Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

[tom...@cox.net]

tims...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, 27 May 2013 12:23:52 UTC+10, aeffects wrote:

> > On May 26, 6:18=A0pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >=20
> > ...
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > >
> >=20

> > > > HOW CAN WE DETERMINE THE REASL PAUL MAY? ? ? ?

> >=20
> > >
> >=20
> > > > EASY =A0 JUST LOOK FOR THE ONE WITH A PUSSY..
> >=20
> > >
> >=20
> > > > --
> >=20
> > > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> >=20

> > > > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > > > =A0 =

> =A0$9.95/Month 30GB
> >=20
> > >
> >=20
> > > The REASL Paul May?
> >=20
> > >
> >=20

> > > Simply CLASSIC tomnln in action!

> >=20
> >=20
> >=20

> > focus shithead, it's not hard. Well for you maybe it is.... LMAO!

> >=20

> > ...
>
> Planning on producing any <snicker> *case evidence* at any time,

> Dave/Ringo= ?

>
> Say, they're even calling you Ringo over @ the Amazon forum now,

> Dave/Ringo= !

>
> KUTGW, Dave/Ringo!
>
> LMFAO@U Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0

> 14= 4a.htm

>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

===========================================================================
=== MAY GOD GRNT YOU THE SAME LEVEL OF JUSTICE THAT YOU CONDONE FOR OTHERS.
===========================================================================
=====IT WAS "NOT" OSWALD'S RIFLE BEC AUSE HE DID NOT DELIVER THE ORDER TO
THE POST OFFICE. NOR, DID ODSWALD PICK IT UP FROM THE POST OFFICE...

SEE>>http://www.whokilledjfk.net/orderingreceiving_weapons.htm

===========================================================================
===

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

[aeffects]

On Jun 4, 3:03 pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, 27 May 2013 12:23:52 UTC+10, aeffects  wrote:
> > On May 26, 6:18 pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ...
>
> > > > HOW CAN WE DETERMINE THE REASL PAUL MAY? ? ? ?
>
> > > > EASY   JUST LOOK FOR THE ONE WITH A PUSSY..
>
> > > > --
>
> > > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
>
> > > > Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB
>
> > > The REASL Paul May?
>
> > > Simply CLASSIC tomnln in action!
>
> > focus shithead, it's not hard. Well for you maybe it is.... LMAO!
>
> > ...
>
> Planning on producing any <snicker> *case evidence* at any time, Dave/Ringo?
>
> Say, they're even calling you Ringo over @ the Amazon forum now, Dave/Ringo!

i notice you fled Amazon, again.... what-a-chicken shit... yellow
certainly is your color Chubbs.... so....KUTGW. Btw, your man is
getting his ass kicked here on ACJ, imagine Bill'o Clarke, ya ought to
buy the poor soul the condensed version of the WCR, give'em somrthing
to hold himself up with... what idiots you .john, lone nut trolls have
become!

> KUTGW, Dave/Ringo!

always here to help you idiots....

> LMFAO@U Regards,

you look mav-hel-ous in yeller, that a Fresno color?
ROTFLMFAO! ! ! ! !

> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

...

[Bud]

I used to think you were just a moron until I realized you were
honestly, for-real retarded. Now you`re an inspiration to me.

> CJ

[Bud]

Giltard, Giltard, hes our man, if he can`t catch the conspirators no
one can!

When does he get out, anyway?

[tom...@cox.net]

aeffects <aeffe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 4, 3:03=A0pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, 27 May 2013 12:23:52 UTC+10, aeffects =A0wrote:

> > > On May 26, 6:18=A0pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > ...
> >
> > > > > HOW CAN WE DETERMINE THE REASL PAUL MAY? ? ? ?
> >

> > > > > EASY =A0 JUST LOOK FOR THE ONE WITH A PUSSY..
> >
> > > > > --
> >
> > > > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> >
> > > > > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > > > > =
> =A0 =A0$9.95/Month 30GB

> >
> > > > The REASL Paul May?
> >
> > > > Simply CLASSIC tomnln in action!
> >
> > > focus shithead, it's not hard. Well for you maybe it is.... LMAO!
> >
> > > ...
> >
> > Planning on producing any <snicker> *case evidence* at any time,

> > Dave/Rin=

> go?
> >
> > Say, they're even calling you Ringo over @ the Amazon forum now,

> > Dave/Rin=

> go!
>
> i notice you fled Amazon, again.... what-a-chicken shit... yellow
> certainly is your color Chubbs.... so....KUTGW. Btw, your man is
> getting his ass kicked here on ACJ, imagine Bill'o Clarke, ya ought to
> buy the poor soul the condensed version of the WCR, give'em somrthing
> to hold himself up with... what idiots you .john, lone nut trolls have
> become!
>
> > KUTGW, Dave/Ringo!
>
> always here to help you idiots....
>
> > LMFAO@U Regards,
>
> you look mav-hel-ous in yeller, that a Fresno color?
> ROTFLMFAO! ! ! ! !
>
> > Tim Brennan
> > Sydney, Australia
> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> ...

hey timmy;

tell us your address when you lived in greenwich village? ? ?

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

[curtjester1]

Bud has the inane ability to ask a retarded question after getting an
answer. Bravo! As a prosecution team you have to prove that Oswald
procurred and had a rifle. We as the Defense, use Gil, and have
posted that for a tard' like you.

Damn, another 'Tard!!! Bro!!! Give me a man hug!!!

CJ

>
> > CJ

[aeffects]

Bud the Dudster doesn't let facts get in the way of his .john
disinfo...

> CJ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > CJ

[Bud]

You didn`t answer it. Here it is again, give it a shot...

How does Gil explain what is in evidence tying Oswald to the rifle?

>  Bravo!  As a prosecution team you have to prove that Oswald
> procurred and had a rifle.

Maybe if there was a photo of him holding it... wait a minute....

> We as the Defense, use Gil, and have
> posted that for a tard' like you.

OJ had a Dream Team defense, poor Oswald only gets a wet dream.

Not with that retard drool running down your chin.

> CJ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > CJ